Re-attendance after false-positive screening mammography: a population-based study in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: In the current study, mammography adherence of women who had experienced a false-positive referral is evaluated, with emphasis on the probability of receiving surveillance mammography outside the national screening programme. METHODS: We included 424,703 consecutive screens and collected imaging, biopsy and surgery reports of 3463 women who experienced a false-positive referral. Adherence to screening, both in and outside the screening programme, was evaluated. RESULTS: Two years after the false-positive referral, overall screening adherence was 94.6%, with 64.7% of women returning to the national screening programme, compared with 94.9% of women re-attending the screening programme after a negative screen (P<0.0001). Four years after the false-positive screen, the overall adherence had decreased to 85.2% (P<0.0001) with a similar proportion of the women re-attending the screening programme (64.4%) and a lower proportion (20.8%) having clinical surveillance mammography. Women who had experienced a false-positive screen at their first screening round were less likely to adhere to mammography than women with an abnormal finding at one of the following screening rounds (92.4% vs 95.5%, P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Overall screening adherence after previous false-positive referral was comparable to the re-attendance rate of women with a negative screen at 2-year follow-up. Overall adherence decreased 4 years after previous false-positive referral from 94.6% to 85.2%, with a relatively high estimate of women who continue with clinical surveillance mammography (20.8%). Women with false-positive screens should be made aware of the importance to re-attend future screening rounds, as a way to improve the effectiveness of the screening programme.

Trends in delayed breast cancer diagnosis after recall at screening mammography.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent and characteristics of delay in breast cancer diagnosis in women recalled at screening mammography. METHODS: We included a consecutive series of 817,656 screens of women who received biennial screening mammography in a Dutch breast cancer screening region between 1997 and 2016. During at least 3.5 years follow-up, radiological reports and biopsy reports were collected of all recalled women. The inclusion period was divided into four cohorts of four years each. We determined the number of screen-detected cancers and their characteristics, and assessed the proportion of recalled women who experienced a diagnostic delay of at least 4 months in breast cancer confirmation. RESULTS: The proportion of recalled women who experienced diagnostic delay decreased from 7.5 % in 1997-2001 (47/623) to 3.0 % in 2012-2016 (67/2223, P < 0.001). The proportion of women with a delay of at least two years increased from 27.7 % (13/47) in 1997-2001 to 75.7 % (53/70) in 2012-2016 (P < 0.001). Cancers with a diagnostic delay > 2 years were more frequently invasive (P = 0.009) than cancers with a diagnostic delay of 4-24 months. The most frequent cause of diagnostic delays was incorrect radiological classifications by clinical radiologists (55.2 % overall) after recall. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of recalled women with a delayed breast cancer diagnosis has more than halved during two decades of screening mammography. Delays in breast cancer diagnosis are characterized by longer delay intervals, although the proportion of these delays among all screen-detected cancers has not increased. Preventing longer delays in breast cancer confirmation may help improve breast cancer survival.

Unusual case of bifocal leptomeningeal melanocytoma in the posterior fossa with seeding in the spinal canal.

A 26-year-old man presented with signs of raised intracranial pressure. CT and MRI of the head demonstrated two separate lesions in the posterior fossa. The radiological differential diagnoses included multiple meningiomas, schwannomas, neurofibromas and subependymomas. Both lesions were surgically resected. Histopathological examination revealed localisations of a leptomeningeal melanocytoma. Leptomeningeal melanocytoma is a rare tumour of the central nervous system. Generally, it has a good prognosis if radical resection can be performed. In cases of subtotal resection, adjuvant radiotherapy should be considered. Local recurrences are common. Less frequently, leptomeningeal metastases and, on rare occasions, distant metastases or progression to malignant melanoma have been described. We describe an unusual case with multiple localisations of melanocytoma in the posterior fossa and spinal canal, with the emphasis being on the radiological findings and diagnosis of this rare tumour. After surgery of the brain, this patient was irradiated on the craniospinal axis.

Intraperitoneal radioimmunotherapy in an ovarian carcinoma mouse model: Effect of the radionuclide.

Despite debulking surgery and multidrug chemotherapy, advanced stage ovarian cancer has a high mortality rate. Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) is a treatment modality using specific, radiolabeled antibodies that guide cytotoxic radionuclides to cancer cells. In the present study, the therapeutic efficacy of RIT with murine monoclonal antibody HMFG1 labeled with three different beta-radiation emitting radionuclides (90Yttrium, 186Rhenium, and 131Iodine) was assessed in athymic BALB/c mice with intraperitoneally growing NIH:OVCAR-3 ovarian carcinoma xenografts. Each of the three intraperitoneally administered radiolabeled antibody preparations (90Y-HMFG1, 186Re-HMFG1, and 131I-HMFG1) caused a significant delay in ascites formation and mortality as compared to the control groups treated with 90Y-labeled irrelevant antibody, nonradiolabeled HMFG1, or phosphate buffered saline. Intraperitoneally (ip) administered 90Y-HMFG1 was shown to have a significantly higher abdominal retention as compared to the intraperitoneally administered irrelevant antibody 90Y-G250. Furthermore, intraperitoneally administered 90Y-HMFG1 more effectively inhibited tumor growth than intravenously administered 90Y-HMFG1. It was concluded that in intraperitoneally located malignant disease with ascitic cell clusters and tumor deposits, intraperitoneal administration of RIT seemed preferable as compared to intravenous administration. The choice of the most optimal radionuclide in intraperitoneally located malignancies needs further research, but could well depend on tumor characteristics such as the size of the tumor lesions.