H3K27M diffuse midline glioma is homologous recombination defective and sensitized to radiotherapy and NK cell-mediated antitumor immunity by PARP inhibition.

Background: Radiotherapy (RT) is the primary treatment for diffuse midline glioma (DMG), a lethal pediatric malignancy defined by histone H3 lysine 27-to-methionine (H3K27M) mutation. Based on the loss of H3K27 trimethylation producing broad epigenomic alterations, we hypothesized that H3K27M causes a functional double-strand break (DSB) repair defect that could be leveraged therapeutically with PARP inhibitor and RT for selective radiosensitization and antitumor immune responses. Methods: H3K27M isogenic DMG cells and orthotopic brainstem DMG tumors in immune deficient and syngeneic, immune competent mice were used to evaluate the efficacy and mechanisms of PARP1/2 inhibition by olaparib or PARP1 inhibition by AZD9574 with concurrent RT. Results: H3K27M mutation caused an HRR defect characterized by impaired RT-induced K63-linked polyubiquitination of histone H1 and inhibition of HRR protein recruitment. H3K27M DMG cells were selectively radiosensitized by olaparib in comparison to isogenic controls, and this effect translated to efficacy in H3K27M orthotopic brainstem tumors. Olaparib and RT induced an innate immune response and induction of NK cell (NKG2D) activating ligands leading to increased NK cell-mediated lysis of DMG tumor cells. In immunocompetent syngeneic orthotopic DMG tumors, either olaparib or AZD9574 in combination with RT enhanced intratumoral NK cell infiltration and activity in association with NK cell-mediated therapeutic responses and favorable activity of AZD9574. Conclusions: The HRR deficiency in H3K27M DMG can be therapeutically leveraged with PARP inhibitors to radiosensitize and induce an NK cell-mediated antitumor immune response selectively in H3K27M DMG, supporting the clinical investigation of best-in-class PARP inhibitors with RT in DMG patients. Key points: H3K27M DMG are HRR defective and selectively radiosensitized by PARP inhibitor.PARP inhibitor with RT enhances NKG2D ligand expression and NK cell-mediated lysis.NK cells are required for the therapeutic efficacy of PARP inhibitor and RT. Importance of the Study: Radiotherapy is the cornerstone of H3K27M-mutant diffuse midline glioma treatment, but almost all patients succumb to tumor recurrence with poor overall survival, underscoring the need for RT-based precision combination therapy. Here, we reveal HRR deficiency as an H3K27M-mediated vulnerability and identify a novel mechanism linking impaired RT-induced histone H1 polyubiquitination and the subsequent RNF168/BRCA1/RAD51 recruitment in H3K27M DMG. This model is supported by selective radiosensitization of H3K27M DMG by PARP inhibitor. Notably, the combination treatment results in NKG2D ligand expression that confers susceptibility to NK cell killing in H3K27M DMG. We also show that the novel brain penetrant, PARP1-selective inhibitor AZD9574 compares favorably to olaparib when combined with RT, prolonging survival in a syngeneic orthotopic model of H3K27M DMG. This study highlights the ability of PARP1 inhibition to radiosensitize and induce an NK cell-mediated antitumor immunity in H3K27M DMG and supports future clinical investigation.

Potentiating the radiation-induced type I interferon antitumoral immune response by ATM inhibition in pancreatic cancer.

Radiotherapy induces a type I interferon-mediated (T1IFN-mediated) antitumoral immune response that we hypothesized could be potentiated by a first-in-class ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) inhibitor, leading to enhanced innate immune signaling, T1IFN expression, and sensitization to immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer. We evaluated the effects of AZD1390 or a structurally related compound, AZD0156, on innate immune signaling and found that both inhibitors enhanced radiation-induced T1IFN expression via the POLIII/RIG-I/MAVS pathway. In immunocompetent syngeneic mouse models of pancreatic cancer, ATM inhibitor enhanced radiation-induced antitumoral immune responses and sensitized tumors to anti-PD-L1, producing immunogenic memory and durable tumor control. Therapeutic responses were associated with increased intratumoral CD8+ T cell frequency and effector function. Tumor control was dependent on CD8+ T cells, as therapeutic efficacy was blunted in CD8+ T cell-depleted mice. Adaptive immune responses to combination therapy provided systemic control of contralateral tumors outside of the radiation field. Taken together, we show that a clinical candidate ATM inhibitor enhances radiation-induced T1IFN, leading to both innate and subsequent adaptive antitumoral immune responses and sensitization of otherwise resistant pancreatic cancer to immunotherapy.

Developing H3K27M mutant selective radiosensitization strategies in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma.

Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is a rare but highly lethal pediatric and adolescent tumor located in the pons of the brainstem. DIPGs harbor unique and specific pathological and molecular alterations, such as the hallmark lysine 27-to-methionine (H3K27M) mutation in histone H3, which lead to global changes in the epigenetic landscape and drive tumorigenesis. While fractionated radiotherapy, the current standard of care, improves symptoms and delays tumor progression, DIPGs inevitably recur, and despite extensive efforts chemotherapy-driven radiosensitization strategies have failed to improve survival. Advances in our understanding of the role of epigenetics in the cellular response to radiation-induced DNA damage, however, offer new opportunities to develop combinational therapeutic strategies selective for DIPGs expressing H3K27M. In this review, we provide an overview of preclinical studies that explore potential radiosensitization strategies targeting the unique epigenetic landscape of H3K27M mutant DIPG. We further discuss opportunities to selectively radiosensitize DIPG through strategic inhibition of the radiation-induced DNA damage response. Finally, we discuss the potential for using radiation to induce anti-tumor immune responses that may be potentiated in DIPG by radiosensitizing-therapeutic strategies.

DNA-PK Inhibition and Radiation Promote Antitumoral Immunity through RNA Polymerase III in Pancreatic Cancer.

Targeting the DNA damage response in combination with radiation enhances type I interferon (T1IFN)-driven innate immune signaling. It is not understood, however, whether DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK), the kinase critical for repairing the majority of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks in cancer cells, is immunomodulatory. We show that combining radiation with DNA-PK inhibition increases cytosolic double-stranded DNA and tumoral T1IFN signaling in a cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS)- and stimulator of interferon genes (STING)-independent, but an RNA polymerase III (POL III), retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I), and antiviral-signaling protein (MAVS)-dependent manner. Although DNA-PK inhibition and radiation also promote programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, the use of anti-PD-L1 in combination with radiation and DNA-PK inhibitor potentiates antitumor immunity in pancreatic cancer models. Our findings demonstrate a novel mechanism for the antitumoral immune effects of DNA-PK inhibitor and radiation that leads to increased sensitivity to anti-PD-L1 in poorly immunogenic pancreatic cancers. IMPLICATIONS: Our work nominates a novel therapeutic strategy as well as its cellular mechanisms pertinent for future clinical trials combining M3814, radiation, and anti-PD-L1 antibody in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Translation of DNA Damage Response Inhibitors as Chemoradiation Sensitizers From the Laboratory to the Clinic.

Combination therapies with agents targeting the DNA damage response (DDR) offer an opportunity to selectively enhance the therapeutic index of chemoradiation or eliminate use of chemotherapy altogether. The successful translation of DDR inhibitors to clinical use requires investigating both their direct actions as (chemo)radiosensitizers and their potential to stimulate tumor immunogenicity. Beginning with high-throughput screening using both viability and DNA damage-reporter assays, followed by validation in gold-standard radiation colony-forming assays and in vitro assessment of mechanistic effects on the DDR, we describe proven strategies and methods leading to the clinical development of DDR inhibitors both with radiation alone and in combination with chemoradiation. Beyond these in vitro studies, we discuss the impact of key features of human xenograft and syngeneic mouse models on the relevance of in vivo tumor efficacy studies, particularly with regard to the immunogenic effects of combined therapy with radiation and DDR inhibitors. Finally, we describe recent technological advances in radiation delivery (using the small animal radiation research platform) that allow for conformal, clinically relevant radiation therapy in mouse models. This overall approach is critical to the successful clinical development and ultimate Food and Drug Administration approval of DDR inhibitors as (chemo)radiation sensitizers.

Cytidine Deaminase APOBEC3A Regulates PD-L1 Expression in Cancer Cells in a JNK/c-JUN-Dependent Manner.

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) promotes tumor immune evasion by engaging the PD-1 receptor and inhibiting T-cell activity. While the regulation of PD-L1 expression is not fully understood, its expression is associated with tumor mutational burden and response to immune checkpoint therapy. Here, we report that Apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like 3A (APOBEC3A) is an important regulator of PD-L1 expression. Using an APOBEC3A inducible expression system as well as siRNA against endogenous APOBEC3A, we found that APOBEC3A regulates PD-L1 mRNA and protein levels as well as PD-L1 cell surface expression in cancer. Mechanistically, APOBEC3A-induced PD-L1 expression was dependent on APOBEC3A catalytic activity as catalytically dead APOBEC3A mutant (E72A) failed to induce PD-L1 expression. Furthermore, APOBEC3A-induced PD-L1 expression was dependent on replication-associated DNA damage and JNK/c-JUN signaling but not interferon signaling. In addition, we confirmed the relevance of these finding in patient tumors as APOBEC3A expression and mutational signature correlated with PD-L1 expression in multiple patient cancer types. These data provide a novel link between APOBEC3A, its DNA mutagenic activity and PD-L1-mediated antitumoral immunity. This work nominates APOBEC3A as a mechanism of immune evasion and a potential biomarker for the therapeutic efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade. IMPLICATIONS: APOBEC3A catalytic activity induces replication-associated DNA damage to promote PD-L1 expression implying that APOBEC3A-driven mutagenesis represents both a mechanism of tumor immune evasion and a therapeutically targetable vulnerability in cancer cells.

Combinatorial Efficacy of Olaparib with Radiation and ATR Inhibitor Requires PARP1 Protein in Homologous Recombination-Proficient Pancreatic Cancer.

PARP inhibitor monotherapy (olaparib) was recently FDA approved for the treatment of BRCA1/2-mutant, homologous recombination (HR) repair-deficient pancreatic cancer. Most pancreatic cancers, however, are HR proficient and thus resistant to PARP inhibitor monotherapy. We tested the hypothesis that combined therapy with radiation and ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) inhibitor (AZD6738) would extend the therapeutic indication of olaparib to HR-proficient pancreatic cancers. We show that olaparib combined with AZD6738 significantly reduced radiation survival relative to either agent alone, regardless of HR status. Whereas catalytic inhibition of PARP with low concentrations of olaparib radiosensitized HR-deficient models, maximal sensitization in HR-proficient models required concentrations of olaparib that induce formation of PARP1-DNA complexes. Furthermore, CRISPR-Cas9-mediated PARP1 deletion failed to recapitulate the effects of olaparib on radiosensitivity and negated the combinatorial efficacy of olaparib and AZD6738 on radiosensitization, suggesting that PARP1-DNA complexes, rather than PARP catalytic inhibition, were responsible for radiosensitization. Mechanistically, therapeutic concentrations of olaparib in combination with radiation and AZD6738 increased DNA double-strand breaks. DNA fiber combing revealed that high concentrations of olaparib did not stall replication forks but instead accelerated replication fork progression in association with an ATR-mediated replication stress response that was antagonized by AZD6738. Finally, in HR-proficient tumor xenografts, the combination of olaparib, radiation, and AZD6738 significantly delayed tumor growth compared with all other treatments. These findings suggest that PARP1-DNA complexes are required for the therapeutic activity of olaparib combined with radiation and ATR inhibitor in HR-proficient pancreatic cancer and support the clinical development of this combination for tumors intrinsically resistant to PARP inhibitors.

Screening and Validation of Molecular Targeted Radiosensitizers.

