Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Am Heart J ; 168(3): 280-288.e2, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25173538

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are prone to develop preclinical myocardial dysfunction, but no single strategy to prevent progression to heart failure has been established. We aimed to assess whether intensified global cardiovascular (CV) risk factor control would improve left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic function as compared with standard of care. METHODS: A total of 100 patients with ≥1 CV risk factor (29% female, mean ± SD age 58 ± 10 years, LV ejection fraction 63 ± 8%, 16% with LV diastolic dysfunction) were randomized to 2 years of intensified CV risk multi-intervention (INT, n = 50) or standard care (STAND, n = 50). Echocardiography, including tissue Doppler imaging, and maximum exercise test were performed at baseline and study end. Multi-intervention comprised lifestyle intervention and pharmacologic treatment to reach strict prespecified CV risk factor goals, whereas STAND group received current guideline care. RESULTS: Greater reductions were observed for hemoglobin A1c and total cholesterol in the INT group (P < .001 and P = .021, respectively), whereas blood pressure reduction was similar. Work capacity increased in INT and decreased in STAND (P = .014). There was no significant between-group difference in the change in any of the echocardiographic parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Two years of intensified multi-intervention in patients with T2D improved work capacity and glycemic and lipid control and had no significant benefit or harm on resting cardiac function.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatologia , Angiopatias Diabéticas/prevenção & controle , Função Ventricular Esquerda/fisiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Doenças Cardiovasculares/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Angiopatias Diabéticas/epidemiologia , Diástole/fisiologia , Progressão da Doença , Teste de Esforço , Feminino , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Sístole/fisiologia , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/fisiopatologia , Função Ventricular Esquerda/efeitos dos fármacos
2.
Cardiovasc Diabetol ; 12: 126, 2013 Aug 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23987834

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Novel and robust cardiovascular (CV) markers are needed to improve CV morbidity and mortality risk prediction in type 2 diabetes (T2D). We assessed the long term predictive value of 4 novel CV risk markers for major CV events and mortality. METHODS: We included patients with T2D who had cytokines (interleukin [IL]-6 and activin A [actA]), a maximum stress ECG test (evaluated by the normalization pattern in early recovery phase) and echocardiography (evaluated by a measure of the left ventricular filling pressure - E/Em) assessed at baseline. The primary endpoint was time to first of any of the following events: myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina pectoris and death. All outcomes were adjudicated by independent experts. We used Cox proportional hazard modeling, Harrell C-statistic and the net reclassification improvement (NRI) to assess the additional value beyond conventional markers (age, gender, prior CV disease, HDL, creatinine, diastolic BP, microalbuminuria). RESULTS: At baseline the study cohort (n = 135, mean age/diabetes duration/HbA1c: 59 yrs/7 yrs/7.6% [59 mmol/mol], 26% females) had moderate elevated CV risk (42% microalbuminuria, mean Framingham 10 year CV-risk 9.6%). During 8.6 yrs/1153.7 person years, 26 patients experienced 36 events. All 4 novel risk markers were significantly associated with increased risk of the primary endpoint, however, only IL-6 and actA improved C-statistic and NRI (+0.119/43.2%, +0.065/20.3% respectively) compared with the conventional CV risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: IL-6 and actA may provide prognostic information on CV events and mortality in T2D beyond conventional CV risk factors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00133718.


Assuntos
Ativinas/sangue , Doenças Cardiovasculares/sangue , Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/mortalidade , Interleucina-6/sangue , Idoso , Angina Instável/sangue , Angina Instável/mortalidade , Biomarcadores/sangue , Proteína C-Reativa/análise , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/fisiopatologia , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatologia , Progressão da Doença , Ecocardiografia sob Estresse , Eletrocardiografia , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/sangue , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/sangue , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/mortalidade , Fatores de Tempo , Função Ventricular Esquerda , Pressão Ventricular
3.
J Int Med Res ; 45(5): 1535-1552, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28627980

RESUMO

Objective To report the long-term impact on cardiovascular (CV) outcomes and mortality of a 2-year hospital-based multi-interventional care programme as compared with general practitioner (GP)-provided standard care. Methods Patients with type 2 diabetes with ≥ 1 additional CV risk factor were randomized to 2 years of specialist-based, multi-intervention comprising lifestyle modification and specific pharmacological treatment, or GP-based standard care. After the 2-year intervention period, all participants returned to pre-study care, but were followed up for CV outcomes and mortality. The primary outcome was time to any first severe CV event or death. Results A total of 120 patients (31 women) were enrolled in the study. During the mean ± SD observational period of 8.7 ± 2.0 years, 27 patients (16 and 11 in the multi-intervention and standard care groups, respectively) experienced at least one primary outcome event, with a hazard ratio (HR) if allocated to the multi-intervention group of 1.73 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80, 3.75). The HR for total mortality was 1.82 (95% CI 0.66, 5.01). Conclusions Hospital-based multi-intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus improved long-term glycaemic control, but failed to reduce CV outcomes and deaths. Clinical trials.gov id: NCT00133718.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Hospitais , Albuminúria/complicações , Intervalos de Confiança , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Fatores de Tempo
4.
J Diabetes ; 7(6): 779-90, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25350248

