RESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare postoperative complications of laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) with total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). A secondary outcome examined whether complications differ by age. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A multicenter academic healthcare system. PATIENTS: Individuals > 18 years old undergoing LM from 2011 to 2021 or TLH for benign indications from 2020 to 2021. INTERVENTIONS: LM or TLH. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were 1178 patients in the LM group and 1304 in the TLH group. Patients who underwent LM were younger, more often premenopausal, nonsmokers, with lower body mass index, lower preoperative hemoglobin, larger uterine size, and lower American Society of Anesthesiologists class. LM had longer operative times (154.1 ± 74.5 vs 145.9 ± 70.5 min, p <.0001), higher use of intraoperative hemostatic agents (25% vs 9.1%, p <.0001), and higher estimated blood loss (222.7 ± 313.0 vs 87.4 ± 145.9 mL, p <.0001) than TLH. Postoperatively, LM was associated with fewer surgical site infections (3.1% vs 5.8%, p <.0001), readmissions within 30 days (2.0% vs 5.6%, p <.0001), or emergency department visits within 90 days (10.9% vs 14.4%, p = .008). LM were more likely to be admitted 24 hours postoperatively (5.9% vs 3.4%, p = .0023) or receive a blood transfusion within 30 days (4.0% vs 1.0%, p <.0001). Variables associated with increased risk of postoperative complications were tobacco use, American Society of Anesthesiologists class > 3, preoperative anemia, estimated blood loss ≥ 150 mL, and specimen weight > 250 g. Logistic regression demonstrated that operative time ≥185 minutes was most strongly associated with 24-hour admission postoperatively (odds ratio [OR] = 12.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.71-45.27). In individuals ≤ 37 years of age, the LM group was less likely than the TLH group to experience surgical site infection (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.14-0.62) or present to the emergency department (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.26-0.63). CONCLUSION: In this large cohort of patients, both LM and TLH had low rates of postoperative complications, but the complications differed for each approach. In appropriate surgical candidates, either approach may be offered based upon patients' goals.
Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Miomectomia Uterina , Feminino , Humanos , Adolescente , Miomectomia Uterina/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article will review current guidelines regarding surgical protocols for elective and nonelective surgeries during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic. RECENT FINDINGS: Perioperative management for surgical patients should be modified to promote the safety and wellbeing of patients and caregivers amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. COVID-19 testing should be performed preoperatively with subsequent preprocedure quarantine. Nonemergent or nonlife-threatening surgery should be postponed for COVID-19 positive patients. The consensus of surgical societies is to use a laparoscopic surgical approach for COVID-19 positive patients when appropriate and to avoid port venting at the end of procedures. For COVID-19 positive patients requiring an emergent procedure, the use of personal protective equipment is strongly recommended. SUMMARY: After over a year of the COVID-19 pandemic, effective protocols and precautions have been established to decrease the morbidity and mortality of patients undergoing surgery and to promote the safety of healthcare personnel. Continued investigations are necessary as cases of new, possibly more virulent, strains of the virus arise.
Assuntos
COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa/prevenção & controle , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/normas , Assistência Perioperatória/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Equipamento de Proteção Individual , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the rate of postoperative urinary retention (POUR) after total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) using the autofill vs the backfill void trial. Secondary objectives were to compare the time to discharge from the recovery room, rate of postoperative urinary tract infection (UTI), perceived bladder condition, the effect of bladder function on life, and patient satisfaction. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Single academic medical center. PATIENTS: Women who underwent TLH by conventional laparoscopy or robotic-assisted laparoscopy for benign non-urogynecologic indications. INTERVENTIONS: After TLH, participants were randomized to have an autofill void trial (group A) or a backfill void trial once they were able to ambulate (group B). Failure rate, time to discharge, and UTI rate were assessed. Participants completed the patient perception of bladder condition and the incontinence impact questionnaire-short form questionnaires. Patient satisfaction was assessed. Multiple regression analysis was performed to determine the predictors of POUR. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Eighty-two participants completed the study after randomization, 42 in group A and 40 in group B. There were no statistically significant differences in demographic or perioperative outcomes. Seven participants had POUR in group A (16.7%) and 11 in group B (27.5%) (pâ¯=â¯.36), respectively. The median time to discharge was 176 minutes for group A (160.5, 255.5) and 218 minutes for group B (180, 265) (pâ¯=â¯.01), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in rate of postoperative UTI (pâ¯>.99), patient perception of bladder condition scores (pâ¯=â¯.24), incontinence impact questionnaire-short form scores (pâ¯=â¯.23), and patient satisfaction scores (pâ¯=â¯.26). A stepwise logistic regression analysis did not demonstrate any predictors of POUR. CONCLUSION: Backfill void trial once the participant was able to ambulate was not superior to the autofill void trial with respect to the rate of POUR. The autofill void trial resulted in faster same-day discharge.
Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Retenção Urinária , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Retenção Urinária/etiologia , MicçãoRESUMO
Surgical adhesions can lead to significant consequences including abdominopelvic pain, bowel obstruction, subfertility, and subsequent surgery. Although laparoscopic surgery is associated with a decreased risk of adhesion formation, methods to further decrease adhesions are warranted. We systematically reviewed literature addressing the management, prevention, and sequelae of adhesions in women undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, EBSCOhost, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and found 6566 records. The primary outcome was adhesion formation. The secondary outcomes were abdominopelvic pain, quality of life, subfertility, pregnancy, bowel obstruction, urinary symptoms, and subsequent surgery. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 52 studies remained for qualitative synthesis. Risk of bias assessments were applied independently by 2 authors. There was evidence that Hyalobarrier Gel (Anika Therapeutics, Bedford, MA), HyaRegen NCH Gel (Bilar Medikal, Istanbul, Turkey), Oxiplex/AP Gel (Fziomed, Inc., San Luis Obispo, CA), SprayGel (Confluent Surgical Inc., Waltham, MA), and Beriplast (CSL Behring, LLCm King of Prussia, PA) all decrease the incidence of adhesions. Adept (Baxter, Deerfield, IL) significantly decreased de novo adhesion scores of the posterior uterus. Using an integrated treatment approach to pelvic pain significantly improved pain and quality of life compared with standard laparoscopic treatment. Lastly, Hyalobarrier Gel Endo (Anika Therapeutics, Bedford, MA) placement led to a higher pregnancy rate than no barrier usage. Our findings underscore the need for high-quality trials to evaluate the efficacy of surgical techniques, adhesion barriers, and other treatment modalities on the management and prevention of adhesions and their clinical sequelae. This review was registered on PROSPERO (ID = CRD42017068053).
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Aderências Teciduais/prevenção & controle , Dor Abdominal/etiologia , Dor Abdominal/prevenção & controle , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Endometriose/cirurgia , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Humanos , Infertilidade Feminina/cirurgia , Obstrução Intestinal/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Dor Pélvica/etiologia , Dor Pélvica/prevenção & controle , Qualidade de Vida , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Aderências Teciduais/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Vaginal cuff dehiscence may be a vascular-mediated event, and reports show a higher incidence after robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy (RATLH), when compared with other surgical routes. This study was conducted to determine the feasibility of using laser angiography to assess vaginal cuff perfusion during RATLH. METHODS: This was a pilot feasibility trial incorporating 20 women who underwent RATLH for benign disease. Colpotomy was made with ultrasonic or monopolar instruments, whereas barbed or nonbarbed suture was used for cuff closure. Time of instrument activation during colpotomy was recorded. Images were captured of vaginal cuff perfusion before and after cuff closure. Reviewers evaluated these images and determined areas of adequate cuff perfusion. RESULTS: Indocyanine green (ICG) was visible at the vaginal cuff in all participants. Optimal dosage was determined to be 7.5 mg of ICG per intravenous dose. Mean time to appearance for ICG was 18.4 ± 7.3 s (mean ± SD) before closure and 19.0 ± 8.7 s after closure. No significant difference (P = .19) was noted in judged perfusion in open cuffs after colpotomy with a monopolar (48.9 ± 26.0%; mean ± SD) or ultrasonic (40.2 ± 14.1%) device. No difference was seen after cuff closure (P = .36) when a monopolar (70.9 ± 21.1%) or ultrasonic (70.5 ± 20.5%) device was used. The use of barbed (74.1 ± 20.1%) or nonbarbed (66.4 ± 20.9%) sutures did not significantly affect estimated closed cuff perfusion (P = .19). Decreased cuff perfusion was observed with longer instrument activation times in open cuffs (R2 = 0.3175). CONCLUSION: Laser angiography during RATLH allows visualization of vascular perfusion of the vaginal cuff. The technology remains limited by the lack of quantifiable fluorescence and knowledge of clinically significant levels of fluorescence.