RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Frailty is a complex, multi-dimensional syndrome commonly observed in patients with heart failure (HF). The presence of frailty in patients living with HF is strongly associated with increased vulnerability to adverse events, including falls, hospitalisation, and increased mortality. Several scoring systems have been developed to assess the presence of frailty in patients with HF. These scoring systems vary in their complexity and applicability; however, they provide the physician with a more comprehensive understanding of the biological, functional, and psychosocial needs of these patients. OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical applicability of frailty tools in HF patients and their prognostic value, specifically relating to outcomes such as mortality, readmissions, and clinical deterioration. METHODS: A literature search using six electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane and Web of Science) was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Key search Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms combined "Frailty" AND "Heart failure". Studies were included if they assessed frailty using systematically defined criteria in a HF population. The PRISMA guidelines were used to include all relevant articles based on titles and abstracts. Full text articles were screened based on abstract relevance. A systematic narrative review of the literature was conducted on the final list of full text articles. RESULTS: An initial search yielded 8,066 articles. Following the removal of duplicates, title, and abstract searches, the remaining 154 articles underwent full text review, with 31 articles accepted for final qualitative synthesis. The two most utilised frailty scores were the Fried Frailty Phenotype (n=10) and the Barthel Index (n=8). The frailty scores provide prognostic data on multiple outcomes including mortality, increased hospitalisation, and functional decline. CONCLUSION: At the present time there is no universally applied frailty measure in a HF population. Choice of frailty score should be guided by physician experience and clinical setting, as well as tailored to a patient's functional, biological, and psychosocial circumstances. A push to adopt a single universal scoring system may help to ensure that frailty is assessed in all patients who live with HF.
Assuntos
Fragilidade , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Humanos , Hospitalização , PrognósticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as a feasible alternative treatment to conventional surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) for high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. The present systematic review aimed to assess the comparative clinical and cost-effectiveness outcomes of TAVI versus AVR, and meta-analyse standardized clinical endpoints. METHODS: An electronic search was conducted on 9 online databases to identify all relevant studies. Eligible studies had to report on either periprocedural mortality or incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) to be included for analysis. RESULTS: The systematic review identified 24 studies that reported on comparative clinical outcomes, including three randomized controlled trials and ten matched observational studies involving 7906 patients. Meta-analysis demonstrated no significant differences in regards to mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction or acute renal failure. Patients who underwent TAVI were more likely to experience major vascular complications or arrhythmias requiring permanent pacemaker insertion. Patients who underwent AVR were more likely to experience major bleeding. Eleven analyses from 7 economic studies reported on ICER. Six analyses defined TAVI to be low value, 2 analyses defined TAVI to be intermediate value, and three analyses defined TAVI to be high value. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated no significant differences in regards to mortality or stroke between the two therapeutic procedures. However, the cost-effectiveness and long-term efficacy of TAVI may require further investigation. Technological improvement and increased experience may broaden the clinical indication for TAVI for low-intermediate risk patients in the future.