Creation and implementation of a pharmacy-led meds-to-beds program at a large teaching hospital.

BACKGROUND: "Meds-to-beds" programs are a quality improvement intervention that is gaining wider implementation throughout the United States. The University of Oklahoma hospital system did not have this program and sought to implement one. There are sufficient data on the benefits of meds-to-beds programs, but there is a lack of literature on describing the development and implementation process. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this article is to describe the planning process, implementation, and barriers encountered during the organization of a pharmacy-led meds-to-beds program operating within 2 large teaching hospitals. PRACTICE DESCRIPTION: The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center campus has 7 colleges, multiple primary care and specialty clinics, and 2 hospitals. In addition, there are 3 on-campus outpatient pharmacies operated by the University of Oklahoma College of Pharmacy (OUCOP). PRACTICE INNOVATION: The college implemented a meds-to-beds program primarily serving 2 on-campus hospitals, The Oklahoma Children's Hospital and University of Oklahoma College of Pharmacy Medical Center. The program operated out of The Children's Pharmacy, an outpatient pharmacy located within the Children's Hospital. EVALUATION METHODS: A Plan-Do-Study-Act model was used, which allowed for adaptation in response to barriers encountered throughout the process. Frequent meetings among stakeholders were held to continuously evaluate progress (e.g., awareness and utilization of the program and prescription counts) and make necessary changes. RESULTS: Implementation of the program required changes in workflow both within the pharmacy and within the registration and discharge processes of medical teams. In addition, after the initiation of the meds-to-beds program, the daily prescription count more than doubled. The program averages 40 deliveries per day and 3 prescriptions per delivery and continues to grow, providing evidence of a successful meds-to-beds implementation. CONCLUSION: The Plan-Do-Study-Act model allowed for many adjustments to be made throughout the process, including the conversion from an opt-in to an opt-out model to increase program utilization.

Shot of a lifetime: How pharmacists stay ahead of the season.

OBJECTIVES: The profession of pharmacy has long advocated for the advancement of practice through increased clinical responsibility. Provision of immunization related services has been one service pharmacists have been able to provide to add to their existing responsibilities. A universal influenza vaccination has been under investigation and is nearing success. While other clinical services should be considered, now more than ever, development of the universal vaccine should provide a pause for the profession and consideration of not only the impact on student learning opportunities but also pharmacy revenue. SUMMARY: The development of the universal influenza vaccination poses a potential challenge to existing service-related revenue models for community pharmacies. There are many other opportunities pharmacists can capitalize on including, but not limited to, travel and other vaccinations, point-of-care testing, and transitions-of-care. In addition, through initiatives such as "Flip the Pharmacy" and Community Pharmacy Enhanced Service Network, pharmacists are in a great position to be innovative with clinical services while continuing to provide learners with training opportunities. CONCLUSION: Many opportunities exist for pharmacists to expand services that lean into their clinical training and add other vaccination opportunities. These opportunities can augment revenue streams and still provide learners with training.

Interventions to improve dissemination and implementation of Hepatitis B vaccination in patients with diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess provider awareness of routine vaccinations recommended for patients with diabetes and to determine whether pharmacist-led interventions are associated with increased provider implementation of recommendations for hepatitis B vaccination. METHODS: This study was conducted in 3 phases at 2 outpatient clinics affiliated with an academic institution. In phase 1, adults with diabetes who visited the clinics between January and November 2012 and who were eligible for the hepatitis B vaccine were identified. In phase 2, medical residents were surveyed twice for vaccine recommendations and reasons for (not) recommending the hepatitis B vaccine, specifically. Residents were then provided a pharmacist-led in-service about hepatitis B vaccine recommendations. The third phase was initiated in April 2013, following postintervention observation from December 2012 through March 2013. RESULTS: Forty-eight of 100 (48%) medical residents attended the in-service and completed both surveys, with 77% indicating they did not recommend the hepatitis B vaccine. During phase 1, 1441 patients were identified, 0.6% (n = 8) of whom had received at least the first dose of the series. In phase 3, 946 patients were identified with 1.7% (n = 16) having received at least the first dose (P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: An attempt to disseminate updated recommendations to providers via educational in-service was successful in increasing the percentage of eligible patients vaccinated with the hepatitis B vaccine.

Effectiveness of a modified open airways curriculum.

OBJECTIVE: Open Airways for Schools is an asthma education program that has proven to be effective in decreasing the number of asthma attacks in children and increasing their confidence in self-management. It is taught to 8-11 year olds in six 40-min sessions. Due to financial and scheduling constraints, many schools have difficulty implementing the program. The Tulsa Health Department created a modified version of the program, which is taught in ten 20-min sessions over lunch. The same topics are covered in a different order and fewer activities are utilized. This study aimed to pilot the effectiveness of the modified program. METHODS: In both versions, a pre-questionnaire is given to participating students on the first day of the program. At the end of the program, the same questionnaire is administered to assess knowledge gained. This is a retrospective review comparing pre- and post-questionnaire data from the two versions of the program. Descriptive statistics and t-tests were used to compare the results of the questionnaires from the modified program to results from the original program. RESULTS: Twenty students completed the original curriculum and 45 completed the modified program. Both versions were found to improve children's knowledge of how to manage asthma triggers and symptoms, as well as to improve inhaler technique. CONCLUSIONS: The modified curriculum is effective at increasing asthma knowledge. Schools may use the modified program as an alternate delivery approach to reduce the scheduling burden and to allow more children to benefit from the educational program.

Nontraditional Considerations With Insulin Needle Length Selection.

Ensuring the correct delivery of insulin is essential in the treatment of diabetes. Both proper injection technique and needle length are important considerations for adequate insulin delivery. There have been several studies demonstrating that BMI does not affect efficacy or insulin leakage with shorter pen needles (e.g., 4 or 5 mm vs. 12.7 mm). Additionally, the International Scientific Advisory Board for the Third Injection Technique Workshop released recommendations in 2010 on best practices for injection technique for patients with diabetes, which, with regard to needle length, concluded that 4-mm pen needles were efficacious in all patients regardless of BMI. However, regardless of patients' BMI, insulin injection technique should always be assessed and physically disabling comorbid conditions taken into consideration when choosing a needle length that will be manageable for patients. The purpose of this article is to raise awareness of unique patient circumstances that may warrant the use of the longer 12.7-mm needle.

Management of a prediabetes case with the DPP-4 inhibitor sitagliptin.

OBJECTIVE: It is important to prevent or slow the progression of prediabetes to type 2 diabetes and, therefore, reduce the risk of long-term complications. New therapeutic options will allow more patients to be effectively managed. Although theorized to be effective for prediabetes, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors have not been studied in this population. The purpose of this article is to report the results of a case in which a patient with prediabetes was treated with the DPP-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin. CASE SUMMARY: A 56-year-old woman was diagnosed with prediabetes at a hemoglobin A1C (A1C) of 6.2%. After 6 months of consistent lifestyle modifications, her A1C was 6.3%, and she wanted to start a medication to prevent disease progression. Because of anticipated risk or intolerability with standard prediabetes treatments, she was started on sitagliptin 100 mg daily; 6 weeks later, she noted improvements in glucometer readings. After 18 months on sitagliptin, her A1C had improved to 5.8% without further lifestyle improvements, and by 32 months, her A1C had improved to 5.6%. Her A1C was maintained within or below the prediabetes range of 5.7% to 6.4% over 3 years of treatment with sitagliptin. DISCUSSION: Although human studies with DPP-4 inhibitors are lacking, the available studies have shown improvements in ß-cell function and postprandial and fasting glucose levels. Furthermore, animal studies have shown a delay in progression of prediabetes. No case reports have been found regarding DPP-4 inhibitor use in prediabetes. CONCLUSION: Sitagliptin may have a role in treating prediabetes and should be further studied.

Diabetes and Hearing Impairment: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Among Providers and Patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices among providers and patients regarding hearing impairment and screening referrals in people with diabetes. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey design among health care providers and patients at an academic medical center in Oklahoma was used to gather knowledge, attitudes, and practices data. RESULTS: Only 25.6% of providers selected hearing impairment as a complication of diabetes, whereas 96.7% selected retinopathy, kidney dysfunction, and foot infection. Reported barriers to referring patients for hearing impairment screenings were being unfamiliar with recommended screening frequency (57.3%) and existence of higher priorities (35.4%). When asked to select parts of the body affected by diabetes, 21.0% of patients surveyed selected ears, 88.0% selected feet, and 85.0% selected eyes and kidneys. Fewer patients reported being told hearing impairment is a complication of diabetes compared to retinopathy (8.1% vs 85.9%). Additionally, 24.2% of patients reported having a hearing impairment screening, and 96.0% reported having a dilated eye exam. CONCLUSIONS: Most providers and patients at an academic medical center are unaware of the relationship between diabetes and hearing impairment. Providers reported there are several barriers that need to be overcome to refer patients to audiologists.

Report of the 2023-2024 Strategic Engagement Standing Committee.

The American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy has long emphasized the value of strategic engagement, recognizing that it is critical to the success of pharmacy education, contributing to the expansion of pharmacy and public health practice, the fulfillment of institutional missions, and the meeting of programmatic needs. The 2023-2024 Strategic Engagement Committee was charged with operationalizing advocacy champions, creating an advocacy resource guide to support advocacy champions in their engagement with diverse public and private stakeholders, offering formal training to advocacy champions in the form of a new connect community and webinar series, and conducting focus groups at the 2024 Annual Meeting to determine strengths of the advocacy guide and opportunities to support advocacy champions further.

Prescriber and employee utilization of a health sciences center campus outpatient pharmacy: A qualitative analysis.

PURPOSE: The college of pharmacy has operated pharmacies on campus for over 26 years. Employees and patients are users of the pharmacies; however, utilization across the campus has been limited. This paper describes a process, as well as results, that was used to gather input from employees on a large university health sciences center campus on pharmacy needs and related behaviors on campus pharmacy utilization. METHODS: Two focus groups of staff and 4 focus groups of prescribers were conducted over 1 month. Participants were selected through purposive sampling via email within an academic health sciences center campus over a 1-month period. The sessions were moderated by one investigator using a preconstructed discussion guide and lasted 1 hour. Two additional investigators observed sessions for nonverbal communication; all sessions were audio recorded for subsequent transcription. An open-coding process was performed on verbatim transcripts using NVivo12. The investigator team then developed, refined, and grouped themes during subsequent group discussions. RESULTS: A total of 44 participants took part in 6 focus groups. Participants included prescribers (physicians, nurses, physician assistants) and staff (nonprescribers). Two major themes identified were (1) factors related to on-campus pharmacies and (2) qualities valued in a pharmacy. There was an equal split (8% for each group) on awareness of the on-campus pharmacies. Almost 11% of participants commented on the accessibility of a pharmacy being a quality valued in a pharmacy. CONCLUSION: Focus groups provided insights for the administration team regarding additional value-added services that would be helpful for the campus community, as well as various approaches to increase utilization of the on-campus pharmacies. Focus group methodology is an effective approach to engage employees of a large university campus to garner new ideas to enhance existing policies or services, as well as to gather thoughts on preliminary strategic plans before implementation.

The Report of the 2021-2022 Professional Affairs Standing Committee: Resource Guide for the Integration of Clinical Pharmacy Faculty in Professional Practice Settings.

The 2021-22 Professional Affairs Committee was charged to (1) Develop a resource guide for member institutions and faculty regarding payment for the practice-related activities of pharmacy faculty; (2) Nominate at least one person for an elected AACP or Council Office; and (3) Consider ways that AACP can improve its financial health. This report describes the methodology and content utilized for the development of an online resource guide for member institutions, faculty, and practice sites regarding the integration of clinical faculties' patient care services into patient care settings, including models for payment and value-based payment structures that can be utilized to support the practice-related activities of faculty. The committee offers a revision to a current association policy statement, a proposed policy statement as well as recommendations to AACP and suggestions to colleges and schools of pharmacy pertaining to the committee charges.

Appropriateness of Term Limits for Administrative Appointments in Pharmacy Programs.

The appropriateness of term limits for administrative appointments is a subject of much discussion, not just within pharmacy programs, but in organizations of all types. The prospect of term limits for involves a wide variety of important organizational issues, including succession planning, institutional memory, strategic decision-making, and concepts regarding leadership styles overall. This paper examines both sides of the debate regarding the appropriateness of term limits for administrative appointments. Arguments supporting term limits include the ability for strategic changes in the diversity of leaders as well as a more focused effort on continuous quality improvement. The arguments against term limits focus around the need for stability and the time involved in the development of effective leaders.

Student agreement regarding adequacy of didactic content and practical experiences of vaccination clinic business operations.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To report student perceived adequacy regarding didactic content and practical experiences of vaccination clinic business operations. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: Didactic content, a case study, and practical experiences regarding vaccination clinic business operations were implemented in related lectures of a Pharmacy Business and Entrepreneurship (PBE) elective and the college of pharmacy sponsored vaccination clinics. An online survey was used to evaluate student perceived adequacy of didactic content and practical experiences of vaccination clinic business operations. FINDINGS: Mean scaled agreement was compared between students in the PBE elective versus those not in the elective. Student confidence in performing business operations was also assessed. Students in the PBE had higher mean confidence than non-elective students regarding staff management (3.23 vs. 2.73, p = 0.04). SUMMARY: Success of the interventions may be attributed to students in the PBE elective that reported a higher mean perceived adequacy of content and practical experiences and confidence in performing nearly all business operations. Still, further evaluation of interventions is being considered to assess effectiveness of learning.

Cystic fibrosis-related education: Are we meeting patient and caregiver expectations?

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to improve patient education in clinic by evaluating patient perceptions of education provided, as well as patient self-confidence related to topics within cystic fibrosis (CF). The study assessed whether self-confidence matched knowledge and defined patient-specific goals for education timing and information sources. METHODS: Age specific questionnaires were distributed over four months to patients 11 years of age and older and caregivers of patients of all ages at a single CF Foundation accredited care center. RESULTS: Participants reported frequent education on all topics except for reproductive effects of CF and mental health. A positive correlation was seen between overall confidence in CF-related knowledge and performance on a validated knowledge scale in adolescent caregivers only. Participants expected all educational milestones to be met by 13-14 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: Gaps in CF education remain and educational models should deliver information by the early teens without overlooking reproductive effects and mental health. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The educational model for CF clinics should become more comprehensive by including education on topics such as mental health and reproductive effects. Providers are an important pathway for information and should not disregard the value of education provided during clinic visits.

Assessing guideline-concordant prescribing for community-acquired pneumonia.

Background Current reports of outpatient antimicrobial prescribing practices may overestimate guideline concordance since they address only drug selection. Appropriate stewardship should consider all prescribing criteria (i.e., dose, frequency, duration, and route of administration) to fully assess guideline concordance. Objective Using a community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) example, the aims of this pilot study were to estimate guideline concordance in adult patients 18 years or older when all prescribing criteria are considered, and provide recommendations to optimize treatment. Specific objectives were to determine which medications were most commonly prescribed for high-and low-risk patients, respectively, and determine if prescription parameters typically meet guideline recommendations. Methods This historical (retrospective) chart review at a large, non-emergent, outpatient academic practice included adult cases of CAP identified by ICD-9 codes, 481.x-486.x, 480.x and 487.x, diagnosed between July 1, 2014 and June 30, 2015. Patients were stratified into low- or high-risk categories based on presence of comorbidities and recent antibiotic use. Descriptive statistics were used to profile the sample and estimate aggregate guideline appropriateness, based on Infectious Disease Society of America/American Thoracic Society guidelines. Cases that were not prescribed an antibiotic at the index visit were excluded from assessment of concordance. Results Of the 101 total episodes identified, 49% were treated with an antibiotic. Of the 45 cases that met low-risk criteria, seven of the 24 treated cases (29%) received an appropriate antibiotic. When considering all prescription elements, all seven cases were congruent, for a composite concordance rate of 29%. Of the 56 cases that met high-risk criteria, 13 of the 25 treated cases (52%) received an appropriate antibiotic, although two cases were prescribed a suboptimal dose, and one case was prescribed a suboptimal duration, dropping composite concordance to 40%. Overall, prescribing was concordant in 17 of the 49 treated cases (35%). Conclusion Concordance with current guidelines in this local sample is suboptimal. In the low-risk group, when the correct medication was chosen, dose, duration, and frequency were appropriate. Consideration of dose and duration of treatment decreased the rate of concordant prescribing in the high-risk group.

A literacy-sensitive approach to improving antibiotic understanding in a community-based setting.

OBJECTIVE: Antibiotic misuse contributes to antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections. Patient and prescriber knowledge and behaviors influence antibiotic use. Past research has focused on describing and influencing prescriber behavior with less attention to the patient role in antibiotic use. This study seeks to: (1) develop and deploy a program to enhance patient knowledge about antibiotic use; (2) evaluate whether providing patient education is associated with improvements in antibiotic knowledge in a community-based sample; and (3) explore whether health literacy may be associated with knowledge of appropriate antibiotic use. METHOD: This study developed, deployed, and evaluated whether community-based educational seminars enhance patient knowledge about antibiotic use. KEY FINDINGS: Twenty-eight participants from five locations completed the seminar. The antibiotic knowledge index score significantly increased by 2.0 points on the 14 point knowledge index from 10.95 (±2.88) to 12.95 (±1.72) (P = 0.0011) for the 19 participants completing both the pre and post-test. CONCLUSION: A community-based educational seminar on appropriate antibiotic use can effectively increase patient understanding of their role in antibiotic stewardship and combat the inappropriate use of antibiotics.

Barriers to Patient Use of Control Solution for Glucose Meters: Surveys of Patients, Pharmacists, and Providers in a Metropolitan Area.

BACKGROUND: An important factor in controlling diabetes is self-monitoring of blood glucose. Manufacturers of glucose meters recommend routine use of control solution to ensure accuracy. Previous studies have demonstrated that glucose meters vary in accuracy and that patients are not using control solution as recommended. The purpose of this study is to identify potential barriers to control solution use from multiple perspectives including patient, pharmacist, and provider. METHODS: This study was a prospective, observational survey design. First, 25 randomly selected chain and independent pharmacies in the Tulsa metropolitan area were audited for control solution accessibility. These pharmacies were then used to survey pharmacists, via telephone, regarding control solution inventory and perception of importance of use. Next, providers were electronically surveyed on their routine practice recommendations, while 60 patients with diabetes were randomly selected for telephone survey on use and perceptions of control solution. RESULTS: Twenty-five pharmacies were audited and 23 pharmacists, 60 patients, and 29 providers were surveyed. Only 39% of pharmacies stated they supplied control solution, however, only 1 pharmacy visibly stocked it. The only patient factor that appeared to have an impact on control solution usage was having type 1 versus type 2 diabetes (38% vs 15%). Providers are aware of what control solution is (62%), but only half felt it should be routine practice with 44% of those never recommending it. CONCLUSION: This study raises awareness for the need to educate patients, providers, and pharmacists about use of control solution to ensure glucose meter accuracy.

Validation of a survey tool assessing effectiveness of an educational intervention on the caring behaviors and referral activities of community pharmacists for migraineurs.

BACKGROUND: Community pharmacists are in an ideal position to ameliorate migraineur under-consulting, under-diagnosis, and under-treatment. Contemporary education/training on developing therapeutic alliances with patients and in advanced pharmacotherapy may further motivate pharmacists to impact the care of migraineurs. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to assess pharmacists' perceptions of a migraine training program and their self-assessment of subsequent impact on patient care and to develop and assess a tool evaluating the impact of the training program from the patients' perspectives: (1) for patients diagnosed with migraines - identify perceptions of care by pharmacists who have undergone specialty training in migraine vs. pharmacists who have not; and (2) for patients with recurrent headaches and not diagnosed with migraines - identify perceptions of pharmacist effectiveness and thoroughness, after specialty training, to identify a potential migraine diagnosis and referral for advanced care vs. pharmacists that have not undergone specialty training. METHODS: This study employed a mixed method survey design using community pharmacies from the Tulsa, Oklahoma and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania greater metropolitan areas. Pharmacists from intervention pharmacies received specialty training on migraine and were surveyed on their current practices and about the education program. Approximately 1 month after the training, control and intervention pharmacists were surveyed on current practices. Additionally, patients from both pharmacies were surveyed to assess Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) and pharmacists' delivery of care derived from the Pharmacists' Care of Migraineurs Scale (PCMS). Surveys were handed out for a period of 3-months. RESULTS: There were 16 pharmacists and 61 patients recruited. There was no difference in patient perceptions of pharmacists' care or in patient self-perceptions between migraineurs and recurrent headache sufferers. Ninety-two percent of pharmacists agreed that the program could be transferred to an internet-based educational program. The 14-item patient survey, however, demonstrated good internal consistency reliability, with each question having a Cronbach's alpha 0.80 or higher. CONCLUSIONS: There are few studies evaluating the role and potential impact community pharmacists can have on patients suffering from migraines or recurrent headaches. While no difference was found between the groups, the internal reliability of the survey questions and the need to address needs of migraineurs warrants tool dissemination and a larger-scale study.

Identifying opportunities to improve medication management in transitions of care.

PURPOSE: The types and causes of medication discrepancies during the transition from inpatient to ambulatory care were investigated. METHODS: A descriptive study was conducted at an academic outpatient group practice affiliated with a private nonacademic hospital to (1) describe discrepancies between inpatient discharge summaries and patient-reported medication lists, (2) identify patient and system factors related to breakdowns in medication documentation, and (3) determine reasons for medication discrepancies. During a four-month period, 17 patients at high risk for medication misadventures while transitioning from hospital care to outpatient follow-up were contacted by telephone soon after discharge and asked to provide information on all medications they were taking. Patient-reported medication lists were compared with the corresponding discharge summaries, and medication discrepancies were categorized by patient- and system-level factors using a validated instrument. RESULTS: Of the total of 96 discrepancies identified, more than two thirds (n = 67, 68%) involved the omission of a prescribed medication from either the patient-reported list or the discharge summary. Cardiovascular medications, including antihypertensives, antilipemics, diuretics, and antiarrhythmics, accounted for almost one quarter of all medication discrepancies. About 15% (n = 14) and 16% (n = 15) of identified discrepancies related to medication dose and frequency, respectively. CONCLUSION: Among 17 patients transitioning from inpatient to outpatient care, nearly 100 discrepancies between patient-reported medication lists and discharge summaries were identified. Most discrepancies were attributed to nonintentional nonadherence and resumption of home medications without instructions to do so. All 17 patients had at least 1 medication discrepancy categorized as involving a system-level factor.

What is the Role of the Pharmacist in Obesity Management?

Obesity rates have increased over the last two decades. Based on NHANES data, 68.8 % of US adults are classified as overweight or obese. Obesity increases the risk of diseases and can contribute to increased morbidity and mortality. This review examines studies published in which pharmacists have provided weight management services alone or in a team. The electronic databases OVID Medline, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts and EMBASE (1946-2014) were searched. Nine articles were identified in which pharmacists delivered a weight management service either alone or in a team, and eight studies collected outcomes. Six studies evaluated the participant's weight loss or satisfaction with the service, and two studies evaluated weight loss associated with a meal-replacement program. The outcomes from these studies are limited and while positive, have failed to provide significant evidence of the impact of pharmacists providing these services. More randomized, controlled trials are needed to document weight management services.