Ten-year experience with early angioplasty in 759 patients with acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: How effective and safe is rescue percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty [PTCA] compared with primary PTCA, and is it cost effective? BACKGROUND: In acute myocardial infarction (AMI), primary PTCA has been shown to be beneficial in terms of clinical outcome. In contrast, the value of rescue PTCA has not been established. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, we compared the angiographic and clinical outcomes of 317 consecutive patients who had rescue PTCA approximately 90 min after failed thrombolysis and 442 patients treated with primary PTCA. An estimation of interventional costs was compared with the strategies of primary and rescue PTCA or with the strategy of thrombolysis with rescue PTCA, when indicated. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics between primary and rescue PTCA were comparable for most variables. Treatment delay was longer for patients who had rescue PTCA: 240 min. versus 195 min. Coronary patency after PTCA was comparable: 90.2% for rescue PTCA and 91.4% for primary PTCA (p = 0.67, power 71.9%). In-hospital mortality rates were 4.7% and 6.6%, respectively (p = 0.37). Also, the other complications were fairly similar during the in-hospital phase and during one-year follow-up. Predictors of death were age, infarct size, localization of AMI, failed PTCA and left main stem occlusion. The estimated interventional costs during one-year follow-up were $7,377 for primary PTCA and $8,246 for rescue PTCA: difference $869 (11.7%). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis of 759 patients with AMI, rescue angioplasty early after failed thrombolysis seems to be as effective and safe as primary PTCA. In the present evaluation, interventional costs of primary PTCA are less than those of rescue PTCA (p = 0.0001).

Relation of lactate production to postischaemic reduction in function and myocardial oxygen consumption after partial coronary occlusion in swine.

Postischaemic myocardial dysfunction (stunning) induced by partial occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery and its relation to lactate production during reperfusion were studied in nine swine. A 40% reduction in regional left ventricular wall thickening, as measured by ultrasonic crystals, was prospectively defined as stunning. A perfusion pressure of 20 mmHg was maintained with a hydraulic occluder for each ischaemic period and was monitored by a distal arterial catheter. To achieve a 40% reduction in function, four animals required three ischaemic periods (mean ischaemic flow reduction 73%), four two (86% flow reduction), and one one (93% flow reduction). At 25 min of reperfusion transmural flow was slightly reduced from 0.67 ml.g-1.min-1 at control to 0.58 ml.g-1.min-1 (p less than 0.05), whereas regional flow endocardial to epicardial flow ratio was unchanged. At 60 min reperfusion, percentage systolic wall thickening was reduced to 25% from a control of 39% (p less than 0.01) and parallel reductions in regional myocardial oxygen consumption from 4.3 ml.min-1 to 2.7 ml.min-1 occurred (p less than 0.01). Lactate extraction was depressed at 15 min reperfusion (-4.0% compared with control +18.0% (p less than 0.05)) but returned to control values by 30 min. It is concluded that postischaemic myocardial dysfunction (stunning) can be induced by partial coronary occlusions and that the extent of dysfunction depends on the degree of flow reduction. The reductions in myocardial oxygen consumption parallel those of wall thickening during reperfusion after stunning. Finally, lactate production occurs during early reperfusion but does not persist with the postischaemic reductions in function and myocardial oxygen consumption.

Traumatic tricuspid valve rupture with luxation of the heart.

Three patients are described with the combination of a luxation of the heart through a pericardial tear and traumatic rupture of the papillary muscle of the tricuspid valve. In only 1 patient was the dislocation of the heart suspected preoperatively. In all 3 patients operative treatment was performed with considerable delay after the accident; nevertheless, all 3 patients survived. In all cases treatment consisted of repositioning of the heart, closure of the pericardium, and valvular repair of the tricuspid valve.