Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Transl Med ; 11: 95, 2013 Apr 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23578094

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The traditional smallpox vaccine, administered by scarification, was discontinued in the general population from 1980, because of the absence of new smallpox cases. However, the development of an effective prophylactic vaccine against smallpox is still necessary, to protect from the threat of deliberate release of the variola virus for bioterrorism and from new zoonotic infections, and to improve the safety of the traditional vaccine. Preventive vaccination still remains the most effective control and new vectors have been developed to generate recombinant vaccines against smallpox that induce the same immunogenicity as the traditional one. As protective antibodies are mainly directed against the surface proteins of the two infectious forms of vaccinia, the intracellular mature virions and the extracellular virions, combined proteins from these viral forms can be used to better elicit a complete and protective immunity. METHODS: Four novel viral recombinants were constructed based on the fowlpox genetic background, which independently express the vaccinia virus L1 and A27 proteins present on the mature virions, and the A33 and B5 proteins present on the extracellular virions. The correct expression of the transgenes was determined by RT-PCR, Western blotting, and immunofluorescence. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Using immunoprecipitation and Western blotting, the ability of the proteins expressed by the four novel FPL1R, FPA27L, FPA33R and FPB5R recombinants to be recognized by VV-specific hyperimmune mouse sera was demonstrated. By neutralisation assays, recombinant virus particles released by infected chick embryo fibroblasts were shown not be recognised by hyperimmune sera. This thus demonstrates that the L1R, A27L, A33R and B5R gene products are not inserted into the new viral progeny. Fowlpox virus replicates only in avian species, but it is permissive for entry and transgene expression in mammalian cells, while being immunologically non-cross-reactive with vaccinia virus. These recombinants might therefore represent safer and more promising immunogens that can circumvent neutralisation by vector-generated immunity in smallpox-vaccine-experienced humans.


Assuntos
Vírus da Varíola das Aves Domésticas/genética , Vacina Antivariólica/genética , Vacinas Sintéticas/genética , Vaccinia virus/genética , Vacinas Virais/genética , Animais , Embrião de Galinha , Chlorocebus aethiops , Fibroblastos/metabolismo , Genes Virais , Humanos , Camundongos , Microscopia de Fluorescência , Testes de Neutralização , Vacina Antivariólica/imunologia , Transgenes , Vacinas Sintéticas/imunologia , Células Vero
2.
J Virol Methods ; 187(1): 172-6, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23000750

RESUMO

The development of an effective prophylactic vaccine is still necessary to improve the safety of the conventional although-discontinued smallpox vaccine, and to protect from the threat of deliberate release of variola virus. This need also arises from the number of new cases of animal orthopoxvirus infections each year, and to reduce the risk to animal handlers. Fowlpox (FP) recombinants only replicate in avian species and have been developed against human infectious diseases, as they can elicit an effective immune response, are not cross-reactive immunologically with vaccinia, and represent safer and more promising immunogens for immunocompromised individuals. The aim of this study was the characterisation of two new fowlpox recombinants expressing the A33R vaccinia virus gene either alone (FP(A33R)) or with the green fluorescent protein (FP(A33R-GFP)) to verify whether GFP can affect the expression of the transgene. The results show that both FP(A33R) and FP(A33R-GFP) can express A33R correctly, but A33R mRNA and protein synthesis are higher by FP(A33R) than by FP(A33R-GFP). Therefore, GFP co-expression does not prevent, but can reduce the level of a vaccine protein, and may affect the protective efficacy of the immune response.


Assuntos
Vírus da Varíola das Aves Domésticas/genética , Vírus da Varíola das Aves Domésticas/metabolismo , Proteínas de Fluorescência Verde/genética , Glicoproteínas de Membrana/genética , Proteínas Recombinantes/biossíntese , Proteínas do Envelope Viral/genética , Animais , Linhagem Celular , Embrião de Galinha , Chlorocebus aethiops , Vírus da Varíola das Aves Domésticas/imunologia , Proteínas de Fluorescência Verde/biossíntese , Humanos , Glicoproteínas de Membrana/biossíntese , Orthopoxvirus/imunologia , Infecções por Poxviridae/imunologia , Infecções por Poxviridae/prevenção & controle , Biossíntese de Proteínas , RNA Mensageiro/biossíntese , Proteínas Recombinantes/genética , Vaccinia virus/imunologia , Células Vero , Proteínas do Envelope Viral/biossíntese , Replicação Viral
3.
Virus Res ; 178(2): 374-82, 2013 Dec 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24050999

RESUMO

The first-generation smallpox vaccine was based on live vaccinia virus (VV) and it successfully eradicated the disease worldwide. Therefore, it was not administered any more after 1980, as smallpox no longer existed as a natural infection. However, emerging threats by terrorist organisations has prompted new programmes for second-generation vaccine development based on attenuated VV strains, which have been shown to cause rare but serious adverse events in immunocompromised patients. Considering the closely related animal poxviruses that might also be used as bioweapons, and the increasing number of unvaccinated young people and AIDS-affected immunocompromised subjects, a safer and more effective smallpox vaccine is still required. New avipoxvirus-based vectors should improve the safety of conventional vaccines, and protect from newly emerging zoonotic orthopoxvirus diseases and from the threat of deliberate release of variola or monkeypox virus in a bioterrorist attack. In this study, DNA and fowlpox recombinants expressing the L1R, A27L, A33R and B5R genes were constructed and evaluated in a pre-clinical trial in mouse, following six prime/boost immunisation regimens, to compare their immunogenicity and protective efficacy against a challenge with the lethal VV IHD-J strain. Although higher numbers of VV-specific IFNγ-producing T lymphocytes were observed in the protected mice, the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte response and the presence of neutralising antibodies did not always correlate with protection. In spite of previous successful results in mice, rabbits and monkeys, where SIV/HIV transgenes were expressed by the fowlpox vector, the immune response elicited by these recombinants was low, and most of the mice were not protected.


Assuntos
Vírus da Varíola das Aves Domésticas/genética , Mpox/prevenção & controle , Vacina Antivariólica/imunologia , Vacinas de DNA/imunologia , Vaccinia virus/imunologia , Proteínas Virais/imunologia , Animais , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Citotoxicidade Imunológica , Feminino , Vetores Genéticos , Interferon gama/metabolismo , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos BALB C , Mpox/imunologia , Vacina Antivariólica/administração & dosagem , Vacina Antivariólica/genética , Linfócitos T/imunologia , Vacinas de DNA/administração & dosagem , Vacinas de DNA/genética , Vaccinia virus/genética , Proteínas Virais/genética
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa