S-1 Maintenance Therapy in Extensive Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer-A Randomized Clinical Study.

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a recalcitrant cancer for its dismal prognosis although extensive research had been done. Four to 6 cycles platinum-based chemotherapy is the mainstay treatment for the extensive-stage disease; but the role of maintenance treatment is not fully understood. This is a phase 2, open-label study. Patients with extensive-stage SCLC reaching an objective response or stable disease (SD) after induction chemotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1) with a minimization procedure. One group received oral S-1 and the other group received placebo as maintenance treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. The primary end point of this study was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary end points were overall survival (OS), response rates, and toxicities. This study was based on earlier work, the preliminary results was reported on 2019 ASCO annual meeting. A total of 89 patients were enrolled, of whom 45 received S-1 maintenance therapy and 44 received placebo. The median PFS and OS were 6.35 months and 10.82 months in the S-1 group, as compared to 5.98 months and 10.09 months in the placebo group. The PFS was 7.2 months and 5.3 months, and OS was 12.9 months and 10.9 months in patients with an objective response compared to in patients with SD after induction chemotherapy, respectively. S-1 maintenance therapy did not prolong PFS or OS in patients with extensive-stage SCLC; tumor regression rate was the prognostic factor of PFS or OS. Further research with novel agents in the maintenance setting is warranted.

Treatment of Skin Reaction Induced by Nivolumab Combined with Radiotherapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Case Report.

Skin reaction or dermatological toxicities induced by immunotherapy is common. It usually manifests skin rash or erythema and can be cured by skin lotion or steroid. Nivolumab, a human IgG4 programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor, blocks T cells activation preventing signal and allows the immune system to clear cancer cells. Nivolumab was approved in the second-line therapy in squamous cell lung cancer by FDA, with less than 10% unusual skin reaction, like sensory neuropathy, peeling skin, erythema multiforme, vitiligo, and psoriasis. Radiotherapy could aggravate this skin reaction through inflammatory response and promotion of immunity. The combined treatment of anti-PD-1 and radiotherapy represented a new promising therapeutic approach in many studies, but the risk of side effects may be high. We reported a patient with advanced squamous cell lung cancer who suffered from serious skin immune-related adverse events when he was treated with nivolumab and radiotherapy. The immune overreaction of the treatment of anti-PD-1 treatment and radiotherapy might cause these serious skin adverse events. Our report warranted careful workup to reduce the risk of side effects by combinative therapy with anti-PD-1 and radiotherapy.

Clinical Observation of Bevacizumab Combined with S-1 in the Treatment of Pretreated Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma.

Objective To investigate the clinical effects and safety of bevacizumab combined with S-1 as the second-line treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic esophageal cancer after chemoradiation. Methods Patients with recurrent or metastatic esophageal cancer after chemoradiation were treated with bevacizumab and S-1. Bevacizumab was used by intravenous infusion, 7.5mg/kg body weight on day 1; S-1 was used by oral at 80mg/m2·d on day 1-14, 21 days as a cycle of treatment and repeated until either pro- gressive disease or intolerable toxicity occurred. Chest CT were performed and RECIST 1.1 was used for response evaluation. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. Side effects were recorded and analyzed. Results Totally 78 patients were enrolled in the study, including 67 squamous cell carcinoma and 11 adenocarcinoma histologically. The overall response (CR+PR) rate was 22.4% (17/76) and disease control (CR+PR+SD) rate was 61.8% (47/76) respectively. The median follow-up time was 20 months (range from 9 to 44 months). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.9 months (95% CI 4.4-5.5) and the median overall survival (OS) was 8.1 months (95% CI 7.6-9.2). The median PFS and OS of patients with metastasis diseases were 6.2 months (95% CI 3.3 to 6.3) and 8.5 months (95% CI 5.8 to 11.2), where PFS was longer than that of patients with local regional recurrence (median 5.0 months, 95% CI 3.0 to 5.5, P=0.017) and OS was longer than that of patients with regional disease and metastasis (median 8.0 months, 95% CI 4.6 to 9.5, P=0.010). The common adverse effects were mild to moderate neutropenia (84.2%), grade I-II hand and foot syndrome (51.3%), grade I-II nausea (48.7%), mild epistaxis (30.1%) and mild vomiting (14.5%). Esophageal bleeding occurred in 7.9% of patients. One patient (1.3%) died from massive bleeding which was caused by esophageal perforation. Conclusion Bevacizumab combined with S-1 was effective and safe for esophageal cancer patients who had recurrent or metastatic diseases after chemoradiation.

Sorafenib in liver function impaired advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the efficacy and safty of sorafenib in Child-Pugh class B to class C hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: In this three-center open-label study from November 2011 to May 2013, we randomly assigned 189 patients with advanced Child-Pugh class B or C HCC patients into two groups, one group with 95 patient to receive sorafenib (400 mg a time, twice a day) and the other group with 94 patients to receive best supportive care. The primary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: The median progression-free survival was 2.2 months and 1.9 months in the sorafenib group and best supportive care group respectively (Hazard ratio in the sorafenib group, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.75; P=0.002). The median overall survival was 4.0 months and 3.5 months in the sorafenib group and best supportive care group respectively (Hazard ratio in the sorafenib group, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.68; P<0.001). The main adverse effect of sorafenib was rash and acne of the skin (in 51.7% patients). The incidences of severe rash, diarrhea, and dry skin were 5.6%, 5.6%, and 2.2% in the sorafenib group. One patient reached partial response in the sorafenib group. CONCLUSIONS: Sorafenib is safe in patients with liver function impaired advanced HCC. It is effective in terms of progression-free survival and overall survival compared with best supportive care. Liver functions are the important predictive factors.

IRF1 promotes the chondrogenesis of human adipose-derived stem cells through regulating HILPDA.

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis is a main cause of deformity in aging people. The chondrogenesis of human adipose-derived stem cells (hADSCs) has a positive effect on the cure of osteoarthritis. However, the regulatory mechanism of hADSC chondrogenesis still needs further exploration. This research investigates the role of interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF1) in the chondrogenesis of hADSCs. METHODS: hADSCs were purchased and cultured. The interaction between IRF1 and hypoxia inducible lipid droplet associated (HILPDA) was predicted by bioinformatics analysis, and verified through dual-luciferase reporter and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. The expressions of IRF1 and HILPDA in osteoarthritis cartilage samples were measured through qRT-PCR. After hADSCs were transfected or further induced for chondrogenesis, the chondrogenesis was visualized by Alcian blue staining, and the expressions of IRF1, HILPDA and chondrogenesis-related factors (SOX9, Aggrecan, COL2A1, MMP13, MMP3) were determined through qRT-PCR or Western blot. RESULTS: HILPDA bound to IRF1 in hADSCs. IRF1 and HILPDA levels were up-regulated during the chondrogenesis of hADSCs. Overexpressions of IRF1 and HILPDA promoted the chondrogenesis of hADSCs with the up-regulation of SOX9, Aggrecan and COL2A1 and the down-regulation of MMP13 and MMP3; however, IRF1 silencing generated the opposite effects. Besides, HILPDA overexpression reversed the effects of IRF1 silencing on inhibiting chondrogenesis of hADSCs and regulating the expressions of chondrogenesis-related factors. CONCLUSION: IRF1 promotes the chondrogenesis of hADSCs through up-regulating HILPDA level, providing novel biomarkers for treating osteoarthritis.

Osimertinib combined with bevacizumab as the first-line treatment in non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastasis harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of osimertinib combined with bevacizumab in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastasis harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations have not been fully studied. METHODS: Treatment-naïve NSCLC patients with brain metastasis harboring EGFR-activating mutations were treated with osimertinib 80 mg oral daily and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg intravenously on day 1, repeated every 21 days, until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or death. The primary endpoint was the median progression-free survival (mPFS), and the secondary endpoints were the median overall survival (mOS), response rates, and toxicities. This study has been registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05104281) and is ongoing. RESULTS: A total of 52 Chinese patients were enrolled, of whom 17 harbored EGFR 19 del and 35 harbored EGFR L858R mutation. The objective response rate (ORR) was 75.0% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 96.2%; the mPFS was 17.0 months (95% CI: 11.46-22.54), while the mOS was not reached. The mPFS was 20.0 months (95% CI: 14.56-25.44) and was 17.0 months (95% CI: 13.28-20.72) for patients harboring EGFR 19 del and EGFR L858R mutation (p = 0.844), respectively. The intracranial ORR was 82.7%, and the intracranial mPFS was 22.0 months (95% CI: 2.92-41.08).The main adverse events were mild-to-moderate hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea, hypertension, and proteinuria. Three patients developed grade III proteinuria, while five patients developed grade III hypertension; they permanently discontinued bevacizumab treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Osimertinib combined with bevacizumab shows promising results in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with brain metastasis, and the side effects are tolerable.

Prognostic Factors and Outcomes in Advanced Stage Lung Cancer Patients with COVID-19 Omicron Variant Infection.

Background: We study the characteristics and outcomes in lung cancer patients with COVID-19 Omicron variant infection. Methods: Hospitalized lung cancer patients with advanced-stage disease and laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 Omicron infection were included. Pneumonitis involving at least 25% of lung parenchyma on CT scans, accompanied by symptoms and oxygen saturation below 93%, were criteria for enrollment. Pneumonitis severity was graded using CTCAE v5.0. Treatment included Paxlovid, prednisolone, anticoagulation, and ventilation. Initial data, radiographic findings, and outcomes were compared. Logistic regression was employed to determine risk factors for in-hospital mortality. Results: Fifteen patients (median age: 65 years; 80.0% males) were included. 73.3% improved and were discharged, 20.0% died, and 6.7% remained intubated. Initial symptoms included cough (100.0%), fever (73.3%), and shortness of breath (53.3%). Symptoms resolved in discharged patients. Median fever duration was 3.5 days, and respiratory symptom recovery took 26 days. Three patients died due to respiratory failure from Omicron pneumonia. Lower oxygen saturation, reduced lymphocyte/neutrophil ratio on day 7, and diffuse bilateral lung lesions were poor prognostic factors. Conclusion: This study underscores the importance of prompt intervention and early diagnosis for lung cancer patients infected with the COVID-19 Omicron variant. Lower oxygen saturation, decreased lymphocyte/neutrophil ratio on day 7, and diffuse lung lesions on CT scans were associated with worse outcomes. Clinicians should prioritize timely and comprehensive management to improve survival rates in this population.

Risk Factors for Esophageal Fistula in Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated with Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Esophageal fistula is a critical and fatal complication of esophageal cancer. The aim of this meta-analysis was to explore the risk factors for esophageal perforation in esophageal cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. METHODS: Data from the PubMed and Embase databases were retrieved for clinical research published between 1990 and 2018. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the quality of the articles. A meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3 software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration Network. RESULTS: Seventeen articles were eligible for the meta-analysis. In these articles, over 35 risk factors for esophageal fistula formation were described and 17 risk factors were analyzed. Significant differences in the odds of developing an esophageal perforation were found with regard to age (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.08-5.03, p = 0.001), ulcerative type (OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.43-5.16, p = 0.002), histology (OR 4.16, 95% CI 1.14-15.12, p = 0.03), T stage (OR 2.66, 95% CI 1.44-4.91, p = 0.002), short-term response (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.06-4.62, p = 0.03), chemotherapy regimen (OR 2.80, 95% CI 1.38-5.68, p = 0.005), and stenosis (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.03-3.89, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: An age of <60-65 years, ulcerative type, squamous cell cancer, T4 stage, incomplete response, fluorouracil-based regimen, and stenosis were associated with an increased risk of esophageal fistula during or after radiotherapy. However, further, large-scale prospective studies are needed to establish the validity of this associ-ation.

A randomized clinical study to compare intrapleural infusion with intravenous infusion of bevacizumab in the management of malignant pleural effusion in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: To compare the efficiency and toxicity of bevacizumab by intrapleural or intravenous infusion in the management of malignant pleural effusion in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Sensitizing mutation negative NSCLC patients with malignant pleural effusion were randomized into two groups in 1:1 ratio. The pleural effusion was completely drained in 24 hours; one group received intrapleural infusion and the second group received intravenous infusion of bevacizumab at a dose of 7.5 mg per kg bodyweight. The serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was tested before and 72 hours after injection of bevacizumab. Computerized tomography (CT) scan to evaluate pleural effusions was carried out at four weeks for each patient and their survival followed-up. RESULTS: A total of 67 patients were screened and 43 enrolled into the study. The response rate was 80% (16 of 20) in the intrapleural group and 66.7% (14 of 21) in the intravenous group. The median duration of response (DoR) of pleural effusion was 4.50 months and 3.70 months, respectively. The median serum VEGF level at 72 hours decreased 67.25% in the intrapleural group and 57.19% in the intravenous group compared to baseline level (P = 0.276). The median serum VEGF level at 72 hours decreased 52.02% compared to baseline level in patients' DoR less than three months and 68.33% in patients' DoR longer than three months, respectively (P = 0.014). The main side effects noted were mild to moderate hypertension, proteinuria and epistaxis. CONCLUSIONS: Bevacizumab intrapleural infusion had higher efficiency and higher safety than intravenous infusion in the management of malignant pleural effusion caused by NSCLC. The decreased level of serum VEGF at 72 hours after bevacizumab treatment was closely related to the response rate and duration of the response of pleural effusion.

Irinotecan combined with oxaliplatin and S-1 in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a single-arm, three-centre, prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan combined with oxaliplatin and S-1 in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated patients with cytologically or histologically confirmed metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma underwent a treatment regimen consisting of an intravenous infusion of irinotecan 165 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 1, and oral S-1 40 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14, repeating the regimen every 21 days until one of the following occurred: disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or patient death. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), response rate, toxicity, and quality of life. This ongoing study had been registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03726021. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients were enrolled in this study, 18 men and 23 women. The median PFS was 4.33 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.83-5.88] and the median OS was 11.00 months (95% CI: 9.16-12.84). There were no instances of a complete response; the partial response, stable disease, and disease progression rates were 39.02% (16/41), 29.27% (12/41), and 31.71% (13/41), respectively.The most common adverse side effects were mild to moderate nausea, vomiting, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 29.27% (12/41) and 12.20% (5/41) of the patients, respectively. No treatment-related death was observed. CONCLUSION: Irinotecan combined with oxaliplatin and S-1 is a safe and effective treatment for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and any toxicities are mild to moderate and tolerable. A larger study population is needed for further evaluation.

Primary resistance to crizotinib treatment in a non-small cell lung cancer patient with an EML4-ALK rearrangement: a case report.

Crizotinib, a small molecular tyrosine kinase inhibitor, manifests dramatic responses in patients with non-small cell lung cancer with echinoderm microtubule associated protein like 4-anaplastic lymphoma kinase (EML4-ALK) rearrangements. ALK gene point mutation is the primary mechanism of acquired crizotinib resistance; however, the intrinsic mechanism is not fully understood. Here, we report a patient with a low mutant allele fraction (MAF) of EML4-ALK rearrangement, who experienced primary resistance to crizotinib treatment. The patient was a 66-year-old Chinese man, who had a history of metastatic lung cancer and was treated with first- and third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs). After 14 months of osimertinib treatment, his disease progressed, and next-generation sequencing was performed from a liquid biopsy of the patient's blood. An EML4-ALK rearrangement was found and crizotinib was administered. The patient's lung lesions continued to progress after one month of crizotinib treatment, and pemetrexed-bevacizumab was initiated. After two cycles of chemotherapy, the metastatic cancers shrunk, and the patient maintained stable disease at his last follow-up. EML4-ALK rearrangements can happen in patients with EGFR-positive NSCLC, after acquired resistance to EGFR TKI treatment. The EGFR T790M and C797G mutations occur in cis is a critical mechanism of resistance to osimertinib therapy. The MAF of EML4-ALK rearrangements in cancer cells might be a predictive factor for crizotinib treatment.

