Reconsideration of three screening tests for dysphagia in patients with cerebrovascular disease performed by non-expert examiners.

Dysphagia prevalence has increased with increasing elderly population worldwide. Therefore, early detection of dysphagia has become increasingly important. Repetitive saliva swallowing test (RSST), modified water swallowing test (MWST), and cervical auscultation, which are convenient for non-experts to assess eating and swallowing and have been frequently used in Japan since 20 years. Using aspiration and pharyngeal residues, the objective of this study was to elucidate the efficacy of the three screening tests performed by non-experts in patients who had swallowing disorders. In total, 102 patients with cerebrovascular diseases who were suspected of having dysphagia were assessed. A swallowing team assessed their swallowing capabilities; videofluoroscopy and screening tests were performed. RSST, MWST, and cervical auscultation were performed by junior dentists who were non-experts in dysphagia. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio in each examination were evaluated using results of aspiration in videofluoroscopy and pharyngeal residues. For aspiration, the highest sensitivity with cervical auscultation (VES) was 93.7%. For pharyngeal residue, the highest sensitivity with cervical auscultation (VES) was 84.3%. For piriform sinus residue, the highest sensitivity with cervical auscultation (VES) was 86.4%. Despite being evaluated by a non-expert, the sensitivity of cervical auscultation (VES) and MWST was ≥ 80%, suggesting their effectiveness as prescreening tests, although the range of specificity was 25.5-68.4% in all examinations. These tests are easy to perform and useful to screen for aspiration or pharyngeal residues before precision tests.

Relationship between age and sex and the numbers of ingestions and swallows for foods of different textures among healthy adults.

BACKGROUND: The number of swallows needed per single ingestion of food is an important index when assisting a patient with dysphagia in eating. While providing meal assistance, the caregiver may assume that one ingestion is completed with one swallow and then may administer the next ingestion even if the individual's mouth still has remaining food from the previous ingestions, increasing the risk for aspiration and choking. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this pilot study was to clarify the differences in foods ingested and swallowed because of influencing factors such as age and gender among healthy adults. METHODS: The study enrolled 110 healthy adults (47.4 ± 15.8 years; 57 males, 53 females). The numbers of ingestions and swallows were counted and evaluated by food type (pilaf, 100 g; yogurt 80 g; and sponge cake, 35 g) and participant age and sex and analyzed by least-squares multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: The mean numbers of ingestion/swallows were pilaf, 12.5 ± 3.2/13.4 ± 4.2; yogurt, 8.8 ± 2.1/10.8 ± 2.1; and sponge cake, 5.8 ± 2.1/7.0 ± 2.1. The mean number of ingestions and swallows for all foods were higher for female participants compared with male participants. Statistical analysis identified sex as a significant influencing factor for the number of ingestion for all foods. For the number of swallows, the significant influencing factors were sex for sponge cake and age for pilaf and yogurt. CONCLUSION: For the test foods of different textures, sex and age were significant influencing factors for the numbers of ingestions and swallows. Further research is needed to elucidate the problem areas in this pilot study.