Medical malpractice and epidural hematomas: a retrospective analysis of 101 cases in the United States.

Background: Neurosurgeons face particularly high rates of litigation compared to physicians in other fields. Malpractice claims are commonly seen after mismanagement of life-threatening medical emergencies, such as epidural haematomas. Due to the lack of legal analysis pertaining to this condition, the aim of this study is to identify risk factors associated with litigation in cases relating to the diagnosis and treatment of epidural haematomas. Materials and methods: Westlaw Edge, an online database, was used to analyze malpractice cases related to epidural haematomas between 1986 and 2022. Information regarding plaintiff demographics, defendant specialty, reason for litigation, trial outcomes, and payouts for verdicts and settlements were recorded. Comparative analysis between cases that returned a jury verdict in favour of the plaintiff versus defendant was completed. Results: A total of 101 cases were included in the analysis. Failure to diagnose was the most common reason for litigation (n = 64, 63.4%), followed by negligent care resulting in an epidural haematoma (n = 44, 43.6%). Spine surgery (n = 29, 28.7%), trauma (n = 28, 27.7%), and epidural injection/catheter/electrode placement (n = 21, 20.8%) were the primary causes of haematomas. Neurosurgeons (n = 18, 17.8%) and anesthesiologists (n = 17, 16.8%) were the two most common physician specialties cited as defendants. Most cases resulted in a jury verdict in favour of the defense (n = 54, 53.5%). For cases ending in plaintiff verdicts, the average payout was $3 621 590.45, while the average payment for settlements was $2 432 272.73. Conclusion: Failure to diagnose epidural haematomas is the most common reason for malpractice litigation, with neurosurgeons and anesthesiologists being the most common physician specialties to be named as defendants. More than half of all cases returned a jury verdict in favour of the defense and, on average, settlements proved to be more cost-effective than plaintiff verdicts.

Medical malpractice and cerebrospinal fluid shunts: An analysis of 36 cases.

Many physicians, particularly neurosurgeons, face malpractice claims during their career. The aim of this paper is to identify which factors increase the risk of litigation and influence legal outcomes relating to cerebrospinal fluid shunt management. Westlaw, an online legal database, was used to identify all medico-legal cases pertaining to cerebrospinal fluid shunts. Information regarding plaintiff demographics, defendant specialties, reasons for litigation, and trial outcomes were analysed. Thirty-six cases met criteria for inclusion. Most cases returned a defence verdict (44.4%), with delayed treatment or failure to appropriately treat patients with shunts the most common reason for litigation (66.7%). The average plaintiff verdict payout was $4,888,136.75 and average settlement $1,362,307.69. Delay or failure to treat resulted in the largest average payouts for plaintiff verdicts and settlements ($5,329,299.14 and $1,531,500.00, respectively).

Endoscopic Transclival Approach for Evacuation of Retroclival Hematoma: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

Retroclival hematomas are a rare entity, presenting anteriorly to the brainstem in the epidural, subdural, or subarachnoid space. Although those that develop in the epidural space often arise from trauma, subdural retroclival hematomas frequently occur spontaneously in the setting of coagulopathy, aneurysm rupture, or pituitary apoplexy, with many cases having an unknown etiology.1-4 Although most are treated with conservative management, surgical intervention is preferred for those presenting with evidence of brainstem compression, hydrocephalus, worsening neurological deficits, and clinical deterioration.5 In this report, we present the case of a 75-year-old woman with a medical history of mitral regurgitation, nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and atrial fibrillation on warfarin presenting with 4 days of temporoparietal headaches and double vision. On examination, the patient demonstrated right abducens and hypoglossal nerve palsies. Computed tomography revealed a subdural hemorrhage within the retroclival cistern, extending into the dorsal inferior aspect of the C2 vertebral body, resulting in posterior displacement of the pons, medulla, and proximal cervical spinal cord. Spinal and cerebral angiograms did not show evidence of any vascular malformation. An endoscopic transclival approach was selected for hematoma evacuation. Key surgical steps included harvesting of nasoseptal flap, endoscopic transnasal approach to the sellar/subsellar space, transclival drilling, retroclival hematoma evacuation, and clival reconstruction. The patient tolerated the procedure well and was discharged 15 days postoperatively with resolution of prior cranial nerve deficits. Postoperative computed tomography imaging revealed complete retroclival hematoma evacuation. At her 3-month follow-up, the patient remained neurologically intact with imaging confirming no residual subdural hematoma. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for this submission (2018-9379). Patient consent was not obtained as personal identifying information was kept confidential, following guidelines set forth by Institutional Review Board requirements.

The Relationship Between Race, Social Vulnerability Index, and Clinical Follow-up After Surgical Resection of Pituitary Tumors.

INTRODUCTION: Socioeconomic status and race have been found to influence patient outcomes for various cancer subtypes. In particular, minority and economically vulnerable patients present with more advanced disease and experience decreased survival compared to others. The aim of this study was to analyze the association between demographic or socioeconomic variables and rates of post-surgical follow-up after pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET) resection. METHODS: A retrospective review was completed for patients with PitNETs who underwent surgery between 2018-2021. Patient demographics and information related to post-operative appointments and MRIs were obtained. Social vulnerability index (SVI) scores were recorded from the Centers for Disease Control based on nationwide census tracts. RESULTS: One-hundred and sixteen patients were included in the analysis (57 males). In this cohort, 50% were Black, 34% Hispanic, 9% White, and 1% Asian. Mean overall SVI score was 0.81±0.23. The mean number of cancelled appointments was significantly higher in the moderate-high/high SVI group (p=0.034). Additionally, 30% of patients with moderate-high/high SVI had ≥2 cancelled follow-up visits compared to 0% among patients with low/low-moderate SVI (p=0.035). On average, White patients were less likely than non-White patients to have at least one cancelled follow-up appointment (p=0.048). CONCLUSION: Black patients and those with high social vulnerability have decreased rates of follow-up after PitNET resection. Follow-up delays can lead to failed identification of tumor recurrence, potentially resulting in more advanced disease by the time medical care is re-initiated and increasing rates of patient morbidity and mortality. As a result, further work is needed to address and bridge these care gaps.

