A new method (the "Bascule method") for lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve during prone esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: In esophageal cancer, lymph nodes along the recurrent laryngeal nerves (RLNs) are thought to be highly involved. Complete dissection of these lymph nodes is recommended but there is limited working space in the left upper mediastinum and advanced dissection skills are required. We present herein a new method for lymphadenectomy along the left RLN, called the Bascule method during prone esophagectomy. METHODS: The fundamental concept of this new method is to draw the proximal portion of the divided esophagus and tissue that includes the left RLN and lymph nodes through a gap between the vertebral body and the right scapula. Using this technique, a two-dimensional membrane, similar to the "esophageal mesenteriolum" (lateral pedicle), will be easily recognizable. Identification and reliable cutting of the tracheoesophageal artery and distinguishing the left RLN from the lymph nodes should be easy. This technique was evaluated in 39 consecutive cases of prone esophagectomy for squamous cell cancer. RESULTS: There were 18 patients who underwent the new method (Bascule method; Bm) and 21 patients who underwent the conventional method (Cm). The duration of the thoracic procedure and dissection along the left RLN was significantly shorter in Bm group than in Cm group (258 ± 30 vs. 291 ± 39 min; p = 0.007 and 66 ± 9 vs. 75 ± 14 min; p = 0.036, respectively). Estimated blood loss in Bm group was 20 ± 11 g compared to 38 ± 32 g in Cm group (p = 0.028). No intraoperative morbidity related to the left RLN was observed in either group. The hoarseness rate in Bm group was 28 %, which was lower than that in the Cm group (48 %). CONCLUSIONS: The Bascule method for lymphadenectomy along the left RLN during prone esophagectomy is technically safe and feasible and reduces operative time and blood loss.

[A case of stage IV b pancreatic head cancer that was resected because of a good response to chemotherapy].

The prognosis of Stage IV b pancreatic cancer is extremely poor; the mean survival time is 2-4 months. However, new anticancer agents can improve the outcome of advanced pancreatic cancer. We present the case of a 50-year-old female patient with Stage IV b pancreatic head cancer with invasion to the superior mesenteric vein(SMV)and multiple liver metastases. The patient received S-1 as first-line chemotherapy. Three months later, a further CT scan showed reduction of the pancreatic tumor, disappearance of the liver metastases, and reduction in SMV invasion. Therefore, a subtotal stomach-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy with partial SMV resection was performed. Following surgery, the patient received S-1 chemotherapy again. However, lung metastasis appeared. Despite the initiation of gemcitabine(GEM)treatment, the patient developed metastases in other parts of the lung and the abdominal wall. She died 46 months after surgery, but it is noteworthy that the liver metastases were manageable. The combination of chemotherapy and surgery was effective in prolonging survival in this patient with Stage IV b pancreatic head cancer.

Successful laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection preserving the common hepatic artery branched from the left gastric artery for advanced gastric cancer with an Adachi type VI (group 26) vascular anomaly.

We report a case of successful laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection preserving the common hepatic artery branched from the left gastric artery for advanced gastric cancer with an Adachi type VI (group 26) vascular anomaly. A 76-year-old female patient was admitted with a diagnosis of advanced gastric cancer at the anterior wall to the lesser curvature of the antrum (cT3N0M0 cStage IIA). Dynamic computed tomography showed the ectopia of the common hepatic artery branched from the left gastric artery. We made a diagnosis of an Adachi type VI (group 26) vascular anomaly and performed the abovementioned operation. In this anomaly pattern, scrupulous attention is required to remove the suprapancreatic lymph nodes because the portal vein is located immediately dorsal to those lymph nodes and is at increased risk for the injury in this situation. The common hepatic artery is branched from the left gastric artery, and the hepatic perfusion from the superior mesenteric artery is not present in group 26. Planning to preserve the artery will improve safety when it is possible oncologically. There were no postoperative complications, and the patient was discharged 9 days after the operation. To our knowledge, the present case is the first reported case of a laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection with an Adachi type VI (group 26) vascular anomaly. Preoperative diagnostic imaging is very important to prevent surgical complications because the reliable identification of vascular anomaly during an operation is very difficult.

Comparing the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D1+ and D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) with D1+ lymph node dissection (LND) for early gastric cancer has been widely accepted. However, LDG with D2 LND for advanced gastric cancer remains in limited use. The aim of this retrospective study was to clarify the safety of LDG with D2 LND for gastric cancer. METHODS: From January 2010 to September 2014, 296 patients underwent LDG; those who received D1+ LND (n = 230) or D2 LND (n = 66) were included in this study. The clinicopathological characteristics and short-term outcomes of both groups were investigated and compared. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups. However, the frequency of infectious intra-abdominal complications was higher in the D2 LND group than in the D1+ LND group. Additionally, a lower risk of infectious intra-abdominal complications was seen with certified than with uncertified operators. CONCLUSION: The evaluation of short-term outcomes demonstrated that LDG with D2 LND is generally feasible. However, the risk of infectious intra-abdominal complications is higher with D2 LND than with D1+ LND. Also, D2 LND should be performed by trained operators.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) is associated with less-restrictive ventilatory impairment and less risk for pulmonary complication than open laparotomy in thoracoscopic esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy improves prognosis but it is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The thoracoscopic approach is associated with fewer pulmonary complications. Abdominal wall injury greatly affects pulmonary function and complication rates during the acute postoperative phase. In this study we aimed to compare the incidence of pulmonary complications and respiratory recovery after thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position with hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) versus open laparotomy (OL). METHODS: This was a case-matched control study of patients with esophageal cancer who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position. Thirty-two patients in the HALS group and 32 patients in the OL group were selected by the use of propensity score matching. Operative outcomes and perioperative changes in respiratory function were compared. RESULTS: There was no operative mortality in either group. Estimated blood loss was less in the HALS group (P < .001). The incidence of postoperative pneumonia was 6.2% (4/64) overall; it was less in the HALS group (0%) than in the OL group (12.5%) (P = .016). There were no differences in preoperative vital capacity (VC) and percent predicted vital capacity (%VC). Each parameter, including the ratio of the postoperative to preoperative %VC (%VC ratio), reached its nadir on postoperative day 7 in both groups but was greater in the HALS group (VC, 2.91 ± 0.68 L vs 2.53 ± 0.53 L, P = .018; %VC, 90.62 ± 16.92% vs 78.91 ± 16.65%, P = .007; %VC ratio, 80.90 ± 9.87% vs 72.09 ± 11.95%, P = .002). At 1 and 3 months, respiratory recovery was seen in both groups but more so in the HALS group. At 6 months, further respiratory recovery was seen in both groups, without any significant intergroup differences. CONCLUSION: During the acute phase after thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position, HALS is associated with less-restrictive ventilatory impairment, fewer subsequent pulmonary complications, and less blood loss than OL. The combination of HALS and thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position is less invasive on respiratory function.