Trametinib overcomes KRAS-G12V-induced osimertinib resistance in a leptomeningeal carcinomatosis model of EGFR-mutant lung cancer.

Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC) occurs frequently in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and is associated with acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). However, the mechanism by which LMC acquires resistance to osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR-TKI, is unclear. In this study, we elucidated the resistance mechanism and searched for a novel therapeutic strategy. We induced osimertinib resistance in a mouse model of LMC using an EGFR-mutant NSCLC cell line (PC9) via continuous oral osimertinib treatment and administration of established resistant cells and examined the resistance mechanism using next-generation sequencing. We detected the Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS)-G12V mutation in resistant cells, which retained the EGFR exon 19 deletion. Experiments involving KRAS knockdown in resistant cells and KRAS-G12V overexpression in parental cells revealed the involvement of KRAS-G12V in osimertinib resistance. Cotreatment with trametinib (a MEK inhibitor) and osimertinib resensitized the cells to osimertinib. Furthermore, in the mouse model of LMC with resistant cells, combined osimertinib and trametinib treatment successfully controlled LMC progression. These findings suggest a potential novel therapy against KRAS-G12V-harboring osimertinib-resistant LMC in EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Phase II study of amrubicin plus erlotinib in previously treated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer with wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor (TORG1320).

Background Amrubicin (AMR) is a completely synthetic 9-aminoanthracycline and clinically active against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted a phase I study of AMR and erlotinib (ERL) combination therapy in previously treated patients with advanced NSCLC and have already reported the safety and effectiveness. Methods We conducted a multi-center, single-arm phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of AMR and ERL combination therapy in patients with previously treated, advanced NSCLC harboring wild-type EGFR, PS 0-1 and < 75 years of age. Patients were treated at 3-week intervals with AMR plus ERL. The primary endpoint was the PFS, and the secondary endpoints were the response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. The trough ERL concentration (Ctrough) was measured as an exploratory study to analyze the relationship between the efficacy/safety and pharmacokinetics. Results From June 2013 to July 2016, 25 patients were enrolled in this trial. The PFS according to the central test was 3.6 months (95% confidence interval 2.1-5.1). The RR and DCR were 24.0% and 64.0%, respectively. We had no treatment-related deaths in this study. Conclusions The PFS of AMR and ERL combination therapy was superior to that of AMR monotherapy in the historical setting, but the primary endpoint was not met in this trial. In our study, the pharmacokinetic analysis showed that the Ctrough of ERL was elevated with combination therapy. This combination therapy might be a viable treatment for previously treated NSCLC patients without a driver oncogene mutation. Clinical trial information UMIN 000010582.

MET amplification results in heterogeneous responses to osimertinib in EGFR-mutant lung cancer treated with erlotinib.

The third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) osimertinib is approved for untreated, or previously EGFR-TKI-treated T790M-positive EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). We investigated the heterogeneity of responses to osimertinib and its underlying mechanisms. A patient with EGFR-L858R-mutated NSCLC was treated with erlotinib. Following treatment, he developed brain and multiple bone metastases and was eventually diagnosed with NSCLC with EGFR-T790M mutation. The responses of various tumor specimens to osimertinib were heterogeneous. We investigated EGFR-T790M and MET amplification using PCR and FISH in autopsy specimens of the cervical spine, lumbar spine, and brain. We established the KNZ osimertinib-resistant (KNZ_OR) tumor cell line with MET amplification using a cervical spine lesion that was intrinsically resistant to osimertinib. We evaluated the effects of MET knockdown and MET inhibitor on KNZ_OR cell sensitivity to osimertinib in vitro and in vivo. Osimertinib-resistant lesions (cervical spine and brain) showed EGFR-L858R and MET amplification, but not EGFR-T790M, whereas osimertinib-sensitive lesions (lumbar spine) showed EGFR-L858R and -T790, but not MET amplification. Osimertinib decreased the association of amplified MET with L858R-mutated EGFR but increased that with human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 in KNZ_OR cells. MET knockdown or MET inhibitor sensitized KNZ_OR cells to osimertinib in vitro, indicating that MET amplification induced osimertinib resistance. Combination with osimertinib plus crizotinib induced tumor shrinkage in the KNZ_OR xenograft model. Hence, MET amplification might induce heterogeneous responses to osimertinib in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Further investigations on mutated EGFR and amplified MET might lead to the development of effective therapies.

Real-world assessment of afatinib for patients with EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer.

Introduction Afatinib is used to treat patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring common EGFR mutations; however, the clinicopathological factors that predict this drug's effectiveness in real-world settings remain unclear. We therefore evaluated the effectiveness of afatinib in such patients and assessed potential prognostic factors. Methods We retrospectively investigated patients with NSCLC who received first-line afatinib between July 2014 and August 2018. Variables (including sex, age, performance status, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, EGFR genotype, smoking status, clinical stage prior to treatment [stage IV vs.. postoperative recurrence], presence or absence of brain metastases, body surface area, any afatinib dose reductions, and afatinib starting dose [40 vs.. 20 or 30 mg]) were subjected to a Cox proportional hazards regression model to estimate progression-free survival (PFS). Results Forty-eight patients with a median age of 67 years were included; the objective response rate was 62.5% (30 patients). The median PFS was 14.1 months; the PFS periods were 11.8 and 15.9 months for patients receiving 40 mg versus 20-30 mg of afatinib (P = 0.41), respectively, and were 14.5 and 13.8 months for patients who required afatinib dose reduction and those who did not, respectively (P = 0.80). The PFS tended to be longer in patients without brain metastases (albeit not significantly). Ultimately, no significant predictive values for PFS were identified. Conclusions Afatinib is effective for patients with NSCLC harboring common EGFR mutations irrespective of their clinicopathological backgrounds. A direct comparison of afatinib and osimertinib in treatment-naïve patients is warranted to determine the optimal standard of care.

Patient-derived xenograft models of non-small cell lung cancer for evaluating targeted drug sensitivity and resistance.

Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models are a useful tool in cancer biology research. However, the number of lung cancer PDX is limited. In the present study, we successfully established 10 PDX, including three adenocarcinoma (AD), six squamous cell carcinoma (SQ) and one large cell carcinoma (LA), from 30 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (18 AD, 10 SQ, and 2 LA), mainly in SCID hairless outbred (SHO) mice (Crlj:SHO-Prkdcscid Hrhr ). Histology of SQ, advanced clinical stage (III-IV), status of lymph node metastasis (N2-3), and maximum standardized uptake value ≥10 when evaluated using a delayed 18 F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scan was associated with successful PDX establishment. Histological analyses showed that PDX had histology similar to that of patients' surgically resected tumors (SRT), whereas components of the microenvironment were replaced with murine cells after several passages. Next-generation sequencing analyses showed that after two to six passages, PDX preserved the majority of the somatic mutations and mRNA expressions of the corresponding SRT. Two out of three PDX with AD histology had epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations (L858R or exon 19 deletion) and were sensitive to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI), such as gefitinib and osimertinib. Furthermore, in one of the two PDX with an EGFR mutation, osimertinib resistance was induced that was associated with epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. This study presented 10 serially transplantable PDX of NSCLC in SHO mice and showed the use of PDX with an EGFR mutation for analyses of EGFR-TKI resistance.

Phase I study of Nedaplatin, a platinum based antineoplastic drug, combined with nab-paclitaxel in patients with advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer.

Background This study was designed to determine the recommended dose of a combination of nedaplatin (NED) and nab-paclitaxel (nab-PTX) in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Patients received escalating doses of NED on day 1 and nab-PTX on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks by an intravenous infusion for up to six cycles. Results A dose of 100 mg/m2 NED and 100 mg/m2 nab-PTX was determined to be the recommended dose for patients with advanced squamous NSCLC. The study had an overall response rate of 66.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 38.4-88.2) and disease control rate of 93.3% (95% CI: 68.1-99.8). The median progression-free survival time and survival time was 7.0 months (95% CI: 5.9-8.1) and 13.1 months (95% CI: 6.2-20.1), respectively. The most common adverse events were neutropenia (grade 3/4, 33%) and leukopenia (grade 3/4, 27%). Although peripheral neuropathy was observed in 5 patients (grade 1/2), non-hematological toxic effects were relatively mild. Febrile neutropenia, pneumonitis, and treatment-related death were not observed. Conclusions The combination of NED and nab-PTX was a tolerable and effective regimen and its recommended dose was 100 mg/m2 and 100 mg/m2, respectively, in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced squamous NSCLC (UMIN000010963).

Phase II study of bevacizumab, cisplatin, and docetaxel plus maintenance bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer combined with exploratory analysis of circulating endothelial cells: Thoracic Oncology Research Group (TORG)1016.

BACKGROUND: Preclinical studies have demonstrated that docetaxel and bevacizumab may act synergistically by decreasing endothelial cell proliferation and preventing circulating endothelial progenitor mobilization. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of a combination therapy of bevacizumab, cisplatin, and docetaxel in chemotherapy-naive Japanese patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Eligible patients were chemotherapy-naive and had advanced/recurrent non-squamous NSCLC. The patients received 4 cycles of docetaxel (60 mg/m2), cisplatin (80 mg/m2), and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) once every 3 weeks, followed by bevacizumab as maintenance therapy, every 3 weeks until disease progression or attainment of unacceptable toxicity level. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). The numbers of circulating endothelial cells (CEC) were also estimated on days 1 and 8 of the first cycle for the exploratory analysis of efficacy prediction. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients were enrolled from October 2010 to April 2012. Bevacizumab as maintenance therapy was administered to 41 patients (87.2%), and the median number of total treatment cycles was 9 (range: 1-36). ORR, median progression-free survival (PFS), and median overall survival of the patients were 74.5%, 9.0 months, and 27.5 months, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 adverse event was neutropenia (95.7%), followed by leukopenia (59.6%) and hypertension (46.8%). PFS was longer in patients with ≥10 count increase in CECs than that in patients with < 10 count increase in CECs (respective median PFS of 11.0 months versus 6.90 months) although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.074). CONCLUSIONS: A combination therapy of bevacizumab, cisplatin, and docetaxel, followed by bevacizumab as maintenance was highly effective in patients with non-squamous NSCLC despite the high incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia. The increase in CEC count between days 1 and 8 may predict the efficacy of our bevacizumab-contained treatment regimen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trial Registry; UMIN000004368 . Registered date; October 11, 2010 (Retrospectively registered).

The role of prophylactic cranial irradiation for patients with small-cell lung cancer.

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) has a particular propensity to metastasize to the brain, affecting ~10% of SCLC patients at diagnosis, but may occur in more than 50% of 2-year survivors. Most cytotoxic drugs have limited ability to cross the blood-brain barrier, and the effectiveness of chemotherapy for brain metastasis is limited. Therefore, prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has been proposed to treat SCLC. A meta-analysis revealed that PCI significantly decreased the risk of brain metastasis and increased the 3-year survival rate; it has been established as a standard therapy for limited-disease SCLC. However, certain aspects of PCI remain unclarified, including the roles in resected SCLC and extensive-disease SCLC, and its neurotoxicities. In addition, information on PCI has been obtained from old clinical trials without the use of new imaging devices, such as magnetic resonance imaging. Evidence from advanced imaging techniques is needed in this era.

Phase II study of Amrubicin monotherapy in elderly or poor-risk patients with extensive disease of small cell lung cancer.

Background Previous study indicated that an optional anti-cancer drug for the treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is amrubicin. However, no prospective studies have evaluated amrubicin in chemo-naive elderly or poor-risk patients with SCLC. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of amrubicin as first-line chemotherapy for elderly or poor-risk patients with extensive-disease SCLC (ES-SCLC). Methods Patients with chemotherapy-naive ES-SCLC received multiple cycles of 40 mg/m2 amrubicin for 3 consecutive days every 21 days. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results Between March 2011 and August 2015, 36 patients were enrolled in this study. Each patient received a median of four treatment cycles (range, 1-6 cycles). ORR was 52.8% [95% confidence interval (CI), 37-69%]. The median PFS and OS periods were 5.0 months (95% CI, 3.4-6.6 months) and 9.4 months (95% CI, 5.2-13.6 months), respectively. Neutropenia was the most common grade 3 or 4 adverse event (69.4%), with febrile neutropenia developing in 13.9% of patients. No treatment-related death occurred. At the time of starting second-line chemotherapy, 19 of 22 patients (86%) had significantly improved or maintained their performance status (PS) relative to their PS at the time of starting amrubicin monotherapy as first-line chemotherapy (P = 0.027). Conclusions The results of the present study suggest that amrubicin could be considered as a viable treatment option for chemotherapy-naive elderly or poor-risk patients with ES-SCLC (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN000011055 www.clinicaltrials.gov ).

Impact of PD-L1 Expression in Patients with Surgically Resected Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy can become a crucial therapeutic option to improve the prognosis of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we evaluated the impact of programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression in surgically resected NSCLCs. METHODS: We estimated PD-L1 expression in 229 consecutive NSCLC specimens using rabbit polyclonal antibodies to human PD-L1 in a SP263 immunohistochemical assay and evaluated PD-L1 expression for potential associations with clinicopathological parameters and survival time. RESULTS: PD-L1 expression was significantly higher in tumors from men or current smokers. Squamous cell carcinoma histology was independently associated with high PD-L1 expression according to multivariate analysis (p = 0.015). The 5-year survival rate of patients was 70%, and the difference in the 5-year survival rate according to PD-L1 expression was not statistically significant (high expression group [67%] vs. low expression group [68%]); however, the squamous cell carcinoma group exhibited significantly lower 5-year survival rates as compared to the non-squamous cell carcinoma group (53 and 71%, respectively; p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: Here, we revealed high PD-L1 expression and poor prognosis observed in patients with surgically resected squamous NSCLC as compared with non-squamous NSCLC. Our results support the identification of patient subsets that most likely respond to anti-PD-1 therapy as the first step in precision medicine.

Phase I/II study of induction chemotherapy using carboplatin plus irinotecan and sequential thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) for elderly patients with limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC): TORG 0604.

BACKGROUND: The role of irinotecan for elderly patients with LD-SCLC has been unclear, and the timing of TRT combined with chemotherapy has not been fully evaluated. METHODS: Patients aged > 70 years with untreated, measurable, LD-SCLC, performance status (PS) 0-2, and adequate organ function were eligible. Treatment consisted of induction with carboplatin on day 1 and irinotecan on days 1 and 8, every 21 days for 4 cycles, and sequential TRT (54Gy in 27 fractions). Carboplatin doses were based on AUC of 4 and 5 (levels 1 and 2, respectively), with a fixed irinotecan dose (50 mg/m2). Primary objective of the phase II study was overall responce rate. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were enrolled and forty-one were finally analyzed (median age: 75 years [range 70-86 years); males 31; PS 0/1/2, n = 22/18/1]. Two patients were excluded because of protocol violation (ascertained to be extensive disease). Twelve patients were accrued at phase I and the number of patients with carboplatin dose-limiting toxicities at levels-1 (n = 6) and -2 (n = 6) were 1(grade 3 hypertension) and 2 (grade 4 thrombocytopenia), respectively. The phase II trial was expanded to 29 additional patients receiving the level 1 carboplatin dose, total of 35 patients. The median number of chemotherapy cycles was 4 (range 1-4), and the median radiation dose was 54Gy (range 36-60). Toxicities were generally mild. There were 4 complete and 27 partial responses (response rate 88.6%). With a median follow-up of 52 months, the median progression-free and overall survival times of phase II were 11.2 and 27.1 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Induction chemotherapy of carboplatin plus irinotecan and sequential TRT was well tolerated and effective for elderly patients with LD-SCLC. Additional confirmatory studies are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number: UMIN000007352 Name of registry: UMIN. Date of registration: 1/Dec/2006. Date of enrolment of the first participant to the trial: 6/Feb/2007. Clinical trial registration date: 1/Feb/2006 (prospective).

Smoking History as a Predictor of Pemetrexed Monotherapy in Patients with Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pemetrexed monotherapy has come to be recognized as the standard of care for second-line therapy of non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thymidylate synthase (TS) expression is recognized as a potential predictor of the response to pemetrexed-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. The purpose of this study was to identify useful predictors of the response to pemetrexed other than TS expression. METHODS: The records of non-squamous NSCLC patients without driver mutations who received pemetrexed monotherapy as a second or later line of chemotherapy at Kitasato University Hospital between March 2009 and October 2015 were retrospectively reviewed, and the treatment outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: In the 116 patients with non-squamous NSCLC, the overall response rate and progression-free survival (PFS) were 10.3% and 2.1 months, respectively. The disease control rate and PFS differed significantly among current smokers and never-smokers/former light smokers (44.9 vs. 65.8%, and 1.8 vs. 4.0 months, respectively). Furthermore, multivariate analysis identified Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status and smoking status as independent predictors of the PFS. CONCLUSION: The clinical data obtained in this study may provide a valuable basis for the use of smoking status as a predictor of pemetrexed monotherapy in wild-type NSCLC patients.

Impact of Smoking History on the Efficacy of Gefitinib in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Activating Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations.

BACKGROUND: Gefitinib treatment has come to be recognized as the standard therapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. However, resistance to gefitinib has been observed in certain subpopulations of these patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of smoking status on the efficacy of gefitinib in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations. METHODS: The records of NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations who were treated with gefitinib at Kitasato University Hospital were retrospectively reviewed, and the treatment outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: In 153 patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations, the overall response rate and progression-free survival (PFS) were 66.7% and 9.0 months, respectively. PFS differed significantly among the current smokers and never-smokers/former light smokers (10.7 vs. 5.4 months, p=0.0002), and the response rate was significantly higher in the never-smokers/former light smokers than in the current smokers (72.3 vs. 55.8%, p=0.04). Multivariate analysis identified smoking status as an independent predictor of PFS. CONCLUSION: The clinical data obtained in this study provide a valuable rationale for considering smoking status as a predictor of the efficacy of gefitinib in patients with NSCLC harboring activating EGFR mutations.

Comparison of the efficacy of gefitinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer according to the type of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation.

BACKGROUND: Exon 19 deletion and L858R point mutation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are the most commonly encountered EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and predict higher clinical outcomes following treatment with gefitinib. The objective of this study was to evaluate the differential clinical outcomes of gefitinib in patients with NSCLC according to the type of active EGFR mutation, i.e. exon 19 deletion or L858R point mutation. METHODS: We identified patients with advanced NSCLC harboring the exon 19 deletion or the L858R point mutation of EGFR who were on gefitinib treatment. The clinical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 124 patients with NSCLC harboring active EGFR mutations, the overall response rate, progression-free survival and overall survival were 60.5%, 11.3 and 27.3 months, respectively, and did not differ significantly between patients with the exon 19 deletion (61.8%, 11.3 and 32.2 months, respectively) and those with the L858R point mutation (58.9%, 9.0 and 27.7 months, respectively). CONCLUSION: It may be considered that there is no difference in the clinical efficacy of gefitinib between NSCLC patients who harbor the exon 19 deletion and those with the L858R point mutation.

Evaluation of amrubicin as a third or later line of chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there are no standard cytotoxic treatments for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients beyond third-line therapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of amrubicin monotherapy as a salvage treatment in heavily pretreated NSCLC patients. METHODS: The records of NSCLC patients who received amrubicin monotherapy as a third or later line of chemotherapy at a Kitasato University Hospital between January 2009 and December 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Amrubicin was administered to patients by intravenous injection at a dose of 35 or 40 mg/m(2) daily on 3 consecutive days, and cycles were repeated at 3-week intervals. RESULTS: There were 36 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Their median number of prior chemotherapy treatments was 4 (range 2-7), and the median number of chemotherapy cycles per patient was 4 (range 1-9). Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia (61.1%), leukopenia (58.3%), thrombocytopenia (22.2%) and anemia (11.1%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 8 patients (22.2%). Nonhematologic toxicities were mild. The overall response rate, median progression-free survival time and median survival time were 8.3%, 1.7 months, and 6.3 months, respectively. Progression-free survival time was the same, i.e. 1.7 months in both groups i.e. the 35- and the 40-mg/m(2)-dose groups. CONCLUSION: Amrubicin exhibits modest activity and acceptable toxicity when used as a third or later line of chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC.

Multicenter, single-arm phase II study of modified carboplatin/nab-paclitaxel in untreated performance status 2 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: TORG1426.

Background: Currently, only a few treatment options exist for performance status (PS) 2 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), whereas the carboplatin/nab-paclitaxel (CBDCA/nab-PTX) regimen is attracting attention as a standard of care for PS 0-1 patients because of its wide suitability and modest risk of peripheral neuropathy. However, the treatment dose and schedule should be optimized for PS 2 patients. Therefore, we planned a single-arm phase II study to characterize the efficacy and tolerability of our modified CBDCA/nab-PTX regimen for untreated PS 2 patients with advanced NSCLC. Methods: Enrolled patients were treated with CBDCA (area under the curve 5 on day 1) plus nab-PTX (70 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15) every 4 weeks for up to six cycles. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months. As exploratory analyses, the reasons for PS 2 (disease burden versus comorbidities/indeterminant) and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were evaluated as efficacy indicators. Results: This study was terminated early because of slow accrual. Seventeen patients [median age, 68 years (range, 50-73 years)] received a median of three cycles. The 6-month PFS rate, median PFS, and median overall survival were 20.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0-41.6], 3.0 months (95% CI: 1.7-4.3), and 9.5 months (95% CI: 5.0-14.0), respectively. Exploratory analyses suggested better overall survival in patients whose PS was not attributable to the disease burden (median, 9.5 vs. 7.2 months) or whose CCI was ≤3 (median, 15.5 vs. 7.2 months). Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 12 (71%) patients, and grade 5 pleural infection occurred in one (6%) patient. Meanwhile, only one (6%) patient each experienced grade 1 peripheral neuropathy and grade 2 interstitial pneumonitis. Conclusions: No conclusion could be drawn from this study because of its early termination. However, our modified CBDCA/nab-PTX regimen might be useful for PS 2 patients who hesitate to use regimens other than nab-PTX, and particularly patients concerned about peripheral neuropathy or interstitial pneumonitis. The potential role of PS 2 and CCI as efficacy predictors for this regimen should be further examined.

Efficacy and safety of single-dose ivermectin in mild-to-moderate COVID-19: the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled CORVETTE-01 trial.

Background: To investigate whether ivermectin inhibits SARS-CoV-2 proliferation in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 using time to a negative COVID-19 reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. Methods: CORVETTE-01 was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study (August 2020-October 2021) conducted in Japan. Overall, 248 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 using RT-PCR were assessed for eligibility. A single oral dose of ivermectin (200 µg/kg) or placebo was administered under fasting. The primary outcome was time to a negative COVID-19 RT-PCR test result for SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid, assessed using stratified log-rank test and Cox regression models. Results: Overall, 112 and 109 patients were randomized to ivermectin and placebo, respectively; 106 patients from each group were included in the full analysis set (male [%], mean age: 68.9%, 47.9 years [ivermectin]; 62.3%, 47.5 years [placebo]). No significant difference was observed in the occurrence of negative RT-PCR tests between the groups (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-1.32; p = 0.785). Median (95% CI) time to a negative RT-PCR test was 14.0 (13.0-16.0) and 14.0 (12.0-16.0) days for ivermectin and placebo, respectively; 82.1% and 84% of patients achieved negative RT-PCR tests, respectively. Conclusion: In patients with COVID-19, single-dose ivermectin was ineffective in decreasing the time to a negative RT-PCR test. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04703205.

Pemetrexed for previously treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer and differences in efficacy according to thymidylate synthase expression.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of pemetrexed monotherapy in previously treated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) including salvage treatment, and to evaluate whether thymidylate synthase (TS) expression is a predictor for pemetrexed efficacy. Hundred and four previously treated patients with advanced NSCLC who received pemetrexed monotherapy were retrospectively evaluated for clinical efficacy and toxicity. If available, tissue specimens of patients were also analyzed immunohistochemically for TS expression. The patients' median age was 65 years (range: 43-82). An overall response rate of 9.6% and a median progression-free survival (PFS) time of 3.4 months were achieved. The response rates for the second-line, third-line, fourth-line or further treatments were 9.1, 9.3 and 10.2% (p = 0.33); the median PFS were 3.3, 3.2 and 3.8 months (p = 0.21). The median follow-up duration was 14.9 months; the median overall survival (OS) was 11.9 months. The median PFS and OS were significantly longer in the TS-negative group than in the TS-positive group (5.8 months vs. 1.6 months; p = 0.03, and 14.7 months vs. 8.6 months; p = 0.04, respectively). Pemetrexed monotherapy could be considered as an option in the fourth or later lines of treatment of previously treated patients with advanced NSCLC as well as a second- or third-line treatment, and TS expression may be a potentially predictive factor for pemetrexed efficacy in NSCLC patients.

[Efficacy of chemotherapy with carboplatin-paclitaxel plus bevacizumab for previously treated patients with advanced non-small cell carcinoma].

BACKGROUND: There have been few reports on the efficacy or safety of combination therapy with carboplatin-paclitaxel plus bevacizumab(TC+Bev)in previously treated patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma(NSCLC). PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of TC+Bev as second-line therapy and beyond for previously treated NSCLC patients. METHODS: A total of 17 patients previously treated with NSCLC at the Kitasato University Hospital between April 2010 and February 2012 were enrolled in this retrospective study. On day 1 all patients received a 200mg/m2 dose of paclitaxel by intravenous infusion over a 3-h period, followed by infusion of carboplatin at a dose corresponding to an AUC of 6.0 min mg/mL, and then by Bev at a dose of 15mg/m2. The treatment course was repeated every three or four weeks. Patients continued to receive Bev monotherapy every 3 weeks thereafter until evidence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity developed. RESULTS: Median age: 60 years old(range 39-74 years old); gender: male/female, 6/11; PS 0-1/≥2, 17/0; clinical stage:III B/IV postoperative recurrence, 0/16/1; EGFR mutation status: positive/negative/unknown, 7/9/1; histological type: adenocarcinoma in all patients; median number of prior regimens: 3. 4(1-6); median number of cycles(induction phase): 3(1-6). The objective response rate and disease control rate were 17. 6% and 70. 6%, respectively, and the median progression-free survival time was 4. 7 months. There were no treatment-related deaths, and the toxicities of the treatment regimen were acceptable. CONCLUSION: TC+Bev therapy exhibits activity in previously treated NSCLC patients and has acceptable toxicity. Further study is warranted to confirm our results.

[Pemetrexed as second-line treatment and beyond for elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer].

BACKGROUND: In Japan, the standard first-line therapy for elderly patients with advanced non-small lung cancer(NSCLC)is docetaxel(DOC)monotherapy. However, there is very limited information about second-line and beyond chemotherapy regimens for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. Pemetrexed(PEM)monotherapy has been recognized as a standard regimen for advanced NSCLC in second-line settings, just as DOC monotherapy has been. PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of PEM as second-line therapy and beyond for elderly patients. METHODS: The records of previously -treated elderly patients with advanced NSCLC, who had been treated with PEM as second-line therapy and beyond between July 2009 and December 2010, were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: median age: 73 years old(range 70-79 years old); gender: male/female, 11/8; PS 0-1/≥2, 19/0; clinical stage: III B/IV/postoperative recurrence, 4/10/5; pathology: adeno/LCNEC/other, 17/1/1 patient. The objective response-rate and disease control-rate were 15. 8% and 57. 9%, respectively. Median progression-free survival time was 3. 2 months. There were no treatment-related deaths, and most of the toxicities of the treatment regimen were mild and acceptable. CONCLUSION: PEM monotherapy exhibits activity in previously treated elderly NSCLC patients and has an acceptably low toxicity. Further study is warranted to confirm our results.