Utility of in vivo metabolomics to support read-across for UVCB substances under REACH.

Structure-based grouping of chemicals for targeted testing and read-across is an efficient way to reduce resources and animal usage. For substances of unknown or variable composition, complex reaction products, or biological materials (UVCBs), structure-based grouping is virtually impossible. Biology-based approaches such as metabolomics could provide a solution. Here, 15 steam-cracked distillates, registered in the EU through the Lower Olefins Aromatics Reach Consortium (LOA), as well as six of the major substance constituents, were tested in a 14-day rat oral gavage study, in line with the fundamental elements of the OECD 407 guideline, in combination with plasma metabolomics. Beyond signs of clinical toxicity, reduced body weight (gain), and food consumption, pathological investigations demonstrated the liver, thyroid, kidneys (males only), and hematological system to be the target organs. These targets were confirmed by metabolome pattern recognition, with no additional targets being identified. While classical toxicological parameters did not allow for a clear distinction between the substances, univariate and multivariate statistical analysis of the respective metabolomes allowed for the identification of several subclusters of biologically most similar substances. These groups were partly associated with the dominant (> 50%) constituents of these UVCBs, i.e., indene and dicyclopentadiene. Despite minor differences in clustering results based on the two statistical analyses, a proposal can be made for the grouping of these UVCBs. Both analyses correctly clustered the chemically most similar compounds, increasing the confidence that this biological approach may provide a solution for the grouping of UVCBs.

Evaluation of the systemic toxicity and mutagenicity of OLIGOPIN®, procyanidolic oligomers (OPC) extracted from French Maritime Pine Bark extract.

The potential systemic toxicity of Oligopin®, a French Maritime Pine Bark extract (FMPBE) rich in procyanidolic oligomers, was evaluated in an acute oral limit test and a 90-day repeated dose oral toxicity study with Sprague Dawley rats. The potential mutagenicity was assessed in a bacterial reverse mutation assay and in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration assay with human lymphocytes. The results indicate that Oligopin® was nongenotoxic in both bacterial and human cell assays, was not acutely toxic via oral administration at up to 2000 mg/kg and was well tolerated following 90 days of oral administration to SD rats, with a no observed adverse effect level of 1000 mg/kg/day. The lack of significant adverse systemic effects in the 90 day study is concordant with findings from several human clinical trials. The acute toxicity and mutagenicity data are consistent with data reported by AFSSA in a summary of FMPBE safety, in which a NOAEL of 100 mg/kg/day was established. In contrast, the NOAEL derived from the 90-day study with Oligopin® was 1000 mg/kg/day, suggesting that it is less systemically toxic than other FMPBE previously evaluated in subchronic studies, and comparable to proanthocyanidins extracted from grape seeds, which are widely used as nutritional supplement ingredients.

The mouse spot test. Evaluation of its performance in identifying chemical mutagens and carcinogens.

The published results on 60 chemicals and X-rays investigated in the mouse spot test were compared with data on the same chemicals tested in the bacterial mutation assay (Ames test) and lifetime rodent bioassays. The performance of the spot test as an in vivo complementary assay to the in vitro bacterial mutagenesis test reveals that of 60 agents, 38 were positive in both systems, 6 were positive only in the spot test, 10 were positive only in the bacterial test and 6 were negative in both assays. The spot test was also considered as a predictor of carcinogenesis; 45 chemicals were carcinogenic of which 35 were detected as positive by the spot test and 3 out of 6 non-carcinogens were correctly identified as negative. If the results are regarded in sequence, i.e. that a positive result in a bacterial mutagenicity test reveals potential that may or may not be realized in vivo, then 48 chemicals were mutagenic in the bacterial mutation assay of which 38 were active in the spot test and 31 were confirmed as carcinogens in bioassays. 12 chemicals were non-mutagenic to bacteria of which 6 gave positive responses in the spot test and 5 were confirmed as carcinogens. These results provide strong evidence that the mouse coat spot test is an effective complementary test to the bacterial mutagenesis assay for the detection of genotoxic chemicals and as a confirmatory test for the identification of carcinogens. The main deficiency at present is the paucity of data from the testing of non-carcinogens. With further development and improvement of the test it is probable that the predictive performance of the assay in identifying carcinogens should improve, since many of the false negative responses may be due to inadequate testing.

An assessment of the in vivo rat hepatocyte DNA-repair assay.

The in vivo rat hepatocyte autoradiographic assay for unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) described by Mirsalis et al, and its in vitro counterpart described earlier by Williams have been employed by us for 4 years. Our experience is that the in vivo assay performs as described in the literature. We have therefore concentrated in this initial paper on the key practical factors we have found to govern the assay sensitivity and reproducibility. This has been achieved by a discussion of the assay performance with two potent rat hepatocarcinogens [the novel azo compound 6-dimethylaminophenylazobenzthiazole (6BT) and the reference agent 2-acetylaminofluorene (2AAF)] and a non-carcinogen of similar structure to 6BT [5-dimethylaminophenylazoindazole (51)]. Assay responses were compared with the effect of these chemicals in the Salmonella mutation assay. We conclude that the in vivo liver UDS assay has a critical role to play as a complement to rodent bone marrow cytogenic assays when conducting assessment studies on agents defined as genotoxic in vitro. However, the in vivo assay is resource-consuming and false results could consequently arise due to incomplete evaluations. Methods to counteract this danger are discussed and criteria for assessing weak UDS responses are suggested.

4-Chloromethylbiphenyl (4CMB): a novel mutagen and potential carcinogen.

The bacterial mutagenicity and cell transforming properties of the monocyclic alkylating agent benzyl chloride have been compared with those of its biphenyl analogue, 4-chloromethylbiphenyl (4CMB), and it is apparent that the addition of the second benzene ring greatly enhances biological activity. The possible reasons for this enhancement are discussed in relation to similar effects observed when comparing the activities of aniline with its biphenyl analogue, 4-aminobiphenyl (4AB). The marked activity observed for 4CMB, a stable and crystalline solid, suggests that it could prove useful as a direct-acting positive control test chemical for use in short-term mutagenicity tests.