Unilateral inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy in patients with early-stage vulvar squamous cell carcinoma and a unilateral metastatic sentinel lymph node is safe.

OBJECTIVE: Optimal management of the contralateral groin in patients with early-stage vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) and a metastatic unilateral inguinal sentinel lymph node (SN) is unclear. We analyzed patients who participated in GROINSS-V I or II to determine whether treatment of the contralateral groin can safely be omitted in patients with a unilateral metastatic SN. METHODS: We selected the patients with a unilateral metastatic SN from the GROINSS-V I and II databases. We determined the incidence of contralateral additional non-SN metastases in patients with unilateral SN-metastasis who underwent bilateral inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (IFL). In those who underwent only ipsilateral groin treatment or no further treatment, we determined the incidence of contralateral groin recurrences during follow-up. RESULTS: Of 1912 patients with early-stage VSCC, 366 had a unilateral metastatic SN. Subsequently, 244 had an IFL or no treatment of the contralateral groin. In seven patients (7/244; 2.9% [95% CI: 1.4%-5.8%]) disease was diagnosed in the contralateral groin: five had contralateral non-SN metastasis at IFL and two developed an isolated contralateral groin recurrence after no further treatment. Five of them had a primary tumor ≥30 mm. Bilateral radiotherapy was administered in 122 patients, of whom one (1/122; 0.8% [95% CI: 0.1%-4.5%]) had a contralateral groin recurrence. CONCLUSION: The risk of contralateral lymph node metastases in patients with early-stage VSCC and a unilateral metastatic SN is low. It appears safe to limit groin treatment to unilateral IFL or inguinofemoral radiotherapy in these cases.

Margin status revisited in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of local recurrence of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma in relation to tumor- and/or precursor lesion free pathologic margins. METHODS: Consecutive patients with primary vulvar squamous cell carcinoma surgically treated in two Dutch expert centers between 2000 and 2010 were included. All pathology slides were independently reviewed by two expert gynecopathologists, and local recurrence was defined as any recurrent disease located on the vulva. Time to first local recurrence was compared for different subgroups using univariable and multivariable Cox-regression analyses. RESULTS: In total 287 patients with a median follow-up of 80months (range 0-204) were analyzed. The actuarial local recurrence rate ten years after treatment was 42.5%. Pathologic tumor free margin distance did not influence the risk on local recurrence (HR 1.03 (95% CI 0.99-1.06)), neither using a cutoff of eight, five, or three millimeters. Multivariable analyses showed a higher local recurrence rate in patients with dVIN and LS in the margin (HR 2.76 (95% CI 1.62-4.71)), in patients with dVIN in the margin (HR 2.14 (95% CI 1.11-4.12)), and a FIGO stage II or higher (HR 1.62 (95% CI 1.05-2.48)). CONCLUSIONS: Local recurrences frequently occur in patients with primary vulvar carcinoma and are associated with dVIN (with or without LS) in the pathologic margin rather than any tumor free margin distance. Our results should lead to increased awareness among physicians of an ongoing risk for local recurrence and need for life-long follow-up. Intensified follow-up and treatment protocols for patients with dVIN in the margin should be evaluated in future research.

Sentinel nodes in vulvar cancer: Long-term follow-up of the GROningen INternational Study on Sentinel nodes in Vulvar cancer (GROINSS-V) I.

OBJECTIVE: In 2008 GROINSS-V-I, the largest validation trial on the sentinel node (SN) procedure in vulvar cancer, showed that application of the SN-procedure in patients with early-stage vulvar cancer is safe. The current study aimed to evaluate long-term follow-up of these patients regarding recurrences and survival. METHODS: From 2000 until 2006 GROINSS-V-I included 377 patients with unifocal squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva (T1, <4 cm), who underwent the SN-procedure. Only in case of SN metastases an inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy was performed. For the present study follow-up was completed until March 2015. RESULTS: Themedian follow-up was 105 months (range 0­179). The overall local recurrence ratewas 27.2% at 5 years and 39.5% at 10 years after primary treatment, while for SN-negative patients 24.6% and 36.4%, and for SN-positive patients 33.2% and 46.4% respectively (p = 0.03). In 39/253 SN-negative patients (15.4%) an inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy was performed, because of a local recurrence. Isolated groin recurrence rate was 2.5% for SN-negative patients and 8.0% for SN-positive patients at 5 years. Disease-specific 10-year survival was 91% for SN-negative patients compared to 65% for SN-positive patients (p b .0001). For all patients, 10-year disease-specific survival decreased from 90% for patients without to 69% for patients with a local recurrence (p b .0001).

Prognostic value of HPV-PCR, p16 and p53 immunohistochemical status on local recurrence rate and survival in patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma.

The primary aim of this study was to assess the association between human papilloma virus (HPV) and p53 expression and local recurrence (LR), disease specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC). Secondary, the accuracy of p16 immunohistochemistry for HPV status was assessed. The tumor tissue of 255 patients, surgically treated for primary unifocal VSCC between 2000 and 2010, was analyzed. HPV-PCR and P16 and p53 immunohistochemical stainings were performed. All histologic slides were independently reviewed by two expert gyneco-pathologists. Time to first LR, DSS, and OS for the variables p16, p53, and HPV-PCR were compared using univariable and multivariable Cox-regression analyses. In 211/255 (83.5%) patients, HPV-PCR was negative. The local recurrence rate was significantly lower in patients positive with HPV-PCR (10-year LR rate 24.6%) versus negative tumors (47.5%), p = 0.004. After multivariable analyses, this difference remained significant (HR 0.23 (95% CI 0.08-0.62) p = 0.004). There was no difference in LR rate correlated to the p53 expression. DSS and OS did not significantly differ after multivariable analyses for all different subgroups. Sensitivity and specificity of p16 staining for presence of HPV detected by HPV-PCR were 86.4% and 93.8%, respectively. In conclusion, patients with HPV-negative VSCCs have significantly more LR compared to patients with HPV-positive VSCCs, and p16 immunohistochemistry is a reliable surrogate marker for HPV status. No relevant subgroup for LR or survival based on HPV/p53 status could be identified. We advise to perform an HPV-PCR or p16 IHC staining in all patients with VSCC.

Identification of inguinofemoral lymph node metastases by methylation markers in vulvar cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Lymph node status in early-stage vulvar cancer can be accurately assessed by the sentinel-node (SN) procedure. Molecular techniques, such as DNA-methylation assay, might improve SN assessment. In this study, we selected methylation markers for vulvar cancer and determined if these methylation markers were suitable for lymph node assessment. METHODS: We performed methylation specific PCR on DNA isolated from primary tumors, metastatic lymph nodes, and negative lymph nodes from twenty vulvar cancer patients using the following genes: P16INK4a, MGMT, TWIST1, CADM1, TERT, and TFPI2. For P16INK4a and MGMT immunohistochemistry was performed on primary tumors and metastatic lymph nodes in order to explore intratumor heterogeneity in gene expression patterns. RESULTS: TERT was methylated in all vulvar cancers, P16INK4a in 13/20, TFPI2 in 12/20, CADM1 in 11/20, MGMT in 9/20, and TWIST1 in 7/20. A panel of three methylation markers (P16INK4a, TERT and TFPI2) reached a sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 100% for detection of metastatic lymph nodes. Immunohistochemistry showed intratumor heterogeneity for expression of P16INK4a and MGMT in respectively 55% and 45% of primary tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows methylation for one or more methylation markers in all vulvar cancers. Despite a specificity of 100% our panel of three methylation markers had only moderate sensitivity for metastatic lymph node detection, thereby limiting its applicability for lymph node assessment. Intratumor heterogeneity for expression of P16INK4a and MGMT may reflect intratumor heterogeneity for methylation patterns and thereby in general explain the moderate sensitivity of our marker panel for detection of metastases.

A comparison of quality of life between vulvar cancer patients after sentinel lymph node procedure only and inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy.

OBJECTIVES: The SLN-procedure has been introduced in vulvar cancer treatment to reduce morbidity and thereby improve quality of life. Aim of this study was to compare quality of life in vulvar cancer patients who were treated with a SLN-procedure only to those who underwent inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy. Moreover, it was evaluated what patients would advise relatives on the application of the SLN-procedure in light of possible false negative results. METHODS: Patients who participated in the GROningen INternational Study on Sentinel nodes in Vulvar cancer (GROINSS-V) were invited to fill out three questionnaires: the EORTC QLQ-C30, a vulvar specific questionnaire and a questionnaire about the opinion of patients on new treatment options. Patients who only underwent SLN-procedure were compared to those who subsequently underwent inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy because of a positive SLN. RESULTS: With a response rate of 85%, 35 patients after the SLN-procedure and 27 patients after inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy filled out the questionnaires. No difference in overall quality of life was observed between the two groups. The major difference was the increase in complaints of lymphedema of the legs after inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy. The majority of patients would advise the SLN-procedure to relatives. Patients after inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy were more reserved concerning the acceptable false negative rate of a new diagnostic procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent the SLN-procedure report less treatment related morbidity compared to those who underwent inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy. However, this did not influence overall quality of life. Furthermore, patients who underwent inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy are more reserved in advising the SLN-procedure to relatives.

Adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with vulvar cancer and one intra capsular lymph node metastasis is not beneficial.

AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of the study was to analyze the benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with vulvar cancer and a single positive node without extra capsular spread. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population comprised data of 75 patients with vulvar cancer and one lymph node metastasis. The patients were treated in three different university centers in Amsterdam, Groningen and Rotterdam between 1984 and 2005. RESULTS: Out of 75 patients, 31 (41%) were treated with adjuvant radiotherapy. Both disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were comparable between the groups who did and who did not receive adjuvant radiotherapy (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.45-2.14, p=0.97 and HR=1.02, 95% CI 0.42-2.47, p=0.96). CONCLUSION: We could not demonstrate any beneficial effect of adjuvant radiotherapy in the group of patients with one intra capsular metastasis.

[Diagnostic image (389). A woman with a multicystic vulvar mass]. / Diagnose in beeld (389). Een vrouw met een multicysteuze vulvazwelling.

A 28-year-old woman presented with a multicystic vulvar mass due to epidermal inclusion cysts, probably caused by trauma to the left labium minus at her last parturition.

Management of vulvar cancers.

AIM: The radical surgical approach in the treatment of vulvar cancer patients has led to a favorable prognosis for the majority of the patients with early stage squamous cell cancer. However, the morbidity is impressive, leading to more individualized treatment. The aim of this review is to give an overview of the management of vulvar cancer. METHODS: We have reviewed the literature on the modifications in treatment of vulvar cancer with the emphasis on surgery and radiotherapy for primary disease. RESULTS: While surgery is the cornerstone of treatment for early stage squamous cell vulvar cancer (with wide local excision and uni- or bilateral inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy via separate incisions as standard treatment), until now there has been a limited role for primary radiotherapy although this may be an attractive alternative for the inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy in the future. The sentinel lymph node procedure with the combined technique (preoperative lymphoscintigraphy with (99m)technetium-labeled nanocolloid and Patente Blue) is a promising staging technique for patients with vulvar cancer. The clinical implementation of the sentinel lymph node procedure and the role of additional histopathological techniques of the sentinel lymph nodes have to be investigated. In advanced vulvar cancer, chemoradiation followed by surgery should be regarded as the treatment of first choice for these patients. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the rarity of vulvar cancer it is quite clear that further studies will have to be performed by international collaborative groups. The sentinel lymph node procedure and primary radiotherapy are promising methods to reduce morbidity of treatment, but their safety needs to be studied in clinical trials.

[Diagnosis image (258). A women with a 'bullet' in the abdomen]. / Diagnose in beeld (258). Een vrouw met een 'kogel' in het abdomen.

A 48-year-old woman had 17 years after hysterosalpingography a collection of contrast fluid, suggesting a bullet, in the abdomen.

Sentinel node biopsy in vulvar cancer: Implications for staging.

In 2008, the first Groningen International Study on Sentinel nodes in Vulvar cancer (GROINSS-V) showed that omission of inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy is safe in patients with early-stage vulvar cancer and a negative sentinel node and it simultaneously decreases treatment-related morbidity. An important part of the sentinel node procedure is pathologic ultrastaging of the removed sentinel nodes. Subsequently, since the introduction of this procedure in the standard care of patients with early-stage vulvar cancer, more and smaller inguinofemoral lymph node metastases have been diagnosed. The clinical consequences of these micrometastases are not clear yet. With increasing size of the sentinel node metastasis, chances of non-sentinel node metastases increase and those of survival decrease. The size of lymph node metastases is included in the latest staging system for vulvar cancer, however at this moment without clinical implications. Furthermore, a separate category for micrometastases is not incorporated yet. More research is needed to determine the clinical consequences of the size of (sentinel) lymph node metastases.

EGFR expression is associated with groin node metastases in vulvar cancer, but does not improve their prediction.

OBJECTIVES: High morbidity of elective inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy in early stage vulvar cancer patients urges the need for defining a group of low-risk patients in whom inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy can be safely omitted. Aim of the study was to evaluate whether in addition to 'classic' clinicopathological factors determination of EGFR expression in vulvar cancer can be helpful in defining such a 'low-risk' group. METHODS: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue samples of 197 surgically treated T1/2 patients were collected in a Tissue Micro Array (TMA). On this TMA, immunohistochemistry for EGFR was performed. Logistic regression analyses were performed including histopathological characteristics with the presence of nodal metastases as outcome. A predictive model was constructed, and absolute risks were calculated. RESULTS: EGFR expression was present in 68% of the vulvar tumors and related to the presence of lymph node metastases (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.09-4.10). Our predictive model with only clinicopathological factors was able to define a group of patients with a likelihood of absence of lymph node metastases of 13% (95% CI 5-36), which could be decreased to 6% (95% CI 0-29) after inclusion of EGFR expression (p=0.07). CONCLUSIONS: EGFR expression is present in the majority of vulvar tumors and is associated with groin node metastases in vulvar cancer. Current classic clinicopathological predictive factors for inguinofemoral lymph node metastases with or without EGFR analysis are not strong enough for identification of "sufficiently low" risk T1/2 vulvar cancer patients. Our predictive model approach however is excellent for evaluation of new cell biological parameters, associated with clinical outcome.

Prediction of lymph node metastases in vulvar cancer: a review.

The aim of this study was to review the literature on currently available non- and minimally-invasive diagnostic methods and analysis of primary tumor characteristics for prediction of inguinofemoral lymph node metastases in patients with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. We used the English language literature in PubMed and reference lists from selected articles. Search terms included vulvar carcinoma, prognosis, lymph node metastases, ultrasound, computer tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, and sentinel lymph node. No study type restrictions were imposed. Currently no noninvasive imaging techniques exist that are able to predict lymph node metastases with a high enough negative predictive value. A depth of invasion < or =1 mm is the only histopathologic parameter that can exclude patients for complete inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy. No other clinicopathologic parameter allows exclusion of lymph node metastases with a high enough negative predictive value. The minimally invasive sentinel node procedure is a promising technique for selecting patients for complete lymphadenectomy, but its safety has not been proven yet.

Pitfalls in the sentinel lymph node procedure in vulvar cancer.

OBJECTIVES: There is an increasing interest among gynecologic oncologists to implement the sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure in vulvar cancer patients in clinical practice. However, the safety of this promising method of staging still has to be proven in a randomized trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two vulvar cancer patients are reported to illustrate pitfalls in the sentinel lymph node procedure. RESULTS: The phenomena of bypassing the sentinel lymph node and confusion about the number of removed sentinel lymph nodes are presented and discussed. CONCLUSION: Gynecological oncologists who perform the sentinel lymph node procedure in vulvar cancer patients should perform this technique by following a strict protocol and within the protection of a clinical trial.