High-Grade Glioma Recurrence Is Delayed in Hispanic Patients despite Severe Social Vulnerability: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

High-grade gliomas (HGGs; WHO grade III or IV) are the most common and lethal brain malignancy. Patients of Hispanic ethnicity are diagnosed with HGGs earlier than non-Hispanic patients, but they exhibit improved HGG survival following diagnosis. Either environmental or biological factors could explain this survival benefit. We aimed to determine if post-diagnosis advantages would still be present in Hispanic patients with high social vulnerability, an environmental condition predisposing patients to poor oncologic outcomes. HGG outcomes were retrospectively assessed in a cohort of 22 Hispanic patients and 33 non-Hispanic patients treated for HGGs from 2015 to 2020 at a single institution that serves a highly vulnerable region. Compared to non-Hispanic patients, Hispanic patients demonstrated higher social vulnerability index scores (96.8 + 0.7 vs. 76.3 + 4.6; *** p = 0.0002) and a 14-month longer interval between diagnosis and recurrence (19.7 + 5.9 (n = 13) vs. 5.5 + 0.6 months (n = 19); ** p = 0.001). In only those patients with more aggressive IDH-1 wildtype tumors (glioblastoma), Hispanic ethnicity still related to a longer time before recurrence (15.8 + 5.9 months (n = 9); 5.5 + 0.6 months (n = 18); * p = 0.034), and in a multivariate analysis, Hispanic ethnicity predicted time-to-recurrence (* p = 0.027) independent of patient age, functional status, MGMT gene methylation, or treatments received. Therefore, environmental factors, specifically social vulnerability, did not obscure the post-diagnosis benefits associated with Hispanic ethnicity. In future experiments, basic studies should be prioritized which investigate the cellular or genetic mechanisms underlying this ethnicity effect on HGG progression in the hopes of improving care for these devastating malignancies.

Primary Pituitary Abscess: Two Case Reports.

Introduction Pituitary abscess is a rare disorder that represents a small fraction of all pituitary lesions. In this report, we present two additional cases with unique features to promote awareness and prompt surgical intervention. Case Presentations A 42-year-old male presented with headache, photophobia, subjective fever, dizziness, imbalance, nausea, and vomiting. A pituitary hormone panel confirmed hypothyroidism and suggested central hypogonadism and secondary adrenal insufficiency. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a large sellar mass measuring 2.5 cm × 1.8 cm × 1.6 cm (CC × XT × AP). A 76-year-old woman presented with several months of headaches and unsteady gait in the setting of a known previously asymptomatic sellar lesion, measuring 1.8 cm × 1.2 cm × 1.5 cm (XT × CC × AP). Repeat MRI demonstrated possible hemorrhage within the lesion. In both cases, a preliminary diagnosis of pituitary macroadenoma was made, but transsphenoidal surgery revealed an encapsulated abscess; cultures obtained from the abscesses stained for gram-positive bacteria. Conclusion Pituitary abscess is a rare, potentially life-threatening disorder that may be easily mistaken for other sellar lesions. In this review, we contribute two additional cases of pituitary abscesses to increase awareness and emphasize the importance of proper diagnosis and management.

The Effect of Preoperative Cabergoline on Prolactinoma Fibrosis: A Case Series.

Introduction Prolactinomas are a common intracranial neoplasm and constitute most pituitary tumors. Although patients can present with variable hormone dysregulation and symptom severity, the use of dopamine agonists remains a first-line treatment. While bromocriptine has been found to increase tumor fibrosis, the effect of cabergoline on collagen deposition has been disputed. The aim of this article is to understand the influence of cabergoline on tumor fibrosis prior to resection. Case Presentations Four male patients who underwent prolactinoma resection were included in this report. The average age was 39.8 years (range: 26-52 years). Pre-treatment prolactin levels ranged from 957.8 to 16,487.4 ng/mL. Three patients received cabergoline for at least 1 month prior to surgery (treatment range: 1-6 months). One patient had surgery without prior cabergoline use. Pathology reports confirmed each tumor to be of lactotroph origin. For each sample, Masson's trichrome staining was performed and the percentage of sample fibrosis was quantified using an artificial intelligence imaging software. Among those who received preoperative cabergoline, the extent of tumor fibrosis was in the range of 50 to 70%. In contrast, specimen fibrosis was approximately 15% without cabergoline use. Conclusion This report demonstrates that a short duration of preoperative cabergoline can cause significant prolactinoma fibrosis. Understanding the effect of cabergoline on tumor consistency prior to surgery is essential as increased fibrosis can lead to more difficult tumor removal, reduce the extent of resection, and increase surgical complications. Considering these effects, further studies regarding the use of surgery prior to cabergoline for prolactinoma management are warranted.