Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Japonês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29681599

RESUMO

Medical staffs like radiological technologists, doctors, and nurses are at an increased risk of exposure to radiation while assisting the patient in a position or monitor contrast medium injection during computed tomography (CT). However, methods to protect medical staff from radiation exposure and protocols for using radiological protection equipment have not been standardized and differ among hospitals. In this study, the distribution of scattered X-rays in a CT room was measured by placing electronic personal dosimeters in locations where medical staff stands beside the CT scanner gantry while assisting the patient and the exposure dose was measured. Moreover, we evaluated non-uniform exposure and revealed effective techniques to reduce the exposure dose to medical staff during CT. The dose of the scattered X-rays was the lowest at the gantry and at the examination table during both head and abdominal CT. The dose was the highest at the trunk of the upper body of the operator corresponding to a height of 130 cm during head CT and at the head corresponding to a height of 150 cm during abdominal CT. The maximum dose to the crystalline lens was approximately 600 µSv during head CT. We found that the use of volumetric CT scanning and X-ray protective goggles, and face direction toward the gantry reduced the exposure dose, particularly to the crystalline lens, for which lower equivalent dose during CT scan has been recently recommended in the International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 118.


Assuntos
Corpo Clínico , Exposição à Radiação , Proteção Radiológica/métodos , Tomógrafos Computadorizados , Humanos , Proteção Radiológica/instrumentação
2.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 175(2): 238-245, 2017 Jun 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27886993

RESUMO

To decrease radiation exposure to medical staff performing angiography, the dose distribution in the angiography was calculated in room using the particle and heavy ion transport code system (PHITS), which is based on Monte Carlo code, and the source of scattered radiation was confirmed using a tungsten sheet by considering the difference shielding performance among different sheet placements. Scattered radiation generated from a flat panel detector, X-ray tube and bed was calculated using the PHITS. In this experiment, the source of scattered radiation was identified as the phantom or acrylic window attached to the X-ray tube thus, a protection curtain was placed on the bed to shield against scattered radiation at low positions. There was an average difference of 20% between the measured and calculated values. The H*(10) value decreased after placing the sheet on the right side of the phantom. Thus, the curtain could decrease scattered radiation.


Assuntos
Angiografia , Doses de Radiação , Proteção Radiológica , Humanos , Método de Monte Carlo , Imagens de Fantasmas , Espalhamento de Radiação
3.
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi ; 59(7): 872-8, 2003 Jul.
Artigo em Japonês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12937409

RESUMO

In otorthinolaryngology, Stenvers' method is employed in radiography of the pyramid (internal acoustic meatus and semicircular canals). However, in cases of dizziness, where the prone position is difficult to achieve, we occasionally use the opposite Stenvers' method instead of the conventional one. This makes it possible to perform radiography with the patient in the supine position. Compared with the conventional Stenvers' method, the problems of this method were increases not only in the rate of magnification but also in lens dose. In this study, we evaluated these problems by employing computed tomography (CT) and a glass dosimeter with phantom as well as by clinical evaluation. The results showed no statistically significant difference between Stenvers' method and the opposite Stenvers' method in both the rate of magnification and the clinical evaluation. The increase in lens dose with the opposite Stenvers' method was not significant. We concluded that the opposite Stenvers' method was useful.


Assuntos
Orelha Interna/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Cristalino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Imagens de Fantasmas , Postura , Doses de Radiação , Radiometria/instrumentação , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/instrumentação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa