Comparison of lung ultrasound technique versus clinical method to evaluate the accuracy of size and placement of left endobronchial double lumen tube in patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery: a prospective observational study.

Anthropometric measurements like height and gender have been frequently found to be inaccurate in prediction of size of double lumen tube (DLT). A tracheal ultrasonography (TUS) is a technique that can be used to predict the size of DLT and its correct placement for lung isolation. We aim to check the accuracy of ultrasound over clinical methods. This prospective study included 68 patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation (OLV) with DLT. The groups were assessed for the size of DLT by either anthropometric measurement using height and gender (Group C) or ultrasound method (Group U). Further, the accuracy of placement of DLT was assessed through, either lung auscultation in group C or various ultrasonographic and ventilatory parameters such as lung isolation in the first attempt (lung sliding and lung pulse sign), oxygenation status and peak airway pressure, in group U. Surgeon satisfaction score was also compared in both the groups. The accuracy of predicted DLT size between Group C and Group U was statistically significant (p=0.044). In Group C, 56% of patients showed a mismatch between the predicted DLT size and the actual size required, while in Group U, the mismatch was only 32.4%. The accuracy of DLT placement through group C was 41% as compared to 79% in Group U. Surgeon satisfaction score was also significantly higher in Group U as compared to Group C (p=0.0028). Thus, our study suggests that tracheal and chest ultrasonography for DLT size selection and placement for lung isolation is superior to clinical methods.

Changing Critical Care Patterns and Associated Outcomes in Mechanically Ventilated Severe COVID-19 Patients in Different Time Periods: An Explanatory Study from Central India.

Background: The outcomes in critical illness depend on disease severity, practice protocols, workload, and access to care. This study investigates the factors affecting outcomes in mechanically ventilated coronavirus disease-2019 acute respiratory distress syndrome (COVID-19 ARDS) patients admitted in a tertiary teaching hospital intensive care unit (ICU) in Central India with reference to different time periods in pandemic. This is one of the largest series of mechanically ventilated COVID-19 ARDS patients, globally. Methods: This retrospective cohort study classified the entire data into four time periods (Period 1: April 2020 to June 2020; Period 2: July 2020 to September 2020; Period 3: October 2020 to December 2020; and Period 4: January 2021 to April 2021). We performed a multivariable-adjusted analysis to evaluate predictors of mortality, adjusted for baseline-severity, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA score) and time period. We applied mixed-effect binomial logistic regression to model fixed-effect variables with incremental complexity. Results: Among the 56 survivors (19.4%) out of 288 mechanically ventilated patients, there was an up-gradient of survival proportion (0, 18.2, 17.4, and 28.6%) in four time periods. Symptom-intubation interval (OR 1.16; 95% CI 1.03-1.31) and driving pressures (DPs) (OR 1.17; 95% CI 1.07-1.28) were significant predictors of mortality in the model having minimal AIC and BIC values. Patients aged above 60 years also had a larger effect, but statistically insignificant effect favoring mortality (OR 1.99; 95% CI 0.92-4.27). The most complex but less parsimonious model (with higher AIC/BIC) indicated the protective odds of high steroid on mortality (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.59-0.82). Conclusion: The outcomes in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 ARDS patients are heterogeneous across time windows and may be affected by the complex interaction of baseline risk and critical care parameters. How to cite this article: Saigal S, Joshi A, Panda R, Goyal A, Kodamanchili S, Anand A, et al. Changing Critical Care Patterns and Associated Outcomes in Mechanically Ventilated Severe COVID-19 Patients in Different Time Periods: An Explanatory Study from Central India. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(9):1022-1030.

Successful use of tPA for thrombolysis in COVID related ARDS: a case series.

We describe successful usage of low dose Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) (30-50 mg) in three COVID19 critically ill patients, who were in worsening respiratory failure in-spite of being on therapeutic anticoagulation. All patients had respiratory rate > 40; FiO2 > 0.7(on NIV); PiO2/FiO2 ratio < 100 and D-dimer>1000 ng/ml. C.T. Pulmonary Angiography could not be done in these patients due to poor general condition, but 2D echo was normal and none of the patients was in shock. So there was no conventional indication of thrombolysis in these patients, yet after thrombolysis, we saw dramatic changes in oxygenation. All patients became off oxygen within 3-7 days and were discharged within 2 weeks. The whole idea was to prevent intubation, since mortality rates are very high in intubated COVID19 patients. tPA is associated with <1% risk of fatal bleed. In this unprecedented pandemic with high mortality rates, thrombolysis could be an effective and safe option in carefully selected critically ill patients of COVID19.

Efficacy and Safety of Thrombolysis in COVID-19 Related ARDS.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 causes significant pulmonary microthrombi in some individuals, leading to ARDS and death. Thrombolysis could be an effective approach in some patients with severe ARDS. We describe our experience with the usage of thrombolytic agents in critically ill COVID-19 patients who were in worsening respiratory failure. METHODS: Retrospective chart analysis was done in patients who were thrombolysed between May 2020-Sept 2020. Analysis was done to find out factors associated with improvement in oxygenation and survival. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients with severe ARDS [all had respiratory rate >30, FiO2 >0.6 (on NIV/HFNC) and PiO2/FiO2 ratio <120] were thrombolysed in our ICU for COVID19 causes. C.T. Pulmonary Angiography could not be done in any of the 27 patients due to poor general condition, but 2D echo was normal in most (5 had dilated RA, RV), and none of the patients was in shock. So, there was no conventional indication of thrombolysis in these patients, yet after thrombolysis, we observed dramatic changes in oxygenation (defined by a decrease in FiO2 by ≥0.2) in twenty patients. Five patients had a major bleed. Eleven patients survived (survival rate of 40.7%) and the survival rate was high {66% (8/12)} in patients who were thrombolysed within 2 days of oxygen requirement. CONCLUSION: In this unprecedented pandemic with high mortality rates, efficacy of early thrombolysis needs to be further explored in randomised controlled trials.

Whether Early Steroid dose is Associated with Lower Mortality in COVID-19 Critically Ill Patients-An Exploratory Chart Review.

INTRODUCTION: Steroids have shown its usefulness in critically ill COVID-19 patients. However, the time of starting steroid and dose tailored to severity remain a matter of inquiry due to still emerging evidences and wide-ranging concerns of benefits and harms. We did a retrospective record analysis in an apex teaching hospital ICU setting to explore optimal doses and duration of steroid therapy which can decrease mortality. METHODS: 114 adults with COVID-19-ARDS admitted to ICU between 20th March-15th August 2020 were included in chart review. We did preliminary exploratory analysis (rooted in steroid therapy matrix categorized by dose and duration) to understand the effect of several covariates on survival. This was followed by univariate and multivariate Cox proportion hazard regression analysis and model diagnostics. RESULTS: Exploratory analysis and visualization indicated age, optimal steroid, severity (measured in P/F) of disease and infection status as potential covariates for survival. Univariate cox regression analysis showed significant positive association of age > 60 years {2.6 (1.5-4.7)} and protective effect of optimum steroid {0.38(0.2-0.72)} on death (hazard) in critically ill patients. Multivariate cox regression analysis after adjusting effect of age showed protective effect of optimum steroid on hazard defined as death {0.46(0.23-0.87), LR = 17.04, (p = 2e-04)}. The concordance was 0.70 and model diagnostics fulfilled the assumption criteria for proportional hazard model. CONCLUSION: Optimal dose steroid as per defined 'optimum' (<24 hours and doses tailored to P/F at presentation) criteria can offer protective effect from mortality which persists after adjusting for age. This protective effect was not found to be negatively influenced by the risk of infection.

Pathological changes in COVID-19 pneumonia on limited post-mortem sampling of lung: A saga of inflammation and thrombosis.

We describe three postmortem open lung-biopsy findings among patients with COVID-19 pneumonia who were on anticoagulant therapy. The spectrum of histopathological findings included lung inflammation in the form of diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) in exudative and organizing phases, with or without pulmonary artery thrombosis in different stages of evolution. This spectrum of inflammation and thrombosis may be indicative of a natural history of severe COVID-19 pneumonia or demonstrative of variation in therapeutics.

Assessment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Association with Severity of COVID-19: A Prospective Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: OSA has been postulated to be associated with mortality in COVID-19, but studies are lacking thereof. This study was done to estimate the prevalence of OSA in patients with COVID-19 using various screening questionnaires and to assess effect of OSA on outcome of disease. METHODOLOGY: In this prospective observational study, consecutive patients with RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 were screened for OSA by different questionnaires (STOPBANG, Berlin Questionnaire, NoSAS, and Epworth Scale). Association between OSA, outcome (mortality) and requirement for respiratory support was assessed. RESULTS: In study of 213 patients; screening questionnaires for OSA [STOPBANG, Berlin Questionnaire (BQ), NoSAS] were more likely to be positive in patients who died compared to patients who survived. On binary logistic regression analysis, age ≥ 55 and STOPBANG score ≥ 5 were found to have small positive but independent effect on mortality even after adjusting for other variables. Proportion of patients who were classified as high risk for OSA by various OSA screening tools significantly increased with increasing respiratory support (p < 0.001 for STOPBANG, BQ, ESS and p = 0.004 for NoSAS). CONCLUSION: This is one of the first prospective studies of sequentially hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 status who were screened for possible OSA could be an independent risk factor for poor outcome in patients with COVID-19.

Use of autologous bronchial cartilage to repair an intraoperative bronchial airway defect after pneumonectomy for lung mesothelioma.

Tracheobronchial defects may occur intraoperatively because of surgical trauma after resection of thoracic tumors. The repair of large, circumferential tracheobronchial defects with tissue loss may pose a major challenge. In an effort to solve this problem, different techniques have been used with little success. Attempts with foreign materials, nonviable tissues, autogenous noncartilaginous tissues, tissue engineering, and allotransplantation have all been associated with disappointing or suboptimal results. In each category, biologic problems are noted. Hence, the reconstruction and substitution of large, circumferential tracheobronchial defects has so far remained an unsolved surgical dilemma. We report a unique case in which an airway defect in the bronchus, made inadvertently intraoperatively, was repaired using autologous bronchial cartilage obtained from the resected specimen. In the literature, autologous bronchial cartilage has never been used before in reconstructing a large tracheobronchial defect.

Anticoagulation for pregnant patients with mechanical heart valves.

Management of a pregnant patient with mechanical heart valve is a complex issue for all health care providers involved in the care of such patients. Complications may arise at any stage due to the increased haemodynamic load imposed by pregnancy or because of impaired cardiac performance often seen in these patients. In addition, the use of various cardiovascular drugs in pregnancy (especially anticoagulants) may lead tofoetal loss or teratogenic complications. Additionally, the risk of thrombo-embolic complications in the mother is increased by the hypercoagulable state of pregnancy. In this review, we have attempted to draw inferences to guide management of such patients based on the available literature. It seems that in pregnant women with mechanical heart valves, recent data support warfarin use throughout pregnancy, followed by a switch to heparin and planned induction of labour. However, the complexity of this situation demands a cafeteria approach where the patient herself can choose from the available options that are supported by evidence-based information. Unfortunately there is no consensus on such data. An overview of the available literature forms the basis of this review. In conclusion, a guideline comprising pragmatic considerations is preffered.