Ten Year Outcomes of Contemporary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Adolescent and Young Adult Patients are Favorable.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess 10-year patient-reported outcome measures, complications, polyethylene wear-rates, and implant survivorships in patients ≤30 years of age treated with contemporary total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 121 patients (144 hips) who underwent THA at age ≤30 years (mean 23 [range, 11 to 30]) at an average follow-up duration of 10.7 years (range, 8 to 17). Highly-crosslinked polyethylene acetabular liners were used in all cases. Femoral heads were ceramic (74%) or cobalt-chrome (26%). There were 52 hips (36%) that had previous surgery and 31 hips (22%) were in patients who had associated major systemic comorbidities. We analyzed the modified Harris Hip scores, University of California Los Angeles Activity Scores, major complications, polyethylene wear-rates, and implant survivorships. RESULTS: At final follow-up, the average modified Harris Hip scores improved from 47 (±15.1) to 81 (±19.5) with an average 34-point improvement. The University of California Los Angeles scores improved from 4.0 (±2.3) to 6.0 (±2.4). The major complication rate was 5.6%. There were 6 hips (4.2%) that were revised. Indications for revision included instability (3, 2.1%), late infection (1, 0.7%), liner dissociation (1, 0.7%), and acetabular loosening (1, 0.7%). Mean linear (0.0438 mm/y) and volumetric (29.07 mm3/y) wear rates were low. No periprosthetic osteolysis was detected in any hip. Survivorship free from revision for any reason was 97.2, 95.8, and 95.8% at 5, 10, and 15 years. CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary THA in patients ≤30 years of age is associated with marked clinical improvements at 10-year follow-up and encouraging survivorship estimates at 15 years.

Excellent 20-Year Results of Total Hip Arthroplasty With Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene on Cobalt-Chromium Femoral Heads in Patients ≤50 Years.

BACKGROUND: Highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) acetabular bearing surfaces have appeared to offer excellent wear resistance, low incidence of wear-related osteolysis, and high implant survivorship at 10-year to 15-year follow-up. However, concerns over potential performance deterioration at longer-term follow-up remain - particularly in younger patients - and outcome data into the third decade have not been available. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 62 patients (68 hips) who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) at age ≤50 years with a single manufacturer's cementless components, remelted HXLPE liner, and small diameter (26 and 28 millimeter) cobalt-chromium (CoCr) femoral heads at minimum 18-year follow-up. We assessed clinical outcomes (modified Harris Hip score, University of California Los Angeles Activity Score, polyethylene wear rates, radiographic findings (osteolysis, component loosening), and implant survivorship. RESULTS: At 20.6-year mean follow-up (range, 18 to 23 years) modified Harris Hip scores for surviving hips remained an average of 41 points above preoperative baseline (49 versus 90, P < .001) and UCLA scores 2.8 points above baseline (3.7 versus 6.4, P < .001). Wear analysis revealed a population linear wear rate of 0.0142 mm/y (standard deviation (SD), 0.0471) and volumetric wear rate of 10.14 mm3/y (SD, 23.41). Acetabular lysis was noted in 2 asymptomatic hips at 16.6 and 18.4 years. No components were radiographically loose. Survivorship free from wear-related revision was 100% at 20 years (97% free from any revision). CONCLUSION: The HXLPE-CoCr bearing couple with small femoral heads continues to be extremely effective 20 years after primary THA in the younger patient population.

Mean 16-Year Results of Total Hip Arthroplasty With Alumina Ceramic Femoral Heads on Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene in Patients 50 Years or Less.

BACKGROUND: Highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) is a widely used bearing surface in total hip arthroplasty (THA); long-term results in young patients are limited. We previously demonstrated excellent results in HXPLE on cobalt-chrome femoral heads at 15-year mean follow-up. The purpose of the present study was to investigate polyethylene wear rates, implant survivorships, wear-related revisions, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in a young patient cohort who had alumina ceramic on HXPLE coupling at an average 16-year follow-up. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 128 hips that underwent THA with HXLPE on alumina ceramic bearings between March 1, 2004, and April 15, 2007. The patient's mean age was 38 years (range, 13 to 50). All THAs utilized HXPLE liners with alumina ceramic heads. The University of California, Los Angeles activity score and modified Harris hip scores were collected preoperatively and at each follow-up. Martell hip analysis suite was used for wear calculations. RESULTS: At average 16 years (range, 13 to 18), aseptic revision survivorship was 93.3% and osteolysis/wear survivorship was 99.2%. The mean linear wear rate was 0.0191 mm/year and mean volumetric wear rate was 19.43 mm3/y, both of which were clinically undetectable. We observed excellent PROs with a significant increase in mean modified Harris hip scores (43.6 to 87.4, P < .0001) and the University of California, Los Angeles activity scores (4.0 to 6.0, P < .0001). There were no statistically significant differences in PROs or wear rates between ceramic and cobalt-chrome groups. CONCLUSION: At a mean 16-year follow-up, young patients who had HXLPE on ceramic coupling had excellent wear properties, PROs, and acceptable survivorships.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Conventional Polyethylene in Total Hip Arthroplasty in Young Patients: Heightened Wear-Related Complications Are Observed at the Beginning of the Third Decade.

BACKGROUND: Conventional polyethylene (CPE) was used widely in the past as a bearing surface in total hip arthroplasty (THA). As CPE THAs age and the revision burden continues to grow, it is increasingly important to understand the durability and failure mechanisms of this bearing material. Currently, such long-term data remain limited, particularly in younger, more active patients in whom wear issues are of greater concern. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 90 hips (77 patients) that underwent primary THA with CPE bearings on cobalt chrome femoral heads at age ≤50 years at 20-year minimum follow-up (mean 21.6 [20-23]). We analyzed polyethylene wear rates, clinical outcomes (modified Harris Hip Score, University of California, Los Angeles Activity Score), and implant survivorship. RESULTS: Wear analysis revealed a median linear wear rate of 0.113 mm/y (95% CI 0.102-0.148) and a median volumetric wear rate of 41.20 mm3/y (95% CI 43.5-61.0). Modified Harris Hip Scores remained 37 points above preoperative baseline (P < .001) and University of California, Los Angeles scores 1.4 points above baseline (P = .018) at 21.6-year mean follow-up. Twenty-nine hips (32.2%) were revised, 20 of which (22.2%) were wear-related at a median of 15.4 years (interquartile range 11.4-19.5). Survivorship free from wear-related revision was 95.6% (95% CI 88.7-98.3), 87.9% (78.6-93.3), 78.1% (49.6-66.5), and 61.1% (41.3-67.0) at 10, 15, 20, and 25 years. CONCLUSION: Wear-related issues developed at increasingly high rates after 15 years, suggesting the need for surveillance after this time. The long-term wear and survivorship data of this study may be used as a benchmark when evaluating the performance of contemporary bearings in young, active THA patients.

Does It Matter: Total Hip Arthroplasty or Lumbar Spinal Fusion First? Preoperative Sagittal Spinopelvic Measurements Guide Patient-Specific Surgical Strategies in Patients Requiring Both.

BACKGROUND: In patients requiring both total hip arthroplasty (THA) and lumbar spinal fusion (LSF), consideration of preoperative sagittal spinopelvic measurements can aid in the prediction of postfusion compensatory changes in pelvic tilt (PT) and inform adjustments to traditional THA cup anteversion. This study aims to identify relationships between spinopelvic measurements and post-THA hip instability and to determine if procedure order reveals a difference in hip dislocation rate. METHODS: Patients at a single practice site who received both THA and LSF between 2005 and 2015 (292: 158 = LSF prior to THA, 134 = THA prior to LSF) were retrospectively reviewed for incidents of THA instability. Those with complete radiograph series (89) had their sagittal (standing) spinopelvic profiles measured preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 1.5 years, and 2 years postoperatively. Measured parameters included lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), PT, and sacral slope (SS). RESULTS: No significant differences in dislocation rates between operative order groups were elicited (7/73 LSF first, 4/62 THA first; Z = 0.664, P = .509). Compared to nondislocators, dislocators had lower LL (-10.9) and SS (-7.8), and higher PT (+4.3) and PI-LL (+7.3). Additional risk factors for dislocation included sacral fusion (relative risk [RR] = 3.0) and revision fusion (RR = 2.7) . Predictive power of the model generated through multiple regression to characterize individual profiles of post-LSF PT compensation based on perioperative measurements was most significant at 1 year (R2 = 0.565, F = 0.000456, P = .028) and 2 years (R2 = 0.741, F = 0.031, P = .001) postoperatively. CONCLUSION: In performing THA after LSF, it is theoretically ideal to proceed with THA at a postfusion interval of at least 1 year, beyond which further compensatory PT change is minimal. However, the order of surgical procedure revealed no statistical difference in hip instability rates. In cases characterized by large PI-LL mismatch (larger or less predictable compensation profiles) or large SS or LL loss (considerably atypical muscle recruitment), consideration of full functional anteversion range between sitting and standing positions to account for abnormalities not appreciated with standing radiographic assessment alone may be warranted.

Predictive Factors for Intraoperative Determination for the Need of Femoral Osteochondroplasty After Periacetabular Osteotomy for Acetabular Dysplasia.

Background: Determination of need for osteochondroplasty (OCP) during periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) commonly relies on intraoperative assessment of internal rotation at 90° flexion (IRF). Performing an OCP helps decrease the risk of iatrogenic femoroacetabular impingement from PAO reduction. Avoiding impingement helps decrease risks of accelerated secondary osteoarthritis. The literature is limited for factors that predict need for OCPs during PAOs. The purpose of this study was to (1) define the characteristics of patients needing concurrent OCP and provide OCP rate based on IRF and femoral version and (2) identify predictive factors (clinical, radiographic) associated with need for OCP during PAO. As some surgeons determine need for OCP pre-operatively, predictive factors would aid decision making. Methods: This was a prospective cohort of 224 hips (207 patients) who underwent PAO for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia, of which 154 hips (69%) underwent OCP between years 2013 and 2017. Patients underwent OCP if they had restrictions in motion or impingement intra-operatively. Pre-operative factors such as age, sex, BMI, and CT findings were recorded that underwent univariate and multivariable analyses. Multivariable analysis found predictors that were described using odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. IRF>30° and femoral version 10°-25° were used as the reference groups during categorical analysis. P-values ≤0.05 were considered significant. Results: Alpha angles >55° (OR= 2.20, CI: 1.08-4.52, p= 0.03), IRF≤20° (OR: 9.52, CI: 3.87-23.40, p<0.001), IRF >20°-30° (OR: 2.68, CI: 1.08-6.62, p=0.03), and femoral version <10° (OR: 5.26, CI: 1.09-25.30, p=0.04) were associated with increased odds of OCP. On continuous modeling, decreasing femoral version (OR: 1.07, CI: 1.02-1.12, p=0.002) and IRF (OR: 1.06, CI: 1.03-1.09, p<0.001) were associated with increased chance of OCP. For 5° changes, the chance of OCP increased by 40% (OR: 1.40, CI: 1.13-1.73, p=0.002) and 35% (OR: 1.35, IC: 1.16-1.57, p<0.001), respectively. Conclusion: Awareness of need for OCP may be valuable in peri-operative planning for these patients especially since some surgeons perform this technique arthroscopically before PAO. Factors associated with increased chances of OCP were alpha angles >55°, decreased IRF, and decreased femoral version. More studies in the future would help determine how OCP affects patient outcomes. Level of Evidence: III.

Outcomes of Periacetabular Osteotomy for Borderline Acetabular Dysplasia.

BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical treatment (hip arthroscopy compared with periacetabular osteotomy [PAO]) for borderline acetabular dysplasia (lateral center-edge angle [LCEA], 18° to 25°) remains a topic of debate. To date, the literature has focused primarily on arthroscopy outcomes, with only a few small reports on PAO outcomes. The purpose of this study was to define PAO outcomes in a large cohort of borderline hips. In a secondary analysis, we assessed the effect of prior failed arthroscopy, concurrent hip arthroscopy, and concurrent femoral osteoplasty on PAO outcomes in this cohort. METHODS: A prospective database was retrospectively reviewed for patients who underwent PAO for symptomatic instability in the setting of borderline dysplasia (LCEA, 18° to 25°). Of the 232 identified hips, 186 (80.2%) were assessed at a mean follow-up of 3.3 ± 2.0 years postoperatively. The mean patient age was 25.2 ± 8.5 years (range, 14 to 45 years), and 88.2% were female. Thirty hips (16.1%) had undergone a failed prior arthroscopy. Arthroscopy was performed concurrently with the PAO in 130 hips (69.9%), and femoral osteoplasty was performed concurrently in 120 hips (64.5%). The modified Harris hip score (mHHS) was assessed relative to the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 8 and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) of 74. Clinical failure was defined as a reoperation for persistent symptoms or a failure to achieve either the mHHS MCID or PASS. RESULTS: Of the 156 hips undergoing a primary surgical procedure, clinical success was achieved in 148 hips (94.9% [95% confidence interval (CI), 90.2% to 97.4%]). Two hips (1.3% [95% CI, 0.4% to 4.6%]) underwent reoperation (hip arthroscopy) for persistent symptoms and an additional 6 hips (3.8% [95% CI, 1.8% to 8.1%]) failed to achieve the mHHS MCID or PASS, for a clinical failure rate of 5.1% (95% CI, 2.6% to 9.8%); 8.8% reported dissatisfaction with the surgical procedure. Clinical failure was more frequent among the 30 hips (23.3% [95% CI, 11.8% to 40.9%]; p = 0.001) that had undergone a prior failed arthroscopy. There were no outcome differences between hips that had or had not undergone concurrent hip arthroscopy or femoral osteoplasty. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates excellent early outcomes of PAO for borderline acetabular dysplasia, with significant clinical improvement in 94.9% of patients undergoing a primary surgical procedure; 91.2% were satisfied with the surgical procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Outcomes of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients 60 Years and Younger.

Background: The annual volume of patients requiring revision total hip arthroplasty prior to age 60 is projected to increase considerably. Despite this, outcome data for revision THA in these younger patients remain limited. The purpose of this study was to define implant survivorship, identify risk factors for re-revision, and determine clinical outcomes of revision THA in patients aged ≤60 years. Methods: We identified 191 revision THAs performed in patients aged ≤60 years. Minimum 4-year follow-up was obtained in 141 (73.8%) hips (mean 10.3 years [range, 4-20]). Mean age was 48 years (range, 20-60). Forty-five hips (32%) had previously been revised. Indications for index revision included aseptic loosening (28%), polyethylene wear (26%), dislocation (20%), and infection (14%). Outcome measures were Kaplan-Meier survival free from re-revision and patient-reported outcome scores (mHHS, UCLA). Results: Survivorship free from re-revision for any cause was 78% [95% CI=70-85] at five years and 71% [62-78] at ten years. The most common indication for re-revision at both five and ten years was dislocation (12% [8-19], 16% [10-23]), followed by infection (6% [3-12], 10% [5-18]) and aseptic loosening (2% [1-7], 4% [1-11]). Mean scores were improved from baseline at six (mHHS +21.4, UCLA +0.9) and twelve years (mHHS +13.4, UCLA +0.5). Conclusion: Revision THA in patients less than 60 years of age was associated with considerably lower rates of early loosening-related failure than historically reported. Recurrent dislocation and infection appear to remain challenges in this population. Despite improvements in survivorship from earlier studies, patient-reported functional improvements remained relatively unchanged. Level of Evidence: IV.

Is combined surgical dislocation and proximal femoral osteotomy a safe procedure for correction of complex hip deformities?

Complex deformities of the hip requiring intra-articular and proximal femoral correction are challenging with regard to surgical access and complication risk. Combined surgical dislocation and proximal femoral osteotomy (SD/PFO) is a surgical strategy that provides unrestricted access to the joint with the capability for adjunctive PFO. Although providing excellent surgical access, concerns over a potentially high risk of postoperative complications remain, and published information on the safety of this technique remain scarce. In this study, we defined the early complication profile of combined surgery across 48 hips with a variety of complex deformities using a standardized, validated complication grading scheme for hip preservation surgery. Patients were mean age 19.1 years 13-33 years and 60% had previous surgery. At the early mean follow-up of 2.9 years, considerable improvement was seen across all outcome scores. Major complications (Grade III or higher) occurred at a rate of 4.2% (n = 2). Both were osteotomy non-unions, and both were treated successfully with revision PFO and bone grafting at mean 1.1 years. To our knowledge, the current series of combined SD-PFO surgeries represents the largest to date for which detailed complication data have been reported. Given the complexity of these disorders, a major complication rate of 4.2% is acceptable. Our complication rates were comparable to those reported for isolated SD and PFO procedures. These rates did not vary significantly across morphologic variants or patient-specific characteristics. Additionally, our complication risk profile is consistent with previous, smaller reports, which supports the generalizability of these results among appropriately experienced surgeons.

Comparison of modern periacetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia with total hip arthroplasty for hip osteoarthritis-10-year outcomes are comparable in young adult patients.

Young adult patients with symptomatic acetabular dysplasia and marginal secondary osteoarthritis can be faced with the decision to either undergo periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) to relieve symptoms and slow osteoarthritis progression or wait until progression to more advanced disease and undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA). The decision can be difficult, and contemporary literature to guide these decisions is sparse. Therefore, we retrospectively assessed complication rate, survivorship and patient-reported clinical outcomes [modified Harris Hip score (mHHS), UCLA Activity score] in two, consecutive cohorts of patients aged 18-40 years that underwent either PAO for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia (mean age 28.9 years) or THA for advanced secondary osteoarthritis (32.5 years). PAO patients were followed for a mean of 10.5 years (8-19) and THA patients for 11.9 (8-17) years. Between PAO and THA groups, there were no differences in overall complication rate (4.7% versus 4.7%), non-revision reoperation rate (5.9% versus 2.3%, P = 0.37) or end-revision rate [7 (8.2%) PAOs converted to THA at mean 10.8 years versus 3 (7.0%) THAs revised at 6.2 years, P = 0.80]. Latest scores remained significantly improved from baseline in both the PAO (mHHS 86.1 versus 63.3, P < 0.001; UCLA 7.5 versus 6.9, P < 0.05) and THA (mHHS 82.6 versus 48.4, P < 0.001; UCLA 7.2 versus 4.6, P < 0.001) cohorts. Final scores were similar between groups (mHHS 86.1 versus 82.6, P = 0.46; UCLA 7.5 versus 7.2, P = 0.37). Clinical success [mHHS minimal clinically important difference (8) OR PASS (>70) at latest follow-up without end-revision] was achieved in 81.2% of PAO hips and 83.7% of THA hips (P = 0.72).

Does Femoral Osteoplasty Improve Long-term Clinical Outcomes and Survivorship of Hip Arthroscopy? A 15-Year Minimum Follow-up Study.

BACKGROUND: Although femoral osteoplasty is common practice in treating cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), long-term data are lacking that support the ability of this procedure to optimize outcomes and alter natural history. PURPOSE: To compare long-term clinical outcomes and survivorship of treatment for symptomatic FAI via arthroscopic correction of labral or chondral pathology with and without femoral osteoplasty. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed across 2 consecutive cohorts of patients with isolated cam-type FAI who underwent hip arthroscopic treatment of labral or chondral pathology without femoral osteoplasty (HS group) or with femoral osteoplasty (HS-OST group). These unique cohorts were established at a distinct transition time in our practice before and after adoption of femoral osteoplasty for treatment of FAI. Clinical outcomes were measured using the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess for total hip arthroplasty (THA)-free and reoperation-free survivorship. RESULTS: The final HS group included 17 hips followed for 19.7 ± 1.2 years, and the final HS-OST group included 23 hips followed for 16.0 ± 0.6 years. No significant patient or morphological differences were found between groups. Compared with the HS group, the HS-OST group had significantly higher final mHHS (82.7 vs 64.7 for HS-OST vs HS, respectively; P = .002) and mHHS improvement (18.4 vs 6.1; P = .02). The HS-OST group also had significantly greater 15-year THA-free survivorship versus the HS group (78% vs 41%, respectively; P = .02) and reoperation-free survivorship (78% vs 29%; P = .003). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated superior long-term clinical outcomes and survivorship with combined arthroscopy and femoral osteoplasty compared with hip arthroscopy alone. These long-term data strongly support the practice of femoral osteoplasty in patients with cam FAI morphologies and suggest that this treatment alters the natural history of FAI at long-term follow-up.

Factors Associated With Disease Progression in the Contralateral Hip of Patients With Symptomatic Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Minimum 5-Year Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is one of the most common causes of hip osteoarthritis, yet the factors controlling disease progression are poorly understood. PURPOSE: To investigate rates of initial and subsequent symptoms in the contralateral hip of patients with FAI, and identify predictors of disease progression (symptom development and surgical intervention) in the contralateral hip. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: This prospective study included a minimum 5-year follow-up of the contralateral hip in 179 patients undergoing FAI surgery. Symptoms (moderate pain) and surgical progression were monitored. Univariate and multivariate analyses compared patient-specific and imaging characteristics of symptomatic patients with those who remained asymptomatic to identify factors associated with disease progression. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients (84% follow-up) were followed for a mean of 7.1 years (range, 5-11 years). Thirty-nine of these patients (26% [39/150]) had contralateral hip symptoms at initial evaluation. Of those without contralateral hip symptoms at initial evaluation, 32% (36/111) had developed contralateral hip symptoms by latest follow-up. Those who developed symptoms during the study period had a lower anteroposterior head-neck offset ratio (0.153 vs 0.165; P = .005), decreased total arc of rotation in 90° of flexion (39.9° vs 51.1°; P = .005), and decreased external rotation in 90° of flexion (28.6° vs 37.1°; P = .003) compared with those who never developed symptoms. Age, sex, body mass index, alpha angle, lateral center-edge angle, internal rotation in flexion, and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), activity score were similar between these groups. Those with contralateral symptoms at initial evaluation progressed to contralateral surgery at a rate of 41% (16/39) and those who developed contralateral symptoms during the study period progressed to contralateral surgery at a rate of 28% (10/36). Among those with contalateral hip symptoms (either present initially or developed during study period)), younger age (24.6 vs 34.1 years; P < .001) and baseline UCLA activity score ≥9 (P = .003) were associated with progression to surgery. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, 64%, 54%, and 48% of patients remained free of contralateral hip symptoms at 2, 5, and 10 years. CONCLUSION: At a mean follow-up of 7.1 years, significant symptoms in the contralateral hip of patients with FAI were present in approximately 50% of patients. FAI disease progression (symptom development and surgical intervention) was associated with decreased hip rotation arc, decreased external rotation, and decreased head-neck offset ratio. In symptomatic patients, younger age and UCLA activity score ≥9 were associated with progression to surgery. These findings represent important factors for patient counseling and risk modeling in FAI.

Survivorship of the Modular Femoral Revision Stem.

The geriatric population represents a rapidly growing segment of society with prolonged life expectancies and more active lifestyles. Many of these patients have already undergone primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and are presenting with aseptic loosening, polyethylene wear, osteolysis, or periprosthetic fractures. Therefore, the demand for hip revision procedures is expected to grow. Currently, there are many modular implant options available for use in complicated revision THA. Early results of modular femoral revision systems are promising for the treatment of the deficient femur in complex revision THA. The objective of this study was to evaluate component survivorship of a modular femoral revision system in revision THA. A retrospective review was conducted using electronic health records of patients who underwent revision THA performed by 1 of 3 surgeon investigators from 2010 through 2014. The authors included all patients who underwent a revision THA using a specific modular femoral revision system. The authors evaluated component survivorship and time to re-revision THA. Fifty-one revision THAs were included. Seven patients required a second revision THA (13.7%; 95% confidence interval, 4%-23%). Mean time to re-revision THA was 4.88±3.9 months. Kaplan-Meier survivorship using re-revision for any reason was 86.3% at 60 months. This study showed excellent component survivorship of the specific modular femoral revision system in revision THA. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(5):294-298.].