Pretransplantation predictors of survival in nonremission acute myeloid leukemia treated with haploidentical transplantation using steroid-based GVHD prophylaxis.

Haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) using glucocorticoids for acute graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis (GC-haplo) may become a curative treatment option for nonremission acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This retrospective study aimed to identify pre-HCT predictors of survival in a cohort of 97 nonremission AML treated with GC-haplo in Hyogo Medical University Hospital between 2010 and 2020. Relapse and primary induction failure included in 70 (72%) and 27 (28%) patients, respectively. Sixty-one patients (63%) had undergone previous HCT. Multivariate analysis revealed that ≤ 6 months' duration between first complete remission (CR1) and first relapse (Rel1) (CR1-Rel1 interval) (hazard ratio 2.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-3.89, P = 0.016) and serum albumin before starting the conditioning treatment of ≤ 3.5 g/dL (hazard ratio 1.80, 95%CI 1.09-2.96, P = 0.022) as risk factors for overall survival. Among three groups categorized according to serum albumin and CR1-Rel1 interval, the best 3-year overall survival was observed in patients with albumin > 3.5 g/dL and CR1-Rel1 interval > 6 months or primary induction failure (50.2%, 95%CI 28.9%-68.3%, P < 0.001), revealing that survival could be predicted using albumin and past CR duration in patients with very high-risk AML not in remission before GC-haplo.

Donor-derived cytomegalovirus-specific CD8+ T cells restricted to shared, donor-specific, or host-specific HLA after HLA mismatched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Immune reconstitution after human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched (haploidentical) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) can significantly influence long-term outcomes. The three possible HLA haplotypes after transplantation are: one carried by both the patient and the donor (shared HLA), one by donor only (donor-specific HLA), and one by patient only (host-specific HLA), and the donor T cells remain restricted to one of these three haplotypes. Understanding the presence of donor T cells restricted to each haplotype may provide more detailed insights into post-transplant immune response and potentially provide valuable information for the development of chimeric antigen receptor T cell or T cell receptor T cell constructs. In this study, patients or donors with HLA-A24 or HLA-A2 were tested with HLA-A*24:02- and A*02:01-restricted cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific tetramers for detecting the respective HLA-restricted T cells. Sixty-four samples from 40 patients were assayed. More than half of the patients at day 90 and all patients by day 900 had shared HLA-restricted T cells. After day 90, half of the patients had donor-specific HLA-restricted T cells, but no host-specific HLA-restricted T cells were found. In the comparative analysis of the transplant types, shared HLA-restricted T cells were positive in all three categories: haplo-HCT (50%), 2-haplo-mis-HCT (75%), and spousal HCT (67%). Furthermore, donor-specific HLA-restricted T cells demonstrated positivity in haplo-HCT at 57% and in 2-haplo-mis-HCT at 60%, with a threshold of 0.01%. Donor-specific HLA-restricted T cells for spousal HCT were not examined due to the lack of an appropriate HLA combination for the tetramers. The presence of shared HLA-restricted T cells explains the host defense after HLA-haploidentical transplantation, while the presence of donor-specific HLA-restricted T cells may account for host defense against hematotropic viruses, such as CMV. However, this study failed to detect host-specific HLA-restricted T cells, leaving the host defense against epitheliotropic viruses unresolved, thus requiring further investigation.

C16, a PKR inhibitor, suppresses cell proliferation by regulating the cell cycle via p21 in colorectal cancer.

Double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase R (PKR) is highly expressed in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the role of PKR in CRC remains unclear. The aim of this study was to clarify whether C16 (a PKR inhibitor) exhibits antitumor effects and to identify its target pathway in CRC. We evaluated the effects of C16 on CRC cell lines using the MTS assay. Enrichment analysis was performed to identify the target pathway of C16. The cell cycle was analyzed using flow cytometry. Finally, we used immunohistochemistry to examine human CRC specimens. C16 suppressed the proliferation of CRC cells. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis revealed that the cell cycle-related GO category was substantially enriched in CRC cells treated with C16. C16 treatment resulted in G1 arrest and increased p21 protein and mRNA expression. Moreover, p21 expression was associated with CRC development as observed using immunohistochemical analysis of human CRC tissues. C16 upregulates p21 expression in CRC cells to regulate cell cycle and suppress tumor growth. Thus, PKR inhibitors may serve as a new treatment option for patients with CRC.

Ruxolitinib in steroid-refractory acute graft-vs-host disease: Japanese subgroup analysis of the randomized REACH2 trial.

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) is a major complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Japan and other countries. Nearly one-third of patients do not respond to standard systemic steroid therapy and no standard second-line treatment has been established in Japan. We report efficacy and safety findings of ruxolitinib versus best available therapy (BAT) from a subgroup analysis of the international, phase 3 REACH2 study in Japanese patients with steroid-refractory aGvHD. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) at day 28. Overall, 9 patients received ruxolitinib and 21 received BAT. The ORR at day 28 (88.9% vs 52.4%) and durable ORR at day 56 (66.7% vs 28.6%) were higher with ruxolitinib versus BAT. The estimated cumulative incidence of loss of response at 6 months was 12.5% with ruxolitinib and 18.2% with BAT. The median failure-free survival was longer with ruxolitinib versus BAT (2.73 vs 1.25 months). The most common adverse events up to day 28 in the ruxolitinib and BAT groups were anemia (55.6% vs 19.0%) and thrombocytopenia (44.4% vs 4.8%, respectively). Ruxolitinib showed better efficacy outcomes and a consistent safety profile compared with BAT in the Japanese subgroup, and the findings were consistent with overall study results.

Nilotinib vs. Dasatinib in Achieving MR4.5 for de novo Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: the Randomized JALSG CML212 Study.

Treatment-free remission (TFR) is a new therapeutic goal for chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). Deep molecular response (DMR) is a prerequite condition for TFR. The Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group (JALSG) conducted a multicentral prospective randomized phase 3 CML212 study for de novo CML-CP to compare the cumulative achievement of MR4.5 (international scale [IS] BCR::ABL1≤0.0032%) by 18 months between nilotinib and dasatinib as a primary endpoint. A total of 454 patients were randomly assigned to the nilotinib 300 mg, bid arm or dasatinib 100 mg, qd arm (both, n=227). BCR::ABL1 mRNA levels were monitored every three months. Study treatment was stopped if the patients were judged as failure by the European LekemiaNet (ELN) 2009 criteria or showed intolerance. The cumulative achievement rates of MR4.5 by 18 months were 32.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 26.5-39.1%) in the nilotinib arm and 30.8% (95% CI: 24.9-37.3%) in the dasatinib arm with no significant difference (p=0.66). Also, the cumulative achievement rates of early molecular response (EMR), complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR), MR4.0 by 12, 18, 24, and 36 months were almost the same between the two arms. At 36 months, 66.5% and 65.0% patients continued nilotinib and dasatinib, respectively (p=0.76). There was no significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) between the two arms by log-rank tests (PFS, p=0.58; OS, p=0.64). These results suggest that nilotinib and dasatinib would be equally effective for de novo CML-CP patients with similar continuity. UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (#UMIN000007909).

Long-term Use of Ibrutinib in Japanese Patients with Steroid Dependent/Refractory cGVHD: Final Analysis of Multicenter Study.

Background: Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a serious complication after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Poor prognosis has been shown in patients with cGVHD after the failure of primary steroid-based treatments. A previous report demonstrated the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib in these patients, leading to the approval of ibrutinib for cGVHD in Japan. Here, we report the extended follow-up of patients in this study. Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ibrutinib in Japanese patients with steroid-dependent or refractory cGVHD. Study Design: An open-label, single-arm, multicenter study of ibrutinib in Japanese patients with steroid-dependent or refractory cGVHD (NCT No.: NCT03474679; Clinical Registry No.: CR108443). Results: At the time of the final data cutoff, 7/19 (36.8%) patients completed the study treatment, and 12/19 (63.2%) patients discontinued ibrutinib. After a median follow-up of 31.11 months (range:1.9 to 38.6 months), the best overall response rate was 84.2% (16/19 patients; 95% CI:60.4%, 96.6%) in all treated populations, with a median time to response of 2.81 (range:1.0 to 27.6) months. Of 15 responders with ≥2 organs involved at baseline, seven (46.7%) had responses in multiple organs. An improvement in the organ response rate was observed for the skin, eye, mouth, and esophagus compared with that in a previous report. The rate of sustained response for ≥20 weeks, ≥32 weeks, and ≥44 weeks were 68.8%, 62.5%, and 50.0%, respectively for 16 responders. The median daily corticosteroid dose requirement tended to decrease over time for all treated analysis sets. Twelve of 19 patients (63.2%) reached a corticosteroid dose of <0.15 mg/kg/day for at least one week, and four (21.1%) discontinued corticosteroid treatment for at least 28 days during the study. The failure-free and overall survival rates at 30 months were 62.7% and 62.0%, respectively. The safety findings of this updated analysis were consistent with the safety profile observed at the time of the primary analysis and the known ibrutinib safety profile. Common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were pneumonia (6/19 [31.6%] patients), platelet count decreased, and cellulitis (3/19 [15.8%] patients each). After the primary analysis, no new TEAEs leading to death, treatment discontinuation, or dose reduction were reported, and no new patients reported major hemorrhage. Cardiac arrhythmia (Grade 2 atrial flutter) was reported in 1/19 (5.3%) patients. No new safety signs were observed despite prolonged ibrutinib exposure. Conclusions: The final results support previous conclusions, demonstrating a clinically meaningful response and acceptable safety profile of ibrutinib in Japanese patients with steroid-dependent or refractory cGVHD.