RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Learning Environment (LE) influences the performance of students, learning, social life, mental health, and the future of work. AIM: To assess the learning environment (LE) among medical residents of 64 specialties. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two validated instruments "Postgraduate Hospital Education Environment Measure" (PHEEM) and "Ambulatory Care Learning Educational Environment" (ACLEEM), and open questions were answered online by 1259 residents from 15 universities. A descriptive and analytical statistical analysis and semantic deductive-inductive analyses of open questions were performed. RESULTS: LE was positive rather than negative (PHEEM of 100.5 points (79-116) and ACLEEM of 138.5 points (120-157)). An age over 32 years, male sex, studying in a private university, being in first year of residence and being in a non-surgical specialty were associated with a better PHEEM score (p < 0.05). For ACLEEM, the first year of specialty, a non-surgical specialty and studying in a private university were associated with better scores (p < 0.05). Two programs had excellent LE (Pathological Anatomy and Ophthalmology) and no specialty had a very poor performance or many problems. Aspects of teaching, clinical activities, and teachers were strengths reported by students. Aspects to improve were teaching, protected times and clinical activities. CONCLUSIONS: LE among medical specialties had more positive than negative features, but with areas that should be improved.
Assuntos
Internato e Residência , Medicina , Adulto , Chile , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Hospitais de Ensino , Humanos , Masculino , Percepção , Inquéritos e Questionários , UniversidadesRESUMO
Acute appendicitis in the pediatric population is a pathology of heterogeneous presentation that is currently diagnosed using various criteria or predictive scales, which have proven not to be sufficiently accurate to be standardized, however, methods have been created to establish a more accurate diagnosis, an aspect that has been provided by artificial intelligence, which through different algorithms has the ability to show the patient's condition and the most appropriate intervention for this, thus reducing the rate of unnecessary interventions and therefore possible related complications.
La apendicitis aguda en la población pediátrica es una patología de presentación heterogénea que es diagnósticada actualmente mediante diversos criterios o escalas predictivas, que han demostrado no ser lo suficientemente precisas para ser estandarizadas, sin embargo, se han creado métodos que permitan establecer un diagnóstico más preciso, aspecto que ha sido proporcionado por la inteligencia artificial, la cual mediante diferentes algoritmos cuenta con la capacidad de arrojar cuál es el estado del paciente y la intervención más adecuada para este, disminuyendo así la tasa de intervenciones inecesarias y por ende posibles complicaciones relacionadas.
Assuntos
Apendicite , Criança , Humanos , Pré-Escolar , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Learning Environment (LE) influences the performance of students, learning, social life, mental health, and the future of work. Aim: To assess the learning environment (LE) among medical residents of 64 specialties. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two validated instruments "Postgraduate Hospital Education Environment Measure" (PHEEM) and "Ambulatory Care Learning Educational Environment" (ACLEEM), and open questions were answered online by 1259 residents from 15 universities. A descriptive and analytical statistical analysis and semantic deductive-inductive analyses of open questions were performed. Results: LE was positive rather than negative (PHEEM of 100.5 points (79-116) and ACLEEM of 138.5 points (120-157)). An age over 32 years, male sex, studying in a private university, being in first year of residence and being in a non-surgical specialty were associated with a better PHEEM score (p < 0.05). For ACLEEM, the first year of specialty, a non-surgical specialty and studying in a private university were associated with better scores (p < 0.05). Two programs had excellent LE (Pathological Anatomy and Ophthalmology) and no specialty had a very poor performance or many problems. Aspects of teaching, clinical activities, and teachers were strengths reported by students. Aspects to improve were teaching, protected times and clinical activities. CONCLUSIONS: LE among medical specialties had more positive than negative features, but with areas that should be improved.