Evaluating Global Surgery Partnerships From Low and Middle Income Country Perspectives.

INTRODUCTION: Little is known about perceptions of low-income and middle-income country (LMIC) partners regarding global surgery collaborations with high-income countries (HICs). METHODS: A survey was distributed to surgeons from LMICs to assess the nature and perception of collaborations, funding, benefits, communication, and the effects of COVID-19 on partnerships. RESULTS: We received 19 responses from LMIC representatives in 12 countries on three continents. The majority (83%) had participated in collaborations within the past 5 y with 39% of collaborations were facilitated virtually. Clinical and educational partnerships (39% each) were ranked most important by respondents. Sustainability of the partnership was most successfully achieved in domains of education/training (78%) and research (61%). The majority (77%) of respondents reported expressing their needs before HIC team arrival. However, 54% of respondents were the ones to initiate the conversation and only 47% said HIC partners understood the overall environment well at arrival to LMIC. Almost all participants (95%) felt a formal process of collaboration and a structured partnership would benefit all parties in assessing needs. During the COVID-19 pandemic, 87% of participants reported continued collaborations; however, 44% of partners felt that relationships were weaker, 31% felt relationships were stronger, and 25% felt they were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides a snapshot of LMIC surgeons' perspectives on collaboration in global surgery. Independent of location, LMIC partners cite inadequate structure for long-term collaborations. We propose a formal pathway and initiation process to assess resources and needs at the outset of a partnership.

Introduction to Entrustable Professional Activities for Pediatric Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) have emerged as a valuable tool in medical education, enabling the assessment of trainee competence in a real-world context. Despite its growing popularity in other medical specialties, the use of EPAs in pediatric surgery is still relatively new. METHODS: This article provides an overview of the development and application of EPAs in pediatric surgery. The key concepts and principles of EPAs, including the historical development and current implementation in other medical specialties, will also be reviewed. Definition of pediatric surgery EPAs, advantages, and challenges of implementing EPAs in pediatric surgery, and the evidence supporting the use of EPAs in pediatric surgical training will also be examined. RESULTS: The use of EPAs in pediatric surgery has shown promise in providing a comprehensive and standardized approach to assessing trainee competence. By focusing on the essential tasks and responsibilities of a pediatric surgeon, EPAs can provide a framework for measuring trainee progress and ensuring that they possess the necessary skills to perform their duties independently. Challenges in implementing EPAs in pediatric surgery include the need for consensus on the definition and scope of EPAs, as well as the establishment of appropriate assessment and evaluation tools. CONCLUSION: The use of EPAs in pediatric surgery education and training has the potential to enhance the training and ultimately the quality of care delivered to pediatric surgical patients. The development of appropriate assessment and evaluation tools and frameworks will be crucial in implementing EPAs effectively in this field. TYPE OF STUDY: Review.

Cultural competency and ethical behavior for collaboration in limited-resource settings: Guidelines from the Society of University Surgeons Academic Global Surgery Committee and the Association for Academic Global Surgery.

BACKGROUND: There are an increasing number of global surgery activities worldwide. With such tremendous growth, there is a potential risk for untoward interactions between high-income country members and low-middle income country members, leading to programmatic failure, poor results, and/or low impact. METHODS: Key concepts for cultural competency and ethical behavior were generated by the Academic Global Surgery Committee of the Society for University Surgeons in collaboration with the Association for Academic Global Surgery. Both societies ensured active participation from high-income countries and low-middle income countries. RESULTS: The guidelines provide a framework for cultural competency and ethical behavior for high-income country members when collaborating with low-middle income country partners by offering recommendations for: (1) preparation for work with low-middle income countries; (2) process standardization; (3) working with the local community; (4) limits of practice; (5) patient autonomy and consent; (6) trainees; (7) potential pitfalls; and (8) gray areas. CONCLUSION: The article provides an actionable framework to address potential cultural competency and ethical behavior issues in high-income country - low-middle income country global surgery collaborations.