Usefulness of the Quick-Sepsis Organ Failure Assessment Score in Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit to Predict Prognosis in Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Triage of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) at high risk of in-hospital complications is essential. In this study, we evaluated the quick sepsis organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score as a tool for predicting the prognosis of 964 patients admitted to the cardiovascular intensive care unit (CICU) with ACS over a 4-year period. In total, out of 964 patients included, with a percentage of 4.6% for 30-day mortality. The risk of 30-day mortality was independently associated with qSOFA ≥ 2 at admission (hazard ratio = 2.76, 95% CI 1.32-5.74, p = 0.007). For MACEs, qSOFA ≥ 2 at admission was a predictive factor with (odds ratio = 2.42, 95% CI 1.37-4.36, p = .002). A qSOFA ≥ 2 on admission had an AUC of 0.729 (95% CI [0.694, 0.762]), with a good specificity of 91.6%. For 30-day mortality, an AUC of 0.759 (95%CI [0.726, 0.792]) for cardiogenic shock with specificity of 92.5%. For MACEs, an AUC of 0.702 (95% CI [0.64, 0.700] with a specificity of 95%. Concerning the different scores tested, we found no significant difference between the Zwolle score and the qSOFA score for predicting prognosis, whereas the CADILLAC score was better than qSOFA for predicting 30-day mortality (AUC = 0.829 and De long test = 0.03). However, there was no difference between qSOFA and CADILLAC scores for predicting cardiogenic shock (De Long test at 0.08). This is the first study to evaluate qSOFA as a predictive score for 30-day mortality and MACEs, and the results are very encouraging, particularly for cardiogenic shock.

Acute coronary syndrome complicating infective endocarditis: A case report with an etiological review.

Introduction: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is an uncommon complication associated with high mortality in patients with endocarditis. It requires prompt and appropriate management to cure the patient. Cases presentation: We report the case of a 52-year-old patient, initially admitted for an acute non-ST-segment elevation coronary syndrome at very high ischemic risk, in whom coronary exploration was negative, and whose echocardiography showed a mobile image on the aortic valve, suggesting infective endocarditis. The patient benefited from an aortic valve replacement because of the size and the embolic complications he presented, with a favorable evolution. Discussion: Acute coronary syndrome during infective endocarditis is a rare complication with a high mortality rate. Several mechanisms are possible: the embolic mechanism, coronary extraluminal compression due to coronary mycotic aneurysm and obstruction of the coronary ostium by a large vegetation. The management remains multidisciplinary and personalized according to the phenotype of the patient, with the need to have the endocarditis team to be able to take the best therapeutic choice. Conclusion: Infective endocarditis must be evoked in any patient without usual cardiovascular risk factors who presents with an ACS that is accompanied by fever and elevated inflammatory markers, and a thorough clinical examination as well as the performance of additional tests.

Risk stratification of sudden cardiac death in Brugada syndrome: an updated review of literature.

Brugada syndrome is a rare but serious inherited heart disease that causes sudden cardiac death by polymorphic ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. It is an autosomal dominant genetic disease that usually occurs in patients in their forties with a structurally normal heart. Electrically, it manifests by ST elevation segment ≥ 2 mm of at least one right precordial lead (V1 and/or V2). Stratification of sudden cardiac death in Brugada syndrome is not always easy and constitutes a real challenge for the practitioner. In this review, we will present the current state of knowledge for arrhythmic risk stratification and the prevention of sudden cardiac death that can result from this syndrome.

An uncommon presentation of COVID-19: concomitant acute pulmonary embolism, spontaneous tension pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema (a case report).

The presenting symptoms and features of COVID-19 are non-specific and may be extrapulmonary complications such as thrombotic disorders but also pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema; which are well-known complications of mechanical ventilation. Nevertheless, pneumothorax and/or pneumomediastinum, could complicate the course of a COVID-19 disease even in the absence of barotrauma involved. Herein, we report the case of a 55-year-old man with a previous history of erythroblastopenia due to thymoma admitted for COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) who simultaneously developed spontaneous tension pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, subcutaneous emphysema and acute bilateral pulmonary embolism as presenting features of COVID-19 while on high-flow nasal cannula. This rare case highlights the importance of screening for other coexisting alternative diagnoses at the initial presentation of a patient suspected of COVID-19.