Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int Orthop ; 46(12): 2897-2906, 2022 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36153365

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) with the administration of multisegment transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) combined with Ponte osteotomy long-level fixation fusion, as well as to identify the factors affecting health-related quality of life (HRQOL). METHODS: This was a retrospective single-centre study involving comprehensive clinical data. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS) outcomes, and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS-22) questionnaire were recorded to assess HRQOL. A correlation analysis was performed to determine the association between HRQOL and radiographic parameters. RESULTS: A total of 41 consecutive patients (15 males and 26 females) met the inclusion criteria with a follow-up of 8.62 ± 1.20 years. Factors associated with HRQOL were significantly improved post-operation. Global sagittal parameters, including the sagittal vertebral axis (SVA) and T1 pelvic angle (TPA), and local parameters, including apical vertebral translation (AVT) and apical vertebral rotation (AVR), were significantly improved at the last follow-up. Significantly strong correlations between each clinical and radiographic parameter were demonstrated. Moreover, a multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated that the differences in AVT and AVR were significantly correlated with the difference in lumbar lordosis (LL), which was significantly correlated with the differences in SVA and TPA. CONCLUSION: The surgical treatment of DLS with multisegment TLIF accompanied by Ponte osteotomy and long-level fixations improved the quality of life of patients with a long-term effect. AVR correction is an important factor for LL restoration that significantly correlates with improvements in the sagittal balance parameters SVA and TPA, which are key factors for guaranteeing good HRQOL.


Assuntos
Escoliose , Fusão Vertebral , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Escoliose/diagnóstico por imagem , Escoliose/cirurgia , Escoliose/etiologia , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Seguimentos , Resultado do Tratamento , Osteotomia/efeitos adversos , Ponte
2.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg ; 191: 105645, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32028128

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To report the clinical and radiographic outcomes of single-stage posterior total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) of lumbar spinal metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2012 to January 2015, 20 consecutive cases with lumbar spinal metastases who received single-stage posterior TES were retrospectively analyzed. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to evaluate patients' pain status, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) classification was used to evaluate neurological status, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score system was used to evaluate patients' performance status at pre- and post-operation and final follow-up. In addition, Intraoperative blood loss, operative time, postoperative complications, local kyphosis angle, and the postoperative duration of hospital stay were analyzed. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 16 months (ranging from 3 to 39 months), and 4 patients were still alive at the last follow-up. The mean amount of intraoperative blood loss and operation time was 970 mL and 232.5 min, respectively. The average VAS score improved from 7.5 preoperative to 2.8 postoperative and 3.2 at the last follow-up. Postoperative complications occurred in 3 cases. Sixteen patients died within 2 years after surgery, 10 of which died within 1 year. In the remaining 4 patients, the mean follow-up period was 37.25 months. One case of local recurrence occurred but no implant failure presented during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Single-stage posterior TES is a challenging but rewarding procedure in the treatment of lumbar spinal metastases. Due to unique anatomy and biomechanics, surgeons should be aware of important vessels, and nerve root injury should be avoided.


Assuntos
Dor Lombar/fisiopatologia , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Metastasectomia/métodos , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/métodos , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Vazamento de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Tempo de Internação , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Medição da Dor , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Músculos Psoas , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/fisiopatologia , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/secundário , Raízes Nervosas Espinhais , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa