RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Tranexamic acid is used to prevent hyperfibrinolysis and reduce postoperative bleeding and blood transfusions in on-pump cardiac surgery. We evaluate the efficacy of low or high dose tranexamic acid in a prospective cohort study conducted in Valencia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 427 patients were recruited between January 2019 and January 2020, 207 in the Hospital General Universitario (low dose [LD]) and 220 in the Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe (high dose [HD] and intermediate dose [ID]). We recorded the presence of hyperfibrinolysis on rotational thromboelastometry, intra- and postoperative administration of blood products, chest tube output within the first 12â¯h, and incidence of convulsions. Univariate and multivariate comparisons were performed. Univariate analysis of all categories was performed after propensity score matching between LD and HD and between LD and ID. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in: appearance of hyperfibrinolysis, administration of blood products, postoperative chest tube output within the first 12 h, or occurrence of convulsions. Group LD received less fibrinogen than group HD (Pâ¯=â¯.014) and ID (Pâ¯=â¯.040) but more fresh frozen plasma than group ID (Pâ¯=â¯.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of low-dose tranexamic acid is as effective as higher doses in hyperfibrinolysis prophylaxis and the prevention of postoperative bleeding in cardiac surgery.
Assuntos
Antifibrinolíticos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Ácido Tranexâmico , Antifibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Estudos Prospectivos , Ácido Tranexâmico/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Tranexamic acid is used to prevent hyperfibrinolysis and reduce postoperative bleeding and blood transfusions in on-pump cardiac surgery. We evaluate the efficacy of low or high dose tranexamic acid in a prospective cohort study conducted in Valencia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 427 patients were recruited between January 2019 and January 2020, 207 in the Hospital General Universitario (low dose [LD]) and 220 in the Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe (high dose [HD] and intermediate dose [ID]). We recorded the presence of hyperfibrinolysis on rotational thromboelastometry, intra- and postoperative administration of blood products, chest tube output within the first 12h, and incidence of convulsions. Univariate and multivariate comparisons were performed. Univariate analysis of all categories was performed after propensity score matching between LD and HD and between LD and ID. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in: appearance of hyperfibrinolysis, administration of blood products, postoperative chest tube output within the first 12h, or occurrence of convulsions. Group LD received less fibrinogen than group HD (P=.014) and ID (P=.040) but more fresh frozen plasma than group ID (P=.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of low-dose tranexamic acid is as effective as higher doses in hyperfibrinolysis prophylaxis and the prevention of postoperative bleeding in cardiac surgery.
RESUMO
The anesthetist has 2 major tools for optimizing haemodynamics in cardiac surgery: Vasoactive drugs and the intravascular volume. It is necessary to identify which patients would benefit from one or the other therapies for a suitable response to treatment. Hemodynamic monitoring with the different existing parameters (pressure, volumetric static, volumetric functional and echocardiography) allows the management of these patients to be optimized. In this article a review is presented on the most recent and relevant publications, and the different tools available to control the management of the fluid therapy in this context, and to suggest a few guidelines for the haemodynamics monitoring of patients submitted to cardiac surgery. A systematic search has been made in PubMed, limiting the results to the publications over the last five years up to February 2012.
Assuntos
Anestesiologia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Hidratação/métodos , Monitorização Intraoperatória/métodos , Pressão Sanguínea , Volume Sanguíneo , Pressão Venosa Central , Ecocardiografia/métodos , Hidratação/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Intraoperatórias/etiologia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/prevenção & controle , Vasoconstritores/administração & dosagem , Vasoconstritores/farmacologia , Vasodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Vasodilatadores/farmacologia , Desequilíbrio Hidroeletrolítico/diagnóstico , Desequilíbrio Hidroeletrolítico/etiologia , Desequilíbrio Hidroeletrolítico/prevenção & controleRESUMO
En la cirugía cardiaca, el anestesiólogo dispone de 2 grandes herramientas para la optimización hemodinámica: los fármacos vasoactivos y el volumen intravascular. Es vital identificar qué pacientes se beneficiarán de una u otra terapia para una adecuada respuesta al tratamiento. La monitorización hemodinámica con los distintos parámetros existentes (presión, volumétricos estáticos, volumétricos funcionales y ecocardiográficos) permite optimizar el tratamiento de estos pacientes. Resumimos en este artículo las publicaciones más recientes y relevantes y las distintas herramientas disponibles para guiar la fluidoterapia en este contexto con el fin de sugerir pautas de monitorización hemodinámica en los pacientes sometidos a cirugía cardiaca. Se ha realizado una búsqueda sistemática en PubMed, limitando los resultados a las publicaciones de los últimos 5 años, hasta febrero de 2012 (AU)
The anesthetist has 2 major tools for optimizing haemodynamics in cardiac surgery: Vasoactive drugs and the intravascular volume. It is necessary to identify which patients would benefit from one or the other therapies for a suitable response to treatment. Hemodynamic monitoring with the different existing parameters (pressure, volumetric static, volumetric functional and echocardiography) allows the management of these patients to be optimized. In this article a review is presented on the most recent and relevant publications, and the different tools available to control the management of the fluid therapy in this context, and to suggest a few guidelines for the haemodynamics monitoring of patients submitted to cardiac surgery. A systematic search has been made in PubMed, limiting the results to the publications over the last five years up to February 2012 (AU)