Systematic Review of the Effects of Cognitive and Behavioural Interventions on Fall-Related Psychological Concerns in Older Adults.

This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy of cognitive and behavioural interventions for improving falls-related psychological concerns. A systematic search yielded 8 randomised controlled trials eligible for inclusion. All studies compared a cognitive and behavioural intervention to a control. Meta-analysis showed that cognitive and behavioural treatments had beneficial effects on fear of falling outcomes [lower score better] immediately after treatment [random effects standardised mean difference (SMD): -0.3 (95% CI: -0.50 to -0.10)] and at longer term follow up [random effects SMD: -0.29 (95% CI: -0.49 to -0.09)]. Cognitive and behavioural treatments also showed a positive effect on falls efficacy outcomes [higher score better] immediately after treatment [fixed effects SMD: 0.19 (95% CI: 0.04 to 0.34)] and over the longer term [fixed effects SMD: 0.13 (95% CI:-0.00 to 0.25)]. However the clinical significance of these effects on fear of falling and falls efficacy was unclear. Further work is required with best-practice comparators over a longer follow-up period.

Patient and physician reports of the information provided about illness and treatment: what matters for patients' adaptation to cancer during treatment?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine (a) whether illness representations mediate the relation of the amount of information provided by physicians to patients' adaptation to illness; (b) whether patient-physician agreement on the information provided impacts the aforementioned relationship. The study focused on information that, according to the Common Sense Self-Regulation Model, is essential for adaptation to illness. METHODS: The sample consisted of 93 patients undergoing chemotherapy and their physicians. Indirect (mediation) effects and conditional (moderated) indirect effects were examined using bootstrapping. RESULTS: The more illness and treatment-related information was provided by physicians, the more positive illness representations (specifically, illness consequences, emotional representations, and personal control) were reported by patients. In turn, these illness representations were related to better physical functioning and better adjustment to cancer. The degree of the patient-physician agreement on the information provided did not affect this relationship. CONCLUSIONS: What seems to be more crucial for patients' adaptation to cancer during treatment is the amount of information provided by physicians rather than their agreement with patients on the information provided. Also, there is a need to thoroughly examine the pathways through which information provision impacts adaptation to illness.

Maladaptive health beliefs, illness-related self-regulation and the role of the information provided by physicians.

This prospective study in 119 patients with cardiovascular diseases aimed to examine whether (a) illness representations mediate the relation of general maladaptive health beliefs to patients' coping behaviours and (b) these relations are moderated by the patients' perception of the amount of information provided by their physicians. Personal control and illness coherence mediated the relation of maladaptive health beliefs to coping behaviour. The amount of the provided information buffered the negative relation of maladaptive health beliefs to illness representations and coping. Thus, the detrimental effect of general maladaptive health beliefs may be counterbalanced by the amount of information provided by physicians.