Survival Advantage of Lymphadenectomy in Patients with Ovarian Cancer.

We investigated the survival effect of lymphadenectomy in ovarian cancer. The five-year progression-free and overall survival in early-stage ovarian cancer were not affected. Preliminary, unadjusted analysis in advanced ovarian cancer suggested an improvement in survival. However, after adjusting for other factors, e.g. ECOG performance status and patients' age, this survival advantage vanished. Our analysis suggests that systemic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy was not associated with an improvement of the progression-free and overall survival of patients with optimally debulked ovarian cancer.

Factors influencing treatment decision and guideline conformity in high-grade endometrial cancer patients: a population-based study.

PURPOSE: Treatment according to guidelines has been demonstrated to improve survival in a number of different cancer entities. Deviations from guidelines depend on several factors, including the patient's preferences, age and comorbidities. The aim of this study was to assess the adherence to guideline recommendations concerning surgical and adjuvant treatment in endometrial cancer. Furthermore, we sought to evaluate the reasons for non-adherence to guidelines by further examining the influence of comorbidities and age. METHODS: The influence of age, comorbidities, tumor stage and histological subtype on guideline adherence was evaluated by multivariable logistic regression in a cohort of 353 high-grade endometrial cancer patients. High-grade endometrial cancer was defined as carcinosarcoma, Type II (serous, clear cell, mixed cell carcinoma) and Type I G3 histology. RESULTS: Extensive surgical procedures, particularly systematic LNE, were less frequently applied in patients with comorbidities (p = 0.015) or higher age (p < 0.01). Guideline adherence was not affected by comorbidities (p = 0.563), but was significantly reduced with higher age (p < 0.01). In a multivariable model, higher age (p < 0.01), obesity (p = 0.011), higher FIGO Stage (p < 0.01) and histologic subtype (p < 0.01) significantly decreased OS. Surgery (p < 0.001), chemotherapy (p < 0.01) and systematic LNE (p = 0.011) were associated with higher OS. CONCLUSION: Age seems to be the strongest independent factor leading to guideline deviation. Comorbidities were associated with less aggressive treatment, but not with deviations from guidelines.

Comparison of survival outcomes and effects of therapy between subtypes of high-grade endometrial cancer - a population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Similarities in outcome between grade 3 endometrioid cancer and non-endometrioid histologies have been reported by a number of studies. Other reports, however, stated a significantly better prognosis for G3 endometrioid compared to type II histology. In this population-based study, we compared the outcome and treatment approaches of high-grade endometrial cancer patients with FIGO stages I-III depending on their histology. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 284 high-grade endometrial cancer patients diagnosed between 1998 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and recurrence rates were compared depending on histology. RESULTS: Type I G3 patients had a statistically significant OS advantage over women suffering from type II carcinoma (HR 1.527, 95%-CI 1.024-2.276; p = 0.038) and carcinosarcoma (HR 2.106, 95%-CI 1.270-3.493; p = 0.004) in univariable and multivariable Cox-regression analysis. RFS in Type I G3 was significantly superior compared to patients with carcinosarcoma (HR 1.719, 95%-CI 1.018-2.901; p = 0.043) and not significantly superior to type II patients (HR 1.368, 95%-CI 0.920-2.036; p = 0.122). Cumulative recurrence rates were significantly higher in carcinosarcoma compared to type I G3 (HR 2.217, 95%-CI 1.096-4.485; p = 0.027) in univariable analysis, but not after risk adjustment (HR of 1.472, 95%-CI 0.654-3.311; p = 0.350). CONCLUSION: The prognosis of patients with type I G3 endometrial cancer patients seems to be significantly superior to patients with type II cancer and particularly carcinosarcoma. Systematic LND seemed to be beneficial in all of the three subtypes. The benefit of adjuvant treatment methods may differ between histologies.

Endometrial Cancer Lymphadenectomy Trial (ECLAT) (pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage I or II endometrial cancer with high risk of recurrence; AGO-OP.6).

BACKGROUND: The impact of comprehensive pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy on survival in patients with stage I or II endometrial cancer with a high risk of recurrence is not reliably documented. The side effects of this procedure, including lymphedema and lymph cysts, are evident. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the effect of comprehensive pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the absence of bulky nodes on 5 year overall survival of patients with endometrial cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages I and II) and a high risk of recurrence. STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Comprehensive pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy will increase 5 year overall survival from 75% (no lymphadenectomy) to 83%, corresponding to a hazard ratio of 0.65. TRIAL DESIGN: Open label, randomized, controlled trial. In arm A, a total hysterectomy plus bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is performed. In arm B, in addition, a systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy up to the level of the left renal vein is performed. For all patients, vaginal brachytherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy (carboplatin/paclitaxel) are recommended. MAJOR INCLUSION CRITERIA: Patients with histologically confirmed endometrial cancer stages pT1b-pT2, all histological subtypes, and pT1a endometrioid G3, serous, clear cell, or carcinosarcomas can be included when bulky nodes are absent. When hysterectomy has already been performed (eg, for presumed low risk endometrial cancer), study participation is also possible. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Patients with pT1a, G1 or 2 of type 1 histology or uterine sarcomas (except for carcinosarcomas), endometrial cancers of FIGO stage III or IV (except for microscopic lymph node metastases) or visual extrauterine disease. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: Overall survival calculated from the date of randomization until death. SAMPLE SIZE: 640 patients will be enrolled in the study. ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS: At present, 252 patients have been recruited. Based on this, accrual should be completed in 2025. Results should be presented in 2031. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03438474.

Is there a benefit for adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy in early cervical cancer? Results from a population-based study.

PURPOSE: Due to insufficient and conflicting prospective evidence, the recommendations on when to apply adjuvant radiochemotherapy in early-stage cervical cancer vary between international guidelines. In this population-based study, we evaluated the outcome of patients with early-stage cervical cancer based on risk factors and the adjuvant therapy they received. METHODS: The effect of primary therapy (surgery and radiochemotherapy RCT, surgery and radiotherapy RT, and surgery alone) on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was evaluated in the complete cohort of 442 patients and in subgroups according to risk profile and nodal status. RESULTS: In low-risk patients, there was no difference in OS (p = 0.276) depending on whether patients received adjuvant therapy or not. Concerning RFS, patients with RT (including one patient with RCT) exhibited a significantly worse outcome compared to the group with surgery alone (p = 0.015). In intermediate-risk patients, the administration of adjuvant RT significantly benefited RFS when compared to surgery only in multivariate analysis (p = 0.031). Concerning OS, no significant influence for adjuvant treatment could be seen (p = 0.354). Though trends towards better OS and RFS could be observed in patients of the high-risk group-both in RCT and RT groups compared to surgery alone-the effects did not prove to be significant. CONCLUSION: Our study reaffirms the evidence against the use of adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy in low-risk early-stage cervical cancer. In intermediate-, and less pronounced in high-risk patients, however, it seems to be beneficial. The role of adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy in early cervical cancer should be further investigated in prospective randomized trials.

Laparoscopic approaches to the retropubic space: three alternatives with anatomical considerations.

INTRODUCTION: Many urogynecological and surgical laparoscopic interventions require access to the retropubic space, also known as the space of Retzius. Especially in patients with a history of previous surgery in this area or in general in the lower abdomen, the preparation may be complicated by adhesions and scar tissue. The necessity to combine several laparoscopic procedures in one surgical session may require consideration of the most appropriate way to approach the retropubic space. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We describe and discuss three different options to access the space of Retzius via laparoscopy: the medial transperitoneal, the extraperitoneal and the lateral transperitoneal approach. For all approaches, we used one umbilical trocar and two trocars in the lower abdomen. RESULTS: An algorithm was developed to select the most appropriate access route to the retropubic space, depending on the history of previous surgeries and accompanying interventions. CONCLUSION: The knowledge of different access routes to the retropubic space offers the possibility of adjusting the surgical procedure to the individual constellation of the patient.

Protein and mRNA Expression Levels of Interleukin-17A, -17F and -22 in Blood and Skin Samples of Patients with Mycosis Fungoides.

This study investigated the expression of interleukin (IL)-17A, -17F and -22 in mycosis fungoides. Blood samples were collected from 50 patients with mycosis fungoides and 50 healthy controls. Skin samples were obtained from 26 patients with mycosis fungoides and 5 healthy controls. Protein levels of IL-17A, -17F and -22 were measured in serum by multiplex enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and mRNA expression levels were measured in blood and skin samples by real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR. Both IL-17A and IL-17F mRNA expression levels were significantly lower in blood of patients with mycosis fungoides in comparison with healthy controls. IL-22 serum levels and expression levels of IL-22 mRNA in skin tissue, were significantly increased in patients with mycosis fungoides in comparison with healthy controls. These results suggest that low levels of IL-17A and IL-17F in mycosis fungoides may be connected to impaired immune surveillance contributing to tumourigenesis. Upregulation of IL-22 may play a role in the establishment of the tumour microenvironment in mycosis fungoides.

Systematic lymphadenectomy in early stage endometrial cancer.

BACKGROUND: The positive effect of systematic lymphadenectomy on survival of patients with endometrial cancer is a topic of ongoing debate. METHODS: We aimed to investigate whether systemic lymphadenectomy is beneficial for patients with early endometrial cancer. For this purpose, we analyzed a population-based registry with of 2392 women with endometrioid endometrial cancer, stage I and II at intermediate and high risk of recurrence. The primary outcome measure was overall survival. RESULTS: After exclusions, 868 women were eligible for analysis. Of those, 511 and 357 were categorized as intermediate (pT1A G3 and pT1B G1-2) and high risk (pT1B G3 and pT2 G1-3) early stage endometrial cancer, respectively. Lymphadenectomy was performed in 527 (60.7%) of the cases. Patients in the lymphadenectomy group were significantly younger, presented with more tumors of intermediate or undifferentiated grade and exhibited significantly lower co-morbidity rates and Eastern Cooperative of Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status. Median follow-up was 6.7 years. Recurrence-free survival was not improved by lymphadenectomy in the intermediate and high-risk group of patients. During the follow-up period, 111 (12.8%) women had disease recurrence and 302 (34.8%) died. Systematic lymphadenectomy was associated with significant improvement of overall survival in the pT1A G3 and pT1B G3 patient subgroups. Notably, adjustment for patient age and ECOG status abolished the improvement of overall survival by systematic lymphadenectomy in all groups. Thus, lymphadenectomy did not improve recurrence-free survival in the intermediate risk or the high-risk group of patients CONCLUSIONS: Systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy did not improve the survival of patients with early stage I and II endometrioid endometrial cancer at intermediate and high risk of recurrence.

Comparison of survival of patients with endometrial cancer undergoing sentinel node biopsy alone or systematic lymphadenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Recently, sentinel lymph node mapping was introduced in the surgical staging of endometrial cancer as alternative to systematic lymphadenectomy. However, the survival impact of sentinel node mapping is not well characterized yet. METHODS: We performed retrospective study of 104 patients with endometrial cancer treated with sentinel lymph node alone (n = 52) or with pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (n = 52). For sentinel node mapping, indocyanine green was used. The outcome measure was disease-free survival. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 42 months. Fifty-two patients staged by sentinel lymph node mapping were matched in 1:1 ratio with 52 patients staged by lymphadenectomy using patient age, histological type, tumor stage, tumor grade and lymph and vascular space invasion as matching criteria. The median number of removed lymph node was 3 (range 1-6) and 36 (13-63) in the sentinel and lymphadenectomy group, respectively. The rate of lymph node metastases was not significantly higher in the sentinel group (19.2%) in comparison with the lymphadenectomy group (14.3%). The overall detection rate of sentinel lymph nodes was 100% with a bilateral mapping of 98.1%. Most of the 152 lymph nodes identified and removed were localized in upper paracervical pathway (n = 143, 94.1%). During the follow-up period, overall 21 (20.2%) events were observed, 8 (15.4%) in the sentinel group and 13 (25.0%) in the lymphadenectomy group. The estimated disease-free survival was 84.6% and 75.0% for patients in the sentinel and lymphadenectomy groups, respectively. The survival curves demonstrated similar disease-free survival in two groups (p = 0.774). CONCLUSION: Sentinel lymph node mapping did not compromise the outcome of patients with endometrial cancer.

Value of indocyanine green pelvic lymph node mapping in the surgical approach of cervical cancer.

PURPOSE: Lymph node metastasis is a significant predictive factor for disease recurrence and survival in cervical cancer patients and relevant for therapeutic strategies. We evaluated the clinical value of indocyanine green (ICG) by measuring the sensitivity and negative predictive value of sentinel lymph node mapping compared with the gold standard of complete lymphadenectomy in detecting lymph node metastases for cervical cancer. METHODS: We utilized the near-infrared imaging agent ICG to detect tumor-infested lymph nodes in the pelvis analogue to a classical sentinel lymph node procedure by analyzing data from 20 patients who had undergone surgery for cervical cancer at our institution. A laparoscopic lymph node mapping procedure by means of ICG, followed by a complete pelvic lymphadenectomy with or without paraaortic lymphadenectomy was done in all patients. RESULTS: Histological examination identified seven patients with tumor-positive pelvic nodes, whereas mapping with ICG identified only five of these patients. Detection rate of positive nodes by ICG mapping and false negative rate was 71.4% and 28.6%, respectively; bilateral detection rate was 83.3%. One of the two false negative patients additionally suffered from deep infiltrating endometriosis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that ICG can identify the relevant pelvic nodes independent of tumor size, provided bilateral detection is achieved and additional, related diseases are excluded. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered within the German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00014692).

Lymph node micrometastases and outcome of endometrial cancer.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between nodal micrometastases and clinical outcome of endometrial cancer is unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a multicenter, retrospective registry-based study of 2392 patients with endometrial cancer with and without nodal micrometastases. The primary outcome measure was disease-free survival. RESULTS: After exclusions, the final study involved 428 patients: 302 (70.6%) with node-negative endometrial cancer, who did not receive adjuvant treatment, 95 (22.2%) with nodal micrometastases who received adjuvant treatment, and 31 (7.2%) with nodal micrometastases who did not receive adjuvant treatment. The median follow-up was 84.8 months. Without adjuvant therapy the disease-free survival in the cohort of patients with micrometastases was significantly reduced as compared with disease-free survival in the node-negative cohort (p = 0.0001). With adjuvant therapy the median disease-free survival of patients with nodal micrometastases was similar with those of node-negative patients (p = 0.648). The adjusted hazard ratio for disease events among patients with micrometastases and no adjuvant therapy, as compared with node-negative patients, was 2.23 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26-3.95). In the cohort with micrometastases the relative risk of events was significantly decreased by adjuvant therapy (HR 0.29, 95%CI 0.13-0.65) even after adjustment for age at diagnosis, myometrial invasion, histological grade and type, and performance status. CONCLUSIONS: Nodal micrometastases are associated with decreased disease-free survival of patients with endometrial cancer. Adjuvant therapy was associated with improved disease-free survival of patients with micrometastases.

Quality of life and oncological outcome in endometrial cancer patients after vaginal brachytherapy: comparison of two dosing schemes.

PURPOSE: Vaginal brachytherapy reduces the risk of local recurrence and was shown to be equieffective in preventing vaginal vault recurrence, but less toxic compared to external-beam radiotherapy in a subset of high intermediate-risk endometrial cancer patients and is administered as single adjuvant treatment in those patients. Different radiotherapeutic approaches with various dosing schemes exist toward brachytherapy. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome and long-term quality of life after brachytherapy with two different high-dose-rate dosing schemes. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was conducted of the recurrence and survival rates of 104 patients with endometrial cancer FIGO stage I-II that underwent adjuvant brachytherapy with three times 5 Gy or four times 5 Gy to the upper two-thirds of the vaginal vault in two different institutions between January 2010 and December 2013. Quality of life was assessed by EORTC QLQ-30 questionnaire and EN 24 module. RESULTS: The vaginal vault recurrence rates were 4.9% and 5.0% for patients treated with 3 × 5 Gy and 4 × 5 Gy, respectively (p = 0.98). We did not observe a difference in pelvic recurrence (p = 0.96), overall survival (p = 0.33) or quality of life between the different radiotherapy regimens. Metastatic recurrence and the use of chemotherapy contribute to impairment on quality of life. Younger patients (< 70 years) reported worse emotional functioning (p = 0.02) and higher symptom scales of diarrhea (p = 0.01) and financial problems (p = 0.03). Sexual activity was lower in patients younger than 70 years (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the effect of dosing schemes on recurrence rates and quality of life. Younger patients (< 70 years) seem to experience greater reduction in quality of life due to endometrial cancer diagnosis.

Does post-operative radiochemotherapy improve survival in high-grade endometrial cancer patients? Results of a population-based cohort analysis of a cancer registry.