Osimertinib compared docetaxel-bevacizumab as third-line treatment in EGFR T790M mutated non-small-cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and toxicity of osimertinib versus docetaxel-bevacizumab as third-line treatment in EGFR T790M mutated NSCLC. METHODS: In this phase 3, open-label, three-center study, we randomly assigned (1:1) previously treated with TKI-chemotherapy or chemotherapy-TKI recurrent or metastatic advanced non-squamous lung cancer patients into two groups. These patients had acquired EGFR T790M resistance mutation confirmed by tumor tissues or serum. One group received oral osimertinib (80 mg/day) and the other group received intravenous infusion docetaxel (75 mg/m2) and bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg) every 21 days until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects or patient death. The primary endpoint of this study was progression-free survival (PFS) and the secondary endpoints were response rates, toxicities and overall survival (OS). This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02959749. RESULTS: A total of 147 patients were treated. Among them, 74 were enrolled in the osimertinib group and 73 were in the docetaxel-bevacizumab group. The median progression-free survival was 10.20 months in the osimertinib group versus 2.95 months in the docetaxel-bevacizumab group (hazard ratio 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-0.38; P < 0.001). The overall response rate in the osimertinib group was significantly better than in the docetaxel-bevacizumab group (61.6%; 95% CI, 55.5-67.7 versus 8.3%; 95% CI, 1.3-15.3; p < 0.001). Because all the progressed patients in the docetaxel-bevacizumab group crossed over to the osimertinib group, there was no significant difference in the median OS between two groups at the time of last follow-up (hazard ratio 0.79; 95% CI, 0.38-1.61; P = .551). The main grade 3 or 4 toxic effects were diarrhea (2.7%) and interstitial lung disease (1.4%) in the osimertinib group and alopecia (15.3%), anorexia (12.5%), neutropenia (9.7%) and nausea (8.3%) in the docetaxel-bevacizumab group. CONCLUSIONS: Osimertinib had higher response rate, longer PFS and milder side effects than docetaxel-bevacizumab in third-line therapy in patients with EGFR T790 M positive advanced NSCLC.

Mutational Profiling of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Resistant to Osimertinib Using Next-Generation Sequencing in Chinese Patients.

PURPOSE: To identify the somatic mutated genes for optimal targets of non-small-cell lung cancer after resistance to osimertinib treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Study patients all had advanced lung adenocarcinoma and acquired resistance to osimertinib as a second- or third-line treatment. These patients had harboring EGFR T790M mutation before osimertinib treatment, which was confirmed by Amplification Refractory Mutation System (ARMS) PCR or Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS). After resistance to osimertinib treatment, tumor tissue was collected by core needle biopsy. DNA was extracted from 15 × 5 um sliced section of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) material and NGS was done. The genetic changes were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 9 Chinese patients were studied, 5 females and 4 males, age 51-89 years. After progression with osimertinib treatment, core needle biopsy was performed and next-generation sequencing was performed. Nine patients had harboring 62 point mutations, 2 altered gene copies, 2 amplifications, and 1 EML4-ALK gene fusion. No MET or HER2 amplification was found in this cohort study. Nine patients still maintained initial EGFR 19 del or L858R activating mutations, while 7 of them kept EGFR T790M mutations. Among the 7 patients, 5 had secondary EGFR C797S and/or C797G mutations, which all happened in the same allele with T790M mutation. All patients were treated with targets therapies, chemotherapy, or best supportive care (BSC) in accordance with NGS genetic results and patients' performance status; 7 of them are still alive and 2 of them died of disease progression at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: EGFR C797S/G mutation and the same one presented on the same allele with EGFR T790M mutation were the most common mutation feature and played a key role in resistance to osimertinib in Chinese patients with NSCLC. Tumor cells losing T790M mutation and maintaining EGFR activating mutation might benefit from first-generation EGFR-TKI treatment.