RESUMO
Introduction: The emergence of multiple variants of SARS-CoV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic is of great world concern. Until now, their analysis has mainly focused on next-generation sequencing. However, this technique is expensive and requires sophisticated equipment, long processing times, and highly qualified technical personnel with experience in bioinformatics. To contribute to the analysis of variants of interest and variants of concern, increase the diagnostic capacity, and process samples to carry out genomic surveillance, we propose a quick and easy methodology to apply, based on Sanger sequencing of 3 gene fragments that code for protein spike. Methods: Fifteen positive samples for SARS-CoV-2 with a cycle threshold below 25 were sequenced by Sanger and next-generation sequencing methodologies. The data obtained were analyzed on the Nextstrain and PANGO Lineages platforms. Results: Both methodologies allowed the identification of the variants of interest reported by the WHO. Two samples were identified as Alpha, 3 Gamma, one Delta, 3 Mu, one Omicron, and 5 strains were close to the initial Wuhan-Hu-1 virus isolate. According to in silico analysis, key mutations can also be detected to identify and classify other variants not evaluated in the study. Conclusion: The different SARS-CoV-2 lineages of interest and concern are classified quickly, agilely, and reliably with the Sanger sequencing methodology.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The emergence of multiple variants of SARS-CoV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic is of great world concern. Until now, their analysis has mainly focused on next-generation sequencing. However, this technique is expensive and requires sophisticated equipment, long processing times, and highly qualified technical personnel with experience in bioinformatics. To contribute to the analysis of variants of interest and variants of concern, increase the diagnostic capacity, and process samples to carry out genomic surveillance, we propose a quick and easy methodology to apply, based on Sanger sequencing of 3 gene fragments that code for protein spike. METHODS: Fifteen positive samples for SARS-CoV-2 with a cycle threshold below 25 were sequenced by Sanger and next-generation sequencing methodologies. The data obtained were analyzed on the Nextstrain and PANGO Lineages platforms. RESULTS: Both methodologies allowed the identification of the variants of interest reported by the WHO. Two samples were identified as Alpha, 3 Gamma, one Delta, 3 Mu, one Omicron, and 5 strains were close to the initial Wuhan-Hu-1 virus isolate. According to in silico analysis, key mutations can also be detected to identify and classify other variants not evaluated in the study. CONCLUSION: The different SARS-CoV-2 lineages of interest and concern are classified quickly, agilely, and reliably with the Sanger sequencing methodology.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Pandemias , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga EscalaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Fusarium is a very heterogeneous group of fungi, difficult to classify, with a wide range of living styles, acting as saprophytes, parasites of plants, or pathogens for humans and animals. Prevalence of clinical fusariosis and lack of effective treatments have increased the interest in the precise diagnosis, which implies a molecular characterization of Fusarium populations. OBJECTIVE: We compared different genotyping markers in their assessment of the genetic variability and molecular identification of clinical isolates of Fusarium. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the performance of the fingerprinting produced by two random primers: M13, which amplifies a minisatellite sequence, and (GACA)4, which corresponds to a simple repetitive DNA sequence. Using the Hunter Gaston Discriminatory Index (HGDI), an analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA), and a Mantel test, the resolution of these markers was compared to the reference sequencing-based and PCR genotyping methods. RESULTS: The highest HGDI value was associated with the M13 marker followed by (GACA)4. AMOVA and the Mantel tests supported a strong correlation between the M13 classification and the reference method given by the partial sequencing of the transcription elongation factor 1-alpha (TEF1-α) and rDNA 28S. CONCLUSION: The strong correlation between the M13 classification and the sequencingbased reference together with its higher resolution demonstrates its adequacy for the characterization of Fusarium populations.
Assuntos
Fusarium , Animais , Biomarcadores , Colômbia/epidemiologia , Primers do DNA , Fusarium/genética , Genótipo , Repetições de MicrossatélitesRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Reverse transcriptase - polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the standard technique for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. The World Health Organization recommends the Charité-Berlin protocol for COVID-19 diagnosis, which requires triple PCR, limiting the process capability of laboratories and delaying the results. In order to reduce these limitations, a duplex PCR is validated for the detection of the E and ribonuclease P genes. METHODS: We compared the limit of detection, sensitivity and specificity of the duplex PCR technique (E gene and Rnasa P) against the monoplex standard (E gene) in RNA samples from a SARS-CoV-2 isolate and 88 clinical specimens with previously known results. The repeatability and reproducibility of the threshold cycle values ââ(Ct) were determined in two independent laboratories of the Faculty of Medicine of the Universidad de Antioquia, using different reagents and real time instruments. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the Ct results between both techniques (P = .84). Using the monoplex PCR of E gene as a reference, the interrater reliability analysis showed similarity between the two techniques, with a kappa coefficient of 0.89, the sensitivity and the specificity of duplex PCR were 90% and 87%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Duplex PCR does not affect the sensitivity and specificity reported by the Charité, Berlin protocol, being a useful tool for SARS-CoV-2 screening in clinical samples.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Teste para COVID-19 , Humanos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , RNA Viral/análise , DNA Polimerase Dirigida por RNA/genética , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Ribonuclease P/genética , SARS-CoV-2/genéticaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Reverse transcriptase - polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the standard technique for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. The World Health Organization recommends the Charité-Berlin protocol for COVID-19 diagnosis, which requires triple PCR, limiting the process capability of laboratories and delaying the results. In order to reduce these limitations, a duplex PCR is validated for the detection of the E and RNase P genes. METHODS: We compared the limit of detection, sensitivity and specificity of the duplex PCR technique (E gene and RNase P) against the monoplex standard (E gene) in RNA samples from a SARS-CoV-2 isolate and 88 clinical specimens with previously known results. The repeatability and reproducibility of the threshold cycle values (Ct) were determined in two independent laboratories of the Faculty of Medicine of the Universidad de Antioquia, using different reagents and real time instruments. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the Ct results between both techniques (p = 0.84). Using the monoplex PCR of E gene as a reference, the interrater reliability analysis showed similarity between the two techniques, with a kappa coefficient of 0.89, the sensitivity and the specificity of duplex PCR were 90% and 87%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Duplex PCR does not affect the sensitivity and specificity reported by the Charité, Berlin protocol, being a useful tool for SARS-CoV-2 screening in clinical samples.
RESUMO
Introduction: Fusarium is a very heterogeneous group of fungi, difficult to classify, with a wide range of living styles, acting as saprophytes, parasites of plants, or pathogens for humans and animals. Prevalence of clinical fusariosis and lack of effective treatments have increased the interest in the precise diagnosis, which implies a molecular characterization of Fusarium populations. Objective: We compared different genotyping markers in their assessment of the genetic variability and molecular identification of clinical isolates of Fusarium. Materials and methods: We evaluated the performance of the fingerprinting produced by two random primers: M13, which amplifies a minisatellite sequence, and (GACA)4, which corresponds to a simple repetitive DNA sequence. Using the Hunter Gaston Discriminatory Index (HGDI), an analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA), and a Mantel test, the resolution of these markers was compared to the reference sequencing-based and PCR genotyping methods. Results: The highest HGDI value was associated with the M13 marker followed by (GACA)4. AMOVA and the Mantel tests supported a strong correlation between the M13 classification and the reference method given by the partial sequencing of the transcription elongation factor 1-alpha (TEF1-α) and rDNA 28S. Conclusion: The strong correlation between the M13 classification and the sequencing-based reference together with its higher resolution demonstrates its adequacy for the characterization of Fusarium populations.
Introducción. Fusarium es un grupo heterogéneo de hongos, difícil de clasificar y con una amplia gama de estilos de vida, que actúa como saprófito, parásito de plantas o patógeno de humanos y animales. La prevalencia de la fusariosis clínica y la falta de tratamientos han incrementado el interés en su diagnóstico preciso, lo que conlleva la caracterización molecular de las poblaciones. Objetivo. Comparar marcadores de genotipificación en la evaluación de la variabilidad genética e identificación de aislamientos clínicos de Fusarium. Materiales y métodos. Se evaluó la huella genética producida por dos cebadores aleatorios: M13, que amplifica una secuencia minisatélite, y (GACA)4, que corresponde a una secuencia repetitiva de ADN. Utilizando el índice discriminatorio de Hunter Gaston (HGDI), el análisis de varianza molecular (AMOVA) y una prueba de Mantel, se comparó la resolución de estos marcadores con métodos de genotipificación basados en secuenciación y PCR. Resultados. El mayor HGDI se asoció con el marcador M13, seguido de (GACA)4. Las pruebas AMOVA y Mantel mostraron correlación entre las clasificaciones obtenidas con M13 y la referencia basada en la secuenciación parcial del factor de elongación de transcripción 1-alfa (TEF1-α) y el ADNr 28S. Conclusión. La fuerte correlación entre la clasificación obtenida con M13 y el método de referencia, así como su alta resolución, demuestran su idoneidad para la caracterización de poblaciones de Fusarium.
Assuntos
Fusarium , Impressões Digitais de DNA , Bacteriófago M13 , Fusariose , Técnicas de Genotipagem , Elonguina , Genética PopulacionalRESUMO
Introducción: El estándar de diagnóstico para SARS-CoV-2 es la reacción en cadena de la polimerasa (PCR). La Organización Mundial de la Salud recomendó el protocolo de Charité-Berlín para el diagnóstico de COVID-19; esta metodología implica tres PCR, limitando la capacidad de procesamiento y retrasando los resultados. Con el fin de reducir estas limitaciones, se validó una PCR dúplex para la detección del gen E y RNasa P. Métodos: Se comparó el límite de detección, sensibilidad y especificidad de la técnica de PCR dúplex (gen E más RNasa P), comparada contra el estándar monoplex (gen E), en muestras de ARN de un aislado de SARS-CoV-2 y de 88 especímenes clínicos, con resultados previamente conocidos. Se determinó la repetibilidad y reproducibilidad de los valores de ciclos umbrales (cycle threshold [Ct]), en dos laboratorios independientes de la Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad de Antioquia, usando reactivos y equipos diferentes. Resultados: No hay diferencias significativas (p = 0,84) en los resultados de Ct entre ambas estrategias. Al utilizar como referencia el gen E amplificado en monoplex, el análisis de concordancia demostró fuerte similitud entre las dos estrategias, con un coeficiente kappa de Cohen de 0,89, una sensibilidad del 90%, y una especificidad del 87%. Conclusión: La PCR dúplex no afecta la sensibilidad y especificidad informadas por el protocolo Charité, Berlín, siendo una herramienta útil para el cribado de SARS-CoV-2 en muestras clínicas.(AU)
Introduction: Reverse transcriptase - polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the standard technique for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. The World Health Organization recommends the Charité-Berlin protocol for COVID-19 diagnosis, which requires triple PCR, limiting the process capability of laboratories and delaying the results. In order to reduce these limitations, a duplex PCR is validated for the detection of the E and RNase P genes. Methods: We compared the limit of detection, sensitivity and specificity of the duplex PCR technique (E gene and RNase P) against the monoplex standard (E gene) in RNA samples from a SARS-CoV-2 isolate and 88 clinical specimens with previously known results. The repeatability and reproducibility of the threshold cycle values (Ct) were determined in two independent laboratories of the Faculty of Medicine of the Universidad de Antioquia, using different reagents and real time instruments. Results: There were no significant differences in the Ct results between both techniques (p = 0.84). Using the monoplex PCR of E gene as a reference, the interrater reliability analysis showed similarity between the two techniques, with a kappa coefficient of 0.89, the sensitivity and the specificity of duplex PCR were 90% and 87%, respectively. Conclusions: Duplex PCR does not affect the sensitivity and specificity reported by the Charité, Berlin protocol, being a useful tool for SARS-CoV-2 screening in clinical samples.(AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Coronavírus Relacionado à Síndrome Respiratória Aguda Grave , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Betacoronavirus , Genes sry , Ribonuclease Pancreático , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Diagnóstico , Programas de Rastreamento , Doenças Transmissíveis , Organização Mundial da Saúde , Microbiologia , ColômbiaRESUMO
Introducción: La aparición de múltiples variantes del SARS-CoV-2 durante la pandemia de COVID-19 es motivo de gran preocupación mundial. Hasta el momento, su análisis se ha centrado principalmente en la secuenciación de nueva generación. Sin embargo, esta técnica es costosa y requiere equipos sofisticados, largos tiempos de procesamiento y personal técnico altamente cualificado con experiencia en bioinformática. Para contribuir al análisis de variantes de interés y de preocupación, aumentar la capacidad diagnóstica y procesar muestras para realizar vigilancia genómica, proponemos una metodología rápida y fácil de aplicar, basada en la secuenciación Sanger de 3 fragmentos del gen que codifica para la proteína espiga. Métodos: Se secuenciaron 15 muestras positivas para SARS-CoV-2 con un valor de umbral de ciclo inferior a 25 por metodologías Sanger y secuenciación de nueva generación. Los datos obtenidos fueron analizados en las plataformas Nextstrain y PANGO Lineages. Resultados: Ambas metodologías permitieron identificar las variantes de interés reportadas por la OMS. Se identificaron 2 muestras como alfa, 3 gamma, una delta, tres mu, una ómicron y 5 cepas cercanas al aislado inicial del virus Wuhan-Hu-1. Según el análisis in silico, también se pueden detectar mutaciones clave para identificar y clasificar otras variantes no evaluadas en el estudio. Conclusión: Los diferentes linajes de interés y preocupación de SARS-CoV-2 se clasifican de forma rápida, ágil y fiable con la metodología de secuenciación de Sanger.(AU)
Introduction: The emergence of multiple variants of SARS-CoV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic is of great world concern. Until now, their analysis has mainly focused on next-generation sequencing. However, this technique is expensive and requires sophisticated equipment, long processing times, and highly qualified technical personnel with experience in bioinformatics. To contribute to the analysis of variants of interest and variants of concern, increase the diagnostic capacity, and process samples to carry out genomic surveillance, we propose a quick and easy methodology to apply, based on Sanger sequencing of 3 gene fragments that code for protein spike. Methods: Fifteen positive samples for SARS-CoV-2 with a cycle threshold below 25 were sequenced by Sanger and next-generation sequencing methodologies. The data obtained were analyzed on the Nextstrain and PANGO Lineages platforms. Results: Both methodologies allowed the identification of the variants of interest reported by the WHO. Two samples were identified as Alpha, 3 Gamma, one Delta, 3 Mu, one Omicron, and 5 strains were close to the initial Wuhan-Hu-1 virus isolate. According to in silico analysis, key mutations can also be detected to identify and classify other variants not evaluated in the study. Conclusion: The different SARS-CoV-2 lineages of interest and concern are classified quickly, agilely, and reliably with the Sanger sequencing methodology.(AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Coronavírus Relacionado à Síndrome Respiratória Aguda Grave , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Mutação , Doenças Transmissíveis , MicrobiologiaRESUMO
Introducción: El cáncer colorrectal (CCR) es una de las neoplasias más comunes en el mundo; especialmente,en los países desarrollados. En Colombia, la incidencia del CCR ocupa el cuarto lugar en hombres ymujeres; el CCR tiene una gran heterogeneidad genética. Objetivo: Determinar la presencia de mutacionesen los exones 5-8 del gen TP53 en tumores colorrectales, mediante el secuenciamiento directo. Métodos:Muestras con diagnóstico histopatológico de CCR esporádico se dividieron en dos grupos. El Grupo I fue de 30 muestras de tumores a partir de biopsias frescas, y el Grupo II, de 46 muestras de tejidos tumorales embebidos en bloques de parafi na. El análisis de mutaciones se realizó en los exones 5-8 del gen TP53,empleando las técnicas de PCR y de secuenciamiento directo. Resultados: Se encontró una baja frecuenciade mutaciones en el gen TP53, del 4,4%; las mutaciones detectadas fueron sin sentido; además, fueronidentifi cados dos polimorfi smos que segregan juntos. Todas las mutaciones y los polimorfi smos se detectaron en las muestras del grupo I. La mayoría de las muestras analizadas se hallaban en un estado avanzado del cáncer. Conclusiones: La baja frecuencia obtenida de mutaciones en TP53 permite sugerir la existencia de alteraciones en otras vías genéticas, relacionadas con la carcinogénesis colorrectal, como las vías de MSI y de CIN, así como la epigenética; dichas alteraciones no podrían excluirse en las muestras evaluadas. Los estudios moleculares en muestras de tejidos embebidos en parafi na presentan difi cultades para los análisis genéticos. La caracterización molecular del CCR es importante para conocer el espectro de mutaciones y de variantes moleculares presentes en la población observada.
Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies in the world, especially indeveloped countries. In Colombia, the incidence of CRC ranks fourth in men and women. CRC has greatgenetic heterogeneity. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the presence of mutations inexons 5 to 8 of the TP53 gene in colorectal tumors by direct sequencing. Patients and Methods: Samples with histopathological diagnoses of sporadic CRC were divided into two groups. Group I included 30 tumor samples from fresh biopsies and Group II included 46 tumor tissue samples embedded in paraffi n blocks. Mutational analysis was performed for exons 5 through 8 of the TP53 gene using PCR and direct sequencing.Results: The frequency of TP53 mutations was only 4.4%, and mutations that were detected were nonsense mutations. In addition, two polymorphisms that segregate together were identifi ed. All mutations and polymorphismswere detected in samples from Group I. Most of the samples were in advanced stages of cancer.Conclusions: The low frequency of mutations in TP53 suggests the existence of alterations on other related genetic pathways in colorectal carcinogenesis. These could include MSI pathways, CIN and epigenetics. Such alterations could not be excluded in the samples tested. Molecular studies of tissue samples embedded inparaffi n are diffi cult to analyze genetically. Molecular characterization of CRC is important for determining the spectrum of mutations and molecular variants present in our population.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto Jovem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Colorretais , Heterogeneidade Genética , NeoplasiasRESUMO
Se considera que el cáncer colorrectal (CCR) es un problema mundial de salud pública; es el tercer cáncer más común en hombres y el segundo en mujeres. Su distribución geográfica es variable: las tasas de incidencia son altas en países desarrollados de Europa, Norteamérica y Oceanía y bajas en países de regiones subdesarrolladas como África y Suramérica. Sin embargo, los datos de estudios recientes publicados por la Agencia Internacional de Investigaciones en Cáncer (IARC, International Agency for Research on Cancer) muestran un aumento rápido en la incidencia de CCR en los períodos 1983-1987 y 1998-2002 en países en vías de desarrollo (1), mientras que en países desarrollados la incidencia se ha estabilizado y en muchos casos ha disminuido (2). La carcinogénesis del CCR es un proceso de múltiples etapas, caracterizado por una gran inestabilidad genómica que permite la acumulación de mutaciones en protooncogenes y genes supresores de tumores, alteración en la expresión de genes y producción de proteínas no funcionales, que les confieren a las células ventajas de proliferación y aumento de la supervivencia. La inestabilidad genómica del CCR se produce por diferentes vías; entre las más importantes se encuentran: la de inestabilidad cromosómica (CIN), la de inestabilidad microsatelital (MSI) y la de metilación.
Worldwide, colorectal cancer (CRC) is a public health problem; it is the third most prevalent cancer in men and the second in women. There are some geographical variations in its incidence, with high rates in many developed countries of Europe, North America and Oceania, and low rates in countries of less developed regions such as Africa and South America. Recent studies on cancer, published by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), show a rapid increase in the incidence of CRC in developing countries between 1983-1987 and 1998-2002 (1), while in the developed world incidence has stabilized and in many cases decreased (2). Carcinogenesis of CRC is a multiple step process, characterized by high genomic instability that may lead to the accumulation of mutations in proto-oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, repair machinery failures, epigenetic changes in DNA and production of non-functional proteins; these changes lead to cell proliferation advantages and to an increase in cell survival. Genomic instability of CRC occurs through different pathways, the most important of which are: chromosomal instability (CIN), microsatellite instability (MSI) and methylation.