Role of lateral suspension for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a Delphi survey of expert panel.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Lateral suspension is an abdominal prosthetic surgical procedure used to correct apical prolapse. The procedure involves the placement of a T-shaped mesh on the anterior vaginal wall and on the isthmus or uterine cervix that is suspended laterally and posteriorly to the abdominal wall. Since its description in the late 90s, modifications of the technique have been described. So far, no consensus on the correct indications, safety, advantages, and disadvantages of this emerging procedure has been reached. METHODS: A modified Delphi process was used to build consensus within a group of 21 international surgeons who are experts in the performance of laparoscopic lateral suspension (LLS). The process was held with a first online round, where the experts expressed their level of agreement on 64 statements on indications, technical features, and other aspects of LLS. A subsequent re-discussion of statements where a threshold of agreement was not reached was held in presence. RESULTS: The Delphi process allowed the identification of several aspects of LLS that represented areas of agreement by the experts. The experts agreed that LLS is a safe and effective technique to correct apical and anterior prolapse. The experts highlighted several key technical aspects of the procedure, including clinical indications and surgical steps. CONCLUSIONS: This Delphi consensus provides valuable guidance and criteria for the use of LLS in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse, based on expert opinion by large volume surgeons' experts in the performance of this innovative procedure.

Induction of a different immune response in non-titanized compared to titanized polypropylene meshes.

It is well known that pelvic organ prolapse (POP) significantly reduces the quality of life of affected women and in many cases requires corrective surgery. Aim of the study was to compare the immune response against titanized versus non-titanized meshes, especially macrophage polarization and immune checkpoint association. For this, we analyzed 644 POP surgeries, which were performed between 2017 and 2022, in our department. Four of them needed revision surgery caused by erosion. We analyzed the influx of CD68 & CD163 positive macrophages and the expression of immune checkpoint molecules PD-L1 and PD1 in these 4 patients. We identified a large number of CD68 and CD163 positive macrophages and additionally a PD-L1 expression of these cells. Based on the in-vivo results, we isolated monocytes and co-cultivated monocytes with different mesh material covered with or without fibroblasts. We identified a significantly enhanced macrophage activation and PD-L1 expression in macrophages surrounding non-titanized polypropylene mesh material. Encapsulation of the material by fibroblasts was crucial for that. Specifically, CD68-positive macrophages are upregulated (p < 0.001), co-expressing PD-L1 (p < 0.001) in monocytes co-cultivated with non-titanized polypropylene meshes. Monocytes co-cultivated with titanized polypropylene meshes showed significantly lower expression of CD163 (p = 0.027) and PD-L1 (p = 0.022). In conclusion, our in vitro data suggest that the titanium coating leads to a decreased polarization of macrophages and to a decreased immune response compared to non-titanized meshes. This could be an indication for the increased incidence of erosion of the non-titanized meshes, which is a severe complication of this procedure and requires revision surgery. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Pelvic organ prolapse is a well-known problem for women and often requires corrective surgery. Polypropylene meshes are often used, which differ in their coating (titanized vs. non-titanized). A severe side effect of these surgeries is mesh erosion, due to onset of inflammation, which requires revision surgery. We examined all erosion cases (4 of 644 patients) with implanted nontitanium-coated meshes by immunohistochemistry and found upregulation of macrophage polarization (as markers CD68 and CD163) and increased expression of the immune checkpoint molecules PD-L1 and PD1. This suggests inflammatory processes and an enhanced immune response. In addition, we set up an in vitro experiment to investigate whether coating plays a role. Here, we demonstrated that the non-titanized meshes elicited a significantly higher immune response in comparison to titanized meshes, which could lead to the higher erosion rate of the non-titanized meshes. Our results highlight the benefit of titanized meshes, which should lead to a lower revision surgery rate and thus improved patient outcome.

Significant Improvement in Quality of Life, Positive Effect on Sexuality, Lasting Reconstructive Result and Low Rate of Complications Following Cystocele Correction Using a Lightweight, Large-Pore, Titanised Polypropylene Mesh: Final Results of a National, Multicentre Observational Study.

Introduction Patients who suffer from pelvic organ prolapse can experience severe limitations in their quality of life. To improve the quality of life of women affected and achieve a stable reconstruction, surgical therapy is often indispensable. In conventional prolapse surgery, the rate of recurrence is high. For this reason, alloplastic mesh has been implanted increasingly in recent years to reconstruct the anatomy of the pelvic floor organs. Even if the anatomical result can be significantly improved as a result, the mesh-induced complications have been the subject of controversial discussion. In this national, multicentre study, the quality of life, anatomical result as well as the rate of complications following the implantation of an alloplastic mesh for the correction of a cystocele were investigated. Method Fifty-four patients with symptomatic ≥ grade II were included in this prospective, national, multicentre study. The study participants were implanted with a titanised polypropylene mesh (TiLOOP ® PRO A, pfm medical ag). The follow-up observation period was 12 months. Primary as well as repeat procedures were taken into account. The anatomic result of the pelvic floor reconstruction was quantified using the POP-Q system. Data on quality of life and sexuality were collected using validated questionnaires. All complications which occurred were documented and evaluated by an independent committee. Results On average, the patients were in line with the census. An improvement in quality of life was able to be determined during the study in all domains investigated (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon test). Minus incorrect entries and incorrect reports, a total of 19 reports of adverse events in 15 patients were evaluated by the end of the study. The rate of recurrence in the anterior compartment was 4.3%. Conclusion In the reconstruction of the anatomical position of the pelvic floor organs given the presence of a symptomatic cystocele, the implantation of a third-generation alloplastic mesh achieves very good results. Affected patients benefit from the anatomical stability as well as a significant improvement in quality of life, whereby the risks are justifiable.