Arterial Stiffness, Cognitive Dysfunction and Adherence to Antihypertensive Agents. Is there a Link to Hypertensive Patients?

The incidence of hypertension (HTN) and its cardiovascular (CV) complications are increasing throughout the world. Blood pressure (BP) control remains unsatisfactory worldwide. Medical inertia and poor adherence to treatment are among the factors that can partially explain, why BP control rate remains low. The introduction of a method for measuring the degree of adherence to a given medication is now a prerequisite. Complex treatment regimes, inadequate tolerance and frequent replacements of pharmaceutical formulations are the most common causes of poor adherence. In contrast, the use of stable combinations of antihypertensive drugs leads to improved patient adherence. We aim to review the relationships between arterial stiffness, cognitive function and adherence to medication in patients with HTN. Large artery stiffening can lead to HTN. In turn, arterial stiffness induced by HTN is associated with an increased CV and stroke risk. In addition, HTN can induce disorders of brain microcirculation resulting in cognitive dysfunction. Interestingly, memory cognitive dysfunction leads to a reduced adherence to drug treatment. Compliance with antihypertensive treatment improves BP control and arterial stiffness indices. Early treatment of arterial stiffness is strongly recommended for enhanced cognitive function and increased adherence.

IS MESENTERIC PANNICULITIS A SIGN FOR AUTOIMMUNE DIABETES IN ADULTS?

OBJECTIVE: Mesenteric panniculitis (MP) and sclerosing mesenteritis is an umbrella term used to describe a rare, chronic, and frequently benign fibrosing inflammatory disease that affects the adipose tissue of the mesentery. The diagnosis is usually based on imaging (computed tomography [CT] or magnetic resonance imaging) findings and is confirmed by biopsy. We report the unusual case of a patient with MP with typical CT findings and diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: A 48-year-old male presented for symptomatic new onset DM. An abdominal CT scan revealed a well-defined mesenteric mass compatible with MP. The combination of insulin degludec and sitagliptin/metformin resulted in a decrease of HbA1c; however, this was followed by a subsequent gradual increase in HbA1c and positive glutamic acid decarboxylase auto-antibodies. RESULTS: The patient developed auto-immune DM that was confirmed by the presence of auto-antibodies. CONCLUSION: Panniculitis has been infrequently reported in patients with type 2 DM. This is the first report of a patient with MP correlated with auto-immune DM. The possible pathophysiologic mechanisms are discussed.

Hypolipidemic Drugs and Diabetes Mellitus-Mechanisms and Data From Genetic Trials.

Clinical trials and meta-analyses have shown that statins can dose dependently increase the incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus (DM) especially in patients with underlying abnormalities of carbohydrate homeostasis. Mendelian randomization studies support these findings since genetic variants in the gene encoding the target of statins, the enzyme 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase, are associated with increased incidence of new-onset DM, suggesting that the so-called diabetogenic effect of statins is an "on-target effect" possibly related to their main mechanism of action, that is the increased low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor expression. Additionally, Mendelian randomization studies have shown that genetic variants as proxies of other drugs that increase LDL receptor expression (ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 [PCSK9] inhibitors) also increase the risk of new-onset DM. This concept is supported by the fact of decreased DM prevalence in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia who have decreased LDL receptor expression. In contrast, hypolipidemic drugs, such as the cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors, that decrease LDL cholesterol without directly interfering with the LDL receptor expression do not seem to detrimentally affect carbohydrate homeostasis. However, the clinical trials of ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors have not shown an increased DM risk, possibly suggesting that other potential non-well-defined "off-target effects" of hypolipidemic drugs may affect carbohydrate homeostasis. Thus, the long-term effect of hypolipidemic drugs on DM risk depends not only on their final mechanism of hypolipidemic action but also on other "on-target" and "off-target" effects of these drugs.

PCSK9 and carbohydrate metabolism: A double-edged sword.

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) plays a paramount role in the degradation of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors (LDLR) on the hepatic cells surface and subsequently affects LDL particles catabolism and LDL cholesterol (LDL-c) levels. The anti-PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies lead to substantial decrease of LDL-c concentration. PCSK9 (which is also expressed in pancreatic delta-cells) can decrease LDLR and subsequently decrease cholesterol accumulation in pancreatic beta-cells, which impairs glucose metabolism and reduces insulin secretion. Thus, a possible adverse effect of PCSK9 inhibitors on carbohydrate metabolism may be expected by this mechanism, which has been supported by the mendelian studies results. On the other hand, clinical data have suggested a detrimental association of PCSK9 with glucose metabolism. So, the inhibition of PCSK9 may be seen as a double-edged sword regarding carbohydrate metabolism. Completed clinical trials have not shown a detrimental effect of PCSK9 inhibitors on diabetes risk, but their short-term duration does not allow definite conclusions.

Adverse Effects of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are a class of injective anti-diabetic drugs that improve glycemic control and many other atherosclerosis-related parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, the use of this relatively new class of drugs may be associated with certain adverse effects. Concerns have been expressed regarding the effects of these drugs on pancreatic and thyroid tissue, since animal studies and analyses of drug databases indicate an association of GLP-1 receptor agonists with pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer, and thyroid cancer. However, several meta-analyses failed to confirm a cause-effect relation between GLP-1 receptor agonists and the development of these adverse effects. One benefit of GLP-1 receptor agonists is that they do not cause hypoglycemia when combined with metformin or thiazolidinediones, but the dose of concomitant sulphonylurea or insulin may have to be decreased to reduce the risk of hypoglycemic episodes. On the other hand, several case reports have linked the use of these drugs, mainly exenatide, with the occurrence of acute kidney injury, primarily through hemodynamic derangement due to nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. The most common symptoms associated with the use of GLP-1 receptor agonists are gastrointestinal symptoms, mainly nausea. Other common adverse effects include injection site reactions, headache, and nasopharyngitis, but these effects do not usually result in discontinuation of the drug. Current evidence shows that GLP-1 receptor agonists have no negative effects on the cardiovascular risk of patients with T2D. Thus, GLP-1 receptor agonists appear to have a favorable safety profile, but ongoing trials will further assess their cardiovascular effects. The aim of this review is to analyze critically the available data regarding adverse events of GLP-1 receptor agonists in different anatomic systems published in Pubmed and Scopus. Whenever possible, certain differences between GLP-1 receptor agonists are described. The review also provides the reader with structured data that compare the rates of the most common adverse effects for each of the various GLP-1 receptor agonists.