Comparison of diabetic retinopathy severity grading on ETDRS 7-field versus ultrawide-field assessment.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity level determined when considering only the ETDRS 7-field region versus the entire ultrawidefield (UWF) image. METHODS: In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, UWF pseudocolor images were graded on the Eyenuk image viewing, grading, and annotation platform for the severity of DR considering only the regions within the ETDRS 7-fields as well as the entire UWF image using two different protocols: 1) the simple International Classification of Diabetic Retinopathy (ICDR) scale and 2) the more complex DRCR.net Protocol AA grading scale. RESULTS: A total of 250 eyes from 157 patients were included in this analysis. Six eyes (2.4%) demonstrated a discrepancy in severity level between the ETDRS 7-field region and the entire UWF image when using the ICDR classification system. The discrepancies were due to the presence of lesions [intraretinal haemorrhage (n = 2), neovascular disease (n = 4)] in the peripheral fields which were not identified in the ETDRS 7-fields. Fourteen eyes (5.6%) had a discrepancy in severity level between the ETDRS 7-field region and the entire UWF image when using the ETDRS DRSS Protocol AA grading scale. The discrepancies were due to the presence of a higher level of disease [intraretinal haemorrhage (n = 4), neovascularization (n = 4), preretinal haemorrhage (n = 2), scatter laser scars (n = 4)] in the peripheral fields. CONCLUSION: Although considering regions outside of the ETDRS 7-fields altered the DR severity level assessment in <5% of cases in this cohort, significant and potentially vision-threatening lesions including neovascularization and preretinal haemorrhage were identified in these peripheral regions. This highlights the importance of evaluating the entire UWF region when assessing patients with diabetic retinopathy.

The many faces of ocular syphilis: case-based update on recognition, diagnosis, and treatment.

In recent years, syphilis (Treponema pallidum) has become increasingly prevalent in Canada, and as a result, rates of ocular syphilis are also rising. Classically, syphilis was seen primarily in men who have sex with men; now, it is increasingly seen in people of all age groups, sexes, and sexual orientations. We present a series of 26 cases of ocular syphilis from London, Ontario, 5 of which are discussed in detail to illustrate the varied presentations and diagnostic challenges of ocular syphilis. The presentations include uveitis, iris granuloma (gumma), retinitis (acute syphilitic posterior placoid chorioretinitis), vasculitis, optic neuritis, and serous retinal detachment. The 5 cases are mostly middle-aged heterosexual men and women without the typical risk factors that would alert the examiner to suspect syphilis. We emphasize the importance of testing for syphilis when assessing and treating inflammatory eye disease, regardless of demographics and known risk factors, given the increasing prevalence of this disease. Diagnosis of syphilis relies on serologic testing, which is complex and has undergone significant changes from historical reliance on the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory test. We provide an overview of the strategy and rationale for modern serologic testing. The mainstay of treatment remains intravenous penicillin G, with alternative antibiotics (e.g., ceftriaxone) being less effective.