Severe Comorbidity Burden Does Not Influence Postoperative Clinical Outcomes and Trajectory for Back Pain, Leg Pain, Physical Function, or Disability in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Cohort-Matched Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative outcomes, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and minimum clinically important difference achievement after single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in patients stratified by preoperative comorbidity burden. METHODS: PROMs were administered preoperatively/postoperatively and included Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and 12-Item Short-Form Physical Composite Score (SF-12 PCS). Patients were grouped according to preoperative Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) <5 (mild to moderate comorbidity) or preoperative CCI ≥5 (severe preoperative comorbidity). A 3:1 propensity score match for age, gender, insurance status, smoking status, and preoperative spinal disease was used to control for significant demographic differences between cohorts. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 255 patients were included (135 in the CCI <5 cohort; 120 in the CCI ≥5 cohort). The CCI ≥5 cohort showed significantly reduced postoperative VAS back pain score on the day of surgery (P < 0.001, all). Mean PROM differences were noted for postoperative PROMs: VAS back and ODI 6 months, both instances favoring the CCI ≥5 cohort (P < 0.038). The CCI <5 cohort improved from baseline to 1 year for all postoperative PROMs except SF-12 PCS 6 weeks and 12 weeks and SF-12 Mental Composite Score 6 weeks (P < 0.034, all). The CCI ≥5 cohort reported significant improvement from preoperative baseline to 1 year for all postoperative PROMs except ODI 6 weeks, SF-12 Mental Composite Score 6 weeks and 1 year, SF-12 PCS 6 weeks, and PROMIS-PF 6 weeks (P < 0.017, all). Both cohorts reported >50% overall minimum clinically important difference achievement rate for VAS leg, VAS back, ODI, SF-12 PCS, and PROMIS-PF. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that patients undergoing MIS TLIF with severe comorbidities can expect a similar postoperative trajectory for disability, leg and back pain, and physical function. However, long-term (1 year) mental health improvement from preoperative baseline was noted only in the mild to moderate comorbidity group.

Meeting Patient Expectations and Achieving a Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Back Disability, Back Pain, and Leg Pain May Provide Predictive Utility for Achieving Patient Satisfaction Among Lumbar Decompression Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Our study evaluates minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement for back pain/leg pain/disability and meeting preoperative expectations as predictors of patient satisfaction after minimally invasive lumbar decompression (MIS-LD) surgery. METHODS: Single/multilevel MIS-LD procedures were identified. Patient-reported outcome measures (preoperative/postoperative), expectations (preoperative), and satisfaction (postoperative) were collected for visual analog scale (VAS) back/VAS leg/Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Student's t-test assessed patient-reported outcome measure improvement from preoperative baseline. Correlations between outcome and satisfaction scores were evaluated using the Pearson correlation coefficient and categorized according to strength of relationship. MCID achievement and meeting expectations were evaluated as predictors of postoperative patient satisfaction with simple linear regression. Comparison of meeting expectations or achieving MCID as predictors of satisfaction scores was performed using a post hoc Suest test comparison of standardized ß-coefficients. RESULTS: A total of 329 patients were included. All outcomes improved from baselines (P < 0.001, all) at all postoperative time points and demonstrated strong and negative correlations with satisfaction scores (P < 0.001, all). Majority of patients had their expectations met for ODI/VAS back/VAS leg and achieved MCID for ODI/VAS back/VAS leg at all time points and overall. Both MCID achievement and meeting preoperative expectations demonstrated significant associations with satisfaction scores at all time points for ODI/VAS back/VAS leg. Post hoc analysis of predictors of patient satisfaction in pain and disability demonstrated that MCID achievement was an equivalent predictor to meeting patient preoperative expectations at all postoperative time points. CONCLUSION: Pain/disability improved after MIS-LD; improvement was strongly correlated with postoperative satisfaction. Meeting expectations/MCID achievement is associated with satisfaction. MCID achievement was equivalent to meeting expectations in predicting satisfaction at all postoperative time points for pain/disability.

Influence of Self-Identified Gender on Clinical Outcomes and Postoperative Patient Satisfaction After Lumbar Decompression: Cohort-Matched Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: We compared the patient-reported outcomes (PROs), minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement, and perceived postoperative satisfaction after minimally invasive lumbar decompression of patients stratified by self-identified gender. METHODS: Patients who had undergone single minimally invasive lumbar decompression were identified. The PRO measures were administered preoperatively and postoperatively and included the PRO measurement information system-physical function, visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and 12-item short form physical and mental component scores. The patients were grouped by self-identified gender. Propensity score matching was performed. The mean PROs and postoperative satisfaction scores were compared between cohorts using a 2-sample t test. The postoperative PRO improvement within each cohort was calculated using a paired t test. MCID achievement was determined by comparison to previously established threshold values. The MCID achievement rates were compared among the groups using simple logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 128 propensity score-matched patients were included: 44 in the female group and 84 in the male group. The male group demonstrated worse VAS scores for back pain at 12 weeks and a worse ODI at 6 weeks (P < 0.046 for all). The female cohort had achieved greater rates of a MCID for the ODI at 6 months (P < 0.049). Patients in the self-identified female group demonstrated higher levels of postoperative satisfaction for the VAS score for leg pain at 6 and 12 weeks), the VAS score for back pain at 12 weeks, and the ODI at 6 and 12 weeks (P < 0.028 for all). Additionally, patients in the self-identified female group demonstrated greater levels of satisfaction for lifting at 6 and 12 weeks (P < 0.014 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the similar preoperative baseline values, postoperative improvement, and clinical outcomes, our results suggest that the self-identified male patients will have poorer short-term satisfaction for disability, leg pain, back pain, and lifting versus patients in the self-identified female group. Self-identified gender might influence patient satisfaction and could be attributed to differing preoperative expectations at baseline for short-term recovery.

Mental Health as a Predictor of Preoperative Expectations for Pain and Disability Following Lumbar Fusion.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate impact of preoperative mental health on expectations in patients undergoing transforaminal, anterior, or lateral lumbar interbody fusion. METHODS: Demographics, perioperative characteristics, duration of preoperative symptoms, and preoperative mental health scores were collected. Pain and disability were recorded using preoperative visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain and Oswestry Disability Index scores. Patients' expectations were recorded. Preoperative mental health was recorded using Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) mental component score (MCS), and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) MCS. PHQ-9 scores were categorized by severity of depressive symptoms. Simple linear regression evaluated impact of preoperative mental health on patient expectations for pain and disability; multiple linear regression evaluated the same while accounting for preoperative scores. RESULTS: In 181 patients, PHQ-9 and increasing severity of depressive symptoms significantly predicted VAS back pain expectations (P ≤ 0.006); significance was lost after accounting for preoperative VAS back pain. All mental health outcomes significantly predicted VAS leg pain expectations (P ≤ 0.040); only PHQ-9 retained significance after accounting for preoperative VAS leg pain. All mental health scores significantly predicted ODI expectations (P < 0.001); none retained significance after accounting for preoperative ODI. PHQ-9, SF-12, and VR-12 significantly predicted all ODI domains except personal care and pain intensity (P ≤ 0.045). PHQ-9 significantly predicted patient expectations for lifting, walking, standing, sleeping, sex life, and social life. SF-12 MCS significantly predicted expectations for lifting, walking, standing, sleeping, and social life after accounting for preoperative domain scores. VR-12 MCS significantly predicted expectations for lifting, walking, standing, sleeping, sex life, and social life (P ≤0.050, all), even after accounting for preoperative scores. CONCLUSIONS: Mental health scores impact expectations regarding improvement in more active areas of a patient's life. Poor mental health scores may be associated with lower expectations for preoperative symptom improvement.

The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Spine Surgeons Worldwide: A One Year Prospective Comparative Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Survey. OBJECTIVE: In March of 2020, an original study by Louie et al investigated the impact of COVID-19 on 902 spine surgeons internationally. Since then, due to varying government responses and public health initiatives to the pandemic, individual countries and regions of the world have been affected differently. Therefore, this follow-up study aimed to assess how the COVID-19 impact on spine surgeons has changed 1 year later. METHODS: A repeat, multi-dimensional, 90-item survey written in English was distributed to spine surgeons worldwide via email to the AO Spine membership who agreed to receive surveys. Questions were categorized into the following domains: demographics, COVID-19 observations, preparedness, personal impact, patient care, and future perceptions. RESULTS: Basic respondent demographics, such as gender, age, home demographics, medical comorbidities, practice type, and years since training completion, were similar to those of the original 2020 survey. Significant differences between groups included reasons for COVID testing, opinions of media coverage, hospital unemployment, likelihood to be performing elective surgery, percentage of cases cancelled, percentage of personal income, sick leave, personal time allocation, stress coping mechanisms, and the belief that future guidelines were needed (P<.05). CONCLUSION: Compared to baseline results collected at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, significant differences in various domains related to COVID-19 perceptions, hospital preparedness, practice impact, personal impact, and future perceptions have developed. Follow-up assessment of spine surgeons has further indicated that telemedicine and virtual education are mainstays. Such findings may help to inform and manage expectations and responses to any future outbreaks.