Breast, chest wall, and nodal irradiation with prone set-up: Results of a hypofractionated trial with a median follow-up of 35 months.

PURPOSE: To test clinical feasibility, safety, and toxicity of prone hypofractionated breast, chest wall, and nodal radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Following either segmental or total mastectomy with axillary node dissection, patients were treated in an institutional review board-approved prospective trial of prone radiation therapy to the breast, chest wall, and supraclavicular and level III axillary lymph nodes. A dose of 40.5 Gy/15 fractions with a concomitant daily boost to the tumor bed of 0.5 Gy (total dose, 48 Gy) was prescribed. In postmastectomy patients, the same treatment was prescribed, but without a tumor bed boost. The primary endpoint was incidence of >grade 2 acute skin toxicity. The secondary endpoints were feasibility of treatment using prone set-up, compliance with protocol-defined dosimetric constraints, and incidence of late toxicity. A dosimetric comparison was performed between protocol plans (prone) and nonprotocol plans (supine), targeting the same treatment volumes. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients with stage IB-IIIA breast cancer enrolled in this trial. Surgery was segmental mastectomy (n = 45), mastectomy (n = 23), and bilateral mastectomy (n = 1), resulting in 70 cases. None experienced >grade 2 acute skin toxicity according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, v 3.0, meeting our primary endpoint. Ninety-six percent of patients could be treated with this technique prone. However, 17 plans (24%) exceeded protocol constraints to the brachial plexus. Maximum long-term toxicity was 1 grade 2 arm lymphedema, 1 grade 3 breast retraction, and no occurrence of brachial plexopathy. Dosimetric comparison of protocol with nonprotocol plans demonstrated significantly decreased lung and heart doses in prone plans. CONCLUSIONS: Prone hypofractionated breast, chest wall, and nodal radiation therapy is safe and well tolerated in this study. Although the initial pattern of local and regional control is encouraging, longer follow-up is warranted for efficacy and late toxicity assessment, particularly to the brachial plexus.

Comparison of three-dimensional versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques to treat breast and axillary level III and supraclavicular nodes in a prone versus supine position.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine the optimal method of targeting breast and regional nodes in selected breast cancer patients after axillary dissection, we compared the results of IMRT versus no IMRT, and CT-informed versus clinically-placed fields, in supine and prone positions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve consecutive breast cancer patients simulated both prone and supine provided the images for this study. Four techniques were used to target breast, level III axilla, and supraclavicular fossa in either position: a traditional three-field three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) plan, a four-field 3DCRT plan using a posterior axillary boost field, and two techniques using a CT-informed target volume consisting of an optimized 3DCRT plan (CT-planned 3D) and an intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plan. The prescribed dose was 50 Gy in 25 fractions. RESULTS: CT-planned 3D and IMRT techniques improved nodal PTV coverage. Supine, mean nodal PTV V50 was 50% (3-field), 59% (4-field), 92% (CT-planned 3D), and 94% (IMRT). Prone, V50 was 29% (3-field), 42% (4-field), 97% (CT-planned 3D), and 95% (IMRT). Prone positioning, compared to supine, and IMRT technique, compared to 3D, lowered ipsilateral lung V20. CONCLUSIONS: Traditional 3DCRT plans provide inadequate nodal coverage. Prone IMRT technique resulted in optimal target coverage and reduced ipsilateral lung V20.