Epidemiology of granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis in adults in France.

BACKGROUND: Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) are rare systemic necrotizing vasculitis. The national incidence and prevalence of GPA/MPA and patient mortality remain unknown in France. A real-life study using retrospective data from the French National Health Data System was set up to describe the epidemiology and demographic characteristics of hospitalized GPA and MPA patients, overall and by disease. METHODS: All adult patients (≥18 years of age) hospitalized for GPA (ICD-10 M31.3) or MPA (ICD-10 M31.7) between 01 and 01-2010 and 31-12-2017 and affiliated to the General health insurance Scheme (covering 76% of the French population) were included in this national retrospective observational study. Descriptive analyses, univariate and multivariable logistic models, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and Cox models were performed. RESULTS: The study involved 4445 prevalent GPA patients (including 1578 incident patients) and 1833 prevalent MPA patients (878 incident patients). Distinction between GPA and MPA diagnosis could not be made for 303 patients (149 incident patients). In people aged over 20 years, the age-standardized incidence rates of GPA and MPA were 0.5 and 0.3/100,000 person-years, respectively and the age-standardized prevalence rates were 10 and 4/100,000 person-years, respectively. The standardized mortality ratios in GPA and MPA patients aged over 20 years were 2.0 and 2.7, respectively, and remained constant. Renal failure, pulmonary and urinary tract infections, as well as coronary disease were more frequent among MPA than GPA patients. One-year survival rates among GPA and MPA patients were 96% (95%CI 94%-97%) and 94% (92%-95%), respectively. Five-year survival rates among GPA and MPA patients were 81% (95% CI 79%-83%) and 72% (68%-75%), respectively. After adjusting for comorbidities, the risk of death was still higher in MPA (hazard ratio 1.26 [95%CI 1.06-1.50]) than in GPA patients. CONCLUSIONS: Despite advances in the therapeutic management of patients, mortality rates are still high and stable over time, highlighting the need for improved management.

Misuse of benzodiazepines: Prevalence and impact in an inpatient population with psychiatric disorders.

AIMS: Use and misuse of benzodiazepine might be very prevalent in patients with acute psychiatric symptoms, whereas they might be associated with specific adverse events in this population. The study investigated their prevalence in these patients. Secondary objectives were to identify risk factors for misuse of benzodiazepines, and its impact. METHODS: A cohort study was based on the hospital's electronic patient records and conducted in patients aged 18 years and over and admitted to a psychiatric hospital. They were followed up for 84 days or until the end of hospitalisation. Four variables of misuse were built: excessive duration of treatment, type of product, excessive dosage and concomitant benzodiazepines. Backward stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess risk factors for each misuse criterion, on the 1 hand, and impact of benzodiazepine misuse, on the other. RESULTS: In total, 511 psychiatric inpatients were included with 89.0% of them exposed to benzodiazepine. Discharge prescription included no benzodiazepine or a dosage lower than the maximum dosage prescribed during hospitalisation for 78.2% of patients exposed to benzodiazepine during their stay. Of benzodiazepine treatments, 31.4% were associated with at least 1 misuse criterion. Excessive dosage was associated with age ≥65 years (OR 11.57; 95% confidence interval 4.92-27.17), substance/alcohol use disorders (3.35; 95% confidence interval 1.70-6.62) and parenthood (0.49; 0.25-0.97). Some criteria of benzodiazepine misuse were associated with a higher frequency of adverse events occurring after treatment initiation. CONCLUSIONS: Misuse of benzodiazepines is very common in inpatients with psychiatric disorders. These findings should alert clinicians to comply with clinical recommendations.

Use of benzodiazepines and z-drugs not compliant with guidelines and associated factors: a population-based study.

Benzodiazepines and z-drugs are primarily indicated for the treatment of sleep disorders and anxiety symptoms. Their frequent long-term use contrasts with the international guidelines that limit treatment duration to a maximum of 4 weeks. The objective of this study was to assess the frequency of their use that was not in accordance with guidelines in the French general population between 2007 and 2012 and associated characteristics. A cohort of 67,550 benzodiazepine new users was set up in an exhaustive database for health-care reimbursements and representative of the French population. Benzodiazepine use not in accordance with guidelines was defined as the concomitant dispensation of several benzodiazepines, the dispensation of treatment over a period longer than recommended, or a new dispensing within the 2 months following the end of a previous treatment of maximum recommended duration, considering that French recommendations distinguish between hypnotic (4 weeks) and anxiolytic benzodiazepines (12 weeks). Benzodiazepine use not in accordance with guidelines was high, in about 30% of new hypnotic users and 20% of new anxiolytic users. Its frequency was stable over the study period. Associated characteristics were similar for new hypnotic or anxiolytic users, i.e.. older age, treatment initiation by a psychiatrist, presence of a chronic disease, hospitalization, or another psychotropic treatment. These findings provide a solid basis for establishing a public health policy to reduce benzodiazepine use not compliant with guidelines. They should be further explored in patients most at risk in the present study, e.g., patients treated by a psychiatrist.

Incidence, prevalence, and treatment of anemia of non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease: A retrospective database study in France.

BACKGROUND: Minimal data are available regarding the prevalence and incidence of anemia among patients with non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (NDD-CKD) in France. METHODS: This was a retrospective non-interventional study of patients with a record of NDD-CKD in the Echantillon Généraliste des Bénéficiaires (EGB) database between January 01, 2012, and December 31, 2017. The primary objective was to estimate the annual incidence and prevalence of anemia of NDD-CKD. Secondary objectives included description of the demographics and clinical characteristics of patients with NDD-CKD-related anemia. An exploratory objective was to use machine learning to identify patients from the general population that might have NDD-CKD but without a recorded ICD-10 diagnosis of CKD. RESULTS: During 2012-2017, 9865 adult patients in the EGB database had confirmed NDD-CKD; of these, 49.1% (4848/9865) had anemia. From 2015 to 2017, estimates of incidence (108.7-114.7 per 1000 population) and prevalence (435.7-449.5 per 1000 population) of NDD-CKD-related anemia were stable. Less than half of patients with anemia of NDD-CKD were treated with oral iron, and approximately 15% were treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Based on adult French population projections in 2020 and an estimated prevalence rate in 2017 of 42.2 per 1000 population for confirmed plus possible NDD-CKD (as a proportion of the general French population), the estimated number of patients with possible NDD-CKD in France was 2,256,274, approximately five-fold greater than the number identified by diagnostic codes and hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: Anemia of NDD-CKD was shown to be a constant long-term burden in France, and its apparent prevalence may still be significantly underestimated. Given the potential treatment gap, additional initiatives to better identify and treat NDD-CKD anemia may improve patient management and treatment outcomes.

Health trajectories before initiation of non-invasive ventilation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a French nationwide database analysis.

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the most common indication for long-term domiciliary non-invasive ventilation (NIV) but there is uncertainty in data supporting current guidelines. This study described health trajectories before initiation of at-home NIV in people with COPD, and compared mortality outcomes between groups with different pre-NIV health trajectories. Methods: Data were from the French national health insurance reimbursement system database for individuals with COPD aged ≥40 years and ≥1 reimbursement for NIV between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2019. Common health trajectories were determined using time sequence analysis through K-clustering (TAK analysis). Findings: Data from 54,545 individuals were analysed; the population was elderly (median age 70 years) with multiple comorbidities. Four clusters were generated. Cluster 1 (n = 35,975/54,545; 66%) had NIV initiated in ambulatory settings or after the first acute event/exacerbation. Cluster 2 (6653/54,545; 12%) started NIV after ≥2 severe exacerbations in the previous 6 months. Cluster 3 (11,375/54,545; 21%) started NIV after frequent severe COPD-related exacerbations in the previous year. Cluster 4 (652/54,545; 1%) started NIV after many long-lasting severe exacerbations. The four clusters differed in age, sex, comorbidities, pre-NIV investigations, and prescriber/location of NIV initiation. Mortality differed significantly between clusters: highest in Cluster 4 and lowest in Cluster 1. Interpretation: The significant heterogeneity in clinical initiation of NIV probably reflects the current lack of strong evidence and guideline recommendations. Knowledge about the characteristics and outcomes in different clusters should be used to address inequities and facilitate more consistent and personalised use domiciliary NIV in COPD. Funding: JLP and SB are supported by the French National Research Agency in the framework of the "Investissements d'avenir" program (ANR-15-IDEX-02) and the "e-health and integrated care and trajectories medicine and MIAI artificial intelligence (ANR-19-P3IA-0003)" Chairs of excellence from the Grenoble Alpes University Foundation. This work was supported by ResMed.

Use of benzodiazepines non-compliant with guidelines in patients with psychiatric and non-psychiatric chronic disorders.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify benzodiazepine use non-compliant with guidelines in patients with psychiatric and non-psychiatric chronic diseases and assess the risk of non-recommended use associated with these diseases. METHOD: A cohort study was conducted in the French health insurance databases, including 254,488 new benzodiazepine users between 2007 and 2014. Psychiatric, cardiovascular, cancer, diabetes and inflammatory diseases were identified. Patients were followed for 2 years. Non-recommended use was defined as excessive treatment duration, use of long half-life drugs in older patients and concomitant use of several benzodiazepines. Cox models identified the factors associated with non-recommended use. RESULTS: Non-recommended use was frequent, ranging from 44.9% to 68.1%. It was independently associated with each chronic disease, with a slight increase in patients with chronic inflammatory disease (HR = 1.07; 95%CI 1.03-1.13) or diabetes (HR = 1.09; 1.06-1.12), a higher risk in those with chronic cardiovascular disease (HR = 1.34; 1.31-1.37) or cancer (HR = 1.30; 1.25-1.35) and the highest risk in those with psychiatric disease (HR = 2.04; 2.00-2.09). CONCLUSION: Patients with chronic disease have a high risk of benzodiazepine use leading to a higher exposure than recommended. Prescribers should be aware of the need to comply with the recommendations, especially in these patients who are the most frail and vulnerable to adverse events.

[Use and misuse of benzodiazepines in patients with psychiatric disorders]. / Usages et mésusages des benzodiazépines chez les patients souffrant de troubles psychiatriques.

The psychiatric patients are not only particularly exposed to benzodiazepines; they may also be more vulnerable to their side effects than general population. Benzodiazepines are frequently misused in psychiatric patients in terms of duration, dose and number of concomitant medications. There is no evidence that benzodiazepines are effective against most psychiatric disorders, including depression and suicidal risk. Several studies have shown associations between benzodiazepine use and depression worsening, increased disinhibition, suicide risk, anxiety, aggression, and even mortality in patients with psychiatric disorders. Despite the common use of benzodiazepine drugs by clinicians, large and methodologically sound studies are lacking to document the patterns of benzodiazepine use in populations with psychiatric disorders and their specific risks in these patients. It is not known whether it is legitimate to apply the good practice recommendations for benzodiazepines in patients with severe psychiatric disorders.