Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Birth ; 49(3): 364-402, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35322898

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mental health problems during and after pregnancy such as depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), or addiction are common and can have lifelong implications for both parents and offspring. This review investigates the cost-effectiveness of interventions tackling these problems, assesses the methodological quality of included studies, and indicates suggestions for further research. METHODS: Thirteen databases were searched for economic evaluations of interventions related to antenatal, perinatal, and postnatal mental health conditions, published between 2000 and September 2021, in high-income countries. RESULTS: Thirty-nine studies met all inclusion criteria. Interventions considered were screening programs, pharmacological treatments, and various forms of psychosocial and psychological support. Six studies reported that the intervention was cost-saving. Eighteen were cost-effective and seven likely to be cost-effective. Only six studies included health outcomes for the child; one study considered paternal health. The time horizon for which costs and consequences were considered was for most evaluations limited to 1 year (n = 18) or 2 years (n = 11) postpartum. CONCLUSIONS: Given the importance of the subject, a relatively low number of studies have investigated the cost-effectiveness of interventions tackling mental health problems during and after pregnancy. The scant evidence available suggests good overall value for money. Likely, cost-effectiveness is underestimated as costly long-term consequences on offspring are systematically excluded. No evidence was found for several frequently occurring conditions. Further research is required to obtain reliable, long-term effectiveness data and to address the methodological challenges related to measuring all relevant health outcomes for all parties affected.


Assuntos
Saúde Mental , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos , Ansiedade/terapia , Criança , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Parto , Gravidez , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/terapia
2.
Obes Rev ; 23(1): e13324, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34694053

RESUMO

International guidelines recommend women with an overweight or obese body mass index (BMI) aim to reduce their body weight prior to conception to minimize the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Recent systematic reviews have demonstrated that interpregnancy weight gain increases women's risk of developing adverse pregnancy outcomes in their subsequent pregnancy. Interpregnancy weight change studies exclude nulliparous women. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following MOOSE guidelines and summarizes the evidence of the impact of preconception and interpregnancy weight change on perinatal outcomes for women regardless of parity. Sixty one studies met the inclusion criteria for this review and reported 34 different outcomes. We identified a significantly increased risk of gestational diabetes (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.66, 2.14, I2  = 87.8%), hypertensive disorders (OR 1.46 95% CI 1.12, 1.91, I2  = 94.9%), preeclampsia (OR 1.92 95% CI 1.55, 2.37, I2  = 93.6%), and large-for-gestational-age (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.25, 1.49, I2  = 92.2%) with preconception and interpregnancy weight gain. Interpregnancy weight loss only was significantly associated with increased risk for small-for-gestational-age (OR 1.29 95% CI 1.11, 1.50, I2  = 89.9%) and preterm birth (OR 1.06 95% CI 1.00, 1.13, I2  = 22.4%). Our findings illustrate the need for effective preconception and interpregnancy weight management support to improve pregnancy outcomes in subsequent pregnancies.


Assuntos
Complicações na Gravidez , Nascimento Prematuro , Índice de Massa Corporal , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/etiologia , Resultado da Gravidez , Fatores de Risco , Aumento de Peso
3.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34682666

RESUMO

Challenges during the perinatal period can lead to maternal distress, negatively affecting mother-infant interaction. This study aims to retrospectively explore the experiences and needs regarding professional support of mothers with difficulties in mother-infant interaction prior to their admission to an infant mental health day clinic. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 mothers who had accessed an infant mental health day clinic because of persistent severe infant regulatory problems impairing the wellbeing of the infant and the family. Data were transcribed and analyzed using the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven (QUAGOL). Three themes were identified: 'experience of pregnancy, birth, and parenthood'; 'difficult care paths'; and 'needs and their fulfillment'. The first theme consisted of three subthemes: (1) 'reality does not meet expectations', (2) 'resilience under pressure', and (3) 'despair'. Mothers experienced negative feelings that were in contradiction to the expected positive emotions associated with childbirth and motherhood. Resilience-related problems affected the mother-child relationship, and infants' regulatory capacities. Determined to find solutions, different healthcare providers were consulted. Mothers' search for help was complex and communication between healthcare providers was limited because of a fragmented care provision. This hindered the continuity of care and appropriate referrals. Another pitfall was the lack of a broader approach, with the emphasis on the medical aspects without attention to the mother-child dyad. An integrated care pathway focusing on the early detection of resilience-related problems and sufficient social support can be crucial in the prevention and early detection of perinatal and infant mental health problems.


