The complex interaction between atrial fibrillation and heart failure in elderly patients.

Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) often coexist. Subjects with permanent AF show the highest prevalence of HF. Patients with incident AF have HF in a great number of cases and, reciprocally, in patients with incident HF, an AF can be frequently found. The simultaneous presence of the two conditions is associated with mortality rates higher than those observed in individuals with only one or none of them. Interestingly, HF and AF could synergistically promote in elderly patients the development of disability and dementia. Inflammatory mechanisms coupled with changes of renin-angiotensin system, hormonal pathways and neuro-mediators could simultaneously promote left atrium remodeling and sustain both HF and AF. Beta-blockers and digoxin seem to have small therapeutic effect and limited influence on prognosis in these very complex patients. Sinus rhythm restoration could slow down the progression of disability in symptomatic subjects. Recent evidence seem to suggest that upstream therapy coupled with rehabilitation, and that AV node ablation associated with cardiac resynchronization therapy could benefit subjects with HF and AF. In conclusion, elderly patients simultaneously presenting problems of cardiac function and arrhythmia are an important challenge for geriatric medicine, and request important efforts to improve their functional profile and prognosis.

DAPT plus anticoagulant therapy: The difficult coexistence post-ACS in older patients with atrial fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and stenting often coexist in older patients. This poses the difficult problem of concurrent anticoagulant and double antiplatelet therapy (triple therapy). Current treatment guidelines do recommend triple therapy, especially in the course of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), with limitations due to an excessive risk of bleeding associated with this therapeutic regimen. This review summarizes randomized clinical trials and observational studies that compared triple therapy with a variety of different therapeutic options. Although the available evidence is not completely satisfactory and other studies are urgently needed, alternative regimens to triple therapy in AF patients undergoing PCI and stenting are promising, at least in terms of safety.