PURPOSE: Adjuvant treatment of high-grade endometrial cancer varies greatly due to the lack of definitive results from controlled randomized trials on the subject. In a retrospective study, we sought to investigate the influence of post-operative radio-, chemo, and radiochemotherapy on survival time and recurrence rates among high-grade endometrial cancer patients. METHODS: 284 high-grade endometrial cancer patients (FIGOI-III, or unknown classification) diagnosed between 1998 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent surgery. Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and recurrence rates were compared for post-operative treatment modalities of radiotherapy alone (RT), chemotherapy alone (CTX), radiochemotherapy (RCT), and observation (OBS). RESULTS: Post-operative RCT and RT resulted in a significantly improved 5-year OS of 94.1% (HR 0.104, CI 0.013-0.809) and 62.1% (HR 0.615, CI 0.390-0.969), respectively, compared to 43.6% for OBS. CTX did not significantly improve OS leading to a 5-year OS of 56.5% (HR 0.783, CI 0.224-2.740). 5-year recurrence rate was lowest for patients treated with RCT (5.3%). 5-year RFS was 94.1% for the RCT group and proved to be significantly superior to 58.8% for RT (HR 9.034, CI 1.184-68.948), 56% for CTX (HR 12.738, CI 1.337-121.346), and 37.4% for OBS (HR 16.407, CI 2.127-126.575), respectively. In comparison with OBS, RT alone resulted in a significant improvement in RFS (HR 0.551, CI 0.354-0.856). CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective population-based study indicates a survival benefit from treating high-grade endometrial cancer with post-operative RCT. Randomized controlled trials are needed to minimize potential confounding parameters and further clarify the subject.

Treatment of endometrial cancer from 2000 to 2020 in Germany: a retrospective population based cohort study.

PURPOSE: Endometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most common malignancies among women in western countries. This study aimed to assess data on patient treatment in Germany throughout two decades to evaluate the development and effect of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. METHODS: This retrospective registry study included 34,349 EC patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2020. Patients were classified into five risk groups. Overall survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method as well as univariable and multivariable Cox regression to evaluate risk factors and treatment options. RESULTS: Over the study period, minimal invasive surgery was used more often compared to open surgery and was associated with better overall survival. Patients with advanced EC were more likely to receive multimodal therapy. Patients with intermediate risk EC had a good prognosis upon surgery, which further improved when radiotherapy was added. High-risk patients showed poorer prognosis but clearly benefited from additional radiotherapy. Survival of elderly high-risk patients with a non-endometrioid histology was improved when chemotherapy was added to surgery and radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Our study includes a large analysis of data from German clinical cancer registries on the care of endometrial cancer during two decades. We observed an increase of minimal invasive surgery. There is evidence that minimal invasive surgery is not inferior to open surgery. Adjuvant radio- and chemotherapy further improves survival depending on risk group and age.

Endometrial Cancer - Long-Term Survival in Certified Cancer Centers and Non-Certified Hospitals: Comparative Analysis Based on a Large German Retrospective Cohort Study (WiZen).

Introduction Endometrial cancer is the most common malignant tumor of the female genital organs. In Germany, treatment is provided in both cancer centers certified by the German Cancer Society (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, DKG) and in non-certified hospitals. This study investigated whether treatment in DKG-certified centers leads to improved overall survival of patients with endometrial cancer. Materials and Methods Data from 11 legally independent German statutory health insurance (SHI) funds of the AOK were analyzed as well as data from four clinical cancer registries (CCR), resulting in inclusion of 30 102 AOK patients and 8190 registry patients with a diagnosis (incidental cases) of ICD-10-GM code C54 (malignant neoplasm of corpus uteri). For comparative survival analyses, multivariable Cox regressions and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used. Results The Kaplan-Meier estimator for 5-year overall survival was 66.7% for patients from certified centers and 65.0% for patients from non-certified hospitals (using SHI data; CCR data: 63.4% vs. 60.7%). Cox regression adjusted for relevant confounders showed a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.93 (SHI data; 95% CI 0.86 - 1.00; p = 0.050) and 0.935 (CCR data; 95% CI 0.827 - 1.057; p = 0.281) for all-cause mortality. In a subgroup analysis (CCR), patients with International Union against Cancer Control (UICC) stage I had a significant survival benefit if treated in a certified center (HR 0.783; 95% CI 0.620 - 0.987; p = 0.038). Conclusion The study presented herein shows that patients with endometrial cancer treated in a certified cancer center tend to have better survival rates. This should be considered when selecting the treating hospital.

Treatment in Certified Breast Cancer Centers Improves Chances of Survival of Patients with Breast Cancer: Evidence Based on Health Care Data from the WiZen Study.

Introduction: Certified breast cancer centers offer specific quality standards in terms of their structure, diagnostic and treatment approaches with regards to breast surgery, drug-based cancer therapy, radiotherapy, and psychosocial support. Such centers aim to improve treatment outcomes of breast cancer patients. The question investigated here was whether patients with primary breast cancer have a longer overall survival if they are treated in a certified breast cancer center compared to treatment outside these centers. Methods: We used patient-specific data (demographics, diagnoses, treatments) obtained from data held by mandatory health insurance companies ( gesetzliche Krankenversicherung , GKV) and clinical cancer registries (KKR) for the period 2009-2017 as well as hospital characteristics recorded in standardized quality reports. Using multivariable Cox regression analysis, we investigated differences in survival between patients treated in hospitals certified as breast cancers centers by the German Cancer Society (DKG) and patients treated in hospitals which had not been certified by the DKG. Results: The sample population consisted of 143720 (GKV data) and 59780 (KKR data) patients with breast cancer, who were treated in 1010 hospitals across Germany (280 DKG-certified, 730 not DKG-certified). 63.5% (GKV data) and 66.7% (KKR data) of patients, respectively, were treated in DKG-certified breast cancer centers. Cox regression analysis for overall survival which included patient and hospital characteristics found a significantly lower mortality risk for patients treated in DKG-certified breast cancer centers (GKV data: HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.74-0.81; KKR data: HR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.85-0.92). This result remained stable even after several sensitivity analyses including stratified estimates for subgroups of patients and hospitals. The effect was even more pronounced for recurrence-free survival (KKR data: HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.74-0.82). Conclusions: Patients who are treated by an interdisciplinary team in a DKG-certified breast cancer had clear and statistically significantly better survival rates. Certification is therefore an effective means of improving the quality of care, and more patients should be treated in certified breast cancer centers.

Risk factors and temporal patterns of recurrences in patients with vulvar cancer: implications for follow-up intervals and duration.

BACKGROUND: To date, information on risk factors and temporal patterns of recurrences in patients with vulvar cancer is sparse. Conclusive data for an optimal surveillance strategy are lacking. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective population-based register study included 1412 patients who have been treated from 2000 to 2017 for vulvar cancer in the German districts of Upper Palatinate, Lower Bavaria, and Saxony-Anhalt. Kaplan-Meier method, and univariate and multivariate Cox regression were employed to evaluate prognostic factors and temporal course of overall survival, cumulative recurrence, and recurrence-free survival rates. RESULTS: After exclusion, the final study cohort comprised 829 patients. Most recurrences occurred within the first 3 years after diagnosis. Notably, a significant subset of patients were recurrent even after 5 years. The cumulative recurrence rate from all relapses was 18.6% 1 year after primary diagnosis. The recurrence rate increased to 34.7% after 3, to 41.8% after 5, and to 56.6% after 10 years post-diagnosis. The risk of relapse was significantly increased in patients over 70 years of age (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.7; p < 0.001; 95% CI 1.6-4.4), and in patients with positive nodal status N1 (HR = 2.0; p = 0.019; 95% CI 1.1-3.5) and N2/3 (HR = 2.2; p = 0.033; 95% CI 1.1-4.4). CONCLUSION: Our study provides compelling evidence that follow-up care should be carried out for longer than 5 years, especially for high-risk patients.

Guideline concordant therapy improves survival in high-grade endometrial cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Data from randomized controlled trials in high-grade endometrial cancer are scarce due to its low prevalence. Therefore, guideline recommendations in this cancer subtype rely on relatively few randomized trials and data from retrospective studies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefits from guideline-concordant therapy in high-grade endometrial cancer in a real-world patient group. METHODS: The effect of treatment according to German S3 guidelines and the former S2k guideline on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was evaluated in a cohort of 293 high-grade endometrial cancer patients. RESULTS: Treatment concordant with the S3 guideline significantly improved OS (HR 0.623, CI 0.420-0.923, p = 0.018) and RFS (HR 0.578, CI 0.387-0.863, p = 0.007). Treatment concordant with the S2k guideline did not result in a significantly higher OS (HR 0.783, CI 0.465-1.316, p = 0.335) or RFS (HR 0.741, CI 0.347-1.740, p = 0.242). CONCLUSION: Therapy according to the German S3 guideline improved OS and RFS in univariate as well as multivariate analysis in this cohort of high-grade endometrial cancer patients.