Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rare Tumors ; 12: 2036361320982813, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33425309

RESUMO

This study examines whether surgical resection of carotid body tumors (CBTs) is acceptable in light of potential significant neurologic complications. This IRB-approved retrospective study analyzed data from 24 patients undergoing surgical treatment for CBTs between April 1998 and April 2017 at Mayo Clinic (Florida campus only). For patients who underwent multiple CBT resections, only data from the first surgery was used in this analysis. CBT resection occurred in 24 patients with the following demographics: fourteen patients (58.3%) were female, median age was 56.5 years, median BMI was 29. A prior history of neoplasm was found in ten patients (41.7%). A known family history of paraganglioma was present in five patients (20.8%). Two patients were positive for succinate dehydrogenase mutation (8.3%). Multiple paragangliomas were present in seven patients (29.2%). There was nerve sacrifice in three patients (12.5%) during resection. Carotid artery reconstruction and patch angioplasty occurred in one patient (4.2%). Complete resection occurred in 24 patients (100.0%). Postoperatively, one patient (4.2%) suffered stroke. No mortalities occurred within or beyond 30 days of surgery. Persistent cranial nerve injury occurred in two patients (8.3%) with vocal cord paralysis. There was no recurrence of CBT through last follow-up. Five patients (20.8%) were diagnosed with other neoplasms after resection, including basal cell carcinoma, contralateral carotid body tumor, glomus vagale, and glomus jugulare. There was 100% survival at 1 year in patients followed for that time (n = 17). Surgical treatment remains the first-line curative treatment to relieve symptoms and ensure non-recurrence. While acceptable, neurologic complications are significant and therefore detailed preoperative informed consent is mandatory.

2.
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med ; 8(2): 137-43, 2006 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16533488

RESUMO

Acute mesenteric ischemia frequently results in bowel necrosis, which necessitates laparotomy to assess bowel viability. Reduction in mortality requires a high index of suspicion and prompt diagnosis. Bowel resection should be preceded by visceral artery revascularization. Medical management includes the use of anticoagulation, vasodilators, and the use of inhibitors of reperfusion injury. The management of chronic mesenteric ischemia largely depends on the general condition of the patient, who is often affected by malnutrition and dehydration. Surgery, although associated with greater morbidity and mortality, is more durable and effective in relieving the symptoms of chronic mesenteric ischemia. Endovascular treatment options for chronic mesenteric ischemia include percutaneous balloon angioplasty and stenting. This treatment is more likely to be successful in dealing with stenotic rather than occlusive lesions and offers a minimal invasive approach but is associated with a smaller primary success rate and a higher recurrence rate.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa