A Nationwide Study of the Delayed Diagnosis and the Clinical Manifestations of Predominantly Antibody Deficiencies and CTLA4-Mediated Immune Dysregulation Syndrome in Greece.

Background and Objectives: Predominantly antibody deficiencies (PAD) represent the most common type of primary immunodeficiencies in humans, characterized by a wide variation in disease onset, clinical manifestations, and outcome. Considering that the prevalence of PAD in Greece is unknown, and there is limited knowledge on the clinical and laboratory characteristics of affected patients, we conducted a nationwide study. Materials and Methods: 153 patients (male/female: 66/87; median age: 43.0 years; range: 7.0-77.0) diagnosed, and followed-up between August 1979 to September 2023. Furthermore, we classified our cohort into five groups according to their medical history, immunoglobulin levels, and CTLA4-mutational status: 123 had common variable immunodeficiency (CVID), 12 patients with "secondary" hypogammaglobulinemia due to a previous B-cell depletion immunotherapy for autoimmune or malignant disease several years ago (median: 9 years, range 6-14) displaying a typical CVID phenotype, 7 with combined IgA and IgG subclass deficiencies, 5 patients with CVID-like disease due to CTLA4-mediated immune dysregulation syndrome, and 6 patients with unclassified hypogammaglobulinemia. Results: We demonstrated a remarkable delay in PAD diagnosis, several years after the onset of related symptoms (median: 9.0 years, range: 0-43.0). A family history of PAD was only present in 11.8%, with the majority of patients considered sporadic cases. Most patients were diagnosed in the context of a diagnostic work-up for recurrent infections, or recurrent/resistant autoimmune cytopenias. Interestingly, 10 patients (5.6%) had no history of infection, diagnosed due to either recurrent/resistant autoimmunity, or during a work-up of their medical/family history. Remarkable findings included an increased prevalence of lymphoproliferation (60.1%), while 39 patients (25.5%) developed bronchiectasis, and 16 (10.5%) granulomatous disease. Cancer was a common complication in our cohort (25 patients, 16.3%), with B-cell malignancies representing the most common neoplasms (56.7%). Conclusion: Our findings indicate the necessity of awareness about PAD and their complications, aiming for early diagnosis and the appropriate management of affected patients.

Is there a role for low-dose eltrombopag as maintenance therapy in the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia?

BACKGROUND/AIM: Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (romiplostim and eltrombopag) have recently been licensed for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) with an insufficient response to corticosteroids, immunoglobulins or splenectomy. In the present case series, we present 4 nonresponding patients with chronic ITP who achieved maintenance of complete response (CR) for a period of at least 6 months on eltrombopag treatment administered in a modified regimen of 25 mg for 2, 3 or 5 days a week. METHODS: The present study is a retrospective, nonconsecutive case series of 4 eltrombopag-treated patients with chronic ITP. Secondary ITP had been excluded in each patient, first-line therapy had failed and splenectomy had been refused. Furthermore, each patient was treated with eltrombopag, which resulted in a CR for a mean of 2 months. Consequently, decreased eltrombopag dosages have been able to maintain long-term CR. RESULTS/CONCLUSION: Despite the low quality of evidence, our study results support the use of reduced-dose eltrombopag as a maintenance therapy after achieving CR. It seems a very promising strategy for the effective maintenance of response, improving health-related quality of life, lowering costs and possibly improving the safety in the treatment of ITP.

Intensity of Humoral Immune Responses, Adverse Reactions, and Post-Vaccination Morbidity after Adenovirus Vector-Based and mRNA Anti-COVID-19 Vaccines.

The aim of the study was to compare mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 with adenovirus vector- based vaccines in terms of presence of adverse reactions, immunogenicity, and protection against COVID-19. A total of 270 individuals were enrolled, of which 135 were vaccinated with adenovirus vector-based vaccines and compared with 135 age- and sex-matched participants who received the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. Serum sampling was performed on all participants on days 21, 42, 90, and 180 following the first dose, to evaluate anti-spike IgG and IgA responses. Antibodies were quantified by chemiluminescent microplate and ELISA assays. We demonstrate that both mRNA and adenovirus vector-based vaccines caused mild side-effects and were effective in inducing adequate antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2, although BNT162b2 was superior concerning the intensity of antibody responses and protection against severe COVID-19. Moreover, we identify that IgG and IgA responses depended primarily on both history of previous COVID-19 infection and vaccination platform used, with individuals immunized with a single-dose vaccine having lower antibody titers over time. Lastly, all vaccine platforms had limited side-effects, with the most frequent pain at the injection site. Our results provide useful information regarding antibody responses after vaccination with different vaccine platforms, which can be useful for public health vaccination strategies.

Intensity and Dynamics of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immune Responses after BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccination: Implications for Public Health Vaccination Strategies.

The aim of our study was to investigate the immunogenicity of the BNT162b2 vaccination according to the age and medical status of vaccinated individuals. A total of 511 individuals were enrolled (median age: 54.0 years, range: 19-105); 509 of these individuals (99.6%) received two doses of BNT162b2 at an interval of 21 days. IgG and IgA responses were evaluated on days 21, 42, 90, and 180 after the first dose with chemiluminescent microparticle and ELISA assays. The cell-mediated immune responses were assessed by an automated interferon-gamma release assay. We demonstrated positive antibody responses after vaccination for the majority of enrolled participants, although waning of IgG and IgA titers was also observed over time. We further observed that the intensity of humoral responses was positively correlated with increased age and prior COVID-19 infection (either before or after the first vaccination). Moreover, we found that only a medical history of autoimmune disease could affect the intensity of IgA and IgG responses (3 weeks after the primary and secondary immunization, respectively), while development of systemic adverse reactions after the second vaccination dose was significantly associated with the height of IgG responses. Finally, we identified a clear correlation between humoral and cellular responses, suggesting that the study of cellular responses is not required as a routine laboratory test after vaccination. Our results provide useful information about the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccination with significant implications for public health vaccination strategies.