Real world comparison of the MGuard Stent versus the bare metal stent for ST elevation myocardial infarction (the REWARD-MI study).

AIM: The MGuard Stent (MGS) was designed to prevent distal embolization of thrombus and has been shown to improve microcirculation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, there are no real world data comparing it with the bare metal stent (BMS). The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of the MGS in STEMI in the real world compared to the BMS. METHODS AND RESULTS: In total, 262 patients were included from a single centre, of which 35.9% had an MGS implanted. Two groups of 79 patients were established after propensity score matching, and they were similar in terms of baseline and periprocedural variables. The mean follow-up was 321 ± 12.94 days. There was no difference in mortality (7.6% in both groups), major adverse cardiac events (20.3% vs. 12.7%, P = 0.198), non-cardiac mortality, or non-fatal myocardial infarction (6.3% in both groups). Target lesion revascularization (TLR) was significantly higher in the MGS group (11.4% (9) vs. 1.3% (1) P < 0.01; RR 10.02 [1.23-81.16]). CONCLUSION: Our study is the first to compare the MGS with the BMS in STEMI in the real world, and it also appears to confirm that although the MGS is a safe device in STEMI that is not associated with increased mortality, it is associated with a higher long-term TLR rate. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Mehran contrast nephropathy risk score: Is it still useful 10 years later?

BACKGROUND: Nowadays, contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is the third cause of acquired acute renal impairment in hospital. CIN is related to increased in-hospital morbidity, mortality, costs of medical care, and long admissions. Because of this, we hypothesized it would be useful to determine the risk of CIN with scores such as the Mehran score. The aim of this study was to validate the Mehran score in a contemporary cohort of Spanish patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: We assessed the calibration and discriminatory capacity of Mehran score to predict CIN in a cohort of 1520 patients with a definitive diagnosis of ACS and who underwent coronary angiography between March 2008 and June 2012. We excluded patients on chronic dialysis and those without data of contrast volume. The calibration of the model was assessed with the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test and discriminatory capacity was assessed by C-statistic, which is equivalent to the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: From the total group, 118 patients (7.8%) developed CIN. They were older, with higher rates of diabetes (DM) and hypertension and worse renal function and anemia (p<0.001). The odds ratios for different score components in Mehran's population versus our study were similar except for DM, hypotension, and intra-aortic balloon pump (1.6%, 2.68%, 2.55% vs 0.9%, 1.89%, and 2.86%, respectively). Calibration and discriminatory capacity of Mehran score were excellent with a Hosmer-Lemeshow p=0.7, C-statistic value >0.8. CONCLUSIONS: Mehran risk score has been validated in our study as a good score for predicting CIN in patients with ACS who underwent coronary angiography. According to this, we support its use in patients hospitalized for ACS in order to identify the ones at risk, and to optimize CIN prophylactic therapy prior to and after catheterization.

[Myocardial injury caused by reperfusion]. / Daño miocárdico por reperfusión.

Arterial coronary occlusion produces ischaemic changes, and alter the aerobic metabolism, creatinephosphate depletion and accumulation of anoxic metabolites in the ischaemic tissue, with an alteration in the calcium regulation. With the recovery of the blood flow, the myocardial ischaemic injury and infarct zone are diminished, leading to an improvement of survival. The adverse effect induced by the reperfusion of ischaemic cells with the production of free radicals and dearrangements in the glucose metabolism, fatty acids and intracellular calcium flow as well, has been proven. There are 4 kinds of reperfusion damage: stunned myocardium, reperfusion arrhythmia, no-reflow phenomena, and cellular death, all of them with a particular physiopathology. Nowadays, there are too many paraclinics in order to reach a diagnosis, and perhaps the only available treatment is still under research. This field has great expectancy in the future. In this article, some of the contemporary concepts are reviewed.

Proceso de remodelado arterial negativo tras cateterización transradial / Negative arterial remodeling after transradial catheterisation

No disponible