Mid-term (up to 12 years) clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is still a concerning issue in developing countries. Among delayed RHD presentations, rheumatic mitral valve stenosis (MS) remains a prevalent finding. Percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy (PTMC) is the intervention of choice for severe mitral stenosis (MS). We aimed to assess the mid-term outcome of PTMC in patients with immediate success. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, out of 220 patients who had undergone successful PTMC between 2006 and 2018, the clinical course of 186 patients could be successfully followed. Cardiac-related death, undergoing a second PTMC or mitral valve replacement (MVR) were considered adverse cardiac events for the purpose of this study. In order to find significant factors related to adverse cardiac outcomes, peri-procedural data for the studied patients were collected.The patients were also contacted to find out their current clinical status and whether they had continued secondary antibiotic prophylaxis regimen or not. Those who had not suffered from the adverse cardiac events were additionally asked to undergo echocardiographic imaging, in order to assess the prevalence of mitral valve restenosis, defined as mitral valve area (MVA) < 1.5 cm2 and loss of ≥ 50% of initial area gain. RESULTS: During the mean follow-up time of 5.69 ± 3.24 years, 31 patients (16.6% of patients) had suffered from adverse cardiac events. Atrial fibrillation rhythm (p = 0.003, HR = 3.659), Wilkins echocardiographic score > 8 (p = 0.028, HR = 2.320) and higher pre-procedural systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (p = 0.021, HR = 1.031) were three independent predictors of adverse events and immediate post-PTMC mitral valve area (IMVA) ≥ 2 cm2 (p < 0.001, HR = 0.06) was the significant predictor of event-free outcome. Additionally, follow-up echocardiographic imaging detected mitral restenosis in 44 patients (23.6% of all patients). The only statistically significant protective factor against restenosis was again IMVA ≥ 2 cm2 (p = 0.001, OR = 0.240). CONCLUSION: The mid-term results of PTMC are multifactorial and may be influenced by heterogeneous peri-procedural determinants. IMVA had a great impact on the long-term success of this procedure. Continuing secondary antibiotic prophylaxis was not a protective factor against adverse cardiac events in this study. (clinicaltrial.gov registration: NCT04112108).

The effect of chewing-gum on dose rate of salivary gland in differentiated thyroid carcinoma patients treated with radioiodine.

BACKGROUND: Although, different methods have been suggested on reducing salivary gland radiation after radioiodine administration, an effective preventive or therapeutic measure is still debated. To the best of our knowledge this is the second study that aimed to evaluate the effect of chewing-gum as a sialagogue on the radioiodine content of salivary gland, and radioiodine-induced symptoms of salivary gland dysfunction. METHODS: Twenty-two patients who were referred to radioiodine therapy were randomized into chewing-gum (group A) and control (group B) groups. Anterior and posterior planar images including both head and neck were obtained 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours after the administration of radioiodine in all patients and round regions of interest (ROI) were drawn for both left and right parotid glands with a rectangular ROI in the region of cerebrum as the background. All patients were followed once, 6 months after radioiodine administration via a phone call for subjective evaluation of symptoms related to salivary gland damage. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the mean age, gender and initial iodine activity. The geometric mean of background-corrected count per administrated dose and acquisition time was calculated for bilateral parotid glands. This normalized parotid count showed a significant reduction in net parotid count in both groups during the first 48 hours after the radioiodine administration. However, no significant difference was found between the groups according to the amount and pattern of dose reduction in this time period. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that chewing-gum had no significant effect on the radioiodine content of parotid glands during the first 48 hours after radioiodine administration. Also, no significant difference was found in the incidence of relevant symptoms after 6 months comparing both groups.