Assuntos
Saúde Mental , Mães , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Relações Mãe-Filho , Gravidez , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Estudos Retrospectivos , Apoio Social
4.
Obes Facts ; 13(4): 333-348, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32862185

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Maternal obesity is an epidemic health problem that is aggravated by excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) and postpartum weight retention. Current US Institute of Medicine (now US National Academy of Medicine) guidelines (2009) for GWG need to be evaluated against the current rise in obesity in the general and pregnant population. We wanted to study the relation between GWG and pregnancy and birth outcomes and to relate this to the current recommendations for GWG. METHODS: Population-based study. We performed an epidemiological analysis in a cohort of Belgian pregnant women with singleton live births at term (≥37 weeks) between 2009 and 2014 (n = 337,590). Logistic regression was used to determine the optimal GWG in relation to relevant pregnancy and birth outcomes. RESULTS: The prevalence of maternal obesity significantly increased from 10.3% in 2009 to 11.4% in 2014. The mean (SD) body mass index at the start of the pregnancy significantly increased from 23.9 (4.5) in 2009 to 24.2 (4.6) in 2014. Excessive GWG was frequent, especially in overweight (56.8%) and obese (52.9%) pregnant women. In the logistic regression model, the amount of GWG associated with the lowest incidence of both large-for-gestational-age and small-for-gestational-age infants was 21 kg in underweight women, 14 kg in normal weight, 8 kg in overweight, 0 kg in obese class I, -4 kg in obese class II and -5 kg in obese class III. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of maternal obesity has risen in Belgium between 2009 and 2014. Current GWG guidelines, based on historic observational data, are probably too liberal for class II and III obese women in which better outcomes are being predicted for lower weight gain than recommended.


Assuntos
Ganho de Peso na Gestação , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Adulto , Índice de Massa Corporal , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Parto , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Gestantes , Prevalência , Magreza/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
5.
Front Psychol ; 11: 563432, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33224056

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The ability to cope with challenges and stress in life is generally understood as resilience. Pregnancy and parenthood are challenging times. The concept of resilience is receiving increasing interest from researchers, clinicians, and policy staff because of its potential impact on health, well-being, and quality of life. Nevertheless, the concept is less studied during the perinatal period. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to understand the concept of perinatal resilience, including the underlying processes and more specifically for the first 1,000 days of life. METHODS: A concept analysis according to the Walker and Avant (2011) framework was used, to investigate the basic elements of the concept. Concurrently, a two-round Delphi survey involving researchers, clinicians, epidemiologists, mothers, and fathers (N = 21), was conducted to prioritize the terms associated with perinatal resilience. Data collection took place between January and April 2019. RESULTS: Through concept analysis and Delphi survey, five defining attributes for perinatal resilience were identified: social support, self-efficacy, self-esteem, sense of mastery and personality. The additional terms, rated important by the Delphi survey, were linked to the consequences of being resilient during the perinatal period for the individual and his/her family. Specifically, highlighted were the experiences of families in personal growth and achieving family balance, adaptation, or acceptance. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of the concept analysis and Delphi survey, we describe perinatal resilience for the first 1,000 days as a circular process towards a greater well-being in the form of personal growth, family balance, adaptation or acceptance, when faced with stressors, challenges or adversity during the perinatal period. The presence of resiliency attributes such as social support, sense of mastery, self-efficacy, and self-esteem enhance the capacity to be resilient and probably prevent mental health problems.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa