Validity of Lichen Planus and Lichen Planopilaris Case Identification Using Diagnostic Codes from a Clinical Database.

BACKGROUND: Case identification strategies to conduct population-based studies have not been developed for lichen planus (LP) or lichen planopilaris (LPP). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the validity of using diagnostic codes to establish both a cutaneous (non-oral) LP cohort and an LPP cohort from a large clinical database. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed to determine whether patients with ICD-9 or ICD-10 codes for LP and ICD-10 codes for LPP are confirmed cases of LP and LPP. Validation samples were used to estimate the positive predictive value (PPV) of three case definitions any LP, non-oral LP, and LPP defined as: at least one code by any physician, at least two codes by any physician, and at least one code by a dermatologist. RESULTS: Among the 199 reviewed LP charts, 166 and 123 were confirmed cases of any LP and non-oral LP, respectively. The PPVs for any LP were: 83.4% (166/199) for one code by any physician, 84.6% (77/91) for two codes by any physician, and 95.1% (97/102) for one code by a dermatologist. The PPVs for non-oral LP were: 61.8% (123/199) for one code by any physician, 70.3% (64/91) for two diagnoses by any physician, and 86.3% (88/102) for one diagnosis by a dermatologist. Of the 139 patients with at least one code for LPP, 122 were confirmed cases of LPP. The case definition for one LPP code applied by any physician had a PPV of 87.8% (122/139) to identify a true case of LPP, whereas two diagnoses by any physician had a PPV of 96.2% (76/79) and a diagnosis by a dermatologist had a PPV of 93% (107/115). CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis codes for LP and LPP, restricted by the diagnosing physician's specialty, may be used to accurately identify case cohorts of overall LP, non-oral LP, or LPP in large clinical databases.

Prevalence and Treatment Patterns in Patients With Lichen Planopilaris.

Importance: Lichen planopilaris (LPP) is a form of scarring alopecia associated with progressive, permanent hair loss. Symptoms range from burning pain to itching, also carrying substantial psychological morbidity. Yet, disease characteristics, pathophysiology, and effective treatment data are limited, making treatment a challenge. Objective: To describe the prevalence and dermatologist-prescribed treatment patterns of LPP among US adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used the Explorys database. The prevalence analysis used a 15% random sample and identified US adults with LPP diagnoses between 2017 and 2019. The LPP treatment analysis included all patients with LPP diagnoses between 2016 and 2020 and a dermatologist encounter in the first year after diagnosis. Data were analyzed from January 2023 to April 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes of the prevalence analysis were the crude and standardized prevalence estimates of US adults with LPP across age, sex, and racial groups. The main outcomes of the treatment analysis were the frequency of LPP treatments within 1 year of diagnosis, and the number of patients who continued treatment beyond 1 year, switched treatments, and combined treatments. Results: Among 1 466 832 eligible patients analyzed for prevalence, 241 patients had an LPP diagnosis (222 [92.1%] female; median [IQR] age, 64 [54-73] years). Standardized overall prevalence was 13.4 per 100 000 (95% CI, 11.7-15.1). In the treatment analysis, 991 patients had an LPP diagnosis (907 [91.5%] female; median (IQR) age, 60 [47-69] years). Most received at least 1 type of medication (635 [64.1%]), most frequently intralesional corticosteroids (370 [37.3%]) and topical corticosteroids (342 [34.5%]), followed by doxycycline (104 [10.5%]) and hydroxychloroquine (72 [7.3%]). Treatment continued beyond 1 year in 71 of 200 patients (35.5%) prescribed intralesional corticosteroids and 7 of 29 patients (24.1%) prescribed hydroxychloroquine. Treatment switching at 1 year occurred in 32 of 254 patients (12.6%) first prescribed an intralesional corticosteroid and in 44 of 194 (22.7%) first prescribed a topical corticosteroid. Combinations of 2 or 3 treatment types were given to 137 (13.8%) and 74 (7.5%) patients, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study reported prevalence and treatment patterns for US adults with LPP in a representative sample. Most patients with LPP received treatment, and many received multiple treatment types and switched treatments, suggesting further research into medication selection offers clinical benefit.

Topical clindamycin for acne vulgaris: analysis of gastrointestinal events.

Purpose: Topical clindamycin, a lincosamide antibiotic, is commonly combined with benzoyl peroxide or a retinoid for acne vulgaris (AV) treatment. While oral and topical clindamycin carry warnings/contraindications regarding gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs), real-world incidence of GI AEs with topical clindamycin is unknown. This review provides background information and an overview of safety data of topical clindamycin for treating AV.Materials and Methods: Available safety data from published literature, previously unpublished worldwide pharmacovigilance data, and two retrospective cohort studies were reviewed.Results and Conclusions: According to pharmacovigilance data, the rate of GI adverse drug reactions with topical clindamycin-containing products was 0.000045% (64/141,084,533). Results from two retrospective medical record studies of patients with AV indicated that physicians prescribe topical clindamycin equally to patients with or without inflammatory bowel disease history, and that rates of pseudomembranous colitis in these patients were low. In 8 published pivotal clinical trials of topical clindamycin for AV, GI AEs were reported in 1.4% of participants. Limitations include under/inaccurate reporting of AEs or prescription data and limited generalizability. This review of published case reports, worldwide pharmacovigilance data, retrospective US prescription data, and clinical trials safety data demonstrates that the incidence of colitis in patients exposed to topical clindamycin is extremely low.

Leprosy Reactions: Experience in the Puerto Rico Hansen's Disease Population.

OBJECTIVE: Hansen's disease (HD) is a chronic granulomatous infection endemic in the tropics. Its main clinical manifestations involve the cutaneous, nervous, and musculoskeletal systems. Leprosy reactions (LR) are systemic inflammatory and immune-mediated complications of HD. These include reversal reactions (RR), erythema nodosum leprosum (ENL), and Lucio phenomenon. These reactions significantly increase disease-related morbidity and disability. We aimed to determine the number and type of LR, their association to hosts' immune responses (Ridley Jopling classification), timing of development, and treatment of HD patients in Puerto Rico. METHODS: A retrospective medical record review was performed on 291 HD patients containing LR status data available from the Dermatology Service at the Hispanic Alliance for Clinical & Translational Research. RESULTS: Our data revealed that 83 (29%) patients developed LR, of which 31% had RR and 69% had ENL. Most LR were observed in patients in the lepromatous border (97%): Borderline lepromatous leprosy (BL) and Lepromatous Leprosy (LL). Most patients with RR and ENL had a single episode (83% and 62%, respectively), and those that received multi-drug therapy (MDT) had a reaction onset occurring most frequently within the first year of MDT and after the first year of MDT, respectively. Prednisone was the first line treatment used to manage both types of LR. CONCLUSION: Most lepromatous reactions occur within the lepromatous border. ENL was the most common LR. Prompt recognition and management of these immunologic reactions is essential to prevent long term nerve function impairment.

National Psoriasis Foundation Telemedicine Task Force guidance for management of psoriatic disease via telemedicine.

Telemedicine emerged as an alternative care delivery system used to offer effective long-term management to patients with chronic, inflammatory conditions such as psoriatic disease. Teledermatology can provide reliable clinical information through thorough history-taking and virtual evaluations that include patient-provided images and disease activity assessment tools that may help accurately diagnose and manage patients with psoriasis. The integration of validated screening tools for psoriatic arthritis and effective teledermatology practices may improve access to specialists, thus avoiding preventable delays in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis. Although the provision of telehealthcare should not completely replace high quality, in-person dermatologic or rheumatologic visits, the convenience and collaborative nature of teledermatology may lead to expanded access and expedited care in the appropriate setting, whether it be in a virtual or in-person visit.

Failure of Biologic Therapy in Psoriasis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe the frequency of biologic therapy failure in psoriasis patients along with associated patient demographics and characteristics. METHODS: This was a retrospective medical-record review of psoriasis patients evaluated from January 1st, 2013, through May 1st, 2018, and who failed at least once to adhere to their biologic therapy. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients with psoriasis who had discontinued biologic therapy at least once were included in this study. Hypertension (58.4%), diabetes (37.7%), dyslipidemia (27.3%), and psoriatic arthritis (23.4%) were the main comorbidities observed. Adalimumab (ADA, 80.5%), ustekinumab (UST, 70.1%), and etanercept (ETA, 14.2%) were the most frequently used biologics in our cohort. The biologic with the longest mean duration of use prior to its discontinuation was UST (17.0 months), followed by ADA (15.9 months) and ETA (13.6 months). CONCLUSION: The most common reason for discontinuing biologic therapy was that said therapy was not effective, though for ETA and UST, the fact that biologic therapies are not universally covered by insurance company was found to be associated with their discontinuation, as well. There were no statistically significant associations found between biologic therapy discontinuation and age, gender, or comorbidities, which last included obesity, class I. Larger studies are warranted to identify risk factors associated with biologic therapy failure to help guide drug selection, decrease morbidity associated with such nonadherence and improve patient outcomes.

Traumatic esophageal perforation in Puerto Rico Trauma Hospital: A case-series.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal injuries are rare, life-threatening, events with an overall reported incidence of less than 3%. In rare cases, trauma due to blunt or penetrating injuries cause esophageal perforations, which account for less than 15% of all esophageal injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A case-series study was conducted to describe the outcomes and management of all the traumatic esophageal injuries at the Puerto Rico Trauma Hospital (PRTH) from 2000 through 2017. These cases were evaluated in terms of etiology of perforation, mechanism of injury and esophageal level. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were treated for esophageal injuries at the PRTH between 2000 and 2017. Of these patients, 15 (93.7%) were males with a median age of 24.5 years (16, 49). Regarding the etiology of the esophageal perforation, 2 (12.5%) patients suffered blunt esophageal trauma, and 14 (87.5%) patients had penetrating trauma to the esophagus. The most common mechanism of perforation was gunshot wound 10 (62.4%), followed by stab wound 4 (25.0%), and the least common were motor vehicle collision 1 (6.3%) and pedestrian injured by traffic 1 (6.3%). Regarding esophageal location, 9 (56.3%) patients presented cervical, 6 (37.5%) thoracic, and 1 (6.3%) abdominal injuries. Most patients 13 (81.3%) had a prompt diagnosis of traumatic esophageal perforation, while 3 (18.7%) patients had a delayed diagnosis. Only 2 (12.5%) deaths occurred among our 16 patients, including 1 (6.3%) in delayed diagnosed subjects. CONCLUSION: Esophageal perforation is a life-threatening condition and should be treated urgently. An early diagnosis and prompt surgical treatment completed in the first 24-h is fundamental for a good outcome.