Incidence of deep infection, union and malunion for open diaphyseal femoral shaft fractures treated with IM nailing: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: and purpose: We have undertaken a systematic review to evaluate the clinical results of intramedullary nailing (IMN) for open diaphyseal femoral fractures on the rates of union, delayed union, malunion, superficial and deep infection and bone grafting. METHODS: We searched the electronic databases of EMBASE, MEDLINE, from their inception until December 1st, 2017 with no language restrictions. The reference lists of all included articles and relevant reviews were also examined for potentially eligible studies. Hand search using electronic database of recent major orthopaedic journals was also carried. Two reviewers working independently extracted study characteristics and data to estimate the diagnostic odds ratio and 95% confidence interval for each result. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were eligible. Pooled estimate of effect size for union rate was 97% (95% CI: 94-99%). Deep infection rate was 6% (95% CI: 3-9.3%) and more prominent in Gustilo type III injuries; superficial infection was 5.6% (95% CI: 3-9.3%). Delayed union rate 3% (95% CI: 1-5.6%) while, malunion rate was 8.4% (95% CI: 5.7-11.6%). The need for bone grafting ranged from 0 to 9%. CONCLUSIONS: IMN remains the treatment of choice for open femoral diaphyseal fractures with very good union rates. Gustilo grade III injuries demonstrate a distinct higher deep infection rate and strict adherence to established surgical debridement and fixation protocols is advocated. The need for bone grafting can be as high as 9% and patients should be made aware of the possibility of requiring this additional procedure.

The role of "cell therapy" in osteonecrosis of the femoral head. A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of 7 studies.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The value of core decrompression for treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is unclear. We investigated by a literature review whether implantation of autologous bone marrow aspirate, containing high concentrations of pluripotent mesenchymal stem cells, into the core decompression track would improve the clinical and radiological results compared with the classical method of core decompression alone. The primary outcomes of interest were structural failure (collapse) of the femoral head and conversion to total hip replacement (THR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: All randomized and non-randomized control trials comparing simple core decompression with autologous bone marrow cell implantation into the femoral head for the treatment of ONFH were considered eligible for inclusion. The methodological quality of the studies included was assessed independently by 2 reviewers using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized studies. Of 496 relevant citations identified, 7 studies formed the basis of this review. RESULTS: The pooled estimate of effect size for structural failure of the femoral head favored the cell therapy group, as, in this treatment group, the odds of progression of the femoral head to the collapse stage were reduced by a factor of 5 compared to the CD group (odds ratio (OR) = 0.2, 95% CI: 0.08-0.6; p = 0.02). The respective summarized estimate of effect size yielded halved odds for conversion to THR in the cell therapy group compared to CD group (OR = 0.6, 95% CI: 0.3-1.02; p = 0.06). INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest that implantation of autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) into the core decompression track, particularly when employed at early (pre-collapse) stages of ONFH, would improve the survivorship of femoral heads and reduce the need for hip arthroplasty.

Management and outcome of diaphyseal aseptic non-unions of the lower limb: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: To review current treatments utilising biological enhancement modalities and their efficacy for the management of lower limb long bone aseptic non-unions. MATERIALS & METHODS: A systematic review of English articles using PubMed Medline; Ovid Medline; Embase; and the Cochrane Library was performed, supplemented by a manual search of bibliographies. RESULTS: Thirteen manuscripts met the inclusion criteria reporting on 428 patients. The overall healing had a pooled estimate of effect size at 94.3%. The calculated summarised estimate of effect size for deep infection rate (413 patients) was 2.3%. Three subgroups were then created on the basis of the exact type of graft used at the non-union site (ABG, BMP-7, BMP-7 + ABG). Comparison between the above subgroups revealed that ABG resulted in approximately 3-fold increase of the odds of healing compared with the use of BMP-7. Combined use of ABGs and BMP-7 improved the odds of healing by 3.5 times compared with BMP-7 alone. However, the previous median operations prior to the implantation of ABG or BMP-7 treatment was 1.09 versus 2.3 respectively (p = 0.02). Although the implantation of ABG was associated with a greater incidence of infection the documented differences did not reach significance. CONCLUSIONS: Although ABG was found to have a higher success rate compared to BMP-7 (95% Vs 87%), patients treated with BMP-7 had a higher number of previous failed interventions, statistically significantly so (BMP-7 is used for the treatment of more recalcitrant non-unions). It is the surgeon's judgement that should determine the most suitable treatment modality, depending on the nature and characteristics (personality) of the non-union and the patient.

Meta-analysis. What have we learned?

Meta-analyses constitute fundamental tools of the Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) aiming at synthesizing outcome data from individual trials in order to produce pooled effect estimates for various outcomes of interest. Combining summary data from several studies increases the sample size, improves the statistical power of the findings as well as the precision of the obtained effect estimates. For all these reasons, meta-analyses are thought of providing the best evidence to support clinical practice guidelines. However, the strength of the provided evidence is closely dependent on the quality of included studies as well as the rigour of the meta-analytic process. In addition, over the course of the evolution of the current meta-analytic methodology, some concerns have been expressed on the ultimate usefulness of such a complex and time consuming procedure on establishing timely, valid evidence on various specified topics in the field of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery. This article provides an overview of the appropriate methodology, benefits and potential drawbacks of the meta-analytic procedure.

Distraction osteogenesis versus induced membrane technique for infected tibial non-unions with segmental bone loss: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of available studies.

INTRODUCTION: Infected tibial non-unions with associated bone loss can be challenging to manage. At present, the two main methods utilized in the management of these fractures include the Ilizarov technique of Distraction Osteogenesis (DO) using external fixator devices, or alternatively, the Induced Membrane Technique (IMT), devised by Masquelet. As there is a paucity of data directly comparing the outcomes of these techniques, there is no universal agreement on which strategy a surgeon should choose to use. AIMS: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the outcomes of both DO and IMT, in terms of primary outcomes (bone union and infection elimination), and secondary outcomes (complication rates and functional outcomes). METHODS: A PRISMA strategy was used. Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Google Scholar library databases were interrogated using pre-defined MeSH terms and Boolean operators. Quality of evidence was evaluated using OCEBM and GRADE systems. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies with 1136 subjects met the inclusion criteria. With respect to the primary outcomes of interest, union was observed in 94.6% (DO method) and 88.0% (IMT method); this difference, however, was not significant between the two techniques (p = 0.45). In addition, infection elimination rates were also higher in the Ilizarov DO group when compared to Masquelet (Mq) IMT (93.0% vs 80.4% respectively). Again, no significant difference was observed (p = 0.06). For all secondary outcomes assessed (unplanned re-operations, re-fracture rates amputation rate), no statistically significant differences were documented between the treatment options. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that there is no clinical difference in outcomes for patients treated with Ilizarov DO versus Mq IMT techniques. The evidence base at present is relatively sparse and, therefore, we would recommend for further Level I studies to be conducted, to make more meaningful conclusions.

Serious adverse events and 30-day hospital readmission rate following elective total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Elective total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common surgery which has evolved rapidly. However, there are no recent large systematic reviews of serious adverse event (SAE) rate and 30-day readmission rate (30-dRR) or an indication of whether surgical methods have improved. METHODS: To obtain a pooled estimate of SAE rate and 30-dRR following TKA, we searched Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases. Data were extracted by two authors following PRISMA guidelines. Eligibility criteria were defined prior to a comprehensive search. Studies were eligible if they were published in 2007 or later, described sequelae of TKA with patient N > 1000, and the SAE or 30-dRR rate could be calculated. SAEs included return to operating room, death or coma, venous thromboembolism (VTE), deep infection or sepsis, myocardial infarction, heart failure or cardiac arrest, stroke or cerebrovascular accident, or pneumonia. RESULTS: Of 248 references reviewed, 28 are included, involving 10,153,503 patients; this includes 9,483,387 patients with primary TKA (pTKA), and 670,116 patients with revision TKA (rTKA). For pTKA, the SAE rate was 5.7% (95% CI 4.4-7.2%, I2 = 100%), and the 30-dRR was 4.8% (95% CI 4.3-5.4%, I2 = 100%). For rTKA, the SAE rate was 8.5% (95% CI 8.3-8.7%, I2 = 77%), while the 30-dRR was 7.2% (95% CI 6.4-8.0%, I2 = 81%). Odds of 30-dRR following pTKA were about half that of rTKA (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.53-0.62%, p < 0.001, I2 = 45%). Of patients who received pTKA, the commonest SAEs were VTE (1.22%; 95% CI 0.83-1.70%) and genitourinary complications including renal insufficiency or renal failure (1.22%; 95% CI 0.83-1.67%). There has been significant improvement in SAE rate and 30-dRR since 2010 (χ2 test < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: TKA procedures have a relatively low complication rate, and there has been a significant improvement in SAE rate and 30-dRR over the past decade.

The role of plating in the operative treatment of severe open tibial fractures: a systematic review.

Open fractures of the tibial diaphysis are the result of high-energy trauma. They are usually associated with extensive soft tissue loss and represent serious clinical problems. Surgical treatment of these injuries has been associated with substantial complications such as osteomyelitis, delayed bone healing, poor functional outcome, soft-tissue failure, or even amputations. More recently a staged treatment, with initial application of spanning external fixators followed by definitive fixation at secondary phase, has been advocated. Plating of these fractures in the acute setting remains a topic of heated discussion. A systematic review of the literature was carried out in order to investigate the existing evidence concerning the efficacy and safety of this method of osteosynthesis. Eleven papers met the inclusion criteria, accumulating 492 open tibial fractures treated with plating. The overall union rate ranged from 62-95% across all studies, with time to union ranging from 13-42 weeks. The reoperation rate ranged from 8-69% and a pooled estimate of deep infection rate was calculated at 11%. Plate fixation for the treatment of open tibial fractures can be considered under specific conditions which need to be elicited and clarified with future well-designed and conducted clinical trials.

Physical Health and Psychological Outcomes in Adult Patients with Long-bone Fracture Non-unions: Evidence Today.

BACKGROUND: Research has suggested that bone fractures can hinder the health status of patients' life. However, limited research has examined the impact that the healing process of a fracture has on the physical health and psychological state of individuals, particularly in considering the short- and long-term impact of having a fracture that fails to heal and drops into a non-union. The aim of this systematic review is to better understand the impact of fracture non-union to physical health and to respective psychological outcomes. METHODS: Electronic databases 'PubMed', 'Cochrane', 'PsycInfo', 'Medline', 'Embase', 'Web of Science', and 'CINAHL' were used. Search terms used were nonunion OR non-union OR "non union" OR "long bone" OR "delayed union" AND "quality of life" OR qol OR depression OR anxiety OR psycholog* OR PTSD OR "post-traumatic stress disorder". Studies published in the years 1995 to 2018 were included. Two independent reviewers carried out screening and data extraction. Studies were included if (1) participants were adult (human) patients with a traumatic non-union secondary to fracture/s; (2) outcomes measured included physical health and psychological wellbeing (e.g., PTSD, psychological trauma, depression, anxiety, etc.). Studies received emphasis if they compared those outcomes between: (1) The "non-union" group to a normative, matched population and (2) the "non-union group" to the same group after union was achieved. However, studies that did not use comparison groups were also included. RESULTS: Out of the 1896 papers identified from our thorough literature search, 13 met the inclusion criteria. Quality assessment was done by the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). Findings suggested that non-unions had a detrimental impact on physical health, and psychological difficulties often after recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who experience a long bone non-union are at risk of greater psychological distress and lower physical health status. There is a need for early identification of psychological distress in patients with fracture non-unions and psychological provision should become part of the available treatment.

Duration of Administration of Antibiotic Agents for Open Fractures: Meta-Analysis of the Existing Evidence.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection remains a significant concern in treating patients with open fractures. In prevention of such, current guidelines support the immediate administration of antibiotic agents. The duration of antibiotic treatment is still controversial. A maximum of 72 hours, even in the absence of definitive soft tissue coverage, is recommended in a number of recent guidelines and consensus reports. The aim of this meta-analysis was to review and analyze all published literature evidence with regard to antibiotic duration in open fracture treatment. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive review of the available literature from the 1970s until the present, including five comparative (1284 open fractures) and 27 observational (5408 open fractures) studies. A subgroup analysis was further performed, based on the Gustilo type of open injury and the anatomic location of the fracture. In addition, we investigated the effect of antibiotic regimes shorter than 72 hours on infection rates. RESULTS: In the comparative studies, the summarized estimate of infection rate favored less than a 72-hour duration of antibiotic treatment, because prolongation of antibiotic treatment more than 72 hours did not seem to offer any protective effect against septic complications of open fractures (odds ratio: 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60-1.21). The same trend was also documented in the observational studies, where the overall pooled estimate of infection rate was 10% (95% CI: 6.8%-14%) when antibiotic treatment did not exceed 72 hours and 9.2% (95% CI: 6.6%-12.2%) for more than 72 hours of antibiotic treatment (p = 0.53). In Gustilo I and II open fractures, the calculated pooled estimate of infection rate did not differ significantly when antibiotic treatment exceeded 72 hours (6%, 95% CI: 3.3%-9%) compared with shorter (up to 72 h) antibiotic protocols (4%, 95% CI: 1.8%-7%) (p = 0.52). In Gustilo III open fractures also, the calculated pooled estimate of infection rate (21.3%, 95% CI: 13%-31%) when duration of antibiotic treatment was more than 72 hours did not differ significantly compared with a shorter (less than 72 h) antibiotic treatment (17.7%, 95% CI: 12.5%-23.5%) (p = 0.39). A further subgroup analysis indicated that even shorter antibiotic regimes (24-48 h) were also equivalent to prolonged regimes of more than 72 hours in terms of infection rates. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present systematic review and meta-analysis could not substantiate any benefit against septic complications of a prolonged duration of antibiotic treatment of open fractures, irrespective of their severity.

Healing of fracture nonunions treated with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Bone fractures fail to heal and form nonunions in roughly 5% of cases, with little expectation of spontaneous healing thereafter. We present a systematic review and meta-analysis of published papers that describe nonunions treated with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS). METHODS: Articles in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, AMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases were searched, using an approach recommended by the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS), with a Level of Evidence rating by two reviewers independently. Studies are included here if they reported fractures older than 3 months, presented new data with a sample N≥12, and reported fracture outcome (Heal/Fail). RESULTS: Thirteen eligible papers reporting LIPUS treatment of 1441 nonunions were evaluated. The pooled estimate of effect size for heal rate was 82% (95% CI: 77-87%), for any anatomical site and fracture age of at least 3 months, with statistical heterogeneity detected across all primary studies (Q=41.2 (df=12), p<0.001, Tau2=0.006, I2=71). With a stricter definition of nonunion as fracture age of at least 8 months duration, the pooled estimate of effect size was 84% (95% CI: 77%-91.6%; heterogeneity present: Q=21 (df=8), p<0.001, Tau2=0.007, I2=62). Hypertrophic nonunions benefitted more than biologically inactive atrophic nonunions. An interval without surgery of <6months prior to LIPUS was associated with a more favorable result. Stratification of nonunions by anatomical site revealed no statistically significant differences between upper and lower extremity long bone nonunions. CONCLUSIONS: LIPUS treatment can be an alternative to surgery for established nonunions. Given that no spontaneous healing of established nonunions is expected, and that it is challenging to test the efficacy of LIPUS for nonunion by randomized clinical trial, findings are compelling. LIPUS may be most useful in patients for whom surgery is high risk, including elderly patients at risk of delirium, or patients with dementia, extreme hypertension, extensive soft-tissue trauma, mechanical ventilation, metabolic acidosis, multiple organ failure, or coma. With an overall average success rate for LIPUS >80% this is comparable to the success of surgical treatment of non-infected nonunions.

Timing of internal fixation of femoral neck fractures. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the final outcome.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of timing of internal fixation of intracapsular fractures of the neck of femur on the development of late complications, particularly osteonecrosis of femoral head (ONFH) and non-union. We undertook a systematic review of the literature adhering to the PRISMA guidelines. There were 7 eligible reports for the final analysis. The methodological quality of component studies was assessed with the Coleman Methodology Score (CMS). Each included study was assigned a score independently by the two reviewers. The final score of each individual study constituted the average value of the scores given by the two reviewers. The agreement between the two assessors was tested with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The CMS ranged from 37 to 64 within component studies (mean: 46.5, SD: 10.8, median: 41). The ICC was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.69-0.99), implying a nearly perfect agreement between the two assessors. Based on the available data regarding the timing of operative fixation of the femoral neck fractures, 4 discreet pairs of comparison groups could be created: (1) fractures fixed within 6h from injury versus fractures fixed after 6h from injury; (2) fractures fixed within 12h versus after 12h; (3) fractures fixed within 24h versus after 24h; and (4) fractures fixed within 6h versus after 24h. Outcome measures were analyzed within each one of the above pairs of treatment groups. The following subgroups analyses were a priori decided: (1) initial fracture displacement (displaced vs. undisplaced fractures); (2) fixation method (cannulated screws vs. sliding hip screw); (3) quality of reduction (anatomic vs non-anatomic reduction). This study failed to prove any essential association between timing of NOF fracture internal fixation and incidence of AVN. With respect to non-union though, it indicated that delay of internal fixation of more than 24h could increase substantially the odds of non-union.

Topical tranexamic acid in total knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: To examine the safety and efficacy of topical use of tranexamic acid (TA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: An electronic literature search of PubMed Medline; Ovid Medline; Embase; and the Cochrane Library was performed, identifying studies published in any language from 1966 to February 2013. The studies enrolled adults undergoing a primary TKA, where topical TA was used. Inverse variance statistical method and either a fixed or random effect model, depending on the absence or presence of statistical heterogeneity were used; subgroup analysis was performed when possible. RESULTS: We identified a total of seven eligible reports for analysis. Our meta-analysis indicated that when compared with the control group, topical application of TA limited significantly postoperative drain output (mean difference: -268.36ml), total blood loss (mean difference=-220.08ml), Hb drop (mean difference=-0.94g/dL) and lowered the risk of transfusion requirements (risk ratio=0.47, 95CI=0.26-0.84), without increased risk of thromboembolic events. Sub-group analysis indicated that a higher dose of topical TA (>2g) significantly reduced transfusion requirements. CONCLUSIONS: Although the present meta-analysis proved a statistically significant reduction of postoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements with topical use of TA in TKA, the clinical importance of the respective estimates of effect size should be interpreted with caution. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I, II.

The role of arterial embolization in controlling pelvic fracture haemorrhage: a systematic review of the literature.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of emergency transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) in controlling retroperitoneal arterial haemorrhage associated with unstable pelvic fractures. METHODS: A systematic review of the English literature yielded 21 eligible studies published from 1979 to 2010. Evaluation of clinical and methodological heterogeneity was based on recording certain descriptive characteristics in the component studies. Statistical heterogeneity was detected using Cochran chi-square and I square tests and, when absent, a pooled estimate of effect size for each outcome of interest was calculated. The principal outcomes of interest were efficacy rate of TAE to control intrapelvic bleeding, mortality rates and frequency of associated complications. RESULTS: All component studies were assigned a low to moderate quality score. Methodological and clinical heterogeneity was evident across component studies, but not strongly associated with the observed results. The efficacy rate of TAE ranged from 81 to 100%, while the frequency of repeat TAE for effective control of haemorrhage was 10% (95% CI: 7-13%, range: 0-19%). TAE was associated with an overall mortality ranging from 7 to 47%, and a 0-25% mortality due to intrapelvic bleeding (pooled estimate of effect size: 6%, 95% CI: 4-8%). A very low rate of associated complications were recorded in the component studies (pooled estimate of effect size: 1.1%, 95% CI: 0.1-2.1%). CONCLUSION: TAE is an efficient acute intervention for controlling severe arterial bleeding related to pelvic trauma with a low complication rate. Repeat of the procedure is occasionally necessary before the effective haemorrhage control.

Femoral-shaft fractures and nonunions treated with intramedullary nails: the role of dynamisation.

Dynamisation of a previously interlocked intramedullary nail is believed to stimulate an osteogenic response due to increased load across the fracture site. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively investigate fracture patterns that could tolerate dynamisation without the risk of major complications. Thirty patients (24 males) with an average age of 33 years (17-90) were studied. As many as 21 suffered from a fresh femoral fracture, whereas the remaining nine patients suffered from femoral nonunions. Four patterns of osseous lesion were recognised in terms of mechanical stability under a dynamic nail and biological activity at the fracture/nonunion site: stable/hypertrophic, stable/atrophic, unstable/hypertrophic and unstable/atrophic osseous lesions. Complete union (within 6 months) occurred in 21 patients. Six fractures united within the 7th-11th post-dynamisation month and, in the remaining three cases, a nonunion developed. Significant femur shortening (>20 mm) was noticed in four patients and rotational malalignment in one patient. Logistic regression analysis revealed high odds ratio (OR=70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.5-1998) for the unstable/atrophic pattern of osseous lesion to develop major complications. In the unstable/atrophic pattern of osseous lesion, dynamisation should never be done, as it could lead to significant complications.

The timing of drug administration for thromboprophylaxis following orthopaedic surgery: evidence and controversies related to treatment initiation and duration.

Patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery of the lower extremities or spine are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Although consensus exists as to the need for routine thromboprophylaxis in high risk patients, some aspects of this approach, such as the timing of the first dose and overall duration of the anticoagulation regimen, are subject to debate. Reviewing the available literature, there appears to be little evidence to support initiation of thromboprophylaxis more than 12 hours before surgery. Perioperative thromboprophylaxis (2 hours pre to 6 hours post -op) has been associated with an increased risk of bleeding complications whilst initiating prophylaxis more than 12 hours after surgery appears to increase the incidence of subsequent thromboembolic complications. Overall evidence would appear to support initiation of thromboprophylaxis 6 to 9 hours postoperatively, though further confirmatory studies investigating this variable in isolation would be useful to guide clinical decision making. Although evidence exists supporting extended duration thromboprophylaxis after major orthopaedic procedures, further evidence is required, using clinically important end points, prior to adoption of such an approach in all patients. Stratification of prophylaxis duration, based on risk factors for thromboembolic or bleeding complications, would seem a more rational approach than strict adherence to guidelines.

Prevalence of complications of open tibial shaft fractures stratified as per the Gustilo-Anderson classification.

The aim of the present study was to comparatively analyse certain outcome measures of open tibial fractures, stratified per grade of open injury and method of treatment. For this purpose, a systematic review of the English literature from 1990 until 2010 was undertaken, comprising 32 eligible articles reporting on 3060 open tibial fractures. Outcome measures included rates of union progress (early union, delayed union, late union and non-union rates) and certain complication rates (deep infection, compartment syndrome and amputation rates). Statistical heterogeneity across component studies was detected with the use of Cochran chi-square and I(2) tests. In the absence of significant statistical heterogeneity a pooled estimate of effect size for each outcome/complication of interest was produced. All component studies were assigned on average a moderate quality score. Reamed tibial nails (RTNs) were associated with significantly higher odds of early union compared with unreamed tibial nails (UTNs) in IIIB open fractures (odds ratio: 12, 95% CI: 2.4-61). Comparing RTN and UTN modes of treatment, no significant differences were documented per grade of open fractures with respect to both delayed and late union rates. Surprisingly, nonunion rates in IIIB open fractures treated with either RTNs or UTNs were lower than IIIA or II open fractures, although the differences were not statistically significant. Significantly increased deep infection rates of IIIB open fractures compared with all other grades were documented for both modes of treatment (RTN, UTN). However, lower deep infection rates for IIIA open fractures treated with RTNs were recorded compared with grades I and II. Interestingly, grade II open tibial fractures, treated with UTN, presented significantly greater odds for developing compartment syndrome than when treated with RTNs. Our cumulative analysis, providing for each grade of open injury and each particular method of treatment a summarised estimate of effect size for the most important outcome measures of open tibial fractures, constitutes a useful tool of the practicing surgeon for optimal decision making when operative treatment of such fractures is contemplated.