Long-term survival and cure model following liver resection for breast cancer metastases.

INTRODUCTION: Long-term survival is still rarely achieved with current systemic treatment in patients with breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM). Extended survival after hepatectomy was examined in a select group of BCLM patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Hepatectomy for BCLM was performed in 139 consecutive patients between 1985 and 2012. Patients who survived < 5 years were compared to those who survived ≥ 5 years from first diagnosis of hepatic metastases. Predictive factors for survival were analyzed. Statistically cured, defined as those patients who their hazard rate returned to that of the general population, was analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 139, 43 patients survived ≥ 5 years. Significant differences between patient groups (< 5 vs. ≥ 5 years) were mean time interval between primary tumor and hepatic metastases diagnosis (50 vs. 43 months), mean number of resected tumors (3 vs. 2), positive estrogen receptors (54% vs. 79%), microscopic lymphatic invasion (65% vs. 34%), vascular invasion (63% vs. 37%), hormonal therapy after resection (34% vs. 74%), number of recurrence (40% vs. 65%) and repeat hepatectomy (1% vs. 42%), respectively. The probability of statistical cure was 14% (95% CI 1.4-26.7%) in these patients. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatectomy combined with systemic treatment can provide a chance of long-term survival and even cure in selected patients with BCLM. Microscopic vascular/lymphatic invasion appears to be a novel predictor for long-term survival after hepatectomy for BCLM and should be part of the review when discussing multidisciplinary treatment strategies.

Predictive Profile-Nomogram for Liver Resection for Breast Cancer Metastases: An Aggressive Approach with Promising Results.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM) are considered the most lethal compared with other sites of metastases in patients with breast cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome after hepatectomy for BCLM within current multidisciplinary treatment and to develop a clinically useful nomogram to predict survival. METHODS: Between January 1985 and December 2012, 139 consecutive female patients underwent liver resection for BCLM at the authors' institution. Clinicopathologic data were collected and analyzed for survival outcome with determination of prognostic factors. A nomogram to predict survival was developed based on a multivariate Cox model. The predictive performance of the model was assessed according to the C-statistic and calibration plots. RESULTS: After a median follow-up period of 55 months, the overall 3- and 5-year survival rates after hepatectomy were respectively 58 and 47 %. The median overall survival period was 56 months, and the median disease-free survival period after surgical resection was 33 months. A single hepatic metastasis, no triple negative tumors, no microscopic vascular invasion, and perioperative hormonal or targeted therapy were related to improved overall survival. The model achieved good discrimination and calibration, with a C-statistic of 0.80. CONCLUSIONS: Liver resection for selected patients with breast cancer metastases can provide significant survival benefit. It should be part of a multidisciplinary treatment program in experienced liver surgery centers. The authors' nomogram facilitates personalized assessment of prognosis for these patients.

Sorafenib vs surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion: A propensity score analysis.

BACKGROUND & AIM: Sorafenib is the standard of care for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and macrovascular invasion (MVI), with limited survival. Retrospective surgical studies have reported prolonged survival in this situation. This study aimed to compare the overall survival of patients with HCC and MVI treated with surgical resection or sorafenib. METHODS: A total of 143 patients with HCC and MVI but no extra-hepatic spread, treated with surgical resection (SR-patients; n=75) or sorafenib (SOR-patients; n=68) in four French centres between 1990 and 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. A propensity score analysis was performed to reduce bias. RESULTS: SR-patients were significantly younger and had a lower tumour burden than SOR-patients. Median overall survival (OS) rates were 10.1 months [95% CI: 4.1-16.1] in SR-patients and 12.9 months [95% CI: 7.9-17.9] in SOR-patients (P=.959). The 90-day mortality rate was 16% (n=12) in SR-patients and 7.5% (n=5) in SOR-patients (P=.196). SR-patients had a median disease-free survival of 4.60 months [95% CI: 3.3-5.9]. Under the propensity analysis, median OS was 12.0 months [95% CI: 5.5-18.5] in SR-patients vs 9.7 months [95% CI: 6.1-13.3] in SOR-patients (P=.682). Under multivariate analysis, extensive MVI (HR=1.956, P=.024) and bilirubin >17 µmol/L (HR=1.738, P=.011) were the two factors significantly associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: Under a propensity score analysis, the overall survival of patients with HCC and MVI undergoing surgical resection was similar to that achieved with sorafenib. We were not able to identify a patient subgroup experiencing a surgery-related improvement in survival, and quality of life was not evaluable.

Survival, safety, and prognostic factors for outcome with Regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard therapies: results from a multicenter study (REBECCA) nested within a compassionate use program.

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials have shown a survival benefit for regorafenib over placebo in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) that progressed after standard therapies. We evaluated survival and safety outcomes in patients treated with regorafenib in a real-life setting. METHODS: REBECCA is a cohort study nested within a compassionate use program designed to evaluate survival, safety, and potential prognostic factors for outcome associated with regorafenib in patients with mCRC refractory to standard therapies. Treatment effects according to various patient and tumour characteristics were evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: Of 1178 patients in the compassionate use program, 654 were in the full analysis set. Median follow-up was 16.5 months. Median survival was 5.6 months. The 12-month survival rate was 22 %. Survival was independently and unfavourably affected by the following variables: poor performance status, short time from initial diagnosis of metastases to the start of regorafenib, low initial regorafenib dose, >3 metastatic sites, presence of liver metastases, and KRAS mutations. We identified prognostic groups of patients with low, intermediate, and high risk of death, with a median survival of 9.2, 5.2, and 2.5 months, respectively. Five-hundred-twenty-four patients (80 %) experienced at least one regorafenib-related adverse event, most commonly, fatigue, hand-foot skin reaction, diarrhea, anorexia, arterial hypertension, and mucositis. CONCLUSION: The safety and efficacy profile of regorafenib in REBECCA are similar to those in randomized trials. Our prognostic model identified subgroups of mCRC patients who derived a minimal and maximum benefit from regorafenib. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02310477 .

Does pathological response after transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients with cirrhosis predict outcome after liver resection or transplantation?

BACKGROUND & AIMS: To investigate the prognostic significance of pathologic response (PR) after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in cirrhotic patients resected or transplanted for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and to identify predictors of complete pathologic response (CPR). METHODS: Between 1990 and 2010, 373 consecutive cirrhotic patients with HCC were treated by TACE followed by either liver resection (LR:184 patients) or liver transplantation (LT:189 patients). The PR was evaluated as the mean percentage of non-viable tumor area within each tumor. CPR was defined as the absence of any viable tumor area in all the present nodules. RESULTS: A total of 59 (32%) and 37 (20%) patients had CPR after LR and LT, respectively. Five-year overall survival (OS) was higher in patients with CPR compared to those without, after LR (58% vs. 34%; p=0.0006) and tends to be higher after LT (84% vs. 65%; p=0.09). The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were significantly higher in both groups (24% vs. 13% after LR; p=0.008 and 94% vs. 73% after LT, p=0.007). A cut-off value of >90% necrosis emerged as an impacting factor on patient survival after LR or LT. On multivariate analysis stratified on the type of procedure (LR or LT), PR >90% remained an independent factor of better OS and RFS. Independent factors associated with CPR were: a maximal tumor size <30 mm (RR 2.17 [1.27-3.74]), a single tumor (RR 6.08 [3.29-12.07]), and an preoperative AFP<100 ng/ml (see results section) (RR 3.99 [1.63-11.98]). The probability to achieve a CPR ranged from 2% in the absence of any factors to 48% in the presence of all factors. CONCLUSION: In cirrhotic patients with HCC, a complete or nearly complete PR improves long-term survival after LR and LT independently of other pathological factors. This underlines the importance of neoadjuvant treatment to obtain a significant decrease of active tumor load.

