Factors associated with uncontrolled blood pressure in hypertensive Brazilians.

Uncontrolled hypertension has a high prevalence and is related to numerous negative health outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the factors associated with the lack of blood pressure control in hypertensive Brazilians treated in public and private services. This is an analytical, multicentric, and national cross-sectional study, carried out with adult hypertensive patients, monitored in 45 outpatient clinics (September 2013 to October 2015) in a prospective record interview, clinical, and anthropometric assessment. Outcome variables included uncontrolled pressure (systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg). Simple and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed. Two thousand six hundred forty-three participants were assessed with a mean age of 61.6 ± 11.9 years, 55.7% of women, and 46.4% with uncontrolled blood pressure (BP). The following were associated with uncontrolled BP: age over 60 years (OR: 1.31 [1.11-1.55]); practice of irregular physical activity (OR: 1.28 [1.06-1.55]); attending the emergency room for hypertensive crises in the last six months (OR: 1.80 [1.46-2.22]); increased body mass index (OR: 1.02 [1.01-1.04]); low adherence to drug treatment (OR: 1.22 [1.04-1.44]) and menopause (OR: 1.36 [1.07-1.72]). The following were negatively associated: fruit consumption (OR: 0.90 [0.85-0.94]); presence of dyslipidemia (OR: 0.75 [0.64-0.89]), acute myocardial infarction (OR: 0.59 [0.46-0.76]), and peripheral arterial disease (OR: 0.52 [0.34-0.78]). Factors associated with difficult-to-control blood pressure are the same that increase the risk for hypertension, while the presence of atherosclerotic disease and its outcomes were associated with better control.

Therapeutic Adherence According to the Morisky Scale in Patients with Hypertension

Abstract Background In view of the high prevalence of hypertension and the importance of adequate drug therapy in the prevention of complications, it is necessary to know the adherence to drug treatment in this population. Objective To verify adherence to antihypertensive drug treatment in Brazilian patients with hypertension using the Morisky-Green Test (MGT), relating it with demographic data. Methods Prospective, observational, multicenter, national registry study, with 2,578 hypertensive patients participating in study I, the Brazilian Cardiovascular Registry of Arterial Hypertension (I-RBH), recruited in the five regions of Brazil. The analyses carried out on the data were descriptive statistics, qui-square tests, ANOVA, and logistic regression, adopting 5% as the significance level for the tests. Results The research shows that 56.13% of patients in the sample were female; 56.71% were elderly (≥ 65 years); 55.86% were White; 52.37% were from the Southeast Region; and 59.74% were non-adherent. Logistic regression showed an independent relationship between patients' age, ethnicity, and region with medication adherence. Conclusion Adherence to treatment is the key to reducing high rates of cardiovascular complications. The study brings a successful outcome in the relationship between the factors ethnicity, age, and region of patients with hypertension and medication adherence. To this end, it is necessary to understand these factors, considering systematic evaluation in the care of patients with hypertension and other chronic non-communicable diseases. This study is a significant contribution to multidisciplinary teams, as it highlights which risk factors interfere with medication adherence, incorporating better strategies in health education.

Factors associated with uncontrolled blood pressure in hypertensive Brazilians

ABSTRACT: Uncontrolled hypertension has a high prevalence and is related to numerous negative health outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the factors associated with the lack of blood pressure control in hypertensive Brazilians treated in public and private services. This is an analytical, multicentric, and national cross-sectional study, carried out with adult hypertensive patients, monitored in 45 outpatient clinics (September 2013 to October 2015) in a prospective record interview, clinical, and anthropometric assessment. Outcome variables included uncontrolled pressure (systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg). Simple and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed. Two thousand six hundred forty-three participants were assessed with a mean age of 61.6 ± 11.9 years, 55.7% of women, and 46.4% with uncontrolled blood pressure (BP). The following were associated with uncontrolled BP: age over 60 years (OR: 1.31 [1.11­1.55]); practice of irregular physical activity (OR: 1.28 [1.06­1.55]); attending the emergency room for hypertensive crises in the last six months (OR: 1.80 [1.46­2.22]); increased body mass index (OR: 1.02 [1.01­1.04]); low adherence to drug treatment (OR: 1.22 [1.04­1.44]) and menopause (OR: 1.36 [1.07­1.72]). The following were negatively associated: fruit consumption (OR: 0.90 [0.85­0.94]); presence of dyslipidemia (OR: 0.75 [0.64­0.89]), acute myocardial infarction (OR: 0.59 [0.46­0.76]), and peripheral arterial disease (OR: 0.52 [0.34-0.78]). Factors associated with difficult-to-control blood pressure are the same that increase the risk for hypertension, while the presence of atherosclerotic disease and its outcomes were associated with better control.

I RBH - First Brazilian Hypertension Registry.

BACKGROUND: A registry assessing the care of hypertensive patients in daily clinical practice in public and private centers in various Brazilian regions has not been conducted to date. Such analysis is important to elucidate the effectiveness of this care. OBJECTIVE: To document the current clinical practice for the treatment of hypertension with identification of the profile of requested tests, type of administered treatment, level of blood pressure (BP) control, and adherence to treatment. METHODS: National, observational, prospective, and multicenter study that will include patients older than 18 years with hypertension for at least 4 weeks, following up in public and private centers and after signing a consent form. The study will exclude patients undergoing dialysis, hospitalized in the previous 30 days, with class III or IV heart failure, pregnant or nursing, with severe liver disease, stroke or acute myocardial infarction in the past 30 days, or with diseases with a survival prognosis < 1 year. Evaluations will be performed at baseline and after 1 year of follow-up. The parameters that will be evaluated include anthropometric data, lifestyle habits, BP levels, lipid profile, metabolic syndrome, and adherence to treatment. The primary outcomes will be hospitalization due to hypertensive crisis, cardiocirculatory events, and cardiovascular death, while secondary outcomes will be hospitalization for heart failure and requirement of dialysis. A subgroup analysis of 15% of the sample will include noninvasive central pressure evaluation at baseline and study end. The estimated sample size is 3,000 individuals for a prevalence of 5%, sample error of 2%, and 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: The results will be presented after the final evaluation, which will occur at the end of a 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: The analysis of this registry will improve the knowledge and optimize the treatment of hypertension in Brazil, as a way of modifying the prognosis of cardiovascular disease in the country.

Posicionamento Luso-Brasileiro de Emergências Hipertensivas ­ 2020 / Luso-Brazilian Position Statement on Hypertensive Emergencies - 2020

A emergência hipertensiva (EH) está integrada em um quadro nosológico mais geral denominado crise hipertensiva (CH). A CH representa situações clínicas que cursam com elevação aguda da pressão arterial (PA), geralmente níveis de PA sistólica (PAS) ≥ 180 mmHg e diastólica (PAD) ≥ 120 mmHg, que podem resultar ou não em lesões de órgãos-alvo (LOA) (coração, cérebro, rins e artérias).1-5 A CH pode se apresentar sob duas formas distintas em relação à gravidade e ao prognóstico: a urgência hipertensiva (UH) e a EH. Casos de EH cursam com elevação acentuada da PA associada a LOA e risco imediato de morte, fato que requer redução rápida e gradual dos níveis tensionais em minutos a horas, com monitoramento intensivo e uso de fármacos por via endovenosa (EV).1-5 Ela pode se manifestar como um evento cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, renal ou na gestação, na forma de pré-eclâmpsia ou eclâmpsia. Embora a definição clássica das duas apresentações da CH a descreva com valores acima dos 180/120 mmHg, atualmente o maior consenso se estabelece no conceito de que mais do que os valores é o dano ou o risco iminente de acometimento de órgãos-alvo que distingue a EH da UH. Assim, a UH caracteriza-se por elevações da PA, sem LOA e sem risco de morte iminente, fato que permite redução mais lenta dos níveis de PA em período de 24 a 48 horas. Atualmente, existe uma ampla discussão sobre a real existência do diagnóstico "urgência hipertensiva".6 Muitos preconizam que esta classificação necessita ser atualizada (se não abandonada) e que a maior importância diagnóstica é a observação dos sinais/sintomas e da disfunção aguda dos órgãos-alvo, mais do que no valor da PA. Outros acreditam que o termo correto deveria ser "elevação da PA sem LOA em evolução".5,7 Como visto, embora o nível de PA seja frequentemente muito elevado (≥ 180/120 mmHg), não é isso que define EH, mas o comprometimento dos órgãos-alvo. Portanto, o padrão numérico que define a CH é conceitual e serve como parâmetro de conduta, mas não deve ser usado como critério absoluto. Se a definição de CH hoje está mais universalmente aceita, a epidemiologia e prevalência desta condição são ainda questões de baixo conhecimento da comunidade científica. Na literatura, existem poucos estudos sobre o tema e todos eles com número limitado de participantes. Atualmente, discute-se a hipótese de a não adesão ao tratamento ser um dos fatores mais prevalentes na etiologia da CH, sem especificações quanto à separação entre UH e EH. Nos EUA, nos maiores estudos seriados a incidência de CH é de cerca de 4,8%, sendo 0,8% atribuída às EH.8,9 Outros centros mostram que a CH responde por uma taxa variável de 0,45 a 0,59% de todos os atendimentos de emergência hospitalar e 1,7% das emergências clínicas, sendo a UH mais comum do que a EH.10-12 Acidente vascular cerebral (AVC) isquêmico e edema agudo de pulmão (EAP) são as situações clínicas mais encontradas nas EH.10,11 Estima-se que cerca de 1% dos indivíduos hipertensos possa vir a apresentar uma CH ao longo da sua vida.1,2 As situações clínicas envolvidas em uma EH, de acordo com as LOA, são mostradas na Tabela 1. A Tabela 2 mostra as principais situações relacionadas à UH.

Hipertensão arterial secundária / Secondary arterial hypertension

A maioria dos pacientes com hipertensão arterial não tem etiologia clara e é classificada como hipertensão primária. No entanto, 5% a 10% desses pacientes podem ter hipertensão secundária, o que indica presença de uma causa subjacente e potencialmente reversível. A prevalência e etiologias potenciais da hipertensão secundária variam de acordo com a idade. As causas mais comuns em crianças são doença do parênquima renal e coarctação da aorta. Em adultos com 65 anos ou mais, estenose da artéria renal aterosclerótica, insuficiência renal e hipotireoidismo são causas comuns. A hipertensão secundária deve ser considerada na presença de sintomas e sinais sugestivos, como hipertensão grave ou resistente, idade de início inferior a 30 anos (especialmente antes da puberdade), hipertensão maligna ou acelerada e aumento agudo da pressão arterial a partir de leituras previamente estáveis. Além disso, a hipertensão renovascular deve ser considerada em pacientes com um aumento da creatinina sérica de pelo menos 50% ocorrendo dentro de uma semana após o início da terapia com inibidores da enzima de conversão da angiotensina ou com bloqueadores dos receptores da angiotensina; hipertensão grave e rim menor unilateral ou diferença no tamanho do rim maior que 1,5 cm; ou edema pulmonar instantâneo recorrente. Outras causas subjacentes da hipertensão secundária incluem hiperaldosteronismo, apneia obstrutiva do sono, feocromocitoma, síndrome de Cushing, doença da tireoide, coarctação da aorta e uso de certos medicamentos. O tratamento adequado da hipertensão secundária geralmente pode controlar tanto a condição subjacente quanto hipertensão arterial, o que reduz o risco de complicações sérias como eventos cardiovasculares (infarto do miocárdio, acidente vascular cerebral, dissecção agudo de aorta e doença aterosclerótica carotídea e periférica) e doença renal crônica.

Most patients with hypertension have no clear etiology and are classified as primary hypertension. However, 5% to 10% of these patients may have secondary hypertension, indicating the presence of an underlying and potentially reversible cause. The prevalence and potential etiologies of secondary hypertension vary with age. The most common causes in children are renal parenchymal disease and aortic coarctation. In adults 65 years and older, atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis, renal failure, and hypothyroidism are common causes. Secondary hypertension should be considered in the presence of suggestive symptoms and signs such as severe or resistant hypertension, onset age less than 30 years (especially before puberty), malignant or accelerated hypertension, and acute blood pressure increase from previously stable readings. In addition, renovascular hypertension should be considered in patients with a serum creatinine increase of at least 50% occurring within one week of initiation of therapy with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers; severe hypertension and unilateral minor kidney or kidney size difference greater than 1.5 cm; or recurrent instant pulmonary edema. Other underlying causes of secondary hypertension include hyperaldosteronism, obstructive sleep apnea, pheochromocytoma, Cushing's syndrome, thyroid disease, aortic coarctation, and the use of certain medications. Appropriate treatment of secondary hypertension can usually control both the underlying condition and hypertension, which reduces the risk of serious complications such as cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke, acute aortic dissection, and carotid and peripheral atherosclerotic disease) and end-stage renal disease

Análise crítica dos estudos que mudaram a prática clínica recente: hipertensão arterial / Critical analysis of studies that changed recent clinical practice: arterial hypertension

Os três estudos que tiveram importante influência na prática clínica de quem trabalha com hipertensão arterial foram os estudos SIMPLICITY HTN-3, PATHWAY 2 e SPRINT. O estudo SIMPLICITY HTN-3 pôs a dúvida um procedimento que já estava sendo utilizado na prática clínica, qual seja, denervação do nervo simpático renal através de ablação por ondas de radiofrequência. Foi o primeiro estudos com grupo controle que não mostrou diferença entre os desfechos específicos de controle da pressão arterial em pacientes com hipertensão resistente. Portanto, o estudo SIMPLICITY HTN 3 modificou a prática clínica no sentido de que todas as diretrizes de hipertensão são unânimes em afirmar que tal procedimento atualmente deva ser reservado para laboratórios específicos de investigação clínica do método e não deve ser empregado como opção estabelecida de tratamento. O estudo PATHWAY 2 consolida o uso do bloqueador de receptor de mineralocorticoides (espironolactona) como o quarto medicamento no fluxograma de tratamento da hipertensão arterial resistente. Os resultados foram tão impactantes que a diretriz europeia de hipertensão arterial mudou substancialmente a orientação da sequência farmacológica do tratamento. Por fim, o estudo SPRINT demonstrou a necessidade de intervenção em pacientes com hipertensão arterial com valores pressóricos abaixo de 140/90 mmHg na dependência da quantidade de risco adicional dos pacientes. Os resultados do estudo SPRINT motivaram alterações ou inclusões de seus dados em várias diretrizes nacionais e internacionais, tais como Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia, American Heart Association e European Society of Cardiology

The three studies that have had an important influence on the clinical practice of who works with arterial hypertension were the SIMPLICITY HTN-3, PATHWAY 2 and SPRINT studies. The SIMPLICITY HTN-3 study raised doubts around a procedure that was already being used in clinical practice, the denervation of the sympathetic renal nerve through radiofrequency wave ablation. It was the first study with a control group that did not show a difference between the specific blood pressure control outcomes in patients with resistant hypertension. Therefore, the Simplicity HTN 3 Study modified clinical practice in the sense that all hypertension guidelines are unanimous in stating that currently such a procedure should be reserved for specific clinical investigation laboratories researching the method and should not be used as an established treatment option. The PATHWAY2 study consolidated the use of the mineralocorticoid receptor blocker (spironolactone) as the fourth drug in the resistant arterial hypertension treatment flowchart. The results were so impactful that the European guideline for arterial hypertension changed its orientation around the pharmacological sequence of resistant hypertension treatment substantially. Finally, the SPRINT study demonstrated the need for intervention in patients with arterial hypertension with pressure values below 140/90 mmHg, depending on the amount of additional cardiovascular risk in those patients. The results of the SPRINT study promoted changes to or inclusions of its data in various national and international guidelines, such as the Brazilian Society of Cardiology, the American Heart Association and the European Society of Cardiology

Hipertensão arterial resistente (HAR) / Resistant arterial hypertension (RAH)

A hipertensão arterial resistente (HAR) é definida quando a pressão arterial (PA) permanece acima das metas recomendadas com o uso de três anti-hipertensivos de diferentes classes, incluindo um bloqueador do sistema renina- angiotensina (inibidor da enzima conversora da angiotensina [IECA] ou bloqueador do receptor de angiotensina [BRA]), um bloqueador dos canais de cálcio (BCC) de ação prolongada e um diurético tiazídico (DT) de longa ação em doses máximas preconizadas e toleradas, administradas com frequência, dosagem apropriada e comprovada adesão. Nesta definição está incluído o subgrupo de pacientes hipertensos resistentes, cuja PA é controlada com quatro ou mais medicamentos anti-hipertensivos, chamada de HAR controlada (HAR-C). A classificação da doença em HAR-C e HAR não controlada (HAR-NC), incluindo a HAR refratária (HAR-Ref), um fenótipo extremo de HAR-NC em uso de cinco ou mais anti-hipertensivos, é uma proposta que ganha espaço na literatura. Diante da suspeita clínica de HAR, é necessário verificar a confirmação diagnóstica, e a primeira etapa na investigação é a exclusão das causas de pseudorresistência, tais como falta de adesão ao tratamento (farmacológico e não farmacológico), posologia inadequada, técnica imprópria de aferição da PA e efeito do avental branco. O MAPA e o monitoramento residencial da pressão arterial (MRPA) são os exames para confirmação do controle inadequado da PA. Uma vez afastada a pseudorresistência, confirma-se a existência da HAR e inicia-se uma investigação diagnóstica com exames específicos, conforme a orientação das Diretrizes de Hipertensão em relação ao comprometimento de lesões em órgãos-alvo e hipertensão secundária. A ocorrência de comorbidades associadas deve ser detectada com exames especializados de acordo com a suspeita clínica. O objetivo do tratamento medicamentoso na HAR é detectar as causas do não controle e encontrar a melhor combinação de fármacos, visando o alcance das metas pressóricas com menor ocorrência de efeitos adversos e maior adesão. Em geral, busca-se otimizar o tratamento tríplice com os fármacos preferenciais, que são: IECA ou BRA, BCC di-hidropiridínico e DT.

Resistant hypertension (RHTN) is defined as blood pressure (BP) persistently above the recommended target values despite the use of three antihypertensive agents of different classes, including one blocker of the renin- angiotensin system (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor [ACEI] or angiotensin receptor blocker [ARB]), one long- acting calcium channel blocker (CCB), and one long-acting thiazide diuretic (TD) at maximum recommended and tolerated doses, administered with appropriate frequency and doses and with proven adherence. The definition above includes a subgroup of patients with RHTN whose BP is controlled with four or more antihypertensive medications, known as controlled RHTN (C-RHTN). On clinical suspicion of RHTN, diagnostic confirmation is required, and the first step in the investigation is the exclusion of causes of pseudoresistance, such as lack of treatment adherence (pharmacological and non-pharmacological), inadequate dosing, improper BP measurement technique, and white-coat effect. Lack of BP control should be confirmed by ABPM and home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM). Secondary hypertension (SecH) is defined as increased BP due to an identifiable cause. Patients with RH should be investigated for the most prevalent causes of "non-endocrine" and "endocrine" SecH after exclusion of use of medications that may interfere with BP values: antiinflammatory drugs, glucocorticoids, nasal decongestants, appetite suppressants, antidepressants, immunosuppressants, erythropoietin, contraceptives, and illicit drugs. The objective of pharmacological treatment in RHTN is to identify the causes of lack of control and find the best combination of drugs, aiming at achieving the target BP with few adverse effects and greater adherence. In general, triple treatment optimization is attempted with preferred drugs, namely, ACEIs or ARBs, dihydropyridine CCBs, and TDs

I RBH - First Brazilian Hypertension Registry / I RBH – Primeiro Registro Brasileiro de Hipertensão Arterial

Abstract Background: A registry assessing the care of hypertensive patients in daily clinical practice in public and private centers in various Brazilian regions has not been conducted to date. Such analysis is important to elucidate the effectiveness of this care. Objective: To document the current clinical practice for the treatment of hypertension with identification of the profile of requested tests, type of administered treatment, level of blood pressure (BP) control, and adherence to treatment. Methods: National, observational, prospective, and multicenter study that will include patients older than 18 years with hypertension for at least 4 weeks, following up in public and private centers and after signing a consent form. The study will exclude patients undergoing dialysis, hospitalized in the previous 30 days, with class III or IV heart failure, pregnant or nursing, with severe liver disease, stroke or acute myocardial infarction in the past 30 days, or with diseases with a survival prognosis < 1 year. Evaluations will be performed at baseline and after 1 year of follow-up. The parameters that will be evaluated include anthropometric data, lifestyle habits, BP levels, lipid profile, metabolic syndrome, and adherence to treatment. The primary outcomes will be hospitalization due to hypertensive crisis, cardiocirculatory events, and cardiovascular death, while secondary outcomes will be hospitalization for heart failure and requirement of dialysis. A subgroup analysis of 15% of the sample will include noninvasive central pressure evaluation at baseline and study end. The estimated sample size is 3,000 individuals for a prevalence of 5%, sample error of 2%, and 95% confidence interval. Results: The results will be presented after the final evaluation, which will occur at the end of a 1-year follow-up. Conclusion: The analysis of this registry will improve the knowledge and optimize the treatment of hypertension in Brazil, as a way of modifying the prognosis of cardiovascular disease in the country.

Resumo Fundamento: Ainda não foi realizado um registro brasileiro para avaliar, na prática clínica diária, o atendimento a pacientes hipertensos tanto em serviços públicos quanto privados distribuídos pelas diversas regiões do país. Este conhecimento é importante como forma de verificar a efetividade deste atendimento. Objetivo: Documentar a prática clínica vigente para o tratamento da hipertensão arterial, através do conhecimento do perfil dos exames realizados, do tipo de tratamento recebido, do nível de controle da pressão arterial (PA) e da adesão ao tratamento. Métodos: Estudo nacional, observacional, prospectivo e multicêntrico que incluirá pacientes > 18 anos, hipertensos há ≥ 4 semanas, em acompanhamento em serviços públicos e privados e com assinatura do consentimento. Serão excluídos pacientes em diálise, internados nos últimos 30 dias, com insuficiência cardíaca classe III ou IV, gravidez ou amamentação, hepatopatia grave, acidente vascular cerebral ou infarto agudo nos 30 dias anteriores e doenças com prognóstico de sobrevida < 1 ano. As avaliações serão realizadas ao início e final do estudo, após acompanhamento por 1 ano. Parâmetros a serem avaliados incluirão dados antropométricos, hábitos de vida, PA, perfil lipídico, síndrome metabólica e adesão ao tratamento. Os desfechos primários serão internação por crise hipertensiva, evento cardiocirculatório e óbito cardiovascular, e os desfechos secundários serão internação por insuficiência cardíaca e necessidade de diálise. Uma análise de subgrupo avaliará a pressão central de forma não invasiva em 15% da amostra no início e final do estudo. A amostra estimada é de 3.000 indivíduos para prevalência de 5%, erro amostral de 2% e intervalo de confiança de 95%. Resultados: Os resultados serão apresentados após a avaliação final que ocorrerá quando encerrado 1 ano de seguimento. Conclusão: A análise deste registro trará melhor conhecimento sobre o tratamento da hipertensão no Brasil e possibilitará a otimização do mesmo, como forma de interferir no prognóstico da doença cardiovascular em nosso meio.

Electrocardiography in the diagnosis of ventricular hypertrophy in patients with chronic renal disease.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is an independent predictor of cardiovascular risk, and its characterization and prevalence in chronic renal disease (CRD) should be further studied. OBJECTIVE: To establish the diagnosis of LVH in patients with stage-5 CRD using six different electrocardiographic criteria, and to correlate them with left ventricular mass index (LVMI) as obtained by echocardiography. METHODS: Cross-sectional study including 100 patients (58 men and 42 women, mean age 46.2 + or - 14.0 years) with CRD of all causes undergoing hemodialysis (HD) for at least six months. Electrocardiography (ECG) and echocardiography were performed in all patients, always up to one hour after the end of the HD sessions. RESULTS: LVH was detected in 83 patients (83%), of whom 56 (67.4%) had the concentric pattern and 27 (32.6%) the eccentric pattern of LVH. Diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of all the electrocardiographic methods studied were higher than 50%. Using Pearson's linear correlation for LVMI, only the Sokolow-Lyon voltage criterion did not show a > or = 0.50 coefficient. Calculation of the likelihood ratio, in turn, showed that ECG has a discriminatory power for the diagnosis of LVH in the population studied, with emphasis on the Cornell-product and Romhilt-Estes criteria. No correlation was observed between LVMI and QTc and QTc dispersion. CONCLUSION: ECG is a useful, efficient, and highly reproducible method for the diagnosis of LVH in HD patients. In this population, the Cornell-product proved to be the most reliable criterion for the detection of LVH.

Slow breathing test increases the suspicion of white-coat hypertension in the office.

BACKGROUND: It would be useful to have a clinical test that increases the suspicion of white coat hypertension (WCH) during the medical consultation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the Slow Breathing Test (SBT) when differentiating hypertension from WCH. METHODS: 101 hypertensive patients selected at triage had their medication withdrawn for 2-3 weeks. The blood pressure (BP) was measured before and after the SBT at two consultations at the office. The test consisted in breathing for 1 minute at the frequency of one respiratory cycle every 10 seconds. Two diagnostic criteria were compared: 1--decrease in diastolic BP > or = 10% in at least one visit or 2--decrease in BP to normal levels (<140/90 mm Hg) in at least one visit. The ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was performed while blinded to the clinical measurements. RESULTS: 71 women and 30 men, with a mean age of 51+/-10 years, with mean pre and post-test BP of 152+/-17/ 99+/-11 and 140+/-18/ 91+/-11 mm Hg were assessed. Nine patients had normal clinical and ambulatory measurements. Of the 92 patients, 28 (30%) were classified as having WCH; 15 had a positive test for Criterion 1 and 21 for the Criterion 2. Among 64 (70%) hypertensive individuals, 14 tested positive for Criterion 1 and 12 for Criterion 2. Sensitivity and specificity (95% CI): 0.54 (0.36-0.71) and 0.78 (0.67-0.87) for Criterion 1; 0.75 (0.57-0.87) and 0.81 (0.70-0.89) for Criterion 2. CONCLUSION: The SBT showed an increase in the clinical suspicion of WCH in two visits when using the BP normalization criterion. This finding suggests that the test can help in the optimization of ABPM requests for suspected cases.

Ventricular mass and electrocardiographic criteria of hypertrophy: evaluation of new score.

BACKGROUND: The left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is an important and independent cardiovascular risk factor. There is a scarcity of studies in Brazil designed to test the efficacy of the electrocardiogram (ECG) in the diagnosis of this important pathological process. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a new electrocardiographic score for the diagnosis of LVH by ECG: the sum of the highest amplitude of the S wave and the highest amplitude of the R wave on the horizontal plane, multiplied by the result of the QRS duration [(S+R) X QRS)] and comparing it with the classic electrocardiographic criteria. METHODS: The echocardiograms and ECG of 1,204 hypertensive patients receiving outpatient care were evaluated. The left ventricular mass index (LVMI) was assessed by the echocardiogram, with a diagnosis of LVH when the LVMI was > or = 96 g/m(2) for women and > or = 116 g/m(2) for men. Four classic criteria of LVH were analyzed at the ECG, in addition to the new score to be tested. RESULTS: In general, the studied ECG-LVH criteria showed significant statistical correlation to the echocardiographic LVMI. The (R+S) X QRS index, using 2.80 mm.s as the cutoff value, provided test accuracy regarding sensibility and specificity of 35.2% and 88.71%, respectively, representing the best correlation to LVMI (r=0.564) when compared to the other indexes: Romhilt-Estes (r=0.464); Sokolow-Lyon (r=0.419); Cornell voltage (r=0.377); Cornell product r=0.444). CONCLUSION: All the electrocardiographic criteria used for the assessment of the LV mass presented low sensitivity. The new score presented the best correlation with LVMI when compared to the other indexes.

The first Brazilian registry of hypertension

Abstract: A systematic, nationwide assessment of care of patients with hypertension in Brazil is needed. The objective of the First National Registry of Patients with Hypertension in Brazil (RBH) is to evaluate the clinical profile, treatment patterns, and outcomes of diagnosed hypertensive patients in the country. Hypertension affects almost one third of the adult population worldwide and is the leading risk factor for death and disability globally. 1-4 Registries indicate that almost half of hypertensive patients have blood pressure (BP) above the target level, 1-6 but many regions are underrepresented in these studies, especially low- and middle-income countries. 1-6 Most of the data for low- to middle-income countries such as Brazil come from cross sectional regional studies, not prospective national studies. 1,7,8 We conducted the First National Registry of Patients with Hypertension in Brazil (RBH) to evaluate the clinical profile, treatment patterns, and outcomes of patients in the country who have a diagnosis of hypertension.

Efeitos da terapia combinada atorvastatina e clopidogrel na biodisponibilidade da estatina e na função plaquetária em pacientes com doença coronária estável / Effects of the artovastatin and clopidogrel combination therapy on station bioavailability and platelet function of patients with stable coronary disease

Introdução: Atorvastatina 80 mg é recomendada a pacientes portadores de doença coronária para redução de eventos cardiovasculares, havendo controvérsia sobre as interações farmacocinéticas entre doses elevadas das estatinas e uso concomitante de clopidogrel, por compartilharem a mesma via de biotransformação. Este estudo avaliou os efeitos da terapia combinada atorvastatina/clopidogrel na farmacocinética da estatina e função plaquetária em pacientes com doença coronária estável, sob uso crônico e efetivo de estatina. Método: Os pacientes foram admitidos quatro vezes para internação (V1 a V4) em leito-dia. Sete dias (D) antes da primeira internação a estatina em uso foi suspensa. A seguir, receberam atorvastatina 80 mg (D1 a D22) e clopidogrel 75 mg/dia (D8 a D29). Em todas as V foram obtidas amostras de sangue em jejum para dosagens lipídicas, avaliação da função plaquetária (técnica da placa e cone) e quantificação dos níveis plasmáticos de atorvastatina (cromatografia líquida e espectrometria de massa). Resultados: A suspensão por uma semana da estatina modificou o perfil lipídico (P < 0,05 vs. basal), ocorrendo rápida melhora de todas as frações lipídicas após atorvastatina 80 mg (P < 0,005; V1 > V2, V3 e V4). A adesão plaquetária foi menor com clopidogrel isolado (P = 0,003; V4 < V1, V2 e V3), enquanto para a agregação houve menor valor com tratamento combinado atorvastatina/clopidogrel ou clopidogrel isolado comparado aos demais períodos (P < 0,0001; V3 e V4 < V1 e V2). O clopidogrel não modificou as concentrações de atorvastatina. Conclusão: Atorvastatina em alta dose não afetou as meias respostas plaquetárias ao clopidogrel; entretanto, curto período de suspensão da estatina piorou o perfil lipídico e a função plaquetária.

Background: Atorvastatin 80 mg is recommended in patientswith coronary artery disease to reduce cardiovascular events, however, there is controversy regarding the pharmacokinetic interactions between high doses of statins and the concomitant use of clopidogrel, since they share the same biotransformation pathway. This study evaluated theeffects of the atorvastatin/clopidogrel combination therapy on the pharmacokinetics of statins and on platelet function of patients with stable coronary artery disease receivingchronic statins. Method: Patients were admitted four times (V1 to V4) to a day-clinic. Statin was discontinued sevendays (D) before the first admission. Patients then received atorvastatin 80 mg (D1 to D22) and clopidogrel 75 mg/day (D8 to D29). Fasting blood samples were obtained at all time points for lipid measurements, platelet function tests (cone and plate technique), and quantification of atorvastatin plasma levels (liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry). Results: The discontinuation of statins for one weekchanged the lipid profile (P < 0.05 vs. baseline), with an early improvement of all lipid parameters after the administration of atorvastatin 80 mg (P < 0.005; V1 > V2, V3 and V4). Platelet adhesion was lower with clopidogrel alone (P = 0.003; V4 < V1, V2 and V3), whereas platelet aggregation values were lower following the atorvastatin/clopidogrel combination therapy or clopidogrel alone when compared to the other time points (P < 0.0001; V3 and V4 < V1 and V2). The use of clopidogrel did not affect atorvastatin serum levels. Conclusion: High-dose atorvastatin did not affectplatelet responses to clopidogrel, however the short-term statindiscontinuation worsened the lipid profile and platelet function.