Postoperative urinary retention by void trial methodology following radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Radical hysterectomy is the standard of care for management of early-stage cervical cancer and is associated with postoperative urinary retention. No clear consensus exists regarding optimal voiding trial methodology for mitigating postoperative urinary retention. Our objective was to evaluate the association between type of postoperative voiding trial and risk of urinary retention after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for apparent early-stage cervical cancer (FIGO 2018 Stage IA2-IB2) between January 2014 and February 2023. We compared incidence of urinary retention and perioperative outcomes based on method of postoperative voiding trial (timed, autofill, or backfill). Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine association of type of void trial with absence of urinary retention within 30 days postoperatively. RESULTS: Of the 115 patients identified, 48 (41.8%) patients completed a timed void trial, 40 (34.7%) an autofill void trial, and 27 (23.5%) a backfill void trial. 44.3% of patients developed postoperative urinary retention with no differences based on void trial (p = 0.17). Urinary retention was more likely to resolve by 7 (p = 0.012) and 30 days (p = 0.01) for patients undergoing backfill voiding trials, compared to other trials. In multivariate models, backfill void trial was associated with absence of 30-day urinary retention, compared to other trials (aOR 15.1; 95% C.I. 1.5-154.9). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of urinary retention following radical hysterectomy do not differ based on postoperative void trial methodology. A backfill void trial following radical hysterectomy may lead to increased rates of resolution of postoperative urinary retention.

Screening and Treating Urinary Incontinence in Primary Care: A Missed Opportunity.

More than 60% of adult women in the United States have urinary incontinence (UI), with the prevalence increasing to over 80% in women over age 65. Despite its high prevalence, most patients do not seek care and few clinicians screen for UI. The Medicare Health Outcomes Survey queries patients about satisfaction with their provider's discussion and management of UI, but formal recommendations about screening, diagnosis, and treatment are lacking. This review presents a practical algorithm for primary care providers to incorporate management of UI into routine preventive care for women, and outlines UI prevalence, risk factors, screening, and non-surgical treatment options.

Updated Prevalence of Urinary Incontinence in Women: 2015-2018 National Population-Based Survey Data.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to update estimates of urinary incontinence (UI) prevalence and associated risk factors for adult women in the United States, using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). METHODS: We used descriptive analysis of 2015-2018 NHANES weighted data for women to estimate prevalence and characterize UI types and severity. Logistic regression modeling determined adjusted associations with UI. RESULTS: Complete data were available for 5,006 women. In weighted analyses, 61.8% had UI, corresponding to 78,297,094 adult U.S. women, with 32.4% of all women reporting symptoms at least monthly. Of those with UI, 37.5% had stress urinary incontinence, 22.0% had urgency urinary incontinence, 31.3% had mixed symptoms, and 9.2% had unspecified incontinence. The prevalence of moderate or more severe UI by Sandvik Severity Index was 22.1%, corresponding to 28,454,778 adult U.S. women. In multivariate models, increasing age, body mass index ≥25, prior vaginal birth, anxiety, depression, functional dependence, and non-Hispanic White ethnicity and race were associated with any and moderate UI. Urinary incontinence was not associated with diabetes, education level, prior hysterectomy, smoking status, physical activity level, or current pregnancy status. CONCLUSIONS: More than 60% of community-dwelling adult women in the United States experience any UI and an increase from prior estimates (38%-49%) using NHANES data from 1999 to 2004; more than 20% experience moderate or more severe UI. Increases in UI prevalence may be related to population aging and increasing obesity prevalence. Age greater than 70 years, body mass index >40, and vaginal birth had the strongest association with UI in multivariate modeling.

Enterocele manifesting as recurrent anterior rectal prolapse: A case report.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: An enterocele is a true herniation of small bowel through the rectovaginal septum, most commonly occurring transvaginally. Although the prevalence of enterocele is not as low as previously thought, enteroceles manifesting transrectally or with rectal prolapse are exceedingly rare and without established surgical guidance. CASE PRESENTATION: A medically complex, oxygen-dependent patient presented with full fecal incontinence and transrectal enterocele associated with recurrent anterior rectal prolapse. This was diagnosed via defecography and repaired under regional anesthesia through an open transabdominal approach of posterior cul-de-sac obliteration, uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension and simplified ventral suture rectopexy. Surgical planning was determined through a multidisciplinary care-conference, with preference for an approach with minimal respiratory compromise and repair durability. Short-term, this patient has complete resolution of bulge symptoms, and improved fecal continence. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: In addition to history and examination, dynamic imaging of the pelvic floor, specifically defecography, is particularly useful in identifying enteroceles that present as a component of pelvic organ or anorectal prolapse. As there are no established standard surgical treatment approaches for these rare conditions, surgeons must consider several points prior to proceeding: the repair of the defect, the symptoms the repair targets, and repair durability. CONCLUSIONS: Complete assessment and specialist consultation should be pursued prior to surgical repair for anorectal pathology. For this patient, an open transabdominal native tissue repair under regional anesthesia was successful, emphasizing that approaches to surgical correction of such rare presentations must be individualized.

Urinary Tract Injury During Gynecologic Surgery: Prevention, Recognition, and Management.

Lower urinary tract (LUT) injuries may occur during gynecologic surgery due to the close proximity of pelvic organs and vary by procedure, surgical indication, and route. Prevention of LUT injury should be a primary goal of gynecologic surgery. LUT injuries are more common in patients with aberrant anatomy, during difficult procedures, and with surgeons with less experience. Immediate recognition and management of LUT injuries is optimal, although delayed postoperative diagnoses may be unavoidable. Surgical management is based on the size and location of injury and should be performed by an experienced surgeon with thorough knowledge of pelvic anatomy, surgical technique, and postoperative management.