Repeat Hepatectomy for Breast Cancer Liver Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Resection of breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM) combined with systemic treatment is increasingly accepted as a therapeutic option; however, the potential benefit of repeat hepatectomy for recurrent BCLM is unknown. METHODS: All consecutive female patients who underwent liver resection for BCLM at our center between January 1985 and December 2012 were included. Patients who had a single hepatectomy (N = 120) were compared with those who also underwent repeat hepatectomy (N = 19). Patients were selected for repeat hepatectomy based on operability and disease control. Prognostic factors of survival after repeat hepatectomy were determined. RESULTS: Median overall survival since first hepatectomy was 35 months, with a 3- and 5-year survival rate of 50 and 38 %, respectively. Overall survival following repeat hepatectomy was 64 and 46 % at 3 and 5 years, respectively. From the time of first hepatectomy, patients who underwent repeat hepatectomy had a better survival than those who had only one hepatectomy (95 and 84 vs. 50 and 38 % at 3 and 5 years, respectively) (p = 0.002). Median survival was 35 and 100 months, respectively, and median survival since the diagnosis of BCLM was 51 and 112 months in the single and repeat hepatectomy groups, respectively. Since the time of diagnosis, overall 3-, 5-, and 7-year survival rates were 75, 57, and 44 %, respectively, for all 139 patients. Improved overall survival after repeat hepatectomy was related to a time interval between breast cancer diagnosis and first hepatectomy of >2 years, a limited hepatectomy, solitary liver metastasis, positive progesterone receptor status, and chemotherapy following repeat hepatectomy. Patients with single BCLM at first hepatectomy had a 3- and 5-year overall survival rate of 76 and 76 % compared with 51 and 17 % in patients with multiple metastases (p = 0.023). CONCLUSION: In selected patients with BCLM, repeat hepatectomy for liver recurrence combined with systemic treatment provided survival rates comparable to those after first hepatectomy.

Regenerative nodular hyperplasia of the liver related to chemotherapy: impact on outcome of liver surgery for colorectal metastases.

BACKGROUND: Regenerative nodular hyperplasia (RNH) represents the end-stage of vascular lesions of the liver induced by chemotherapy. The goal was to evaluate its incidence and impact on the outcome of patients resected for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). METHODS: Patients who underwent hepatectomy for CLM after six cycles or more of first-line chemotherapy, between January 1990 and November 2006, were included. Detailed histopathologic analysis of the nontumoral liver was performed according to a standard format. RESULTS: From a cohort of 856 resected patients at our institution, 771 (90%) received preoperative chemotherapy. Of these, 146 fulfilled the selection criteria and were included: 24 (16%) received 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) alone, 92 (63%) had 5-FU/LV and oxaliplatin, 18 (12%) had 5-FU/LV and irinotecan, and 12 (8%) were treated by 5-FU/LV, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. RNH occurred in 22 of 146 patients (15%). Twenty of these patients (91%) received oxaliplatin, of whom six (30%) had chronomodulated therapy. Patients treated by oxaliplatin more often had RNH compared with oxaliplatin-naïve patients (22 vs. 4%). Although operative mortality was nil, the presence of RNH was associated with increased postoperative hepatic morbidity (50 vs. 29%). Elevated preoperative gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) (>80 U/L; >1N) and total bilirubin levels (>15 µmol/L; >1N) were independent predictors of RNH. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CLM who receive preoperative oxaliplatin have an increased risk of RNH and associated postoperative morbidity. Increased serum GGT and bilirubin are useful markers to predict the presence of RNH.

Renal function in patients receiving streptozocin for locally advanced or metastatic digestive neuroendocrine tumours: results of the Streptotox-FFCD 0906 study.

INTRODUCTION: Streptozocin can impair renal function. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the evolution of renal function in patients receiving this anti-mitotic for the treatment of locally advanced/metastatic digestive well differentiated neuroendocrine tumours. METHODS: A prospective and a retrospective cohort of patients with normal baseline renal function were analysed. The primary endpoint was the incidence of a decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 25% during treatment. Secondary endpoints were the evaluation of glomerular filtration rate changes, the impact of combined nephrotoxic treatments, other toxicities, compliance, and the objective response rate. RESULTS: After screening 142 patients, 27 were included in the prospective and 84 in the retrospective cohort. A decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 25% was observed in 32 patients (30%): respectively four (15.4%) and 28 patients (34.1%) among respectively 26 and 82 patients with numerous measures (P = 0.0097). Altogether, 39 patients (35%) experienced grade 1-2 renal toxicity, while no grade 3-4 occurred in the prospective and 1 occurred in the retrospective cohort. Renal toxicity was more frequent in the retrospective cohort with a less careful follow up. As best responses, objective response was achieved in 27% of patients with pancreatic primary tumours, disease control in 78.9% of patients with pancreatic primary tumours, in 87% of those with small bowel tumours and in 72.7% of patients with other primary locations. CONCLUSIONS: Strongly recommended for pancreatic NET, streptozocin is associated with frequent mild renal toxicity but low occurrence of renal impairment in patients with baseline normal renal function and under adequate hydration.

Tumor marker evolution: comparison with imaging for assessment of response to chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: As the real clinical significance of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19.9 (CA19.9) evolution during preoperative chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases (CLM) is still unknown, we explored the correlation between biological and radiological response to chemotherapy, and their comparative impact on outcome after hepatectomy. METHODS: All patients resected for CLM at our hospital between 1990 and 2004 with the following eligibility criteria were included in the study: (1) preoperative chemotherapy, (2) complete resection of CLM, (3) no extrahepatic disease, and (4) elevated baseline tumor marker values. A 20% change of tumor marker levels while on chemotherapy was used to define biological response (decrease) or progression (increase). Correlation between biological and radiological response at computed tomography (CT) scan, and their impact on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after hepatectomy were determined. RESULTS: Among 119 of 695 consecutive patients resected for CLM who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, serial CEA and CA19.9 were available in 113 and 68 patients, respectively. Of patients with radiological response or stabilization, 94% had similar biological evolution for CEA and 91% for CA19.9. In patients with radiological progression, similar biological evolution was observed in 95% of cases for CEA and in 64% for CA19.9. On multivariate analysis, radiological response (but not biological evolution) independently predicted OS. However, progression of CA19.9, but not radiological response, was an independent predictor of PFS. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CLM and elevated tumor markers, biological response is as accurate as CT imaging to assess "clinical" response to chemotherapy. With regards to PFS, CA19.9 evolution has even better prognostic value than does radiological response. Assessment of tumor markers could be sufficient to evaluate chemotherapy response in a nonsurgical setting, limiting the need of repeat imaging.

Identification of a novel biomarker signature associated with risk for bone metastasis in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

When renal cell carcinoma (RCC) metastasizes to bone (a frequent site of systemic spread of this cancer) it becomes highly resistant to radiation therapy and chemotherapy. A better understanding of the biology of bone metastasis in RCC may permit to identify biomarkers for early detection of subclinical disease and better stratification of patients prior to treatment. We therefore investigated in this study, using a multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay, the expression of a panel of 16 biomarkers involved in angiogenesis and tumor invasion; the panel was applied to primary tumors and normal tissues obtained from clear-cell RCC patients with and without bone metastases. We identified a novel combination of biomarkers associated with the risk of bone metastasis. Among the transcripts of the genes studied, VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, HIF-1alpha, uPA , and PA I-1 overexpression in tumor tissues was significantly associated with the presence of bone metastasis (p=0.02, p=0.02, p<0.0001, p=0.04, and p=0.03, respectively). No differences were found in the expression of these transcripts in the corresponding normal tissues. This preliminary study provides a promising tool that may help in the management of RCC patients with bone metastasis. Indeed, these predictive markers could be useful to identify subclinical disease, improve staging, and guide treatment decisions.

Targeted therapies in metastatic renal cancer in 2009.

The development of targeted molecules in renal carcinogenesis changed the therapeutic approaches of treatment for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Four available drugs are currently available, i.e. bevacizumab, sunitinib, sorafenib and temsirolimus, but other molecules and combined therapy are under investigation. In this review we assess published reports of these targeted therapies and discuss the novel promising molecules targeting vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors, the mammalian target of rapamycin and epithelial growth factor cascade.

Cetuximab plus gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in patients with refractory advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of cetuximab in the palliative treatment of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (CCA) unresponsive to first-line gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (GEMOX) pretreatment. METHODS: Nine patients (mean age: 54 years) with recurrent or unresectable CCA (6 peripheral and 3 hilar CCA, histologically proven) resistant to GEMOX received cetuximab 400 mg/m2 on day 1 then 250 mg/m2 weekly combined with gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on day 1 and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 2, every 3 weeks. Immunohistochemical detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and erbB-2, as well as EGFR gene copy number were assessed. Tumor response was measured using RECIST. RESULTS: A total of 43 cycles were given (3-8 per patient). After 6 months, CT scans revealed 1 complete response, 1 partial response, 1 stable disease and 6 patients with disease progression. Median time to tumor progression and overall survival were 4 and 7 months, respectively. All patients relapsed (mean follow-up: 17 months). In 6 patients, death was not related to treatment. Toxicity included grade 3 neutropenia (n = 1) and acne-like rash (n = 7). In 7 of the 9 patients, EGFR was highly expressed in all tumor cells without gene amplification. No expression of erbB-2 was noted. CONCLUSION: Even in the absence of EGFR gene amplification, cetuximab + GEMOX is a well-tolerated palliative treatment in patients with advanced CCA. Adding cetuximab circumvents tumor resistance to GEMOX.

[Home hospitalisation in urological cancer: assessment of the first 5 years and a satisfaction survey]. / Hospitalisation à domicile en onco-urologie: bilan des 5 premières années et enquête de satisfaction.

INTRODUCTION: The Cancer Plan emphasizes the importance of home hospitalisation. Over the last 5 years, our department has developed this mode of hospitalisation for patients with urological cancer in order to perform chemotherapy or palliative care. The objective of this study was to determine the growth of the number of patients hospitalised at home over the last 5 years and to evaluate the satisfaction of patients hospitalised in 2005 by means of a self-administered questionnaire. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted to identify patients hospitalised at home between 2001 and 2005. A satisfaction questionnaire was sent to 58 patients hospitalised in 2005 to evaluate the degree of satisfaction, management and coordination of all medical and paramedical personnel and the advantages perceived by the patients. RESULTS: Between 2001 and 2005, 178 patients were hospitalised at home, for chemotherapy in 59% of cases and for palliative care in 41% of cases; 56% of patients were followed for prostate cancer. Among the 58 patients contacted, 44 questionnaires were returned (response rate: 76%) : 43 patients were globally satisfied with their management (28 very satisfied, 13 satisfied and 2 moderately satisfied) and would recommend home hospitalisation to their relatives. No difficulties contacting the nurse, the oncologist or the urologist were reported. The advantages emphasized by patients were maintenance in their usual environment (92%) allowing continuation of daily activities (85%), limitation of ambulance transfers to hospital and decreased waiting time in hospital (90%), as well as the involvement of the general practitioner, freely chosen by the patient, in follow-up (62.5%) ; 98% of patients would not have preferred to be managed by conventional hospitalisation for the treatment received. CONCLUSION: Home hospitalisation for chemotherapy or palliative care appears to be an effective alternative to conventional hospitalisation requiring good collaboration by the office-hospital network.

Correlation between clinical response to sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment and polymorphisms of P-glycoprotein (ABCB1) and of breast cancer resistance protein (ABCG2): monocentric study.

OBJECTIVES: We studied the relation between the polymorphism of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), encoded by ABCB1 and ABCG2 genes, respectively, and the pharmacokinetic variability and clinical response during the treatment with sorafenib of hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: At the Paul Brousse Hospital in Villejuif, France, 47 consecutive patients with advanced HCC treated with a single agent sorafenib, were enrolled. Sorafenib exposure was measured by its plasma concentration 3 h after oral administration of 400 mg (bid) by liquid chromatography. All enrolled patients were genotyped for ABCB1 (rs2032582; rs1045642) and ABCG2 (rs2231137; rs2231142; rs2622604) by blood genomic DNA extraction and Mass ARRAY genotyping. The clinical response was evaluated after 3months of treatment according to the RECIST criteria. KEY FINDINGS: Significant associations between sorafenib exposure and the studied polymorphisms were observed for ABCB1 3435C>T, ABCG2 34G>A, ABCG2 1143C>T and ABCG2 421C>A, but not for ABCB1 2677G>TA SNP. In heterozygous patients for ABCB1 3435 C>T, ABCG2 34 G>A and ABCG2 1143 C>T polymorphisms were significantly associated with the lowest sorafenib plasma levels. Those patients presented a tendency to have the best clinical evolution. CONCLUSION: Heterozygous forms of the studied polymorphisms could be associated with a better therapeutic response.

