Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Radiol ; 81(9): 2027-36, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21741785

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation is the only definite treatment for end stage liver disease and it has high costs for the medical system so decreasing its complication and increasing its effectiveness is crucial. One of the factors that affect liver transplantation is the presence of spontaneous splenorenal shunt. Its diagnosis is mainly overlooked in pre-liver transplant patients. Main modality for its diagnosis is multislice CT scan however this is more expensive than sonography. Also, it exposes the patients to ionizing radiation. Considering the advantages of color Doppler ultrasound, studies to determine the sensitivity and specificity for detection of spontaneous splenorenal shunt is essential. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In our study 70 cirrhotic patients who were referred by liver transplant surgeons for evaluation of abdomen by CT and sonograhy were assessed for presence of spontaneous splenorenal shunt, left adrenal varix and left renal vein diameter and velocity and sensitivity and specificity of both modalities were checked. Patients in whom left renal vein could not evaluated by sonography and patients with splenectomy and nutcracker syndrome were excluded. RESULTS: In the point of 10 mm diameter of left renal vein in CT scan there was 78.6% sensitivity and 67.9% specificity for the presence of spontaneous splenorenal shunt. Left adrenal varix in CT had sensitivity of 71.4%, specificity of 100%, and positive predictive value of 100% and negative predictive value of 70% and varix below spleen in CT had sensitivity of 54.8%, specificity of 96.4%, and positive predictive value of 95.8% and negative predictive value of 58.7% for the presence of spontaneous splenorenal shunt. In the point of 8 mm diameter of left renal vein in sonography there was 66.7% sensitivity and 85.7% specificity for the presence of spontaneous splenorenal shunt. For the velocity of more than 35 cm/s of left renal vein in sonography there was 61.9% sensitivity and 82.1% specificity for the presence of spontaneous splenorenal shunt. Left adrenal varix in sonography had sensitivity of 45.2%, specificity of 96.4%, positive predictive value of 95% and negative predictive value of 54% for the presence of spontaneous splenorenal shunt. CONCLUSION: There was moderate agreement between CT scan and sonography for detection of spontaneous splenorenal shunt. CT scan is choice for detection of SSRS but sonography is somehow useful. It means that if sonograhy is positive it is sufficient, if negative, then CT should be performed. This is due to low sensitivity of sonography.


Assuntos
Transplante de Fígado/diagnóstico por imagem , Veias Renais/anormalidades , Veia Esplênica/anormalidades , Fístula Vascular/diagnóstico , Idoso , Feminino , Fibrose/complicações , Fibrose/diagnóstico , Fibrose/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seleção de Pacientes , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Veias Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Veia Esplênica/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Ultrassonografia Doppler em Cores/métodos , Fístula Vascular/complicações
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa