RESUMO
BACKGROUND: All polyethylene acetabular liners wear over time, and numerous methods for calculating linear wear rates exist. The objective of this study was to compare 2-dimensional wear rates between direct, micrometer measurements and the computerized, edge-detection method using Hip Analysis Suite (HAS) 8.0.4.3. METHODS: Two groups of retrieved acetabular liners from Harris-Galante Prosthesis I and Harris-Galante Prosthesis II implants in situ for more than 10 years were evaluated. Group 1 (n = 18) contained liners with both early postoperative (<6 months) and prerevision radiographs taken within 1 month of explantation. Group 2 (n = 55) included liners with only prerevision X-rays (ie, 1 radiograph for wear assessment). Average and maximum direct linear wear was calculated from thicknesses measured at 6 consistent, well-separated locations (3 in the worn and 3 in the unworn regions) using a calibrated, digital micrometer. HAS 8.0.4.3 was used to calculate 2-dimensional wear from anteroposterior pelvic radiographs. RESULTS: Aggregate wear rates calculated by HAS were higher than those calculated by the average of direct measurements for group 1 (P = .020) and group 2 (P < .001). However, comparing the maximum direct micrometer measurements to HAS showed no difference for either group 1 (P = .351) or group 2 (P = .451). Linear regression analysis showed a strong correlation between HAS and both average and maximum direct wear measures for both groups, though the coefficient for the direct maximum measurement comparisons were closer to one, indicating a better one-to-one correspondence between HAS and direct maximum wear. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare and validate 2-dimensional wear rates in polyethylene acetabular liners between direct measurements from retrieved components and a radiographic computer-assisted technique (as opposed to comparison against a phantom component). Wear rates determined by direct measurements from retrievals were consistent with computer-assisted 2-dimensional methods when comparing maximum wear measurements. In addition, a single prerevision radiograph appears to be sufficient to assess 2-dimensional in vivo wear.