[Potential therapeutic implications of EGF R/PDGF R signalling pathways in bone metastases of prostate cancer]. / Les voies de signalisation EGF R/PDGF R dans les métastases osseuses du cancer de prostate: leurs implications thérapeutiques potentielles.

The finding that EGF receptor (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) and PDGF receptor (Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor) are involved in bone metastases opens up new therapeutic prospects. This new approach should allow the development of new therapeutic agents: EGF R/HER2 inhibitors and PDGF R antagonists.

[KIT receptor in testicular seminoma]. / Le récepteur KIT dans le séminome du testicule.

KIT receptor expression is observed in the majority of seminomas. Activation of KIT tyrosine kinase due to somatic mutations has been demonstrated. Mutations of the c-kit gene in testicular seminomas are located in exon 17. Inhibitors of KIT tyrosine kinase activity can have a therapeutic role, particularly in seminomas with a c-kit mutation sensitive to imatinib mesylate. A clinical trial plans to examine the efficacy of imatinib mesylate in the treatment of metastatic seminomas refractory to chemotherapy. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors can also be tested in patients with minimal retroperitoneal lymph node involvement before radiotherapy. If they are active, future therapeutic trials could include the use of these inhibitors as adjuvant therapy for patients with stage I seminoma in order to decrease the potential risk of second tumour.

[Adjuvant chemotherapy and/or hormone therapy after radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer]. / Chimiothérapie et/ou hormonothérapie adjuvantes après prostatectomie radicale des cancers de prostate à haut risque.

Cancer prostate is heterogeneous and may require a risk-adjusted approach to therapy. Improved survival rates are reported for adjuvant chemotherapy alone or in combination with hormone therapy. A specific gene expression signature can be used to identify and predict response to adjuvant standard hormone therapy or hormone therapy and chemotherapy after radical prostatectomy.

[Does radiotherapy still have a place in the treatment of stage I seminoma?]. / La radiothérapie a-t-elle encore une place dans le traitement du séminome stade I?

For the last 60 years, radiotherapy delivering 30 Gy to homolateral iliac and paraaortic lymph nodes has been the standard treatment for clinical stage I seminoma. Adjuvant radiotherapy after orchidectomy is associated with a potential carcinogenic risk. The risk depends on the irradiation field and the dose delivered. The risk appears to be low with low-dose (20 Gy) irradiation techniques. However, the late effects of radiotherapy have led to the search for alternative adjuvant approaches, including surveillance and carboplatin chemotherapy. Finally, experience with surveillance strategies in patients with stage I seminoma have allowed a meta-analysis of predictive factors for relapse, distinguishing patients requiring post-orchidectomy adjuvant therapy from those who can be easily followed by a surveillance strategy. Although this attitude can constitute a reasonable alternative for low-risk patients and appears to be acceptable for patients who find the carcinogenic risk of radiotherapy unacceptable, its disadvantage is the need for long-term surveillance.

[Therapeutic implications of the revised concept of hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer]. / Le concept d'hormonorésistance revisité dans le cancer de la prostate métastatique: implications thérapeutiques.

Almost all patients with prostate cancer become refractory to hormonal therapy which blocks androgen-dependent cellular proliferation. The key to this resistance is related to overexpression of the androgen receptor (AR). Alternative methods designed to block signalling pathways mediated by AR appear to be critical for tumour survival. These signalling pathways, which interact with the AR, can increase the response to androgen deprivation. Identification of signalling pathways will be an important objective for the treatment of prostate cancer. Application of new treatments must be preceded by identification of the genetic and molecular profiles of each patient's tumour.