The development of molecular targeted drugs with radiation and chemotherapy is critically important for improving the outcomes of patients with hard-to-treat, potentially curable cancers. However, too many preclinical studies have not translated into successful radiation oncology trials. Major contributing factors to this insufficiency include poor reproducibility of preclinical data, inadequate preclinical modeling of intertumoral genomic heterogeneity that influences treatment sensitivity in the clinic, and a reliance on tumor growth delay instead of local control (TCD50) endpoints. There exists an urgent need to overcome these barriers to facilitate successful clinical translation of targeted radiosensitizers. To this end, we have used 3-dimensional (3D) cell culture assays to better model tumor behavior in vivo. Examples of successful prediction of in vivo effects with these 3D assays include radiosensitization of head and neck cancers by inhibiting epidermal growth factor receptor or focal adhesion kinase signaling, and radioresistance associated with oncogenic mutation of KRAS. To address the issue of tumor heterogeneity, we leveraged institutional resources that allow high-throughput 3D screening of radiation combinations with small-molecule inhibitors across genomically characterized cell lines from lung, head and neck, and pancreatic cancers. This high-throughput screen is expected to uncover genomic biomarkers that will inform the successful clinical translation of targeted agents from the National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program portfolio and other sources. Screening "hits" need to be subjected to refinement studies that include clonogenic assays, addition of disease-specific chemotherapeutics, target/biomarker validation, and integration of patient-derived tumor models. The chemoradiosensitizing activities of the most promising drugs should be confirmed in TCD50 assays in xenograft models with or without relevant biomarker and using clinically relevant radiation fractionation. We predict that appropriately validated and biomarker-directed targeted therapies will have a higher likelihood than past efforts of being successfully incorporated into the standard management of hard-to-treat tumors.

Gemcitabine sensitization by checkpoint kinase 1 inhibition correlates with inhibition of a Rad51 DNA damage response in pancreatic cancer cells.

The protein kinase checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) has been implicated as a key regulator of cell cycle progression and DNA repair, and inhibitors of Chk1 (e.g., UCN-01 and EXEL-9844) potentiate the cytotoxic actions of chemotherapeutic drugs in tumor cells. We have examined the ability of PD-321852, a small-molecule Chk1 inhibitor, to potentiate gemcitabine-induced clonogenic death in a panel of pancreatic cancer cell lines and evaluated the relationship between endpoints associated with Chk1 inhibition and chemosensitization. Gemcitabine chemosensitization by minimally toxic concentrations of PD-321852 ranged from minimal (<3-fold change in survival) in Panc1 cells to >30-fold in MiaPaCa2 cells. PD-321852 inhibited Chk1 in all cell lines as evidenced by stabilization of Cdc25A; in combination with gemcitabine, a synergistic loss of Chk1 protein was observed in the more sensitized cell lines. Gemcitabine chemosensitization, however, did not correlate with abrogation of the S-M or G2-M checkpoint; PD-321852 did not induce premature mitotic entry in gemcitabine-treated BxPC3 or M-Panc96 cells, which were sensitized to gemcitabine 6.2- and 4.6-fold, respectively. In the more sensitized cells lines, PD-321852 not only inhibited gemcitabine-induced Rad51 focus formation and the recovery from gemcitabine-induced replication stress, as evidenced by persistence of gamma-H2AX, but also depleted these cells of Rad51 protein. Our data suggest the inhibition of this Chk1-mediated Rad51 response to gemcitabine-induced replication stress is an important factor in determining gemcitabine chemosensitization by Chk1 inhibition in pancreatic cancer cells.

Improving gemcitabine-mediated radiosensitization using molecularly targeted therapy: a review.

In the last three decades, gemcitabine has progressed from the status of a laboratory cytotoxic drug to a standard clinical chemotherapeutic agent and a potent radiation sensitizer. In an effort to improve the efficacy of gemcitabine, additional chemotherapeutic agents have been combined with gemcitabine (both with and without radiation) but with toxicity proving to be a major limitation. Therefore, the integration of molecularly targeted agents, which potentially produce less toxicity than standard chemotherapy, with gemcitabine radiation is a promising strategy for improving chemoradiation. Two of the most promising targets, described in this review, for improving the efficacy of gemcitabine radiation are epidermal growth factor receptor and checkpoint kinase 1.

The combination of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors with gemcitabine and radiation in pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: Gemcitabine-radiotherapy is a standard treatment for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Clinical data have shown that gemcitabine plus erlotinib is superior to gemcitabine alone for advanced pancreatic cancer. Therefore, we investigated the effects of the combination of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors with gemcitabine and radiation on a pancreatic cancer model. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: EGFR signaling was analyzed by measuring phosphorylated EGFR (pEGFR(Y845, (Y1173)) and AKT (pAKT(S473)) protein levels in pancreatic cancer cell lines and tumors. The effects of scheduling on gemcitabine-mediated cytotoxicity and radiosensitization combined with erlotinib were determined by clonogenic survival. In vivo, the effects of cetuximab or erlotinib in combination with gemcitabine-radiation on the growth of BxPC-3 tumor xenografts were measured. RESULTS: We found in vitro that gemcitabine induced phosphorylation of EGFR at Y845 and Y1173 that was blocked by erlotinib. Treatment of BxPC-3 cells with gemcitabine before erlotinib enhanced gemcitabine-mediated cytotoxicity without abrogating radiosensitization. In vivo, cetuximab or erlotinib in combination with gemcitabine-radiation inhibited growth compared with gemcitabine-radiation (time to tumor doubling: gemcitabine + radiation, 19 +/- 3 days; cetuximab + gemcitabine + radiation, 30 +/- 3 days; P < 0.05, erlotinib + gemcitabine + radiation 28 +/- 3 days; P < 0.1). Cetuximab or erlotinib in combination with gemcitabine-radiation resulted in significant inhibition of pEGFR(Y1173) and pAKT(S473) early in treatment, and pEGFR(Y845), pEGFR(Y1173), and pAKT(S473) by the end of treatment. This study shows a novel difference pEGFR(Y845) and pEGFR(Y1173) in response to EGFR inhibition. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that the EGFR inhibitors cetuximab and erlotinib increase the efficacy of gemcitabine-radiation. This work supports the integration of EGFR inhibitors with gemcitabine-radiation in clinical trials for pancreatic cancer.

Dose Escalation Trial of the Wee1 Inhibitor Adavosertib (AZD1775) in Combination With Gemcitabine and Radiation for Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

PURPOSE: AZD1775 (adavosertib) is an inhibitor of the Wee1 kinase. In this study, we built on our preclinical studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of AZD1775 in combination with gemcitabine and radiation in patients with newly diagnosed locally advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer were enrolled with the intention to receive four 21-day cycles of gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2 days 1 and 8) with AZD1775 (once daily on days 1, 2, 8, and 9). Cycles 2 and 3 were administered concurrently with radiation, and cycles 5 to 8 were optional. AZD1775 was dose escalated using a time-to-event continual reassessment method on the basis of the rate of dose-limiting toxicities within the first 15 weeks of therapy. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of AZD1775 given in conjunction with gemcitabine and radiation. Secondary objectives were to estimate overall and progression-free survival and determine pharmacodynamic activity of AZD1775 in surrogate tissues. RESULTS: The recommended phase II dose of AZD1775 was 150 mg/d. Eight patients (24%) experienced a dose-limiting toxicity, most commonly anorexia, nausea, or fatigue. The median overall survival for all patients was 21.7 months (90% CI, 16.7 to 24.8 months), and the median progression-free survival was 9.4 months (90% CI, 8.0 to 9.9 months). Hair follicle biopsy samples demonstrated evidence of Wee1 inhibition with decreased phosphorylation of cyclin-dependent kinase 1 staining by immunohistochemistry after AZD1775 administration at the recommended phase II dose. CONCLUSION: AZD1775 in combination with gemcitabine and radiation therapy was well tolerated at a dose that produced target engagement in a surrogate tissue. The overall survival is substantially higher than prior results combining gemcitabine with radiation therapy and warrants additional investigation.

Inhibition of ATM Increases Interferon Signaling and Sensitizes Pancreatic Cancer to Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapy.

Combinatorial strategies are needed to overcome the resistance of pancreatic cancer to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). DNA damage activates the innate immune response and improves ICB efficacy. Because ATM is an apical kinase in the radiation-induced DNA damage response, we investigated the effects of ATM inhibition and radiation on pancreatic tumor immunogenicity. ATM was inhibited through pharmacologic and genetic strategies in human and murine pancreatic cancer models both in vitro and in vivo. Tumor immunogenicity was evaluated after ATM inhibition alone and in combination with radiation by assessing TBK1 and Type I interferon (T1IFN) signaling as well as tumor growth following PD-L1/PD-1 checkpoint inhibition. Inhibition of ATM increased tumoral T1IFN expression in a cGAS/STING-independent, but TBK1- and SRC-dependent, manner. The combination of ATM inhibition with radiation further enhanced TBK1 activity, T1IFN production, and antigen presentation. Furthermore, ATM silencing increased PD-L1 expression and increased the sensitivity of pancreatic tumors to PD-L1-blocking antibody in association with increased tumoral CD8+ T cells and established immune memory. In patient pancreatic tumors, low ATM expression inversely correlated with PD-L1 expression. Taken together, these results demonstrate that the efficacy of ICB in pancreatic cancer is enhanced by ATM inhibition and further potentiated by radiation as a function of increased tumoral immunogenicity, underscoring the potential of ATM inhibition in combination with ICB and radiation as an efficacious treatment strategy for pancreatic cancer. SIGNIFICANCE: This study demonstrates that ATM inhibition induces a T1IFN-mediated innate immune response in pancreatic cancer that is further enhanced by radiation and leads to increased sensitivity to anti-PD-L1 therapy.See related commentary by Gutiontov and Weichselbaum, p. 3815.

The contribution of DNA replication stress marked by high-intensity, pan-nuclear γH2AX staining to chemosensitization by CHK1 and WEE1 inhibitors.

Small molecule inhibitors of the checkpoint proteins CHK1 and WEE1 are currently in clinical development in combination with the antimetabolite gemcitabine. It is unclear, however, if there is a therapeutic advantage to CHK1 vs. WEE1 inhibition for chemosensitization. The goals of this study were to directly compare the relative efficacies of the CHK1 inhibitor MK8776 and the WEE1 inhibitor AZD1775 to sensitize pancreatic cancer cell lines to gemcitabine and to identify pharmacodynamic biomarkers predictive of chemosensitization. Cells treated with gemcitabine and either MK8776 or AZD1775 were first assessed for clonogenic survival. With the exception of the homologous recombination-defective Capan1 cells, which were relatively insensitive to MK8776, we found that these cell lines were similarly sensitized to gemcitabine by CHK1 or WEE1 inhibition. The abilities of either the CDK1/2 inhibitor roscovitine or exogenous nucleosides to prevent MK8776 or AZD1775-mediated chemosensitization, however, were both inhibitor-dependent and variable among cell lines. Given the importance of DNA replication stress to gemcitabine chemosensitization, we next assessed high-intensity, pan-nuclear γH2AX staining as a pharmacodynamic marker for sensitization. In contrast to total γH2AX, aberrant mitotic entry or sub-G1 DNA content, high-intensity γH2AX staining correlated with chemosensitization by either MK8776 or AZD1775 (R2 0.83 - 0.53). In summary, we found that MK8776 and AZD1775 sensitize to gemcitabine with similar efficacy. Furthermore, our results suggest that the effects of CHK1 and WEE1 inhibition on gemcitabine-mediated replication stress best predict chemosensitization and support the use of high-intensity or pan-nuclear γH2AX staining as a marker for therapeutic response.

PARP1 Trapping and DNA Replication Stress Enhance Radiosensitization with Combined WEE1 and PARP Inhibitors.

KRAS mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cause increased levels of DNA damage and replication stress, suggesting that inhibition of the DNA damage response (DDR) is a promising strategy for radiosensitization of NSCLC. This study investigates the ability of a WEE1 inhibitor (AZD1775) and a PARP inhibitor (olaparib) to radiosensitize KRAS-mutant NSCLC cells and tumors. In addition to inhibiting the DDR, these small-molecule inhibitors of WEE1 and PARP induce DNA replication stress via nucleotide exhaustion and PARP trapping, respectively. As monotherapy, AZD1775 or olaparib alone modestly radiosensitized a panel of KRAS-mutant NSCLC lines. The combination of agents, however, significantly increased radiosensitization. Furthermore, AZD1775-mediated radiosensitization was rescued by nucleotide repletion, suggesting a mechanism involving AZD1775-mediated replication stress. In contrast, radiosensitization by the combination of AZD1775 and olaparib was not rescued by nucleosides. Whereas both veliparib, a PARP inhibitor that does not efficiently trap PARP1 to chromatin, and PARP1 depletion radiosensitized NSCLC cells as effectively as olaparib, which does efficiently trap PARP, only olaparib potentiated AZD1775-mediated radiosensitization. Taken together, these mechanistic data demonstrate that although nucleotide depletion is sufficient for radiosensitization by WEE1 inhibition alone, and inhibition of PARP catalytic activity is sufficient for radiosensitization by olaparib alone, PARP1 trapping is required for enhanced radiosensitization by the combination of WEE1 and PARP inhibitors.Implications: This study highlights DNA replication stress caused by nucleotide depletion and PARP1 trapping as an important mechanism of radiosensitization in KRAS-mutant tumors and supports further development of DNA replication as a therapeutic target. Mol Cancer Res; 16(2); 222-32. ©2017 AACR.

Role of checkpoint kinase 1 in preventing premature mitosis in response to gemcitabine.

The deoxycytidine analogue 2',2'-difluoro-2'-deoxycytidine (gemcitabine) is a potent radiation sensitizer in a variety of solid tumors and tumor cell lines. Previous studies have shown that radiosensitization by gemcitabine is accompanied by simultaneous depletion of dATP pools (through ribonucleotide reductase inhibition) and accumulation in the S-phase of the cell cycle. Because of the importance of cell cycle redistribution in gemcitabine-mediated radiosensitization, we investigated the role of checkpoint kinase (Chk) 1 and Chk2 in gemcitabine-induced cell cycle arrest. We hypothesized that gemcitabine might induce Chk1 or Chk2 signal transduction pathways that mediate S-phase arrest. We found that radiosensitizing concentrations of gemcitabine induced accumulation of phosphorylated Chk1 and Chk2 and down-regulation of Cdc25A in BxPC-3 (10 nmol/L), Panc-1 (100 nmol/L), A549 (30 nmol/L), RKO (30 nmol/L), and SW620 (30 nmol/L) cells. Depletion of Chk1 from Panc-1 cells prevented the down-regulation of Cdc25A in response to gemcitabine. Furthermore, Chk1 depletion permitted Panc-1 and SW620 cells treated with gemcitabine to enter mitosis despite incomplete DNA synthesis. However, depletion of neither Chk1 nor Chk2 abrogated the inhibition of DNA synthesis in response to gemcitabine. These results provide evidence that Chk1 negatively regulates entry into mitosis in response to gemcitabine. Furthermore, these data imply that Chk1 acts to coordinate the cell cycle with DNA synthesis, thus preventing premature mitotic entry in gemcitabine-treated cells.

Dissociation of gemcitabine chemosensitization by CHK1 inhibition from cell cycle checkpoint abrogation and aberrant mitotic entry.

In order to determine the relative contribution of checkpoint abrogation and subsequent aberrant mitotic entry to gemcitabine chemosensitization by CHK1 inhibition, we established a model utilizing the CDK inhibitors roscovitine or purvalanol A to re-establish cell cycle arrest and prevent aberrant mitotic entry in pancreatic cancer cells treated with gemcitabine and the CHK inhibitor AZD7762. In this study, we report that the extent of aberrant mitotic entry, as determined by flow cytometry for the mitotic marker phospho-Histone H3 (Ser10), did not reflect the relative sensitivities of pancreatic cancer cell lines to gemcitabine chemosensitization by AZD7762. In addition, re-establishing gemcitabine-induced cell cycle arrest either pharmacologically, with roscovitine or purvalanol A, or genetically, with cyclin B1 siRNA, did not inhibit chemosensitization uniformly across the cell lines. Furthermore, we found that AZD7762 augmented high-intensity γH2AX signaling in gemcitabine-treated cells, suggesting the presence of replication stress when CHK1 is inhibited. Finally, the ability of roscovitine to prevent chemosensitization correlated with its ability to inhibit AZD7762-induced high-intensity γH2AX, but not aberrant pHH3, suggesting that the effects of AZD7762 on DNA replication or repair rather than aberrant mitotic entry determine gemcitabine chemosensitization in pancreatic cancer cells.

Sensitization of Pancreatic Cancers to Gemcitabine Chemoradiation by WEE1 Kinase Inhibition Depends on Homologous Recombination Repair.

To improve the efficacy of chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer and begin to establish patient selection criteria, we investigated the combination of the WEE1 inhibitor AZD1775 with gemcitabine-radiation in homologous recombination (HR) repair proficient and deficient pancreatic cancers. Sensitization to gemcitabine-radiation by AZD1775 was assessed in pancreatic cancer cells by clonogenic survival and in patient-derived xenografts by tumor growth. The contributions of HR repair inhibition and G2 checkpoint abrogation to sensitization were assessed by γH2AX, BRCA2 manipulation, and RAD51 focus formation and pHistone H3 flow cytometry, respectively. We found that AZD1775 sensitized to gemcitabine-radiation in BRCA2 wild-type but not BRCA2 mutant pancreatic cancer cells. In all cells, AZD1775 caused inhibition of CDK1 phosphorylation and G2 checkpoint abrogation. However, sensitization by AZD1775 was associated with persistent γH2AX and inhibition of RAD51 focus formation. In HR-proficient (BRCA2 wild-type) or -deficient (BRAC2 null) isogenic cells, AZD1775 sensitized to gemcitabine-radiation in BRCA2 wild-type, but not in BRCA2 null cells, despite significant G2 checkpoint abrogation. In patient-derived pancreatic tumor xenografts, AZD1775 significantly inhibited tumor growth and impaired RAD51 focus formation in response to gemcitabine-radiation. In conclusion, WEE1 inhibition by AZD1775 is an effective strategy for sensitizing pancreatic cancers to gemcitabine chemoradiation. Although this sensitization is accompanied by inhibition of CDK1 phosphorylation and G2 checkpoint abrogation, this mechanism is not sufficient for sensitization. Our findings demonstrate that sensitization to chemoradiation by WEE1 inhibition results from inhibition of HR repair and suggest that patient tumors without underlying HR defects would benefit most from this therapy.

Targeting mcl-1 for radiosensitization of pancreatic cancers.

In order to identify targets whose inhibition may enhance the efficacy of chemoradiation in pancreatic cancer, we previously conducted an RNAi library screen of 8,800 genes. We identified Mcl-1 (myeloid cell leukemia-1), an anti-apoptotic member of the Bcl-2 family, as a target for sensitizing pancreatic cancer cells to chemoradiation. In the present study we investigated Mcl-1 inhibition by either genetic or pharmacological approaches as a radiosensitizing strategy in pancreatic cancer cells. Mcl-1 depletion by siRNA produced significant radiosensitization in BxPC-3 and Panc-1 cells in association with Caspase-3 activation and PARP cleavage, but only minimal radiosensitization in MiaPaCa-2 cells. We next tested the ability of the recently identified, selective, small molecule inhibitor of Mcl-1, UMI77, to radiosensitize in pancreatic cancer cells. UMI77 caused dissociation of Mcl-1 from the pro-apoptotic protein Bak and produced significant radiosensitization in BxPC-3 and Panc-1 cells, but minimal radiosensitization in MiaPaCa-2 cells. Radiosensitization by UMI77 was associated with Caspase-3 activation and PARP cleavage. Importantly, UMI77 did not radiosensitize normal small intestinal cells. In contrast, ABT-737, an established inhibitor of Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, and Bcl-w, failed to radiosensitize pancreatic cancer cells suggesting the unique importance of Mcl-1 relative to other Bcl-2 family members to radiation survival in pancreatic cancer cells. Taken together, these results validate Mcl-1 as a target for radiosensitization of pancreatic cancer cells and demonstrate the ability of small molecules which bind the canonical BH3 groove of Mcl-1, causing displacement of Mcl-1 from Bak, to selectively radiosensitize pancreatic cancer cells.

Improving the efficacy of chemoradiation with targeted agents.

Chemoradiation is the standard therapy for the majority of inoperable, locally advanced cancers. Although there is a need to improve chemoradiation efficacy, normal-tissue toxicity limits our ability to give additional chemotherapy or higher doses of radiation. Thus, there is excitement about the addition of molecularly targeted agents, which tend to be less toxic than chemotherapy, to chemoradiation regimens. Unfortunately, initial empiric attempts have not been successful. This review will focus on the evidence that supports rational combinations of targeted agents with chemoradiation, with an emphasis on agents that target the DNA damage response and radiation-induced membrane signaling.