Differences of hemiarthroplasty and total hip replacement in orthogeriatric treated elderly patients: a retrospective analysis of the Registry for Geriatric Trauma DGU®.

PURPOSE: Medial femoral neck fractures are typically managed with hemiarthroplasty (HA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) in elderly patients. There is a debate as to which treatment predominates. The literatures have reported better outcomes for those patients with proximal femur fracture who were treated in an orthogeriatric centres compared to standard orthopaedic hospitals. Therefore, we have analysed the differences of outcome between HA and THA on patients, exclusively treated in orthogeriatric co-management and compared the results with the available literature. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective registry analysis of the Registry for Geriatric Trauma DGU®. Between 2016 and 2018, data for 16,236 patients from 78 different hospitals were available: they were analysed univariably, and differences between HA and THA were examined using propensity score matching, according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, Identification-of-Seniors-At-Risk (ISAR) Score, anticoagulation level, sex, age, and walking ability prefracture. RESULTS: There were 4,662 patients treated with HA and 892 with THA, meeting inclusion criteria. Patients in the HA group were older (84 years (IQR 80-89) vs. 79 years (IQR 75-83); p < 0.001), with more severe preexisting conditions, with an ASA grade ≥ 3 in 79% vs. 57% in the THA group (p < 0.001). After matching, the mortality rate, in-house revision rate, and quality of life (QoL) 7 days postoperatively were not significantly different by group. After 120 days, the HA group presented a lower rate of surgical complications (4% vs. 10%; p = 0.006), while the THA group had a higher rate of independent walking (18% vs. 28%; p = 0.001) and a higher QoL, measured by the EQ-5D-3L (0.81 (IQR 0.7-1.0) vs. 0.9 (IQR 0.72-1.0); p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Due to better walking ability and QoL, THA might be the better choice in healthier and more mobile patients, while HA would be better for multimorbid patients to avoid additional complication-associated treatments. Not the age of the patient but the preoperative condition might be important for the choice between THA and HA.

Biomechanical comparison of dorsal nail plate versus screw and K-wire construct for extra-articular distal radius fractures in a cadaver bone model.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to compare the biomechanical stability of distal radius fracture fixation with 2 new implants, the DNP (Hand Innovations LLC, Miami, FL), a dorsal locked hybrid of nail and plate, and the XSCREW (Zimmer, Freiburg, Germany), an implant combining a cannulated screw and K-wires, in a cadaver bone distal radius fracture model. METHODS: Eight pairs of fresh-frozen cadaver radii were used. To simulate an extra-articular distal radius fracture, a 5-mm volar open wedge osteotomy was made. Axial loads of 10 to 100 N and torque loads of -1.5 to 1.5 Nm were applied by a testing machine to the intact radii and to the radii after each device was fixed as recommended by the manufacturer. One thousand cycles in torque and failure tests were performed. RESULTS: With a median of 136.0 N/mm, the axial stiffness of XSCREW-fixed specimens was higher than that of DNP-fixed specimens, with a median of 69.5 N/mm, but differences were not statistically significant. With a median of 0.163 Nm/ degrees , the torque stiffness of XSCREW-fixed specimens was significantly higher than that of DNP-fixed specimens, with a median of 0.068 Nm/ degrees . The XSCREW-group reached 33% of the axial stiffness and 49% of the torque stiffness of the intact radii, and the DNP-group reached 14% of the axial stiffness and 20% of the torque stiffness of the intact radii. CONCLUSIONS: In this human cadaver bone biomechanical study, the XSCREW provided more stability than the DNP in torque stiffness but not in axial stiffness.