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Subclinical left ventricular (LV) dysfunction is prevalent in type 2 diabetes (T2DM). As obesity has been proposed as one causal factor in the disease process, this could bias the reported prevalences. We wanted to characterize echocardiographic LV dysfunction in obese T2DM subjects as compared to non-diabetic obese controls. METHODS: One hundred patients with T2DM without clinical signs of heart failure (29% females, mean ± SD age 58.4 ± 10.5 years, body mass index (BMI) 30.1 ± 5.5 kg/m(2), blood pressure (BP) 141 ± 18/83 ± 9 mmHg) and 100 non-diabetic controls (29% females) matched for age (58.6 ± 10.5 years), BMI (29.8 ± 4.0 kg/m(2) and systolic BP (140 ± 14 mmHg) underwent echocardiography and color tissue Doppler imaging (TDI). Diastolic function was evaluated with conventional Doppler recordings and early (e') and late (a') myocardial velocities. The ratio between early transmitral filling (E) and the corresponding myocardial tissue velocity (e') served as an index of LV filling pressure. RESULTS: T2DM patients had more concentric hypertrophy with a relative wall thickness of 0.42 ± 0.07 vs controls 0.38 ± 0.07, P < 0.001. The T2DM group had signs of diastolic dysfunction with lower E/A ratio (0.91 ± 0.27 vs. 1.12 ± 0.38, P < 0.001), deceleration time (195 ± 49 vs 242 ± 72 ms, P < 0.001), e' (5.7 ± 2.0 vs. 6.6 ± 1.8 cm/s, P = 0.001), and a' (6.5 ± 2.0 vs. 7.6 ± 1.5 cm/s, P < 0.001) compared to the controls, and higher E/e' (13.3 ± 4.7 vs. 11.1 ± 3.5, P < 0.001). Thus, there were indications of pseudo normalization and increased filling pressure in the T2DM group, whereas the controls had evidence for relaxation abnormalities without elevated filling pressure. CONCLUSION: Compared to a non-diabetic obese group, more advanced subclinical impairment of diastolic function was seen in T2DM.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Cardiomiopatias Diabéticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Ecocardiografia Doppler em Cores , Hipertrofia Ventricular Esquerda/diagnóstico por imagem , Obesidade/complicações , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Índice de Massa Corporal , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Fatores de Confusão Epidemiológicos , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Cardiomiopatias Diabéticas/etiologia , Cardiomiopatias Diabéticas/fisiopatologia , Diástole , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertrofia Ventricular Esquerda/etiologia , Hipertrofia Ventricular Esquerda/fisiopatologia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Obesidade/diagnóstico , Razão de Chances , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Fatores de Risco , Sístole , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/etiologia , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/fisiopatologia , Função Ventricular Esquerda , Pressão Ventricular
5.
J Diabetes ; 1(3): 182-7, 2009 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20923537

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are common complications of diabetes mellitus (DM), with a complex pathogenesis. Treatment is difficult and no single treatment with measurable clinical impact is available. In the present clinical pilot trial, we investigated whether statins could be of use against some of the pathogenic factors in DFUs. METHODS: Thirteen diabetic patients (10 men; 11 with Type 2 DM; mean age 64 years; mean duration of DM 18 years) with neuropathic DFUs <4 months were randomized to treatment with either 10 mg (six patients; six ulcers) or 80 mg (seven patients; nine ulcers) atorvastatin for 6 months in addition to conventional DFU care (i.e. prompt debridement, DFU pressure relief, and management of any underlying infection). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in background factors (i.e. HbA1c 8.9%, micro- and macrovascular complications, concomitant medications) or DFU characteristics (duration, surface area, grading) between the two groups. All ulcers in the group receiving 10 mg atorvastatin healed, compared with six of nine ulcers in the group receiving 80 mg atorvastatin (NS). However, two previously healed DFUs recurred and six new DFUs developed in the low-dose group compared with none and one, respectively, in the high-dose group (P = 0.048). There was a significant decrease in C-reactive protein (-1.5 mg/L; P = 0.044) and a non-significant trend towards beneficial effects on lipids and the ankle-arm blood pressure index in the high-dose compared with the low-dose group. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a possible beneficial effect of 6-months high-dose atorvastatin on DFUs, which should be tested in appropriately sized prospective studies.


Assuntos
Pé Diabético/tratamento farmacológico , Ácidos Heptanoicos/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Pirróis/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Índice Tornozelo-Braço , Atorvastatina , Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Proteína C-Reativa/metabolismo , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Pé Diabético/patologia , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Determinação de Ponto Final , Feminino , Pé/patologia , Ácidos Heptanoicos/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/administração & dosagem , Contagem de Leucócitos , Lipídeos/sangue , Testes de Função Hepática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Pirróis/administração & dosagem , Prevenção Secundária , Cicatrização
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa