Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Med Ultrason ; 18(4): 457-462, 2016 Dec 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27981278

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify and analyse existing data regarding knee ultrasound (US) feasibility in clinical practice. Material and methods: A systematic literature review was performed using the terms: ("knee") AND ("ultrasound" OR "ultrasonography") AND ("feasibility" OR "pilot" OR "proof of concept"). Feasibility studies regarding knee US or US aided maneuver involving knee joint, published during 2005-2015, were selected and evaluated against a complex framework constructed around mandatory key areas for feasibility studies: acceptability, demand, implementation, practicality, adaptation, integration and expansion. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-nine publications were identified, of which 9 were included in the final analysis: 6 dealt with the development and implementation of novel US scores, while the rest focused on implementing MSUS in clinical practice, evaluating the usefulness of articular cartilage US assessment and the feasibility of sonography for intra-articular knee injections, respectively. Six studies quantified feasibility as time spent for the evaluation, with only two addressing areassuch as acceptability, implementation and practicality, although none of these systematically assessed all feasibility domains. CONCLUSION: Knee US feasibility is still poorly addressed; the time required for US assessment is the main area addressed. This information gap should be properly addressed in future works, in order to ensure the right place for this technique.


Assuntos
Injeções Intra-Articulares/estatística & dados numéricos , Artropatias/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos do Joelho/diagnóstico por imagem , Articulação do Joelho/diagnóstico por imagem , Pesquisa Translacional Biomédica/estatística & dados numéricos , Ultrassonografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Humanos , Injeções Intra-Articulares/métodos , Traumatismos do Joelho/epidemiologia , Prevalência
2.
Biomed Res Int ; 2014: 702701, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24982902

RESUMO

Clinical response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with biologic agents can be influenced by their pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity. The present study evaluated the concordance between serum drug and antidrug levels as well as the clinical response in RA patients treated with biological agents who experience their first disease exacerbation while being on a stable biologic treatment. 154 RA patients treated with rituximab (RTX), infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADL), or etanercept (ETN) were included. DAS28, SDAI, and EULAR response were assessed at baseline and reevaluated at precise time intervals. At the time of their first sign of inadequate response, patients were tested for both serum drug level and antidrug antibodies level. At the next reevaluation, patients retreated with RTX that had detectable drug level had a better EULAR response (P = 0.038) with lower DAS28 and SDAI scores (P = 0.01 and P = 0.03). The same tendency was observed in patients treated with IFX and ETN regarding EULAR response (P = 0.002 and P = 0.023), DAS28 score (P = 0.002 and P = 0.003), and SDAI score (P = 0.001 and P = 0.026). Detectable biologic drug levels correlated with a better clinical response in patients experiencing their first RA inadequate response while being on a stable biologic treatment with RTX, IFX, and ETN.


Assuntos
Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Monitoramento de Medicamentos , Anticorpos/imunologia , Antirreumáticos/sangue , Artrite Reumatoide/sangue , Artrite Reumatoide/imunologia , Progressão da Doença , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa