RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The minimally invasive UroLift® System procedure in moderate-to-severe benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) refractory to medical treatment may be superior over other prostate procedures regarding its preserved sexual function post-operatively. We aimed to optimise patient selection criteria for the UroLift® System. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-one men that underwent UroLift® System surgery were retrospectively reviewed over >24 months. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of UroLift® System, pre-operatively and at three, six, 12, and 24 months post-operatively, assessing the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPPS), urinary flow rates (Qmax), post void residual (PVR) bladder scan volumes and the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). Adverse events were assessed by Clavien-Dindo Classification. RESULTS: The 51 men undergoing UroLift® System had a success rate of 92.2% over 2 years, with improvements in Qmax, IPSS and PVR. IIEF was preserved in all cases. Adverse events were Clavien-Dindo grade 1, most commonly mild-to-severe dysuria (19.6%), and resolved spontaneously. Four patients failed to improve. CONCLUSION: Patient-related selection criteria to optimise the UroLift® System clinical outcomes include age, Qmax, PVR urine, median lobe, PSA levels, prostate volume, IPSS and IIEF scores. The UroLift® System is safe and effective in moderate-to-severe BPH refractory to pharmacological treatments and avoids retrograde ejaculation.
Assuntos
Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior , Hiperplasia Prostática , Sistema Urinário , Humanos , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/diagnóstico , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/etiologia , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/cirurgia , Masculino , Seleção de Pacientes , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We investigated the surgical feasibility, safety and effectiveness of 50 W (low power) Holmium Laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in patients who have undergone previous template biopsy of the prostate (TPB). METHODS: Data encompassing pre-operative baseline characteristics, intra-operative measures and post-operative outcomes was collected for 109 patients undergoing HoLEP across two UK centres. Patients were stratified into two groups; group 1 (n = 24) had undergone previous TPB were compared with 'controls' (no previous TPB) in group 2 (n = 85). The primary outcome was successful HoLEP. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in either key baseline characteristics or mass of prostate enucleated between groups 1 and 2. There was no statistically significant difference in enucleation or morcellation times parameters between the two groups other than enucleation efficiency in favour of group 1 (p = 0.024). Functional outcomes improved, without any statistically significant difference, in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a previous TPB, HoLEP is surgically feasible, safe and effective. TPB should not be considered a contraindication to HoLEP. Our work provides a strong foundation for further research in this area.
Assuntos
Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Próstata/patologia , Próstata/cirurgia , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Idoso , Biópsia/métodos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos de Viabilidade , Humanos , Lasers de Estado Sólido/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Períneo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The ureter is an extremely rare site for small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. We present a case of this disease in a patient who presented without urological symptoms. The multidisciplinary team proposed nephroureterectomy (if fit) or watchful waiting as management. After discussion with the patient a decision in favour of watchful waiting was made. We report her case including a review of the literature, and emphasise that although small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas can be very aggressive, they can remain asymptomatic.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Neuroendócrino/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Pequenas/diagnóstico , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ureterais/diagnóstico , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma Neuroendócrino/complicações , Carcinoma de Células Pequenas/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Achados Incidentais , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/etiologia , Ureter/patologia , Neoplasias Ureterais/complicaçõesRESUMO
A previously healthy 61-year-old Caucasian woman presented to the emergency department after collapsing at home with associated abdominal pain radiating to her back. An urgent CT angiogram was requested to rule out a ruptured aortic aneurysm. This showed a large 21 cm fat-containing lesion arising from the mid-pole of the left kidney, with an adjacent 4 cm perirenal haematoma. An initial diagnosis of a ruptured angiomyolipoma was made. Her haemoglobin was 105 g/L, with a creatinine of 104 mmol/L and an eGFR of 47 mL/min. Her clotting profile was normal. Following resuscitation, she was taken to the operating room and underwent an emergency open left radical nephrectomy via a left flank incision. Her recovery was uneventful and she was discharged home after 6 days. The histopathology confirmed a well-differentiated liposarcoma.