Concept and contents of a voluntary course for medical students' achievement of a basic qualification in patient safety during the practical year of medical studies.

Objective: Regarding the urgent need of qualification in the field of patient safety, the respective education and training were completed by a voluntary course for 10-15 students in their practical year (PY) provided in cooperation of the private University Hospital of Marburg and the Medical Faculty of the Philipps-University of Marburg. At the same time, this course was intended to develop important knowledge for implementing improvements of the current PY teaching as well as revising the curriculum of Marburg in the medium term. Project description: The PY course on patient safety is offered every six months since 2016 and comprises about 80 lessons. It is based on the principles of shifting simple knowledge transfer to autonomous preparation by the students themselves, of revising already experienced situations of the professional routine, of working with real data of current patients of the PY students, of fostering teamwork, and of applying very deliberately a large combination of methods with numerous interactive types of teaching. The topics of those 13 course units include the majority of the most important problem categories of patient safety as reported in the literature such as communication, drug safety, diagnostic errors, and handovers as well as methods for systematic identification and analysis of errors. In the context of a project task, the students evaluate by means of the global trigger tool and 10 patient files of their current wards each if harm has occurred in the treatment of these patients. Afterwards, the students elaborate in teams of 2 a fishbone diagram for one case where an avoidable harm had emerged. In this graph, the deficient process, the factors contributing to its development, the safety measures that are already applied in the department as well as suggested improvements of the students are visualized. In the final lesson of the course, the students explain and describe their diagram to a member of the managing board of the university hospital. Successful participation is confirmed by an official certificate issued by the Medical Center for Quality in Medicine (Ärztliches Zentrum für Qualität in der Medizin) stating that the course meets the level II requirements ("Basic qualification") of the training concept on "patient safety" of the Germany medical staff. Results: After meanwhile 5 episodes of this course, the whole curriculum obtained a mean score of "very good" based on the standard questionnaire of the Medical Faculty of the University of Marburg. The students perceive an enormous increase in competence regarding the implementation of specific projects to improve patient safety. Furthermore, the intensive cooperation with the PY students led to conceiving and establishing further 7 PY courses for the benefit of patient safety and consolidation of entrustable professional activities. In combination with experiences gained elsewhere from courses on patient safety, the collected knowledge could be used for a first draft of teaching and education of patient safety during the entire clinical studies that takes into account the local conditions. Conclusion: In the process of anchoring the topic of patient safety in the Marburg curriculum of medical studies, the introduction of an extensive voluntary course in the second four months of the clinical internship (practical year) turned out to have a very positive effect. Supported by the management board of the hospital and the medical faculty, we consider it useful to permanently provide such an extensive course for a group of students who want to early and intensively deal with the topic of patient safety.

Towards responsive IT-infrastructures--assessment of a health information system.

Marburg University Medical Center has been introducing a comprehensive health information system since 1999, using a single-vendor application framework with an integrated generator tool for the development of clinical applications. To find out if this architecture and our participative software engineering approach can be considered a step towards a responsive infrastructure, we compared the situation after the first deployment phase (basically a holistic approach) with the situation after the system was further developed and adapted to the users' needs using the generator tool approach. We collected system statistics and conducted user satisfaction surveys in 2001/02 and 2003 using standardized measurements. The survey results showed that user involvement as well as system content were judged significantly higher after the second deployment phase. Insofar, we could demonstrate the feasibility of our approach. However, definite statements concerning the superiority of the generator tool approach to other concepts are not yet possible. We will continue our assessment, and we strongly suggest further studies in other institutions introducing comparable clinical functionality.